Business Groups in Emerging Markets: A Survey and Analysis

References

• Almeida, H., S. Y. Park, M. Subrahmanyam, and D. Wolfenzon. 2011. The structure and formation of business groups: Evidence from Korean chaebols. Journal of Financial Economics 99 (2):447–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, H., and D. Wolfenzon. 2006a. A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. The Journal of Finance 61:2637–80, December 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, H., and D. Wolfenzon. 2006b. Should business groups be dismantled? The equilibrium costs of efficient internal capital markets. Journal of Financial Economics 79 (1):99–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki, M. 1984. The economic analysis of the Japanese firm. New York, NY: North-Holland. December.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, K.-H., J.-K. Kang, and J.-M. Kim. 2002. Tunneling or value added? Evidence from mergers by Korean business groups. The Journal of Finance 57 (6):2695–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, J.-S., J.-K. Kang, and I. Lee. 2006. Business groups and tunneling: Evidence from private securities offerings by Korean chaebols. The Journal of Finance 61 (5):2415–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F., and M. Becht. 2001. The control of corporate Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, C., and S. Ghoshal. 1993. Beyond the M-form: Toward a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 14 (S2):23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Beason, D. 1998. Keiretsu affiliation and share price volatility in Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 6 (1):27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Berglöf, E., and E. Perotti. 1994. The governance structure of the Japanese financial keiretsu. Journal of Financial Economics 36 (2):259–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berle, A., and G. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan, April.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., S. Johnson, K. Samphantharak, and A. Schoar. 2008. Mixing family with business: A study of Thai business groups and the families behind them. Journal of Financial Economics 88 (3):466–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., P. Mehta, and S. Mullainathan. 2000. Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. No. w7952. National Bureau of Economic Research, October.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwati, J., R. A. Brecher, and T. N. Srinivasan. 1984. DUP activities and economic theory. European Economic Review 24 (3):291–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaumik, S., and A. Gregoriou. 2010. ‘Family’ownership, tunnelling and earnings management: A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 24 (4):705–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaumik, S., and Y. Zhou. 2014. Do business groups help or hinder technological progress in emerging markets? Evidence from India. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7885, January.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaumik, S. K., S. Estrin, and T. Mickiewicz. 2016. Ownership identity, strategy and performance: Business group affiliates versus independent firms in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management:1–31, July.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, B., H. Jang, and W. Kim. 2006. Does corporate governance predict firms’ market values? Evidence from Korea. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22 (2):366–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, B., W. Kim, H. Jang, and K.-S. Park. 2015. How corporate governance affect firm value? Evidence on a self-dealing channel from a natural experiment in Korea. Journal of Banking & Finance 51:131–50, February.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, W. J., and J. H. Waterhouse. 1975. Budgetary control and organization structure. Journal of Accounting Research 19 (2):177–203.
   Google Scholar
• Buchuk, D., B. Larrain, F. Muñoz, and F. Urzúa. 2014. The internal capital markets of business groups: Evidence from intra-group loans. Journal of Financial Economics 112 (2):190–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, H.-Y., S. Choi, L.-S. Hwang, and R. G. Kim. 2013. Business group affiliation, ownership structure, and the cost of debt. Journal of Corporate Finance 23:311–31, December.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, M., E. Gedajlovic, P. Heugens, M. Van Essen, and J. Hans Van Oosterhout. 2011. Business group affiliation, performance, context, and strategy: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal 54 (3):437–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. J. 2003. Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Academy of Management Journal 46 (2):238–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S.-J. 2006. Business groups in East Asia: Financial crisis, restructuring, and new growth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press on Demand, March.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S. J., and U. Choi. 1988. Strategy, structure and performance of Korean business groups: A transactions cost approach. The Journal of Industrial Economics 25 (2):141–58.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S. J., and J. Hong. 1999. Economic performance of the Korean business groups: Intra-group resource sharing and internal business transaction. Mimeo graph, Korea University, Seoul.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S. J., and J. Hong. 2000. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal 43 (3):429–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. J., and J. Hong. 2002. How much does the business group matter in Korea? Strategic Management Journal 23 (3):265–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Y.-L., P. R. Rau, and A. Stouraitis. 2006. Tunneling, propping, and expropriation: Evidence from connected party transactions in Hong Kong. Journal of Financial Economics 82 (2):343–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittoor, R., P. Kale, and P. Puranam. 2015. Business groups in developing capital markets: Towards a complementarity perspective. Strategic Management Journal 36 (9):1277–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-P., and T. Cowing. 1999. Firm behavior and group affiliation: The strategic role of corporate grouping for Korean firms. Journal of Asian Economics 10 (2):195–209.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, C. ‐N. 2001. Markets, culture and institutions: The emergence of large business groups in Taiwan, 1950s–1970s. Journal of Management Studies 38 (5):719–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, C.-N. 2006. Beyond Guanxi: Network contingencies in Taiwanese business groups. Organization Studies 27 (4):461–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance 57 (6):2741–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1):81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colpan, A., T. Hikino, and J. Lincoln. 2010. The Oxford handbook of business groups. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, August.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G., and T. Thompson. 1994. A social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (1):141–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, S., and J. McGuire. 2009. Propping and tunneling: Empirical evidence from Japanese keiretsu. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (10):1817–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrin, S., S. Poukliakova, and D. Shapiro. 2009. The performance effects of business groups in Russia. Journal of Management Studies 46 (3):393–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccio, M., and L. Lang. 2002. The ultimate ownership of Anglo-American European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 65 (3):365–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R., T.-H. Yang, and G. Hamilton. 1999. Business groups and product variety in trade: Evidence from South Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Journal of International Economics 48 (1):71–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, S., K. Kim, and P. Kitsabunnarat. 2003. The costs (and benefits?) of diversified business groups: The case of Korean chaebols. Journal of Banking & Finance 27 (2):251–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisman, R., and T. Khanna. 2004. Facilitating development: The role of business groups. World Development 32 (4):609–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisman, R., and Y. Wang. 2010. Trading favors within Chinese business groups. The American Economic Review 100 (2):429–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flath, D. 1992. Indirect shareholding within Japan’s business groups. Economics Letters 38 (2):223–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, E., S. Johnson, and T. Mitton. 2003. Propping and tunneling. Journal of Comparative Economics 31 (4):732–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertner, R., D. Scharfstein, and J. Stein. 1994. Internal versus external capital markets. No. w4776. National Bureau of Economic Research, June.
   Google Scholar
• Ghemawat, P., and T. Khanna. 1998. The nature of diversified business groups: A research design and two case studies. The Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (1):35–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalan, R., V. Nanda, and A. Seru. 2014. Internal capital market and dividend policies: Evidence from business groups. Review of Financial Studies 27 (4):1102–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto, A. 1982. Business groups in a market economy. European Economic Review 19 (1):53–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey, and M. Puri. 2015. Capital allocation and delegation of decision-making authority within firms. Journal of Financial Economics 115 (3):449–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1995. Coase revisited: Business groups in the modern economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 4 (1):93–130.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 2005. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1):33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillen, M. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal 43 (3):362–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., X. Mao, O. M. Rui, and X. Zha. 2013. Business groups in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 22:166–92, September.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, N., J. Shi, and Y. Wang. 2013. Coinsurance within business groups: Evidence from related party transactions in an emerging market. Management Science 59 (10):2295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joh, S. W. 2003. Corporate governance and firm profitability: Evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 68 (2):287–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2000. Tunneling. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 90:22–27, September.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kali, R., and J. Sarkar. 2011. Diversification and tunneling: Evidence from Indian business groups. Journal of Comparative Economics 39 (3):349–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keister, L., and J. Lu. 2004. Financial resources and product market development: Strategic choice and institutional processes during China’s transition. In Sociological Forum, vol. 19, no. 2, 229–54. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, June.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, T. 2000. Business groups and social welfare in emerging markets: Existing evidence and unanswered questions. European Economic Review 44 (4):748–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., and K. Palepu. 2000a. The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal 43 (3):268–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., and K. Palepu. 2000b. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. The Journal of Finance 55 (2):867–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., and J. W. Rivkin. 1999. Estimating the performance effects of networks in emerging markets. Academy of Management Journal 1:G1–G6, August.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., and J. W. Rivkin. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal 22 (1):45–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., and Y. Yafeh. 2005. Business groups and risk sharing around the world. The Journal of Business 78 (1):301–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., and Y. Yafeh. 2007. Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites? Journal of Economic Literature 45 (2):331–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-O., and C. W. Mueller. 1978. Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues, vol. 14. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance 54 (2):471–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamin, A. 2012. The business group as an information resource: An investigation of business group affiliation in the Indian software services industry. Academy of Management Journal 56 (5):1487–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., K. Park, and H.-H. Shin. 2009. Disappearing internal capital markets: Evidence from diversified business groups in Korea. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (2):326–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leff, N. 1978. Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change 26 (4):661–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A., and S. Poczter. 2014. Relational financing and innovation in emerging economies. Cornell University Working Paper, June.
   Google Scholar
• Lensink, R., R. Van der Molen, and S. Gangopadhyay. 2003. Business groups, financing constraints and investment: The case of India. The Journal of Development Studies 40 (2):93–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, I., and W. Mitchell. 2004. Two faces: Effects of business groups on innovation in emerging economies. Management Science 50 (10):1348–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maman, D. 2002. The emergence of business groups: Israel and South Korea compared. Organization Studies 23 (5):737–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manikandan, K. S., and J. Ramachandran. 2015. Beyond institutional voids: Business groups, incomplete markets, and organizational form. Strategic Management Journal 36 (4):598–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masulis, R., P. K. Pham, and J. Zein. 2011. Family business groups around the world: Financing advantages, control motivations, and organizational choices. Review of Financial Studies 24 (11):3556–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morck, R. 2005. How to eliminate pyramidal business groups the double taxation of inter-corporate dividends and other incisive uses of tax policy. In Tax policy and the economy, ed. J. M. Poterba, vol. 19, 135–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morck, R., D. Wolfenzon, and B. Yeung. 2005. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature 43 (3):655–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morck, R., and B. Yeung. 2003. Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27 (4):367–82.
   Google Scholar
• Musacchio, A., S. G. Lazzarini, and R. V. Aguilera. 2015. New varieties of state capitalism: Strategic and governance implications. The Academy of Management Perspectives 29 (1):115–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orru, M., N. W. Biggart, and G. Hamilton. 1996. The economic organization of East Asian capitalism. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, W. Q., J. Wei, and Z. Yang. 2011. Tunneling or propping: Evidence from connected transactions in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 17 (2):306–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perotti, E. C., and S. Gelfer. 2001. Red barons or robber barons? Governance and investment in Russian financial–industrial groups. European Economic Review 45 (9):1601–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phiphatsērītham, K., and K. Yoshihara. 1983. Business groups in Thailand, vol. 41. Institute of Southeast Asian, October.
   Google Scholar
• Poczter, S. 2016. Do political connections survive democratization? Cornell University Working Paper, August.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, M. J. 1991. A political theory of American corporate finance. Columbia Law Review 91 (1):10–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, H.-H., and Y. Park. 1999. Financing constraints and internal capital markets: Evidence from Korean chaebols’. Journal of Corporate Finance 5 (2):169–91.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, J., and P. Choudhury. 2012. A reexamination of tunneling and business groups: New data and new methods. The Review of Financial Studies 5 (6):1763–98, March.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, H. 1976. Family and other business groups in economic development: The case of Nicaragua. New York: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, D., and Y. Yafeh. 1995. Japan’s corporate groups: Collusive or competitive? An empirical investigation of keiretsu behavior. The Journal of Industrial Economics 43 (4):359–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law & Economics 22 (2):233–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., H. Van Ees, and R. Lensink. 2009. Does group affiliation improve firm performance? The case of Chinese state-owned firms. The Journal of Development Studies 45 (10):1615–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, M., and R. E. Ratcliff. 2014. Landlords and capitalists: The dominant class of Chile. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, July.
   Google Scholar
• Zenger, T., and S. Lazzarini. 2004. Compensating for innovation: Do small firms offer high-powered incentives that lure talent and motivate effort? Managerial and Decision Economics 25 (6–7):329–45.
   Google Scholar