Can Listing Information Indicate Borrower Credit Risk in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending?

References

• Chen, D., F. Lai, and Z. Lin. 2014. A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: A lender’s perspective. Information Technology & Management 15 (4):239–54. doi:10.1007/s10799-014-0187-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. C., and S. H. Huang. 2003. Credit scoring and rejected instances reassigning through evolutionary computation techniques. Expert Systems with Applications 24:433–41. doi:10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00191-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. 2017. Research on the credit risk assessment of Chinese online peer-to-peer lending borrower on logistic regression model. 3rd Asian Pacific Conference on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development, Singapore: APEESD2017, 216–21.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, J., S. Siegel, and L. Young. 2012. Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Review of Financial Studies 25 (8):2455–84. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhs071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emekter, R., Y. Tu, B. Jirasakuldech, and M. Lu. 2015. Evaluating credit risk and loan performance in online peer-to-peer (p2p) lending. Applied Economics 47 (1):54–70. doi:10.1080/00036846.2014.962222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, F. 1990. Improved linear programming models for discriminant analysis. Decision Science 21:771–85. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1990.tb01249.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grablowsky, B. J., and W. K. Talley. 1981. Probit and discriminant functions for classifying credit applicants: A comparison. Journal of Economic Business 33:254–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, B. 2016. Research on the factors affecting the successful borrowing rate of P2P network lending in China—Taking the case of renrendai online lending as an example. Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Industrial Security Engineering, Australia, IEIS2016: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., W. Zhou, C. Luo, C. Liu, and H. Xiong. 2015. Instance-based credit risk assessment for investment decisions in P2P lending. European Journal of Operational Research 249 (2):417–26. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henley, W. E., and D. J. Hand. 1996. A K-NN classifier for assessing consumer credit risk. The Statistician : Journal of the Institute of Statisticians 45:77–95. doi:10.2307/2348414.
   Google Scholar
• Herzenstein, M., S. Sonenshein, and U. Dholakia. 2011. Tell me a good story and i may lend you my money: The role of narratives in peer-to-peer lending decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 48:138–49. doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M., and C. Wright 2006. Internet based social lending: Past, present and future. Working Paper, Social Futures Observatory, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y., and Y. Zhu 2015. A data-driven approach to predict default risk of loan for online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending. Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, IEEE, Gwalior, INDIA: CSNT2015, 609–13.
   Google Scholar
• Krumme, K., and S. Herrero-Lopez 2009. Do lenders make optimal decisions in a peer-to-peer network? In Proceedings of the lEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technologies, Italy: WI/AIT2009, 1:124–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V. L., S. Natarajan, and S. Keerthana 2016. Credit risk analysis in peer-to-peer lending system. Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Applications, Singapore: ICKEA2016:193–96.
   Google Scholar
• Larrimore, L., L. Jiang, J. Lairimore, et al. 2011. Peer-to-peer lending: The relationship between language features, trustworthiness, and persuasion success. Journal of Applied Communication Research 39 (1):19–37. doi:10.1080/00909882.2010.536844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M., R. Prabhala, and S. Viswanathan. 2013. Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Science 59 (1):17–35. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X., X. Li, and Z. Zheng. 2016. Evaluating borrower’s default risk in peer-to-peer lending: evidence from a lending platform in China. Applied Economics 49 (35):3538–45. doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1262526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, R., and D. K. Malhotra. 2003. Evaluating consumer loans using neural networks. Omega 31:83–96. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00016-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, J. 2012. Do unverifiable disclosures matter? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending. The Accounting Review 87 (4):1385–413. doi:10.2308/accr-50159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mild, A., M. Waitz, and J. Wöckl. 2015. How low can you go? Overcoming the inability of lenders to set proper interest rates on unsecured peer-to-peer lending markets. Journal of Business Research 68 (6):1291–305. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, D. G., and J. R. Sydnor 2008. What’s in a picture? Evidence of discrimination from prosper.com Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=1220902.
   Google Scholar
• Puro, J., J. E. Teich, H. Wallenius, et al. 2010. Borrower decision aid for people-to-people lending. Decision Support Systems 49:52–60. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, J., Z. Lin, and B. Luo. 2012. Effects of borrower-defined conditions in the online peer-to-peer lending market. In E-life: web-enabled convergence of commerce, work, and social life, eds. M. J. Shaw, D. Zhang, And W. T. Yue, Vol. 108, 167–79. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Riggins, F. J., and D. M. Weber. 2017. Information asymmetries and identification bias in P2P social microlending. Information Technology for Development 23 (1):107–26. doi:10.1080/02681102.2016.1247345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano-Cinca, C., B. Gutiérrez-Nieto, and L. López-Palacios. 2015. Determinants of default in P2P lending. PLOS One 10 (10):e0139427. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, Q., Y. Dong, and Z. Lin. 2016. Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform. Information Systems Frontiers 2:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, Q., D. Chen, and W. Shi. 2016. Online peer-to-peer lending decision making: Model development and testing. Social Behavior & Personality an International Journal 44 (1):117–30. doi:10.2224/sbp.2016.44.1.117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiginton, J. C. 1980. A note on the comparison of logit and discriminant models of consumer credit behaviour. Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis 15:757–70. doi:10.2307/2330408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, L., and J. F. Li. 2016. Analysis on credit risk assessment of P2P. Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Singapore, IEEM2016: 907–914.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., and Y. C. Lee. 2016. Influencing factors on the lending intention of online peer-to-peer lending: Lessons from renrendai.com. The Journal of Information Systems 25 (2):79–110.
   Google Scholar
• Zang, D., M. Qi, and Y. Fu. 2014. The credit risk assessment of p2p lending based on BP neural network. Industrial Engineering and Management Science 2014:91–94.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., D. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Zhao, P. Shao, and Q. Meng. 2017. Credit risk assessment based on flexible neural tree model. In Advances in neural networks: International symposium on neural networks, eds F. Cong, A. Leung, and Q. Wei, 215–22. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar