698
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Selected Papers: Emerging Markets and Finance Conference, Chengdu, May 12–13, 2017

Moral and Ethical Antecedents of Attitude Toward Counterfeit Luxury Products: Evidence from Pakistan

, , , & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  • Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research: Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.
  • Aleassa, H., J. M. Pearson, and S. McClurg. 2011. Investigating software piracy in jordan: an extension of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Business Ethics 98 (4):663–676.
  • Al-Khatib, J. A., A. D’Auria Stanton, and M. Y. Rawwas. 2005. Ethical segmentation of consumers in developing countries: A comparative analysis. International Marketing Review 22 (2):225–46. doi:10.1108/02651330510593287.
  • Ang, S., P. Cheng, E. Lim, and S. Tambyah. 2001. Spot the difference: Consumer responses towards counterfeits. Journal of Consumer Marketing Volume 18 (Issue 3):219–35. doi:10.1108/07363760110392967.
  • Arli, D., and F. Tjiptono. 2014. The end of religion? Examining the role of religiousness, materialism, and long-term orientation on consumer ethics in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics 123 (3):385–400. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1846-4.
  • Arli, D., F. Tjiptono, and W. Winit. 2015. Consumer ethics among young consumers in developing countries: A cross national study. Social Responsibility Journal 11 (3):449–66. doi:10.1108/SRJ-05-2013-0059.
  • Bandura, A. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2):248–87. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L.
  • Bhardwaj, V. (2010). The effects of consumer orientations on the consumption of counterfeit luxury brands.
  • Bian, X., K.-Y. Wang, A. Smith, and N. Yannopoulou. 2016. New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption. Journal of Business Research 69 (10):4249–58. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.038.
  • Bian, X., S. Haque, and A. Smith. 2015. Social power, product conspicuousness, and the demand for luxury brand counterfeit products. British Journal of Social Psychology 54 (1):37–54. doi:10.1111/bjso.12073.
  • Biles, J. 2015. Figuring (Out) Mark C. Taylor. The Journal of Religion 95 (2):242–51. doi:10.1086/679689.
  • Bloch, P. H., R. F. Bush, and L. Campbell. 1993. Consumer “accomplices” in product counterfeiting: A demand side investigation. Journal of Consumer Marketing 10 (4):27–36. doi:10.1108/07363769310047374.
  • Byrne, B. 2016. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. New York: Routledge.
  • Cesareo, L. 2016. Figures and trends in the academic research on counterfeiting and piracy counterfeiting and piracy. In Counterfeiting and Piracy 19–44, Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25357-2_4
  • Chakraborty, G., A. T. Allred, and T. Bristol (1996). Exploring consumers’ evaluations of counterfeits: The roles of country of origin and ethnocentrism. ACR North American Advances.
  • Chang, M. 1998. Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1825–34. doi:10.1023/A:1005721401993.
  • Chaudhry, P. E., and M. G. Walsh. 1996. An assessment of the impact of counterfeiting in international markets: The piracy paradox persists. The Columbia Journal of World Business 31 (3):34–48. doi:10.1016/S0022-5428(96)90039-3.
  • Chaudhry, P. E., and S. A. Stumpf. 2011. Consumer complicity with counterfeit products. Journal of Consumer Marketing Volume 28 (Issue 2):139–51. doi:10.1108/07363761111115980.
  • Chen, J., L. Teng, S. Liu, and H. Zhu. 2015. Anticipating regret and consumers’ preferences for counterfeit luxury products. Journal of Business Research 68 (3):507–15. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.012.
  • Chen, J., and S. Dibb. 2010. Consumer trust in the online retail context: Exploring the antecedents and consequences. Psychology & Marketing 27 (4):323–46. doi:10.1002/mar.v27:4.
  • Cheung, W. L., and G. Prendergast. 2006. Buyers’ perceptions of pirated products in China. Marketing Intelligence & Planning Volume 24 (Issue 5):446–62. doi:10.1108/02634500610682854.
  • Chiou, J.-S., C.-Y. Huang, and H.-H. Lee. 2005. The antecedents of music piracy attitudes and intentions. Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):161–74. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-5263-6.
  • Chiu, W., and H. Leng. 2016. Consumers’ intention to purchase counterfeit sporting goods in Singapore and Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics Volume 28 (Issue 1):23–36. doi:10.1108/APJML-02-2015-0031.
  • Chiu, W., K.-Y. Lee, and D. Won. 2014. Consumer behavior toward counterfeit sporting goods. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal 42 (4):615–24. doi:10.2224/sbp.2014.42.4.615.
  • Chuchinprakarn, S. (2003). Consumption of counterfeit goods in Thailand: Who are the patrons? ACR European Advances.
  • Chung, J.-E., and D. Thorndike Pysarchik. 2000. A model of behavioral intention to buy domestic versus imported products in a Confucian culture. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 18 (5):281–91. doi:10.1108/02634500010343982.
  • Cohen, A. B., and K. A. Johnson. 2017. The relation between religion and well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life 12 (3):533–47. doi:10.1007/s11482-016-9475-6.
  • Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. 2013. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Cordell, V. V., N. Wongtada, and R. L. Kieschnick. 1996. Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. Journal of Business Research 35 (1):41–53. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00009-7.
  • d’Astous, A., and E. Gargouri. 2001. Consumer evaluations of brand imitations. European Journal of Marketing 35 (1/2):153–67. doi:10.1108/03090560110363391.
  • De Matos, C., C. Ituassu, and C. Rossi. 2007. Consumer attitudes toward counterfeits: A review and extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing Volume 24 (Issue 1):36–47. doi:10.1108/07363760710720975.
  • Denton, M. L., and J. Culver. 2015. Family disruption and racial variation in adolescent and emerging adult religiosity. Sociology of Religion 76 (2):222–39. doi:10.1093/socrel/srv014.
  • Dubinsky, A. J., R. Nataraajan, and W.-Y. Huang. 2005. Consumers’ moral philosophies: Identifying the idealist and the relativist. Journal of Business Research 58 (12):1690–701. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.002.
  • Eisend, M., and P. Schuchert-Güler. 2006. Explaining counterfeit purchases: A review and preview. Academy of Marketing Science Review (2006:1.
  • Essoo, N., and S. Dibb. 2004. Religious influences on shopping behaviour: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Management 20 (7–8):683–712. doi:10.1362/0267257041838728.
  • Fahrmeir, L., and G. Tutz. 2013. Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Fatoki, O. 2015. An investigation into the ethical ideology of immigrant entrepreneurs in South Africa. Journal Social Sciences 43 (2):91–96.
  • Ferrari, J. R. 2015. Religiosity and personality traits of Hispanic and non-Hispanic catholic deacons. Archive for the Psychology of Religion 37 (1):1–13. doi:10.1163/15736121-12341296.
  • Ferrell, O., L. G. Gresham, and J. Fraedrich. 1989. A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing 9 (2):55–64. doi:10.1177/027614678900900207.
  • Forsyth, D. R. 1980. A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1):175. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.175.
  • Forsyth, D. R. 1992. Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5–6):461–70. doi:10.1007/BF00870557.
  • Forsyth, D. R., E. H. O’Boyle, and M. A. McDaniel. 2008. East meets west: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4):813–33. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9667-6.
  • Francis, J. E., L. Burgess, and M. Lu. 2015. Hip to be cool: A Gen Y view of counterfeit luxury products. Journal of Brand Management 22 (7):588–602. doi:10.1057/bm.2015.31.
  • Gentry, J. W., S. Putrevu, and C. J. Shultz. 2006. The effects of counterfeiting on consumer search. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 5 (3):245–56. doi:10.1002/cb.176.
  • Gentry, J. W., S. Putrevu II, and S. Commuri (2001). How now Ralph Lauren? The separation of brand and product in a counterfeit culture. ACR North American Advances.
  • Glass, R. S., and W. A. Wood. 1996. Situational determinants of software piracy: An equity theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1189–98. doi:10.1007/BF00412817.
  • Gopal, R. D., and G. L. Sanders. 1998. International software piracy: Analysis of key issues and impacts. Information Systems Research 9 (4):380–97. doi:10.1287/isre.9.4.380.
  • Graafland, J. 2017. Religiosity, attitude, and the demand for socially responsible products. Journal of Business Ethics 144 (1):121–38. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2796-9.
  • Grossman, G. M., and C. Shapiro. 1988. Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 103 (1):79–100. doi:10.2307/1882643.
  • Guyer, P. 2015. Common sense and idealism. Scottish Philosophy in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries 118.
  • Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham. 1998. Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall.
  • Harun, A., N. A. A. R. Bledram, N. M. Suki, and Z. Hussein. 2012. Why customers do not buy counterfeit luxury brands? Understanding the effects of personality, perceived quality and attitude on unwilligness to purchase. Labuan e-Journal of Muamalat and Society 6:14–29.
  • Harvey, M. E. 2015. The effect of employee ethical ideology on organizational budget slack: An empirical examination and practical discussion. Journal of Business & Economics Research (Online) 13 (1):83.
  • Harvey, P. J., and D. W. Walls. 2003. Laboratory markets in counterfeit goods: Hong Kong versus Las Vegas. Applied Economics Letters 10 (14):883–87. doi:10.1080/1350485032000155431.
  • Hilton, B., C. Choi, and S. Chen. 2004. The ethics of counterfeiting in the fashion industry: Quality, credence and profit issues. Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4):343–52. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-0989-8.
  • Hoe, L., G. Hogg, and S. Hart (2003). Fakin’it: Counterfeiting and consumer contradictions. ACR European Advances.
  • Hunt, S. D., and S. J. Vitell. 1986. A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing 6 (1):5–16. doi:10.1177/027614678600600103.
  • Hunt, S. D., and S. J. Vitell (1993). The general theory of marketing ethics: A retrospective and revisionÕ. Ethics in Marketing (Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL), 775–84.
  • Hussain, A., A. Kofinas, and S. Win. 2017. Intention to purchase counterfeit luxury products: A comparative study between Pakistani and the UK consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 1–16. doi:10.1080/08961530.2017.1361881.
  • Hyuncheol, K. 2013. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43 (5).
  • Imran, Z. S., T. Jalees, Y. Jiang, and K. S. H. Alam. 2018. Testing and incorporating additional determinants of ethics in counterfeiting luxury research according to the theory of planned behavior. Psihologija 51 (2):163–196.
  • Jackman, M., and T. Lorde. 2014. Why buy when we can pirate? The role of intentions and willingness to pay in predicting piracy behavior. International Journal of Social Economics 41 (9):801–19. doi:10.1108/IJSE-04-2013-0104.
  • Jiang, L., and V. Cova. 2012. Love for luxury, preference for counterfeits–A qualitative study in counterfeit luxury consumption in China. International Journal of Marketing Studies 4 (6):1. doi:10.5539/ijms.v4n6p1.
  • John, O. P., and V. Benet-Martínez. 2000. Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kapferer, J. N. 1995. Brand confusion: Empirical study of a legal concept. Psychology & Marketing 12 (6):551–68. doi:10.1002/mar.4220120607.
  • Kim, H., and E. Karpova. 2009. Consumer attitudes toward fashion counterfeits: Application of the theory of planned behavior. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 28 (2):79–94. doi:10.1177/0887302X09332513.
  • Kim, J.-E., H. Cho, and K. K. P. Johnson. 2009. Influence of moral affect, judgment, and intensity on decision making concerning counterfeit, gray-market, and imitation products. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 27 (3):211–26. doi:10.1177/0887302X08327993.
  • Kin-Wai Lau, E. 2006. Factors motivating people toward pirated software. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 9 (4):404–19. doi:10.1108/13522750610689113.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-development approach. Moral development and behavior: Theory research and social issues, 31–53.
  • Lai, K. K.-Y., and J. L. Zaichkowsky. 1999. Brand imitation: Do the Chinese have different views? Asia Pacific Journal of Management 16 (2):179–92. doi:10.1023/A:1015482707900.
  • Liao, C.-H., and I.-Y. Hsieh. 2013. Determinants of consumer’s willingness to purchase gray-market smartphones. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (3):409–24. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1358-7.
  • Maier, M., J. Maier, A. Baumert, N. Jahn, S. Krause, and S. Adam. 2015. Measuring citizens’ implicit and explicit attitudes towards the European Union. European Union Politics 16 (3):369–85. doi:10.1177/1465116515577454.
  • Maldonado, C. (2017). Attitudes toward counterfeit products: an ethical perspective.
  • Maldonado, C., and E. C. Hume. 2005. Attitudes toward counterfeit products: An ethical perspective. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 8 (1/2):105.
  • Marcketti, S. B., and M. C. Shelley. 2009. Consumer concern, knowledge and attitude towards counterfeit apparel products. International Journal of Consumer Studies 33 (3):327–37. doi:10.1111/ijc.2009.33.issue-3.
  • Mohamed, K. (2012). Trademark counterfeiting: Comparative legal analysis on enforcement within Malaysia and the United Kingdom and at their borders.
  • Mohammad, J., F. Quoquab, N. M. N. A. Rahman, and F. Idris. 2015. Organisational citizenship behaviour in the Islamic financial sector: Does Islamic work ethic make sense? International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 10 (1):1–27. doi:10.1504/IJBGE.2015.068674.
  • Moores, T. T., and J. Dhaliwal. 2004. A reversed context analysis of software piracy issues in Singapore. Information & Management 41 (8):1037–42. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.10.005.
  • Moores, T. T., and -J. C.-J. Chang. 2006. Ethical decision making in software piracy: Initial development and test of a four-component model. Mis Quarterly 167–80. doi:10.2307/25148722.
  • Muncy, J. A., and S. J. Vitell. 1992. Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research 24 (4):297–311. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(92)90036-B.
  • Murphy, P., and G. Laczniak. 1981. Marketing ethics: A review with implications for managers, educators and researchers. In Review of Marketing, eds. B. M. Enis and and K. J. Roering, 107–24. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
  • Nash, T. (1989). Only imitation? The rising cost of counterfeiting. Director, 5.
  • Nguyen, N. T., and M. D. Biderman. 2008. Studying ethical judgments and behavioral intentions using structural equations: Evidence from the multidimensional ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4):627. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9644-5.
  • Nia, A., and J. Zaichkowsky. 2000. Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands? Journal of Product & Brand Management Volume 9 (Issue 7):485–97. doi:10.1108/10610420010351402.
  • Noddings, N. 2013. Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press.
  • Nordin, N. 2009. A study on consumers’ attitude towards counterfeit products in Malaysia. unpublished master thesis, Universito Tenaga Nasional, Kuala Lumpur. http://repository.um.edu.my/846/1/CGA070109.pdf(accessed 13 December 2016)
  • Nwankwo, S., N. Hamelin, and M. Khaled. 2014. Consumer values, motivation and purchase intention for luxury goods. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (5):735–44. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.05.003.
  • Oh, J.-W., W. Wang, and -G.-G. Kim. 2016. A synthetic study of influential factors on attitudes toward the counterfeit of prestige brand: Focused on Chinese consumers. Journal of Digital Convergence 14 (6):133–42. doi:10.14400/JDC.2016.14.6.133.
  • Patwardhan, A. M., M. E. Keith, and S. J. Vitell. 2012. Religiosity, attitude toward business, and ethical beliefs: Hispanic consumers in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 110 (1):61–70. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1147-8.
  • Peace, A. G., D. F. Galletta, and J. Y. Thong. 2003. Software piracy in the workplace: A model and empirical test. Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (1):153–77. doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045759.
  • Penz, E., and B. Stottinger (2005). Forget the areal@ thingbtake the copy! an explanatory model for the volitional purchase of counterfeit products. Advances in Consumer Research.
  • Penz, E., and B. Stöttinger. 2008. Original brands and counterfeit brands—Do they have anything in common? Journal of Consumer Behaviour 7 (2):146–63. doi:10.1002/cb.243.
  • Phau, I., M. Sequeira, and S. Dix. 2009a. Consumers’ willingness to knowingly purchase counterfeit products. Direct Marketing: An International Journal Volume 3 (Issue 4):262–81. doi:10.1108/17505930911000865.
  • Phau, I., M. Sequeira, and S. Dix. 2009b. To buy or not to buy a “counterfeit” Ralph Lauren polo shirt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration Volume 1 (Issue 1):68–80. doi:10.1108/17574320910942187.
  • Phau, I., and M. Teah. 2009. Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: A study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing 26 (1):15–27. doi:10.1108/07363760910927019.
  • Poddar, A., J. Foreman, S. Banerjee, and P. Ellen. 2012. Exploring the Robin Hood effect: Moral profiteering motives for purchasing counterfeit products. Journal of Business Research 65 (10):1500–06. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.017.
  • Randhawa, P., R. J. Calantone, and C. M. Voorhees. 2015. The pursuit of counterfeited luxury: An examination of the negative side effects of close consumer–Brand connections. Journal of Business Research 68 (11):2395–403. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.02.022.
  • Rawwas, M. Y. 1996. Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of the ethical beliefs of Austrian consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (9):1009–19. doi:10.1007/BF00705579.
  • Rawwas, M. Y., Z. Swaidan, and M. Oyman. 2005. Consumer ethics: A cross-cultural study of the ethical beliefs of Turkish and American consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):183–95. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-5092-7.
  • Rest, J. R. 1979. Revised manual for the defining issues test: An objective test for moral judgment development. Minnesota Moral Research Projects, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory.
  • Riquelme, H. E., E. Mahdi Sayed Abbas, and R. E. Rios. 2012. Intention to purchase fake products in an Islamic country. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues 5 (1):6–22. doi:10.1108/17537981211225835.
  • Sankey, H. 2015. Constructively engaging with relativism. Metascience 24 (2):265–69. doi:10.1007/s11016-014-9972-x.
  • Shammout, A. B. 2007. Evaluating an extended relationship marketing model for Arab guests of five-star hotels. Australia:Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University.
  • Shaw, D., and E. Shiu. 2002. The role of ethical obligation and self‐identity in ethical consumer choice. International Journal of Consumer Studies 26 (2):109–16. doi:10.1046/j.1470-6431.2002.00214.x.
  • Shoham, A., A. Ruvio, and M. Davidow. 2008. (Un) ethical consumer behavior: Robin Hoods or plain hoods? Journal of Consumer Marketing 25 (4):200–10. doi:10.1108/07363760810882399.
  • Shukor, S. A., and A. Jamal. 2013. Developing scales for measuring religiosity in the context of consumer research. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 13 (1):69–74.
  • Singh, J. J., S. J. Vitell, J. Al-Khatib, and I. Clark III. 2007. The role of moral intensity and personal moral philosophies in the ethical decision making of marketers: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the United States. Journal of International Marketing 15 (2):86–112. doi:10.1509/jimk.15.2.86.
  • Singhapakdi, A., S. J. Vitell, D.-J. Lee, A. M. Nisius, and B. Y. Grace. 2013. The influence of love of money and religiosity on ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1):183–91. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1334-2.
  • Staake, T., F. Thiesse, and E. Fleisch. 2009. The emergence of counterfeit trade: A literature review. European Journal of Marketing 43 (3/4):320–49. doi:10.1108/03090560910935451.
  • Stöttinger, B., and E. Penz. 2015. Concurrent ownership of brands and counterfeits: Conceptualization and temporal transformation from a consumer perspective. Psychology & Marketing 32 (4):373–91. doi:10.1002/mar.20786.
  • Swaidan, Z., S. J. Vitell, and M. Y. A. Rawwas. 2003. Consumer ethics: Determinants of ethical beliefs of African Americans. Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):175–86. doi:10.1023/A:1025068902771.
  • Swami, V., T. Chamorro-Premuzic, and A. Furnham. 2009. Faking it: Personality and individual difference predictors of willingness to buy counterfeit goods. The Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (5):820–25. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.03.014.
  • Tan, B. 2002. Understanding consumer ethical decision making with respect to purchase of pirated software. Journal of Consumer Marketing Volume 19 (Issue 2):96–111. doi:10.1108/07363760210420531.
  • Tang, F., V.-I. Tian, and J. Zaichkowsky. 2014. Understanding counterfeit consumption. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics Volume 26 (Issue 1):4–20. doi:10.1108/APJML-11-2012-0121.
  • Teah, M., I. Phau, and Y.-A. Huang. 2015. Devil continues to wear “counterfeit” Prada: A tale of two cities. Journal of Consumer Marketing Volume 32 (Issue 3):176–89. doi:10.1108/JCM-03-2014-0908.
  • Thurasamy, R., O. Mohamad, M. Jantan, J. L. W. Chow, and S. Nasirin (2002). Counterfeit music CDs: Social and personality influences, demographics, attitudes and purchase intention: Some insights from Malaysia. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management, Reading University, Uk, 20-21 March 2003.
  • Tom, G., B. Garibaldi, Y. Zeng, and J. Pilcher. 1998. Consumer demand for counterfeit goods. Psychology & Marketing 15 (5):405–21. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199808)15:5<405::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-B.
  • Triandis, H. C. (1979). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Paper presented at the Nebraska symposium on motivation.
  • Van Der Linden, W., A. Bakx, A. Ros, D. Beijaard, and L. Van Den Bergh. 2015. The development of student teachers’ research knowledge, beliefs and attitude. Journal of Education for Teaching 41 (1):4–18. doi:10.1080/02607476.2014.992631.
  • Vitell, S. J. 2003. Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1–2):33–47. doi:10.1023/A:1022907014295.
  • Vitell, S. J., and G. Paolillo. 2003a. Consumer ethics: The role of religiousness. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):151–62. doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00315.
  • Vitell, S. J., and J. Muncy. 1992. Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of factors influencing ethical judgments of the final consumer. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (8):585–97. doi:10.1007/BF00872270.
  • Vitell, S. J., and J. G. Paolillo. 2003b. Consumer ethics: The role of religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):151–62. doi:10.1023/A:1025081005272.
  • Vitell, S. J., S. L. Nwachukwu, and J. H. Barnes. 1993. The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: An application of Hofstede’s typology. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (10):753–60. doi:10.1007/BF00881307.
  • Wainer, H., and H. I. Braun. 2013. Test validity. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Walthers, A., and C. L. Buff. 2008. Attitudes towards counterfeiting and counterfeit products: Have they changed. Journal of International Business and Economics 8 (3):79–87.
  • Wang, F., H. Zhang, H. Zang, and M. Ouyang. 2005. Purchasing pirated software: An initial examination of Chinese consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing Volume 22 (Issue 6):340–51. doi:10.1108/07363760510623939.
  • Wang, L. C., and L. Calvano. 2015. Is business ethics education effective? An analysis of gender, personal ethical perspectives, and moral judgment. Journal of Business Ethics 126 (4):591–602. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1973-y.
  • Weaver, G. R., and B. R. Agle. 2002. Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review 27 (1):77–97. doi:10.5465/amr.2002.5922390.
  • Wee, C. H., S. J. Ta, and K. H. Cheok. 1995. Non‐price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods. International Marketing Review 12 (6):19–46. doi:10.1108/02651339510102949.
  • Worthington, E. L., Jr, N. G. Wade, T. L. Hight, J. S. Ripley, M. E. McCullough, J. W. Berry, and L. O’connor. 2003. The Religious Commitment Inventory–10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology 50 (1):84. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.1.84.
  • Yoon, C. 2011. Theory of planned behavior and ethics theory in digital piracy: An integrated model. Journal of Business Ethics 100 (3):405–17. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0687-7.
  • Yushi, J., M. H. A. Naqvi, and M. H. Naqvi. 2018. Using social influence processes and psychological factors to measure pervasive adoption of social networking sites: Evidence from Pakistan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 1–15.
  • Zampetakis, A. L. 2014. The emotional dimension of the consumption of luxury counterfeit goods: An empirical taxonomy. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 32 (1):21–40. doi:10.1108/MIP-10-2012-0102.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.