The Factors that Influence Exchange-Rate Risk: Evidence in China

References

• Adam, T., S. Benecká, and M. Jakub. 2018. Financial stress and its non-linear impact on CEE exchange rates. Journal of Financial Stability 36:346–60. doi:10.1016/j.j-fs.2018.04.0081572-3089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloui, C., B. Hkiri, S. Hammoudeh, and M. Shahbaz. 2018. A multiple and partial wavelet analysis of the oil price, inflation, exchange rate, and economic growth nexus in Saudi Arabia. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 54 (4):935–56. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2017.1423469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amat, C., M. Tomasz, and S. Gilles. 2018. Fundamentals and exchange rate forecastability with simple machine learning methods. Journal of International Money and Finance 88:1–24. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2018.06.0030261-5606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. R., N. Bloom, and S. J. Davis. 2016. Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (4):1593–636. doi:10.1093/qje/qjw024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barguellil, A., O. B. Salha, and M. Zmami. 2018. Exchange rate volatility and economic growth. Journal of Economic Integration 33 (2):1302–36. doi:10.11130/jei.2018.33.2.1302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech, M. L., and J. Sobrun. 2013. FX market trends before, between and beyond triennial surveys. BIS Quarterly Review (December):45–54. http://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1312f.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, J., and R. Czudaj. 2017. Exchange rate expectations and economic policy uncertainty. European Journal of Political Economy 47:148–62. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, M., and L. Catania. 2016. Comparison of value-at-risk models using the MCS approach. Computational Statistics 31:579–608. doi:10.1007/s00180-016-0646-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontempi, M. E., R. Golinelli, and M. Squadrani. 2016. A new index of uncertainty based on internet searches: A friend or foe of other indicators? Quaderni-Working Paper N° 1062. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2746346.
   Google Scholar
• Bozic, J., and D. Babic. 2015. EUR/RSD exchange rate forecasting using hybrid wavelet-neural model: A case study. Computer Science and Information System 12 (2):487–508. doi:10.2298/CSIS140728005B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broni, W. Y., M. Hosen, and M. Masih. 2019. Does a country’s external debt level affect its Islamic banking sector development? Evidence from Malaysia based on Quantile regression and Markov regime-switching. Quantitative Finance and Economics 3 (2):366–89. doi:10.3934/QFE.2019.2.366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulut, L. 2018. Google Trends and the forecasting performance of exchange rate models. Journal of Forecasting 37:303–15. doi:10.1002/for.2500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. P., D. Korobilis, and P. J. Ribeiro. 2018. On the sources of uncertainty in exchange rate predictability. International Economic Review 59 (1):329–57. doi:10.1111/iere.12271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderón, C., and K. Megumi. 2018. Does higher openness cause more real exchange rate volatility? Journal of International Economics 110:176–204. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.08.0020022-1996/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and D. M. Liu. 2018. Dissecting real exchange rate fluctuations in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 54 (2):288–306. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2017.1342621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, J. 2018. Asymmetric effects of exchange rate and income changes on maritime freight flows between Japan and the US. Transport Policy 69:158–69. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., and E. K. Choi. 2018. Unemployment and optimal exchange rate in an open economy. Economic Modelling 69:82–90. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2017.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daelemans, D., J. P. Daniels, and F. Nourzad. 2018. Free trade agreements and volatility of stock returns and exchange rates: Evidence from NAFTA. Open Economic Review 29:141–63. doi:10.1007/s11079-017-9472-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, S., K. Yoshiyama, T. Mitsubuchi, and A. Sakurai. 2015. Hybrid method of multiple kernel learning and genetic algorithm for forecasting short-term foreign exchange rates. Computational Economics 45(1):49–89. doi:10.07/s10614-01/3-9407-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, H., Y. Liu, and J. Q. Chang. 2019. The heterogeneous linkage of economic policy uncertainty and oil return risks. Green Finance 1 (1):46–66. doi:10.3934/GF.2019.1.46.
   Google Scholar
• Drakos, A. A., G. P. Kouretas, and L. Zarangas. 2015. Predicting conditional autoregressive value-at-risk for stock markets during tranquil and turbulent periods. Journal of Financial Risk Management 4:168–86. doi:10.4236/jfrm.2015.43014.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. F., and S. Manganelli. 2004. CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 22 (4):367–81. doi:10.1198/073500104000000370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraty, F., and A. Quintela-del-Río. 2016. Conditional VAR and expected shortfall: A new functional approach. Econometric Reviews 35 (2):263–92. doi:10.1080/07474938.2013.807107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantman, E. R., and M. P. Dabós. 2018. Does trade openness influence the real effective exchange rate? New evidence from panel time-series. SERIEs 9:91–113. doi:10.1007/s13209-017-0168-7.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, R., Z. D. Lu, and H. Huang. 2013. Exponentially smoothing the skewed Laplace distribution for value-at-risk forecasting. Journal of Forecasting 32:534–50. doi:10.1002/for.2255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. R., J. D. Ostry, and M. Chamon. 2016. Two targets, two instruments: Monetary and exchange rate policies in emerging market economies. Journal of International Money and Finance 60:172–96. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2015.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Alana, T. A., and L. Sauci. 2018. Long memory and mean reversion in real exchange rates in Latin America. Applied Economics 50 (29):3148–55. doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1418076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgio, D. G., N. Salvatore, and T. Guido. 2018. Government spending and the exchange rate. International Review of Economics and Finance 54:55–73. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2017.07.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gori, M., and G. Ricchiuti. 2018. A dynamic exchange rate model with heterogeneous agents. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 28:399–415. doi:10.1007/s00191-017-0513-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyntelberg, J., L. Micooretan, and S. Tientip. 2018. Private information, capital flows, and exchange rates. Journal of International Money and Finance 81:41–55. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.10.0050261-5606/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. D. 1989. A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57:357–84. doi:10.2307/1912559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, K. J., Y. H. Chen, and G. K. F. Tso. 2018. Forecasting exchange rate using variational mode decomposition and entropy theory. Physica A 510:15–25. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.1350378-4371/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmels, C., and T. Kirsanova. 2018. Discretionary policy in a small open economy: Exchange rate regimes and multiple equilibria. Journal of Macroeconomics 56:53–64. doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2018.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaki, R., and M. Inoue. 2018. Time-series analysis of multiple foreign exchange rates using time-dependent pattern entropy. Physica A 490:967–74. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehan, Z., and H. Azooba. 2017. Exchange rate volatility and capital inflows: Role of financial development. Portuguese Economic Journal 16:189–203. doi:10.1007/s10258-017-0136-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, J., and J. W. Taylor. 2013. Using CAViaR models with implied volatility for value-at-risk estimation. Journal of Forecasting 32:62–74. doi:10.1002/for.1251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joëts, M. 2014. Energy price transmissions during extreme movements. Economic Modelling 40:392–99. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2013.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katusiime, L., and F. W. Agbola. 2018. Modelling the impact of central bank intervention on exchange rate volatility under inflation targeting. Applied Economics 50 (40):4373–86. doi:10.1080/00036846.2018.1450482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and K. Lim. 2018. Effects of monetary policy shocks on exchange rate in small open economies. Journal of Macroeconomics 56:324–39. doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2018.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, P. R., and G. M. Milesi-Ferretti. 2002. External wealth, the trade balance, and the real exchange rate. European Economic Review 46:1049–71. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00160-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laporta, A. G., L. Merlo, and L. Petrella. 2018. Selection of value at risk models for energy commodities. Energy Economics 74:628–43. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. X., J. de Haan, and B. Scholtens. 2018a. Are international fund flows related to exchange rate dynamics? Open Economic Review 29:31–48. doi:10.1007/s11079-017-9469-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z. H., S. L. Chen, and S. L. Chen. 2017. Statistical measure of validity of financial resources allocation. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13 (12):7731–41. doi:10.12973/ejmste/77932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z. H., H. Dong, Z. H. Huang, and P. Failler. 2018b. Asymmetric effects on risks of virtual financial assets (VFAs) in different regimes: A case of bitcoin. Quantitative Finance and Economics 2 (4):860–83. doi:10.3934/QFE.2018.4.860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, G. K., Z. H. Li, Z. Q. Du, and Y. Liu. 2019. The heterogeneous interconnections between supply or demand side and oil risks. Energies 12 (11):2226. doi:10.3390/en12112226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., W. Y. Hou, and D. Y. Liu. 2017. Foreign exchange rates forecasting with convolutional neural network. Neural Process Letter 46:1095–119. doi:10.1007/s11063-017-9629-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, X. C., and J. W. Taylor. 2018. An approximate long-memory range-based approach for value at risk estimation. International Journal of Forecasting 34:377–88. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2017.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantin, H., and H. S. Shin. 2018. Exchange rates and monetary spillovers. Theoretical Economics 13:637–66. doi:10.3982/TE2669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, K. 2016. Value-at-risk: The effect of autoregression in a quantile process. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1605.04940.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, Y. H., and W. W. Gu. 2017. The impact on RMB internationalization process: Exchange rate expectation and foreign trade. Quantitative Finance and Economics 1 (1):114–24. doi:10.3934/QFE.2017.1.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righi, M. B., and P. S. Ceretta. 2015. Forecasting value at risk and expected shortfall based on serial pair-copula constructions. Expert Systems with Applications 42:6380–90. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, P. A., S. B. Muela, and C. L. Martin 2013. A comprehensive review of value at risk methodologies. FUNCAS working paper (711), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Rubia, A., and L. Sanchis-Marco. 2013. On downside risk predictability through liquidity and trading activity: A dynamic quantile approach. International Journal of Forecasting 29:202–19. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takaishi, T. 2018. Volatility estimation using a rational GARCH model. Quantitative Finance and Economics 2 (1):127–36. doi:10.3934/QFE.2018.1.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., K. Guo, and X. L. Lu. 2016. The long-run dynamic relationship between exchange rate and its attention index: Based on DCCA and TOP method. Physica A 453:108–15. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.01.092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H., T. H. Kim, and S. Manganelli. 2015. VAR for VaR: Measuring tail dependence using multivariate regression quantiles. Journal of Econometrics 187:169–88. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W. X., Z. K. Peng, K. X. Wei, P. Shi, and W. Y. Tian. 2017. Superiorities of variational mode decomposition over empirical mode decomposition particularly in time-frequency feature extraction and wind turbine condition monitoring. IET Renewable Power Generation 11 (4):443–52. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar