Does the Leadership of the Board of Directors Affect Corporate Performance? Based on the Empirical Research of China’s SMEs

References

• Adams, R. B., H. Almeida, and D. Ferreira. 2005. Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies 18:1403–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, R., I. Erel, R. Stulz, and R. Williamson. 2009. Differences in governance practices between U.S. and foreign firms: Measurement, causes, and consequences. Review of Financial Studies 22 (8):3131–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktas, N., P. C. Andreou, I. Karasamani, and D. Philip. 2019. CEO duality, agency costs, and internal capital allocation efficiency. British Journal of Management 30 (2):473–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allegrini, M., and G. Greco. 2013. Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Journal of Management &governance 17:187–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9168-3.
   Google Scholar
• Amihud, Y., and S. Stoyanov. 2017. Do staggered boards harm shareholders? Journal of Financial Economics 123:432–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. A., and R. N. Anthony. 1986. The new corporate directors: Insights for board members and executives. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ballinger, G. A., and J. J. Marcel. 2010. The use of an interim CEO during succession episodes and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 31:262–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. A., K. J. M. Cremers, and U. C. Peyer. 2011. The CEO pay slice. Journal of Financial Economics 102:199–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berle, A., and G. Means. 1932. Private property and the modern corporation. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, N., H. Desai, and K. Venkataraman. 2013. Does earnings quality affect information asymmetry? Evidence from trading costs. Contemporary Accounting Research 30:482–516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01161.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouillon, M. L., G. D. Ferrier, M. T. Stuebs, and T. D. West. 2006. The economic benefit og goal congruence and implications for management control systems. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25 (3):265–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, B. K. 1995. CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal 16:301–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, B. K., K. T. Haynes, and F. Zona. 2011. Dimensions of CEO-board relations. Journal ofManagement Studies 48 (8):1892–923. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00943.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, B. K., S. Gove, and M. A. Hitt. 2005. Consequences of measurement problems in strategic management research: The case of Amihud and Lev. Strategic Management Journal 26:367–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.445.
   Google Scholar
• Brickley, J., J. Coles, and G. Jarrell. 1997. Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance 3:189–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(96)00013-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, V., and S. Claessens. 2010. Corporate governance and regulation: Can there be too much of a good thing? Journal of Financial Intermediation 19:461–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2009.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byard, D., Y. Li, and J. Weintrop. 2006. Corporate governance and the quality of financial analysts’ information. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25 (5):609–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, C., and R. Karri. 2005. Organizational governance and ethical systems: A covenantal approach to building trust. Journal of Business Ethics 58:249–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1419-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K., J. Lee, and H. Shim. 2018. CEO duality and firm performance: Does economic policy uncertainty mediate the relation? International Review of Finance Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta, G., and C. Salvato. 2010. Self - serving or self - actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 28 (4):355–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00050.x.
   Google Scholar
• Core, J., R. Holthausen, and D. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, Chief Executive Officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51:371–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahya, J., O. Dimitrov, and J. J. McConnell. 2008. Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 87:73–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., and D. R. Dalton. 1994. Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal 37:1603–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., and C. M. Dalton. 2011. Integration of micro and macro studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance. Journal of Management 37:404–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310373399.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, A. E. Ellstrand, and J. Johnson. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 19:269–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.0.CO;2-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., and C. M. Dalton. 2011. Integration of micro and macro studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance. Journal of Management 37:404–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310373399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., and I. F. Kesner. 1987. Composition and CEO duality in boards of directors: An international perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 18:33–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., M. A. Hitt, S. T. Certo, and C. M. Dalton. 2007. The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: Independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. Academy of Management Annals 1:1–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/078559806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 22:20–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoskey, D. G., Y. Luo, and L. Zhou. 2019. CEO power, board oversight, and earnings announcement tone. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 52 (2):657–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0721-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, T. 2020. Financing decision and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging country. Management Science Letters 10 (4):849–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.10.012.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L., and J. H. Davis. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management 16:49–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103.
   Google Scholar
• Duru, A., R. J. Iyengar, and E. M. Zampelli. 2016. The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence. Journal of Business Research 69 (10):4269–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, R. A. 1988. Earnings management in an overlapping generations model. Journal of Accounting Research 26:195–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2491102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsayed, K. 2010. A multi-theory perspective of board leadership structure: What does the Egyptian corporate governance context tell us? British Journal of Management 21:80–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00632.x.
   Google Scholar
• Faleye, O. 2007. Does one hat fit all? The case of corporate leadership structure. Journal of Management and Governance 11:239–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-007-9028-3.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics 26:301–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/467037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S. 1992. Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal 35:505–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., D. C. Hambrick, and A. A. Cannella. 2009. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., and R. A. D’Aveni. 1994. CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal 37:1079–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, M., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and Z. Sautner. 2013. Opening the black box: Internal capital markets and managerial power. Journal of Finance 68:1577–631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, V., and C. Park. 2002. Board leadership structure and CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance 8:49–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00028-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A., and S. Leung. 2004. Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23:351–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• He, J. Y., and H. C. Wang. 2009. Innovative knowledge assets and economic performance: The asymmetric roles of incentives and monitoring. Academy of Management Journal 52:919–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44633414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heracleous, L. 2008. What is the impact of corporate governance on organizational performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review 9:165–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00244.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., and T. Dalziel. 2003. Boards of directors and firm of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review 28 (3):383–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S., S.-W. Lin, W.-P. Chen, and J.-W. Huang. 2019. CEO duality, information costs, and firm performance. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 101011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannelli, K. 2013. Opinions shift on separating chairman and CEO roles. http://www.directorship.com/opinions-shift-on-separating-chairman-and-ceo-roles/.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1995. Specific and general knowledge and organizationalstructure. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 8:4–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1995.tb00283.x.
   Google Scholar
• Keay, A. 2016. Stewardship theory: Is board accountability necessary? International Journal of Law and Management 59:1292–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-11-2016-0118.
   Google Scholar
• Kor, Y. Y., and C. Sundaramurthy. 2009. Experience-based human Capital and social Capital of 0utside directors. Journal of Management 35 (4):981–1006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R. 2017. Being the CEO’s boss: An examination of board chair orientations. Strategic Management Journal 38:697–713. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R., and M. Semadeni. 2013. Apprentice, departure, and demotion: An examination of the three types of CEO–board chair separation. Academy of Management Journal 56 (3):805–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R., M. Semadeni, and A. A. Cannella. 2014. CEO duality: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management 40:256–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lublin, J. 2009. Chairman–CEO split gains allies. Wall Street Journal, March 30.
   Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, M. S. 1983. Who controls whom? An examination of the relation between management and boards of directors in large American corporations. Academy of Management Review 8:426–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1983.4284426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, G. C., and V. L. Barker. 1997. Upper echelons and board characteristics of turnaround and nonturnaround declining firms. Journal of Business Research 39:119–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00147-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu, C. C., M. van Essen, M. W. Peng, S. F. Saleh, and P. Duran. 2018. Corporate governance in China: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies 55 (6):943–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. H., C. Kim, Y. K. Chang, D.-H. Lee, and Y.-D. Sung. 2018. CEO hubris and firm performance: Exploring the moderating roles of CEO power and board vigilance. Journal of Business Ethics 147 (4):919–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2997-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, M. W., S. Zhang, and X. Li. 2007. CEO duality and firm performance during China’s institutional transitions. Management and Organization Review 3:205–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00069.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and G. R. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, N., K. B. Oh, and R. Pech. 2015. Mergers and acquisitions: CEO duality, operating performance and stock returns in Vietnam. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 35:298–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pi, L., and S. Timme. 1993. Corporate control and bank efficiency. Journal of Banking &finance 17:515–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(93)90050-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramdani, D., and A. van Witteloostuijn. 2010. The impact of board independence and CEO duality on firm performance: A quantile regression analysis for Indonesia,Malaysia, South Korea and Thailand. British Journal of Management 21:607–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00708.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rechner, P., and D. Dalton. 1991. CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal 12:155–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. J. 2000. Information asymmetry and earnings management: Some evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 15:325–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012098407706.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, N. M., T. M. Iskandar, and M. M. Rahmat. 2005. Earnings management and board characteristics: Evidence from Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan (UKM Journal of Management) 24:77–103.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, H., F. Lan, H. Xiong, J. Lv, and J. Jian. 2020. Does top management Team’s academic experience promote corporate innovation? Evidence from China. Economic Modelling 89 (7):464–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.11.007.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, H., R. Liu, H. Xiong, F. Hou, and X. Tang. 2021. Economic policy uncertainty and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 65:101485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., N. Tabassum, T. K. Darwish, and G. Batsakis. 2018. Corporate Governance and Tobin’s Q as a measure of organizational performance. British Journal of Management 29 (1):171–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J. 2017. CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of other executives and blockholding outside directors. European Management Journal 35 (3):362–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J., M. M. Crossan, and W. G. Rowe. 2011. Dominant CEO, deviant strategy, and extreme performance: The moderating role of a powerful board. Journal of Management Studies 48:1479–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00985.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueman, B., and S. Titman. 1988. An explanation for accounting income smoothing. Journal of Accounting Research 26:127–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2491184.
   Google Scholar
• Vancil, R. F. 1987. Passing the Baton: Managing the process of CEO succession. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, T., and S. Zhao. 2014. CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment. Journal of Banking and Finance 49:534–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zona, F. 2012. Corporate investing as a response to economic downturn: Prospect theory, the behavioural agency model and the role of financial slack. British Journal of Management 23:42–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar