The Impact of CEOs’ Social Capital on China’s Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors’ Holdings

References

• Abdelbadie, R. A., and A. Salama. 2019. Corporate governance and financial stability in US banks: Do indirect interlocks matter? Journal of Business Research 104 (July):85–105.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, R., I. Erel, M. Ferreira, and P. Matos. 2011. Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 100 (1):154–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A., R. M. Monem, D. Delaney, and C. Ng. 2017. Gender diversity in corporate boards and continuous disclosure: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics 13 (2):89–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderighi, S., S. Cleary, and P. Varanasi. 2019. Do institutional factors influence cross-border portfolio equity flows? New evidence from emerging markets. Journal of International Money and Finance 99:102070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allam, B. S. 2018. The impact of board characteristics and ownership identity on agency costs and firm performance: UK evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 18 (6):1147–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beames, S., and M. Atencio. 2008. Building social capital through outdoor education. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning 8 (2):99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. 1964. Human capital. 2nd ed. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J., and M. E. Burkhardt. 1993. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal 36:441–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brav, A., W. Jiang, F. Partnoy, and R. Thomas. 2008. Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. The Journal of Finance 63 (4): 1729–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromiley, P. 1991. Testing a causual model of corporate risk taking and performance. The Academy of Management Journal 34 (1):37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A. W., and U. G. Gurun. 2012. Educational networks, mutual fund voting patterns, and CEO compensation. Review of Financial Studies 25 (8):2533–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L., Y. Du, and J. Ø. Hansen. 2017. Foreign institutional investors and dividend policy: Evidence from China. International Business Review 26 (5):816–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Career development center of Peking University. 2017. Peking university graduates employment quality report for 2017. Accessed August 23, 2021. https://scc.pku.edu.cn/attached/file/2018-01-31/1517365601571_%E5%8C%97%E4%BA%AC%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%A6%E5%B0%B1%E4%B8%9A%E8%B4%A8%E9%87%8F%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A-1.31.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Career development center of Tsinghua University. 2017. Tsinghua university graduates employment quality report for 2017. Accessed August 23, 2021. https://career.tsinghua.edu.cn/__local/4/CB/15/21BD903E039AC566012B54EBEC6_8C723761_106377.pdf?e=.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D. H., J. P. Fan, and T. J. Wong. 2004. Politically-connected CEOs, corporate governance and post-IPO performance of China’s partially privatized firms. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.642441.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M., B. Lin, R. Lu, and M. Wei. 2020. Non-controlling large shareholders in emerging markets: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance 63:101259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, P. K. 1994. Political risk and U.S. investments in China: Chimera of protection and predictability. Virginia Journal of International Law 34:615–83.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., A. Frazzini, and C. Malloy. 2008. The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. Journal of Political Economy 116 (5):951–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human apital. The American Journal of Sociology 94:S95–S120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Y., D. Kong, and S. Liu. 2018. Returnee talent and corporate investment: Evidence from China. European Accounting Review 27 (2):313–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, M., B. Nilsson, and S. Suardi. 2017. Foreign institutional investment, ownership, and liquidity: Real and informational frictions. Financial Review 52 (1):101–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelberg, J., P. Gao, and C. A. Parsons. 2012. The price of a CEO’s rolodex. Review of Financial Studies 26 (1):79–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., T. Wong, and T. Zhang. 2007. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO perfor- mance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics 84:330–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei, X. 1992. From the soil, the foundations of Chinese society. 1st ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, G. K.2010. Business environment In China: Economic, political, and cultural factors. Accessed August 23, 2021. https://www.usi.edu/media/3654697/Business-Environment-China.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fried, M. H. 1969. Fabric of Chinese society: A study of the social life in a Chinese County seat. New York: Octagon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goyer, M., and D. K. Jung. 2011. Diversity of institutional investors and foreign blockholdings in France: The evolution of an institutionally hybrid economy. Corporate Governance: An International Review 19 (6):562–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, L. 2015. The qualified foreign institutional investor system and corporate governance in China. In Sustainable entrepreneurship in China: Ethics, corporate governance, and institutional reforms, ed. D. Cumming, W. Hou, E. Lee, and M. Firth, 105–26. 1st ed. New Yok: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1984. The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review 9 (3):389–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, R. J., P. J. Hanges, S. A. Ruiz-Quintanilla, P. W. Dorfman, S. A. Falkus, and N. M. Ashkanasy. 1999. Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project globe. In Advances in global leadership, ed. W. H. Mobley, M. J. Gessner, and V. Arnold, 171–233. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, B.-H., and S. Kim. 2009. It pays to have friends. Journal of Financial Economics 93:138–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G., F. Belschak, and B. Krug. 2004. Social capital in China: The meaning of guanxi in Chinese business. In China’s rational entrepreneurs: The development of the new private business sector, ed. B. Krug, 166–88. 1st ed. London, GB: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, D., H. Wang, P. Wang, and D. Yin. 2016. Social trust and foreign ownership: Evidence from qualified foreign institutional investors in China. Journal of Financial Stability 23:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, A. N., A. F. Cortes, and P. Herrmann. 2021. CEO proactiveness, innovation, and firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101545
   Google Scholar
• Korkeamäki, T., N. Virk, H. Wang, and P. Wang. 2019. Learning Chinese? the changing investment behavior of foreign institutions in the Chinese stock market. International Review of Financial Analysis 64:190–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, K. C., P. B. McGuinness, and J. P. Vieito. 2013. An empirical assessment of CEO gender, executive compensation and firm performance in Chinese listed enterprises. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 21:1136–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, K., and M. H. Bond. 1984. The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (4):793–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z. 2017. The impact of qualified foreign institutional investors on controlling shareholder’s tunneling: Evidence of listed companies in China. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management 07 (4):522–36.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., and L. Tang. 2010. CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal 53 (1):45–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. L., J. Lu, J.-B. Su, and W. P. Chen. 2018. Sustainable returns: The effect of regional industrial development policy on institutional investors’ behavior in China. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10 (8):2769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J., and S. X. Si. 2010. Can guanxi be a problem? Contexts, ties, and some unfavorable consequences of social capital in China? Asia Pacific Journal of Management 27:561–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N., D. Bredin, L. Wang, and Z. Yi. 2014. Domestic and foreign institutional investors’ behavior in China. European Journal of Finance 20 (7–9):728–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, M. 1988. Culture and the problems of Chinese management. Organization Studies 9 (4):475–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, I., C.-N. Chung, and W. Mitchell. 2017. Political connections and business strategy in dynamic environments: How types and destinations of political ties affect business diversification in closed and open political economic contexts. Global Strategy Journal 7:375–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, Y. N. 2009. China’s capital flow regulations: The qualified foreign intitutional investor and the qualified domestic institutional investor programs. Review of Banking and Financial Law 28:299–337.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, M. W., S. L. Sun, and L. Markóczy. 2015. Human capital and CEO compensation during institutional transitions. Journal of Management Studies 52 (1):117–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. 1st ed. New York/London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, B. K., K. Egbert, J. Tao, and G. Louvel. 2013. The qualified foreign institutional investor program in China – Recent developments. New Opportunities and Ongoing Challenges 20 (2):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rong, Z., X. Wu, and P. Boeing. 2017. The effect of institutional ownership on firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Research Policy 46 (9):1533–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, W., and D. Hambrick. 2007. Swinging for the fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal 50 (5):1055–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawalha, N. N., M. I. Elian, and A. H. Suliman. 2016. Foreign capital inflows and economic growth in developed and emerging economies: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Developing Areas 50 (1):237–56.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 1996. From state to market? The transformation of French business and government. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, S., K. Z. Zhou, and J. J. Li. 2010. The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing 75 (1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, W., L. Markoczy, and C. V. Stan. 2014. The continuing importance of political ties in China. Academy of Management Perspectives 28 (1):57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suleiman, E. N. 2016. Elites in French society: The politics of survival. 1st ed. Princeton: Princeton Legacy Library.
   Google Scholar
• Talavera, O., L. Xiong, and X. Xiong. 2012. Social capital and access to bank financing: The case of Chinese entrepreneurs. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 48 (1):55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, M. N. T. 2009. Has the QFII scheme strengthened corporate governance in China? China: An International Journal 7 (2):353–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teti, E., A. Dell’Acqua, L. Etro, and M. Volpe. 2017. The impact of board independency, CEO duality and CEO fixed compensation on M&A performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 17 (5):947–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, Y. 2018. QFII shareholding, the performance of listed companies and the quality of stock market: An empirical test on the data of China from 2009 to 2017. Journal of Finance and Accounting 6 (4):96.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D., D. Sutherland, L. Ning, Y. Wang, and X. Pan. 2018. Exploring the influence of political connections and managerial overconfidence on R&D intensity in China’s large-scale private sector firms. Technovation 69 (November 2017):40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., S. Zhou, and W. Fang. 2014. The relations between QFII holdings and company performance: Evidence from China’s A-share listed companies. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2014:821463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. W. 1970. Learning to be Chinese: The political socialization of children in Taiwan. 1st ed. Cambridge: M.I.T. press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W., C. Wu, C. Zhou, and J. Wu. 2012. Political connections, tax benefits and firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 31 (3):277–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W., and E. Schiehll. 2018. Human and relational capital behind the structural power of CEOs in Chinese listed firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 36:715–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. K. 1965. Chinese communist society: The family and the village. 1st ed. Cambridge: M.I.T Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., J. Ma, Y. Zhang, and J. H. Hong. 2018. With whom should you have dinner? A multidimensional framework for understanding political ties in China. Business Horizons 61 (6):891–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, J., and G. Du. 2012. Are political connections a blessing or a curse? evidence from CEO turnover in China. Corporate Governance: An International Review 20 (2):179–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W., and Y. Zheng. 2014. Government regulation, corporate board, and firm value: Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 25 (2):182–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., M. Lijun, B. Zhang, and Z. Yi. 2016. Pyramidal structure, political intervention and firms’ tax burden: Evidence from China’s local SOEs. Journal of Corporate Finance 36:15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Z. Zhang, M. Jia, and Y. Ren. 2020. A tiger with wings: CEO–board surname ties and agency costs. Journal of Business Research 118:271–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J. 2010. The empirical study on characteristics of QFII holdings in China’s stock market. Electronic. doi: 10.1109/ICEEE.2010.5660506
   Google Scholar
• Zou, L., T. Tang, and X. Li. 2016. The stock preferences of domestic versus foreign investors: Evidence from Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (QFIIs) in China. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 37–38:12–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulfiqar, M., K. Hussain, M. U. Yousaf, N. Sohail, and S. Ghafoor. 2020. Moderating role of CEO compensation in lean innovation strategies of Chinese listed family firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 20 (5):887–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar