Does Private Means Better? A Water and Sanitation Quasi-Experimental Design

References

• Abadie, A., and G. W. Imbens. 2006. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74 (1):235–67. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, H., M. Campello, B. Laranjeira, and S. Weisbenner. 2011. Corporate debt maturity and the real effects of the 2007 credit crisis. Critical Financial Review 1:3–58. doi:10.1561/104.00000001.
   Google Scholar
• Barrera-Osorio, F., M. Oliveira, and C. Ospino. 2009. Does society win or lose as a result of privatization? The case of water sector privatization in Colombia. Economica 76 (304):649–74. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2008.00731.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdsall, N., and J. Nellis. 2003. Winners and losers: Assessing the distributional impact of privatization. World Development 31 (October):1617–33. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00141-4.
   Google Scholar
• Bitrán, G. A., and E. O. Valenzuela. 2003. Water services in Chile: Comparing private and public performance. Public Policy for the Private Sector. Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/11303?locale-attribute=fr.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. 2003. Public choice: Politics without romance. Policy 19 (3):13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Cairncross, S. 1989. Water supply and sanitation: An agenda for research. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 92 (5):301–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, J. F., J. R. Kahn, and A. Rivas. 2006. Willingness to pay for improved water service in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Ecological Economics 58 (2):365–72. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, G. R. G., K. Kosec, and S. Wallsten. 2009. Has private participation in water and sewerage improved coverage? Empirical evidence from Latin America. Journal of International Development 21 (3):327–61. doi:10.1002/jid.1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estache, A., A. Gómez-Lobo, and D. Leipziger. 2001. Utilities privatization and the poor: Lessons and evidence from Latin America. World Development 29 (July):1179–98. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00034-1.
   Google Scholar
• Galiani, S., P. Gertler, and E. Schargrodsky. 2005. Water for life: The impact of the privatization of water services on child mortality. Journal of Political Economy 113 (1):83–120. doi:10.1086/426041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Lobo, A., and D. Contreras. 2003. Water subsidy policies: A comparison of the Chilean and Colombian schemes. The World Bank Economic Review 17 (3):391–407. doi:10.1093/wber/lhg028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Lobo, A., and M. Melendez. 2006. Social policy, regulation and private sector water supply: The case of Colombia. Bogotá: Fedesarrollo.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., H. Ichimura, and P. E. Todd. 1997. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies 64 (4):605–54. doi:10.2307/2971733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W. 1986. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (396):945–60. doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, A. O. 1990. Government failures in development. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 (3):9–23. doi:10.1257/jep.4.3.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F., W. Wang, and Z. Yi. 2018. Cross-subsidies and government transfers: Impacts on electricity service quality in Colombia. Sustainability 10 (5):1599. doi:10.3390/su10051599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, R. A. P. 1993. Intervenção pioneira do Governo Federal na matéria. Anais do Seminário Os Desafios do Saneamento Ambiental, Regulamentação e Padrões de Financiamento, Fundação do Desenvolvimento Administrativo.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenzie, D., and D. Mookherjee. 2003. The distribution impact of privatization in Latin America: Evidence from four countries. Economia 3 (2):161–233. doi:10.1353/eco.2003.0006.
   Google Scholar
• Mitnick, B. M. 2011. Origin of the theory of agency: An account by one of the theory’s originators. SSRN Electronic Journal, March. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1020378.
   Google Scholar
• Olmstead, S., W. M. Hanemann, and R. N. Stavins. 2007. Water demand under alternative price structures. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54 (2):181–98. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, R. A. 1968. Natural monopoly and regulation. 21 Stanford Law Review 548. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=2861&context=journal_articles.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 (1):41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1985. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician 39 (1):33–38. doi:10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiani, C. C. S. 2012. Competição Política faz bem à Saúde? Evidências dos determinantes e dos efeitos da privatização dos serviços de saneamento básico no Brasil. Articles (PhD of Economics - Thesis). São Paulo: FGV.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., and P. E. Todd. 2005. Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics 125 (1):305–53. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas, M. C., and R. F. Lima. 2004. Concessões Privadas de saneamento do Brasil: Bom negócio para quem? Ambiente & Sociedade 7 (2):67–94. doi:10.1590/S1414-753X2004000200005.
   Google Scholar
• Wallsten, S. J. 1999. An empirical analysis of competition, privatization, and regulation in Africa and Latin America. Working paper 2136. Washington, DC: Regulation and Competition Policy Development Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, J., S. Simonit, A. Kinzig, and C. Perrings. 2014. Estimating the price elasticity of residential water demand: The case of Phoenix, Arizona. Applied Economics Perspectives and Policy 36 (2):333–50. doi:10.1093/aepp/ppt054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar