Does Independence of Board Committees Enhance Corporate Performance? The Case of Russia

References

• Adams, R. B. 2003. What do boards do? Evidence from board committee and director compensation data. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 397401. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=397401.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B. 2017. Boards, and the directors who sit on them. In The economics of corporate governance, ed. B. E. Hermalin and M. S. Weisbach, 291–382. North Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B., B. E. Hermalin, and M. S. Weisbach. 2010. The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature 48 (1):58–107. doi:10.1257/jel.48.1.58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, T., I. Filatotchev, and S. Thomsen. 2011. The research frontier in corporate governance. Journal of Management & Governance 15 (3):311–25. doi:10.1007/s10997-009-9115-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ahsan, T., S. S. Mirza, B. Al-Gamrh, C. Bin-Feng, and Z. U. R. Rao. 2021. How to deal with policy uncertainty to attain sustainable growth: The role of corporate governance. Corporate Governance 21 (1):78–91. doi:10.1108/CG-04-2020-0121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluchna, M., J. D. Mahadeo, and B. Kamiński. 2020. The association between independent directors and company value. Confronting evidence from two emerging markets. Corporate Governance the International Journal of Business in Society 20 (6):987–99. doi:10.1108/CG-08-2019-0263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, D. A., C. S. Hines, and J. Sankara. 2018. Board risk committees: Insurer financial strength ratings and performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 37 (2):130–45. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., S. A. Mansi, and D. M. Reeb. 2004. Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (3):315–42. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appiah, K. O., and A. Chizema. 2016. The impact of board quality and nomination committee on corporate bankruptcy. Advances in Accounting 35:75–81. doi:10.1016/j.adiac.2016.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Berezinets, I., Y. Ilina, and A. Cherkasskaya. 2017. Board structure, board committees and corporate performance in Russia. Managerial Finance 43 (10):1073–92. doi:10.1108/MF-11-2015-0308.
   Google Scholar
• Brick, I. E., and N. K. Chidambaran. 2010. Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance 16 (4):533–53. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., and T. L. Neal. 2000. Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review 15. doi:10.2139/ssrn.229835.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, D. A., F. D’Souza, B. J. Simkins, and W. G. Simpson. 2010. The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance an International Review 18 (5):396–414. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. J., S. Woon Park, and S. Sehyun Yoo. 2007. The value of outside directors: Evidence from corporate governance reform in Korea. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 42 (4):941–62. doi:10.1017/S0022109000003458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management 23 (3):70–74. doi:10.2307/3665623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter, J., and M. Silvester. 2003. Board and monitoring committee independence. Abacus 39 (2):211–32. doi:10.1111/1467-6281.00127.
   Google Scholar
• Cybinski, P., and C. Windsor. 2013. Remuneration committee independence and CEO remuneration for firm financial performance. Accounting Research Journal 26 (3):197–221. doi:10.1108/ARJ-08-2012-0068.
   Google Scholar
• de Andres, P., V. Azofra, and F. Lopez. 2005. Corporate boards in OECD countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance 13 (2):197–210. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00418.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoskey, D. G., Y. Luo, and J. J. Wang. 2018. Do specialized board committees impact the transparency of corporate political disclosure? Evidence from S&P 500 companies. Research in Accounting Regulation 30 (1):8–19. doi:10.1016/j.racreg.2018.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. 1990. The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. The Academy of Management Review 15 (3):369–81. doi:10.2307/258013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L., and J. H. Davis. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management (University of New South Wales) 16 (1):49. doi:10.1177/031289629101600103.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L., and J. H. Davis. 1994. Boards and company performance - Research challenges the conventional wisdom. Corporate Governance an International Review 2 (3):151–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.1994.tb00071.x.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, T., S. Sundgren, and M. T. Wells. 1998. Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics 48 (1):20. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00003-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enikolopov, R., and S. Stepanov. 2013. Corporate governance in Russia. In The Oxford handbook of the Russian economy, ed. M. Alexeev and S. Weber, 221–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erkens, D. H., M. Hung, and P. Matos. 2012. Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance 18 (2):389–411. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88 (2):21. doi:10.1086/260866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law & Economics 26 (2):327–49. doi:10.1086/467038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhan, N., M. Tabash, F. Almaqtari, and A. Yahya. 2020. Board composition and firms’ profitability: Empirical evidence from pharmaceutical industry in India. Journal of International Studies 13 (3):180–94. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-3/12.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraz, D. P., I. T. Lopes, and M. M. Martins. 2016. The influence of diversity on boards on profitability: An overview across Iberian non-financial listed companies. Corporate Ownership & Control 13 (2):454–60.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Castro, R., M. A. Ariño, and M. A. Canela. 2010. Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics 92 (1):107–26. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0143-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, C. P., and S. Homroy. 2018. Female directors, board committees and firm performance. European Economic Review 102:19–38. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, R. 2018. Busy directors and firm performance: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics 128 (1):16–37. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1):153–61. doi:10.2307/1912352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, A. D., S. G. Johnson, L. M. Greco, and S. L. Walter. 2021. Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management 47 (1):105–43. doi:10.1177/0149206320960533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., and T. Dalziel. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. The Academy of Management Review 28 (3):383–96. doi:10.2307/30040728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, I. 2008. The determinants of board composition in a transforming economy: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Corporate Finance 14 (5):532–49. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, M., A. Prevost, and J. Puthenpurackal. 2014. Controlling shareholders, board structure, and firm performance: Evidence from India. Journal of Corporate Finance 27 (27):1–20. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.04.003.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4):305–60. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jermias, J., and L. Gani. 2014. The impact of board capital and board characteristics on firm performance. The British Accounting Review 46 (2):135–53. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiraporn, P., M. Singh, and C. I. Lee. 2009. Ineffective corporate governance: Director busyness and board committee memberships. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (5):819–28. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.09.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesner, I. F. 1988. Directors’ characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. Academy of Management Journal 31 (1):66–84. doi:10.2307/256498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirpishchikov, D. A., F. Lopez-Iturriaga, and M. Zavertiaeva. 2021. Boards of directors in BRIC countries: A review of empirical studies. Russian Management Journal 19 (2):195–228. doi:10.21638/spbu18.2021.204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivogorsky, V. 2000. Corporate ownership and governance in Russia. The International Journal of Accounting 35 (3):331–53. doi:10.1016/S0020-7063(00)00061-3.
   Google Scholar
• Landsman, W. R., and A. C. Shapiro. 1995. Tobin’s q and the relation between accounting ROI and economic return. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 10(1):103–18. doi:10.1177/0148558X9501000108.
   Google Scholar
• Lazareva, O., A. Rachinsky, and S. Stepanov. 2008. A survey of corporate governance in Russia. In Corporate governance in transition economies, 315–49. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-0-387-84831-0_32.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, S., G. Richardson, and B. Jaggi. 2014. Corporate board and board committee independence, firm performance, and family ownership concentration: An analysis based on Hong Kong firms. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 10 (1):16–31. doi:10.1016/j.jcae.2013.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, L., L. Luo, and Q. Tang. 2015. Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review 47 (4):409–24. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, D. J., S. M. Puffer, and S. Michailova. 2013. A critical view of Russia’s IPO market: A sign of success or a reason for caution? Critical Perspectives on International Business 9 (1/2):226–42. doi:10.1108/17422041311300010.
   Google Scholar
• Michailova, S., and V. Worm. 2003. Personal networking in Russia and China: Blat and Guanxi. European Management Journal 21 (4):509–19. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00077-X.
   Google Scholar
• Muravyev, A. 2017. Boards of directors in Russian publicly traded companies in 1998–2014: Structure, dynamics and performance effects. Economic Systems 41 (1):5–25. doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, G. J., and G. C. Kiel. 2007. Can directors impact performance? A case-based test of three theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance an International Review 15 (4):585–608. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00590.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxelheim, L., and T. Randoy. 2003. The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance 27 (12):2369–92. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00395-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and G. R. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. NY: Harper and Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Piot, C. 2004. The existence and independence of audit committees in France. Accounting and Business Research 34 (3):223–46. doi:10.1080/00014788.2004.9729966.
   Google Scholar
• Ruigrok, W., S. Peck, S. Tacheva, P. Greve, and Y. Hu. 2006. The determinants and effects of board nomination committees*. Journal of Management & Governance 10 (2):119–48. doi:10.1007/s10997-006-0001-3.
   Google Scholar
• Sanan, N. K. 2019. Impact of board characteristics on firm dividends: Evidence from India. Corporate Governance the International Journal of Business in Society 19 (6):1204–15. doi:10.1108/CG-12-2018-0383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla, A., S. Narayanasamy, K. Ayyalusamy, and S. K. Pandya. 2020. Influence of independent directors on the market risks of Indian banks. Journal of Asia Business Studies 15 (1):31–49. doi:10.1108/JABS-01-2020-0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D., and A. Delios. 2017. Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India. Journal of World Business 52 (5):615–27. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2017.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thenmozhi, M., and A. Sasidharan. 2020. Does board independence enhance firm value of state-owned enterprises? Evidence from India and China. European Business Review 32 (5):785–800. doi:10.1108/EBR-09-2019-0224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, J., and C.-M. Lau. 2001. Board composition, leadership structure and performance in Chinese Sharehol. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 18 (2):245–63. doi:10.1023/A:1010628209918.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, Q. T. 2019. Independent directors and corporate investment: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Economics and Development. doi:10.1108/JED-06-2019-0008.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, A. D., R. Bhargava, and S. D. Faircloth. 2014. Board structure and role of monitoring committees. Journal of Business Research 67 (7):1486–92. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafeas, N. 1999. The nature of board nominating committees and their role in corporate governance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 26 (1–2):199–225. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.00253.
   Google Scholar
• Yasser, Q. R., A. A. Mamun, and M. Rodrigs. 2017. Impact of board structure on firm performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Asia Business Studies 11 (2):210–28. doi:10.1108/JABS-06-2015-0067.
   Google Scholar
• Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40 (2):185–211. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., S. Owusu-Ansah, and A. Maggina. 2018. Board of directors, audit committee, and firm performance: Evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation 31:20–36. doi:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.03.002.
   Google Scholar