Circulation of conspiracy theories in the attention factory

References

• Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut. How too much information is changing the way we think and know. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aral, S. (2020). The hype machine: How social media disrupts our elections, our economy, and our health – And how we must adapt. Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, L., & Pecorin, A. (2021) FBI warns lawmakers frustrated QAnon conspiracy followers could again turn violent. ABC News. Retrieved from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-warns-lawmakers-frustrated-qanon-conspiracy-followers-turn/story?id=78288191
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, P. (1994) Religion and Globalization Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Connected sociologies. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Butter, M., & Knight, P. (2020). Conspiracy theory in historical, cultural and literary studies. In M. Butter & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of conspiracy theories. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). Hybrid media system. Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Citton, Y. (2017). The ecology of attention (1st). ( B. Norman, Trans.). Polity Press. ( Original work published 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Meijas, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, H. (2001). In media res: Global religion, public spheres, and the task of contemporary comparative religious studies.In H. de Vries & S. Weber (Eds.),Religion and media pp. 3–42. Stanford: Stanford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M. R. X. (2020). Debunking conspiracy theories. Synthese, 198(10), 9897–9911. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02694-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, M. (2016). Black ops advertising: Native ads, content marketing, and the covert world of the digital sell. OR Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., Lewis, S., & Westlund, O. (2022). Epistemologies of digital journalism and the study of misinformation. New Media & Society, 22(2), 205–212. doi:10.1177/1461444819856914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., & Westlund, O. (2019). Epistemology and Journalism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Ellmer, M. (2021, April 15). QAnon & its’ origins. Grey Dynamics. https://www.greydynamics.com/qanon-and-its-origins/
   Google Scholar
• Fay, B. (2019). The Nazi Conspiracy Theory: German Fantasies and Jewish Power in the Third Reich. Library & Information History, 35(2), 75–97. doi:10.1080/17583489.2019.1632574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FBI. (2019) Anti-government, identity-based, and fringe conspiracy theories very likely motivate some domestic extremists to commit criminal, sometimes violent activity. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/420379775/FBI-Conspiracy-Theory-Redacted#from_embed
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Gledhill, C. (1997). Genre and gender: The case of soap opera. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. xx–yy). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Godler, Y., Reich, Z., & Miller, B. (2020). Social epistemology as a new paradigm for journalism and media studies. New Media & Society, 22(2), 213–229. doi:10.1177/1461444819856922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harambam, J. (2020). Contemporary conspiracy culture: Truth and knowledge in an era of epistemic instability. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helin, S. (2021) Salaliittoja ja Raamattua. Youtube tarjoaa salaliittoteorioita ja Raamatun tulkintoja koronarokotteista tietoja hakeville suomalaisille. Ylen selvitys paljastaa somejätin tekemän virheen. (Conspiracies and Bible. Youtube offers conspiracy theories and Bible studies for Finns looking for Covid-19 vaccination information. Yle’s report reveals the errors of the social media giant.) National Broadcasting Company Yle report May 30, 2021. Retrieved from https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11951146
   Google Scholar
• Hemmer, N. (2016). Messengers of the right: Conservative media and the transformation of American politics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of religion: A theory of the media as agents of religious change. Northern Lights: Yearbook of Film & Media Studies, 6(1), 9–24. doi:10.1386/nl.6.1.9_1
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R. (1964). The paranoid style of American politics. Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, S. M. (2011). Media and the imagination of religion in contemporary global culture.European Journal of Cultural Studies,14(6), 610–625.
   Google Scholar
• Knuutila, A. (2019). Närkästyksen kone. Miksi uusoikeiston ääni kuuluu verkossa muita vahvemmin. (The indignation machine. Why the far right gets a louder voice in the net than others) Politiikasta.fi May 9, 2019. Retrieved from https://politiikasta.fi/narkastyksen-kone-miksi-uusoikeiston-aani-kuuluu-verkossa-muita-vahvemmin/
   Google Scholar
• Kunelius, R., & Reunanen, E. (2014). The medium of the media: Journalism, politics and the theory of “mediatisation.” Javnost – The Public, 19(4), 5–24. doi:10.1080/13183222.2012.11009093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntsman, A., & Rattle, I. (2019). Towards a paradigmatic shift in sustainability studies: A systematic review of peer reviewed literature and future agenda setting to consider environmental (un)sustainability of digital communication. Environmental Communication, 13(5), 567–581. doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1596144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffit, B. (2016). The global rise of populism. Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (1981). ‘The nationwide audience’: A critical postscript. Screen Education, 39, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Noppari, E., Haara, P., Nelimarkka, M., Toivanen, P., & Valaskivi, K. (n.d.). Sisältösekaannuksen selviytymisopas: Selviä verkon infokaaoksesta [A survival guide to content confusion: How to overcome online information chaos]. Tampereen yliopisto: Tutkimuskeskus Comet. https://sisaltosekaannus.fi
   Google Scholar
• Orlovski, J. (2020) The social Dilemma. Documentary film available on e.g. Netflix.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. A. (2003). Anthropology and communication: Media and myth in the new Millenium. Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. M. (2020). Pushing boundaries and blurring categories in digital media and religion research. Sociology Compass, 14(3). First published Jan 13, 2020. doi:10.1111/soc4.12769
   Google Scholar
• Promey, S. M. (2014).Sensational religion: Sensory cultures in material practice. Hartford, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pyrhönen, N., & Gwenaëlle, B. (2020). Conspiracies beyond fake news: Producing reinformation on presidential elections in the transnational hybrid media system. Sociological Inquiry, 90(4), 705–731. doi:10.1111/soin.12339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QAnon Anonymous (2018 Aug 18) Introduction to QAnon podcast. Retrieved from https://soundcloud.com/qanonanonymous/episode-1-introduction-to-qanon
   Google Scholar
• Ridell, S. (1998). Tolkullistamisen politiikkaa. Tv-uutisten vastaanotto kriittisestä genrenäkökulmasta [Politics of sensibility: Tv-news reception from a critical genre perspective]. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 617. Tampereen yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. G. (2021). Legitimizing claims of special knowledge: Towards an epistemic turn in religious studies. Temenos – Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion, 57(1), 17–34. doi:10.33356/temenos.107773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Soufan Center. (2021). Quantifying the Q conspiracy: A data-driven approach to understanding the threat posed by QAnon. Limbik. https://thesoufancenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/TSC-White-Paper_QAnon_16April2021-final-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stout, D. A. (2012). Media and religion: Foundations of an emerging field. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sumiala, J., Valaskivi, K., Tikka, M., & Huhtamäki, J. (2018). Hybrid media events: The Charlie Hebdo attacks and the global circulation of terrorist violence. Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Toivanen, P., Nelimarkka, M., & Valaskivi, K. (2021). Remediation in the hybrid media environment: Understanding countermedia in context. New Media & Society, 1–26. doi:10.1177/1461444821992701
   Google Scholar
• Uusitalo, N., & Valaskivi, K. (2020). The attention apparatus: Conditions and affordances of news reporting in hybrid media events of terrorist violence. Journalism Practice, 1–19. doi:10.1080/17512786.2020.1854052
   Google Scholar
• Valaskivi, K. (1999). Relations of television. Genre and gender in the production, reception and text of Japanese family drama [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere]. Trepo. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/66421
   Google Scholar
• Valaskivi, K. (2002). Leipää ja rinkeliä: Johdatus asian ja viihteen suhteeseen suomalaisessa televisiossa [Bread and pretzel: Introduction to the relation of fact and entertainment in Finnish television]. Tampereen yliopiston tiedotusopin laitoksen julkaisuja B43. Tampereen yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Valaskivi, K. (2012). Dimensions of innovationism. In P. Nynäs, M. Lassander, & T. Utriainen (Eds.), Post-Secular Society (pp. 129–156). Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Valaskivi, K. (2017). Valheita, sopimuksia ja sisältösekaannusta [Lies, contracts, and content confusion]. Aikalainen. http://aikalainen.uta.fi/2017/12/01/valheita-sopimuksia-ja-sisaltosekaannusta/
   Google Scholar
• Valaskivi, K. (2020). The contemporary faith of innovationism. In E. Bell, S. Gog, A. Simionca, & S. Taylor (Eds.), Spirituality, organization and neoliberalism: Understanding lived experiences (pp. 171–193). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Valaskivi, K., & Sumiala, J. (2013). Yhteisöt liikkeessä: Innovaatiouskon kiertoa jäljittämässä [Communities on the move: Tracing the circulation of innovation belief. In M. Lehtonen (Ed.), Liikkuva maailma: Liike, raja, tieto [The moving world: Movement, border, knowledge] (pp. XX–YY). Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society. Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velkova, J. (2021). Thermopolitics of data: Cloud infrastructures and energy futures. Cultural Studies, 35(4–5), 663–683. doi:10.1080/09502386.2021.1895243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Emotions, media and politics. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• The Wall Street Journal (2021 Oct 1) The Facebook files. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-facebook-files-11631713039?page=3
   Google Scholar
• Wilska, K. (1997). Iltalypsy - faktan ja fiktion kaksihintajärjestelmä [Evening milking – The dual price system of fact and fiction] [Master’s thesis, University of Tampere]. Trepo. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/89262
   Google Scholar
• Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social media and the arab spring: Politics comes first. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115–137. doi:10.1177/1940161212471716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. Profile Books.
   Google Scholar