Preference for Managerial Boundary Setting in Relation to Empowerment: Adding Clarity to the Role of Boundaries

REFERENCES

• Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leader empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 945 –955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenumey, E. K., & Lockwood, A. (2008). Psychological climate and psychological empowerment: An exploration in a luxury UK hotel. Tourism & Hospitality Research, 8, 265 –281.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. (1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 207 –242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Weichun, Z., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951 –968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122 –147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, K. H., Carlos, J. P., & Randolph, W. A. (1995). The empowerment barometer and action plan. Escondido, CA: Ken Blanchard Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Block, P. (1987). The empowered manager: Positive political skills at work. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brief, A., & Nord, W. R. (1990). Meaning of occupational work. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, L. B., & Chapman, A. R. (2010). The process of empowerment: A model for use in research and practice. American Psychologist, 65, 646 –659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Y. H., Taylor, R. R., & Markum, S. (2008). The role of subordinates’ trust in a social exchange-driven psychological empowerment process. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20, 444 –467.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, T., & Faerman, S. R. (2010). An integrative model of empowerment and individuals’ in-role and extra-role performance in the Korean public sector: Moderating effects of organizational individualism and collectivism. International Public Management Journal, 13, 130 –154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). The support of autonomy and control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024 –1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewetticnk, K., & van Ameijde, M. (2011). Linking leadership empowerment behavior to employee attitudes and behavioral intentions: Testing the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 40, 284 –305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divir, T., & Shamir, B. (2001 , June). The role of follower characteristics in transformational leadership theory. Paper presented at the International Conference on Business, Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, R. (2000). Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent idea. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 67 –80.
   Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright ( Ed.), Studies in social power ( pp. 150 –167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Journal, 12, 472 –485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183 –211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, C., & Rosen, B. (2001). The leader-member exchange as a link between managerial trust and employee empowerment. Group & Organization Management, 26, 53 –69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219 –247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., McLaughlin, M. E., & Coalter, T. M. (1996). Context, cognition, and common method variance: Psychometric and verbal protocol evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 246 –261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon, A. H. Y., & Rensvold, R. B. (2006). An interactional perspective on perceived empowerment: The role of personal needs and task context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 959 –982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Iun, J., Liu, A., & Gong, Y. (2010). Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 122 –143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2004). The barrier effect of conflict with superiors in the relationship between employee empowerment and organizational commitment. Work & Stress, 18, 56 –65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, S., & Nair, S. (2008). Influence of locus of control, job characteristics and superior–subordinate relationship on psychological empowerment. Journal of Management Research, 8, 147 –161.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J. Y., Li-Yun, S., & Law, K. S. (2011). Job satisfaction and organization structure as moderators of the effects of empowerment on organizational citizenship behavior: A self-consistency and social exchange perspective. International Journal of Management, 28, 675 –693.
   Google Scholar
• Kahnweiler, W. M., & Thompson, M. A. (2000). Levels of desired, actual and perceived control of employee involvement in decision making: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 407 –427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 246 –255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58 –74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knol, J., & van Linge, R. (2009). Innovative behaviour: The effect of structural and psychological empowerment on nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 359 –370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koberg, C. S., Boss, R. W., Senjem, J. C., & Goodman, E. A. (1999). Antecedents and outcomes of empowerment: Empirical evidence from the health care industry. Group and Organization Management, 24, 71 –91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laschinger, H. K. S, Finegan, J. E., Shamian, J., & Wilk, P. (2004). A longitudinal analysis of the impact of workplace empowerment on work satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 527 –545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., & Tewksbury, T. W. 1995. Empowerment and work teams. In G. R. Ferris, S. D. Rosen, & D. T. Barnum ( Eds.), Handbook of human resources management ( pp. 386 –403). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Melé, D. (2004). The principle of subsidiarity in organizations: A case study. Available at SSRN 884395. IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, P. K., & Ungson, G. (2003). Reassessing the limits of structural empowerment: Organizational constitution and trust as controls. Academy of Management Review, 28, 143 –153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539 –569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1997). The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider. Organizational Dynamics, 26(2), 37 –49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph, W. A. (1995). Navigating the journey to empowerment. Organizational Dynamics, 23(4), 19 –32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph, W. A. (2000). Re-thinking empowerment: Why is it so hard to achieve? Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), 94 –107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph, W. A., & Kemery, E. R. (2011). Managerial use of power bases in a model of empowerment practices and employee psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 18, 95 –106.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, B. J. (1993). The basis of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 227 –251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747 –773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Silver, S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 332 –349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 981 –1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456 –476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442 –1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 483 –504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper ( Eds.), Handbook of organizational behavior ( pp. 54 –72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M., de Janasz, S. C., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Empowered to lead: The role of psychological empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 511 –527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23, 679 –704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. G., McNulty, R., Griffin, M. T. Q., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2010). Psychological empowerment and structural empowerment among nurse practitioners. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 22, 27 –34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschohl, J. (2003). The importance of empowerment. Canadian Manager, 28, 25 –26.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., & Velthouse, B. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666 –681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorlakson, A. J. H., & Murray, R. P. (1996). An empirical study of empowerment in the workplace. Group and Organization Management, 21, 67 –83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga, J. F., & Yanouzas, J. N. (1979). The dynamics of organization theory: Gaining a macro perspective. St. Paul, MN: West.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, T. D., Cordery, J. L., and Clegg, C. W. (2002). Empowerment, performance, and operational uncertainty: A theoretical integration. Applied Psychology, 51(1), 146 –169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. C., Johnson, P. D., Mathieu, K., & Paul, J. (2011). Structural and psychological empowerment climates, performance, and the moderating role of shared fit accountability: A managerial perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 840 –850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., & Lee, P. D. (2009). Psychological empowerment and job satisfaction. Group & Organization Management, 34, 271 –296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar