Addressing Virtual Work Challenges: Learning From the Field

References

• Academy of Management Conference Program. (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Akella, D. (2013). Theory to Practice: Practice to Theory. Organization Management Journal, 10(1), 75.
   Google Scholar
• Alder, G. S., Noel, T. W., & Ambrose, M. L. (2006). Clarifying the effects of Internet monitoring on job attitudes: The mediating role of employee trust. Information and Management, 43(7), 894–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlMazrouei, H., & Zacca, R. (2015). Expatriate leadership competencies and performance: A qualitative study. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 23(3), 404–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2016). Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust. Information & Management. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. H., McEwan, R., Bal, J., & Carletta, J. (2007). Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2558–2580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. R. (1997). A cognitive framework for understanding demographic influences in groups. The International. Journal of Organizational Analysis, 5(4), 342–359.
   Google Scholar
• Au, Y., & Marks, A. (2012). “Virtual teams are literally and metaphorically invisible” Forging identity in culturally diverse virtual teams. Employee relations, 34(3), 271–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, R. S. (2014). Virtual escapes and intercultural explorations : How members of interpals are using their online community as a window to the world. Retreived from: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4387/
   Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2014). Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The Paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1181–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batarseh, F. S., Usher, J. M., & Daspit, J. J. (2017). Collaboration capability in virtual teams: Examining the influence on diversity and innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21, 4. doi:10.1142/S1363919617500347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, G. R. (2011). Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams: Understanding why traditional team skills are insufficient. Journal of Business Communication, 48(2), 186–206.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016). Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1151–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buvik, M. P., & Tvedt, S. (2017). The influence of project commitment and team commitment on the relationship between trust and knowledge sharing in project teams. Project Management Journal, 48(2), 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. R., Carlson, D. S., Hunter, E. M., Vaughn, R. L., & George, J. F. (2013). Virtual team effectiveness: Investigating the moderating role of experience with computer-mediated communication on the impact of team cohesion and openness. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 25(2), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, S. W. (2016). Perceived proximity and trust network on creative performance in virtual collaboration environment. Procedia Computer Science, 91(Itqm), 807–812.
   Google Scholar
• Charlier, S. D., Stewart, G. L., Greco, L. M., & Reeves, C. J. (2016). Emergent leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel investigation of individual communication and team dispersion antecedents. Leadership Quarterly, 27, 5. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Fu, S., & Druckenmiller, D. (2016). Trust development in globally distributed collaboration: A Case of U.S. and Chinese mixed teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(4), 978–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Fu, S., Sun, J., Han, Y., Shen, J., & Zarifis, A. (2016). Investigating individual trust in semi-virtual collaboration of multicultural and unicultural teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 267–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Yin, G., Azadegan, A., & Kolfschoten, G. (2016). Trust evolvement in hybrid team collaboration: A longitudinal case study. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(2), 267–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chidambaram, L., & Jones, B. (1993). Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quarterly, 465–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Geynier, L. 2006. Global leadership competence: A Cultural intelligence perspective. MBAA Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Chiravuri, A., Nazareth, D., & Ramamurthy, K. (2011). Cognitive conflict and consensus generation in virtual teams during knowledge capture: Comparative effectiveness of techniques. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 311–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connaughton, S. L., & Daly, J. (2004). Leading from afar: Strategies for effectively leading virtual teams. In S. H. Godar & S. P. Ferris (Eds.), Virtual and collaborative teams: Process, technologies and practice (pp. 49–75). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Connaughton, S. L., & Shuffler, M. (2007). Multinational and multicultural distributed teams: A Review and Future Agenda. Small Group Research, 38(3), 387–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural determinants. Management Science, 32, 554–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darics, E. (2014). The blurring boundaries between synchronicity and asynchronicity: New communicative situations in work-related instant messaging. International Journal of Business Communication, 51(4), 337–358.
   Google Scholar
• Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 857–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in small group decision making. Small Group Research, 27(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2017). Team personality composition, emergent leadership and shared leadership in virtual teams: A theoretical framework. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 678–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, J., & Mattarelli, E. (2017). Building bridges in global virtual teams: The role of multicultural brokers in overcoming the negative effects of identity threats on knowledge sharing across subgroups. Journal of International Management, 23(4), 399–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, T. (1999). Persistant Conversation: An Introduction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4)
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, J. Z., & Herb, K. C. (2012). Improving Communication in Virtual Teams. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, (October), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune. 2014. 100 Best companies to work for. Retreived from http://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/best-companies/2014/list/
   Google Scholar
• Fortune. 2015. 100 Best companies to work for. Retreived from http://fortune.com/best-companies/2015/
   Google Scholar
• Fortune. 2016. 100 Best companies to work for. Retreived from http://fortune.com/best-companies/2016/
   Google Scholar
• Fortune. 2017. 100 Best companies to work for. Retreived from http://fortune.com/best-companies/2017/
   Google Scholar
• Fortune. 2017. 100 Best Companies to Work For® 2017. Great Place to Work, 2017, Retrieved from https://www.greatplacetowork.com/best-workplaces/100-best/2017. Accessed 17 May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, G., Wakefield, R. L., Xu, X., & `Kim, S. H. (2010). Globally distributed teams. ACM SIGMIS Database, 41(3), 27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J., & Boyraz, M. (2015). International HRM’s role in managing global teams. In D. G. Collings, G. Wood, & P. Caligiuri (Eds.), The Routledge companion to international human resource management. (pp. 532–551). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J., Kim, H., & Boyraz, M. (2017). Virtual Teams. The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J., Rozaidi, N. A., & Eisenberg, J. (2013). Overcoming the “Ideology of Openness”: Probing the affordances of social media for organizational knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 102–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The Effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., Gibbs, J., Stanko, T., Tesluk, P., & Cohen, S. (2011). Including the “I” in virtuality and modern job design: Extending the job characteristics model to include the moderating effect of individual experiences of electronic dependence and copresence. Organization Science, 22(6), 1481–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, S., & Wasko, M. (2012). The effects of leader-member exchange on member performance in virtual world teams. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(10), 861–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gressgård, L. J. (2011). Virtual team collaboration and innovation in organizations. Team Performance Management, 17(1/2), 102–119.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 265–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S. J., Chae, C., Macko, P., Park, W., & Beyerlein, M. (2017). How virtual team leaders cope with creativity challenges. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(3), 261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, A. M., Fuller, M. A., & Davison, R. M. (2015). I Know I Can, But Can We? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Research, 38(1), 130–155.
   Google Scholar
• Henttonen, K., & Blomqvist, K. (2005). Managing distance in a global virtual team: The evolution of trust through technology-mediated relational communication. Strategic Change, 14(2), 107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication distributed understanding conflict in geographically teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2013). Shared leadership in enterprise resource planning and human resource management system implementation. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 114–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2016). Team personality composition, emergent leadership and shared leadership in virtual teams : A theoretical framework. Human Resource Management Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2014). Leading virtual teams: hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, G. P., & Rousseau, D. M. (2009). Bridging the rigour–Relevance gap in management research: It’s already happening! Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 534–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind. London, UK.: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of applied psychology, 84(5), 680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iorio, J., & Taylor, J. E. (2015). Precursors to engaged leaders in virtual project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 2. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, T., & Gratton, L. (2013). The third wave of virtual work. Harvard Business Review, 91(1), 66–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. K., Bettenhausen, K., & Gibbons, E. (2009). Realities of working in virtual teams: Affective and attitudinal outcomes of using computer-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 40(6), 623–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2000). The global virtual manager: A prescription for success. European Management Journal, 18(2), 183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2002). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 7–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klitmøller, A., & Lauring, J. (2013). When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. Journal of World Business, 48, 3. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, F. Y., & Yu, C. P. (2009). An exploratory study of trust dynamics in work-oriented virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 823–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenders, R. T. A., van Engelen, J. M., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1–2), 69–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J. M., Moreland, R. L., & Choi, H. S. (2001). Group socialization and newcomer innovation. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 86–106). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, C. (2017). Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective. Human Resource Management Review. doi:10.1007/s10787-012-0152-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. (2007). Leading Virtual Teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2016. Management theory is becoming a compendium of dead ideas. The Economist, December 17th. https://www.economist.com/news/business/21711909-what-martin-luther-did-catholic-church-needs-be-done-business-gurus-management
   Google Scholar
• Martins, L., Gilson, L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual Teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). an integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. (2012). Something (s) old and something (s) new : Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 365(November 2011), 342–365.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, K., Dennis, A. R., & Carte, T. A. (2008). It’s the thought that counts: The mediating effects of information processing in virtual team decision making it s the thought that counts. Information Systems Management, 25, 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medsker, L., Tan, M., & Turban, E. (1995). Knowledge acquisition from multiple experts: Problems and issues. Expert Systems With Applications, 9(1), 35–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, M. M., Massey, A. P., Hung, Y.-T. C., & Crisp, C. B. (2009). Can you hear me now? Communication in virtual product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara-Devereaux, M., & Johansen, R. (1994). Global Work: Bridging distance, culture, and time. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. 2012. The role of communication and identification in the emergence of perceived proximity in virtual work. Academy of Management Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014). Beyond being there: The symbolic role of communication and identification in perceptions of proximity to geographically dispersed colleagues. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1219–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, T. A., Hancock, S. E., Zivkov, K., Larson, N. L., & Law, S. J. (2016). Team decision making in virtual and face-to-face environments. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(5), 995–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, G., & Olson, J. (2000). Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2), 139–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, M. B., & Pinto, J. K. (1990). Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(3), 200–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, G., Guerci, M., Cirella, S., & Shani, A. (2014). Intervention research as management research in practice: Learning from a case in the fashion design industry. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L. P., Denis, A. R., & Hung, Y.-T. C. (2009). Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(2), 241–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rynes, S. L., Giluk, T. L., & Brown, K. G. (2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 987–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, C., Van Slyke, C., & Vogel, D. R. (2004). My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Serban, A., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Kahai, S. S., Hao, C., McHugh, K. A., ... & Peterson, D. R. (2015). Leadership emergence in face-to-face and virtual teams: A multi-level model with agent-based simulations, quasi-experimental and experimental tests. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(3), 402–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangirala, S., & Alge, B. J. (2006). Reactions to unfair events in computer-mediated groups: A test of uncertainty management theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenzer, H., Pudelko, M., Harzing, A.-W., & Tenzer, H. (2014). The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 508–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trahan, E. A., & Gitman, L. J. (1995). Bridging the theory-practice gap in corporate finance: A survey of chief financial officers. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 35(1), 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. S. (2010). AOM Theme 2010: Dare to Care: Passion and compassion in management practice and research.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2014, May). An Aging Nation: The Older Population in the United States (Report No. P25-140). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1140.pdfaaaa
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, R. L., Leidner, D. E., & Garrison, G. (2008). A model of conflict, leadership, and performance in virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 434–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 1124–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27(2), 213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., O’Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29(7), 979–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(2), 187–208.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, L., Zettinig, P., & Mäkelä, K. (2013). Leading global virtual teams to success. Organizational Dynamics, 42, 3. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolin, R., Hinds, P. J., Fruchter, R., & Levitt, R. E. (2004). Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study. Information and Organization, 14(1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar