Placing Data in the Land of 10,000 Lakes: Navigating the History and Future of Geospatial Data Production, Stewardship, and Archiving in Minnesota

REFERENCES

• About the Minnesota Geospatial Commons. Minnesota Geospatial Commons. https://gisdata.mn.gov/content/?q=about. Accessed March 10, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Arbeit, David. 2007. Implementing an enterprise strategy for Minnesota's spatial data infrastructure. 06HQAG0104. 50 States Initiative Project. https://www.fgdc.gov/grants/2006CAP/Reports/104-06-3-MN-FinalReport
   Google Scholar
• Arbeit, David. 2008. Functional transformation kick-off meeting. May 13. http://www.gis.state.mn.us/committee/MSDI/dte/D2E_kickoff_arbeit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arbeit, David, Fred Logman, Randall Johnson, Glenn Radde, and Sonia Dickerson. 2004. A foundation for coordinated GIS Minnesota's spatial data infrastructure: A strategic plan. Minnesota Governor's Council on Geographic Information. http://www.gis.state.mn.us/pdf/MN%20IPlan%20Consolidation%20%20Final%20_04OCT13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bethune, Alec, Butch Lazorchak, and Zsolt Nagy. 2009. GeoMAPP: A geospatial multistate archive and preservation partnership. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries 6(1): 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Borchert, JohnR., GeorgeW. Orning, Joseph Stinchfield, and Les Maki. 1970. Minnesota's lakeshore: Summary report of the Minnesota lakeshore development study. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA) and Minnesota State Planning Agency. 1976. Overview of the Minnesota land management information system. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Center for Urban and Regional Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, WilliamJ. 1989. A plethora of GIS use in Minnesota? The Operational Geographer 7(4): 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• CURA Reporter. 1975. Computers and public service. 5(1). . http://www.cura.umn.edu/publications/catalog/reporter-05-1.
   Google Scholar
• Electronic Records Management Guidelines, Metadata. Minnesota Historical Society. http://www.mnhs.org/preserve/records/electronicrecords/ermetadata.php
   Google Scholar
• Erwin, Tracey, and Julie Sweetkind-Singer. 2009. The National Geospatial Digital Archive: A collaborative project to archive geospatial data. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries 6(1): 6–25.
   Google Scholar
• Erwin, Tracey, Julie Sweetkind-Singer, and Mary Lynette Larsgaard. 2009. The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection development: Lessons learned. Library Trends 57(3): 490–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Executive Order 12906: Coordinating Geographic Data Acquisition and Access: The National Spatial Data Infrastructure. 1994. http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/pdf/12906.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Free and Open Data. MetroGIS. http://www.metrogis.org/projects/free-open-data.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Geoarchiving Comprehensive Cost-Benefit Analysis Guidance. 2011. GeoMAPP. . http://www.geomapp.net/docs/03_Geoarchiving_Cost-Benefit_Analysis_Guidance_20111231.pdf
   Google Scholar
• History and Development of MetroGIS. MetroGIS. http://www.metrogis.org/about-metrogis/history-development.aspx
   Google Scholar
• History of CURA | Center for Urban and Regional Affairs. http://www.cura.umn.edu/about/history
   Google Scholar
• History of MnGeo and LMIC. Minnesota Geospatial Information Office. http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/About/history.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kne, Len, Randy Knippel, Mark Kotz, Ryan Mattke, Cory Richter, and Dan Ross. 2014. The 4 W's and 1 H of data archiving. Presented at the Minnesota GIS/LIS Annual Conference, October 3. https://uspatial.umn.edu/node/670
   Google Scholar
• Kollen, Christine, Cynthia Dietz, Joy Suh, and Angela Lee. 2013. Geospatial data catalogs: Approaches by academic libraries. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries 9(3): 276–295.
   Google Scholar
• Kozar, Kenneth, and John Schmitt. 1974. A guide to the CRT data entry system. Center for Urban and Regional Affairs. Box 1. Technical Reports. 4001. Land Management Information Center (Minn.). Records. Minnesota Historical Society. State Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Larsgaard, M. 1995. Spatial data in digital form: An overview. Association of Canadian Map Libraries and Archives Bulletin 95: 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lauriault, TraceyP., and D.R. Fraser Taylor. 2014. The preservation and archiving of geospatial data and cybercartography as a proactive preservation process. In, Tracey P. Lauriault and D.R. Fraser Taylor, eds., 2nd ed., 325--342. Modern Cartography Series 5. New York: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-444-62713-1.00021-0
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, GeorgeR. 2001. Land-grant universities and xxtension into the 21st century: Renegotiating or abandoning a social contract. Iowa City, IA: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MetroGIS Overview. MetroGIS. http://www.metrogis.org/about-metrogis/overview.aspx. Accessed March 12, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Governor's Council on Geographic Information. 1997. Laying the foundation for a geographic data clearinghouse. State Planning Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Governor's Council on Geographic Information. 2005. Minnesota state GIS enterprise conceptual architecture design. http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/pdf/MNGISConceptualArchitectureDesign.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, StevenP. 2009. The North Carolina Geospatial Data Archiving Project: Challenges and initial outcomes. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries 6(1): 26–44.
   Google Scholar
• MRC Report. 1969. 11–1015. Minnesota Resources Commission. http://archive.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2011/other/111015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NGDA Members. NGDA. http://www.ngda.org/participants.html
   Google Scholar
• North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, and North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources. 2011. GeoMAPP Final Report: 2007–2011. http://www.geomapp.net/docs/GeoMAPP_FinalReport_final_20111231.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orning, GeorgeW., and Les Maki. 1972. Land management information in Northwest Minnesota: The beginning of a statewide system Minnesota Land Management Information System Study. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Urban and Regional Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Orning, GeorgeW., Linda Sjoberg, and Les Maki. 1975. Historical perspective on the Minnesota land management information system study. Box 2. LMIC Progress Reports, Development and Overviews, 1970–1986. Land Management Information Center (Minn.). Records. Minnesota Historical Society. State Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Ramapriyan, HampapuramK., GilbertL. Rochon, Ruth Duerr, Robert Rank, Stefano Nativi, and Erich Franz Stocker. 2010. Advances in spatial data infrastructure, acquisition, analysis, archiving and dissemination. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2010 IEEE International, pp. 1980–1983. IEEE. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5653074. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2010.5653074
   Google Scholar
• Robinette, Alan. 1984. Institutional innovations: Moving from academia to serving government needs. In: Seminar on the multipurpose cadastre: Modernizing land information systems in North America, 155--166. Wisconsin Land Information Report #1. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Robinette, Alan. 1988. Development and implementation of a state land information system: Impediments after the technology is mastered. In: Seminar on multipurpose land information systems–Applications of information technology for natural resource planning, management, and monitoring. Niemann, BernardJ., JeromeG. Sullivan (eds.), University of Wisconsin–Madison, and Institute for Environmental Studies, pp. 125–146. . Wisconsin Land Information Report 3. Madison, WI: Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetkind-Singer, Julie. 2009. Unchartered territory: Building a network for the archiving of geospatial images and data. Against the Grain 21(2
   Google Scholar
• Tessar, Paul, William J. Craig, John Scoggins, Bernard J. Niemann, and John Antenucci. 1988. Plenary 5: Geographic information systems management and implementation. In: International Geographic Information Systems (IGIS) Symposium: The Research Agenda 1:141--162. Arlington, VA: [Washington, DC]. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951d00052783t
   Google Scholar