Simulations of Physically Surface-Patterned Membranes for Water Treatment: Recent Advances

References

• Ben Mordechay, E.; Sinai, T.; Berman, T.; Dichtiar, R.; Keinan-Boker, L.; Tarchitzky, J.; Maor, Y.; Mordehay, V.; Manor, O.; Chefetz, B. Wastewater-Derived Organic Contaminants in Fresh Produce: Dietary Exposure and Human Health Concerns. Water Res. 2022, 223 (August), 118986. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118986.
   Google Scholar
• Desiante, W. L.; Carles, L.; Wullschleger, S.; Joss, A.; Stamm, C.; Fenner, K. Wastewater Microorganisms Impact the Micropollutant Biotransformation Potential of Natural Stream Biofilms. Water Res. 2022, 217(October 2021), 118413. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goh, P. S.; Wong, K. C.; Ismail, A. F. Membrane Technology: A Versatile Tool for Saline Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery. Desalination. 2022, 521(October 2021), 115377. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115377.
   Google Scholar
• Bremere, I.; Kennedy, M.; Stikker, A.; Schippers, J. How Water Scarcity Will Effect the Growth in the Desalination Market in the Coming 25 Years. Desalination. 2001, 138(1–3), 7–15. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00239-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daims, H.; Taylor, M. W.; Wagner, M. Wastewater Treatment: A Model System for Microbial Ecology. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24(11), 483–489. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gude, V. G. Desalination and Water Reuse to Address Global Water Scarcity. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 16(4), 591–609. DOI: 10.1007/s11157-017-9449-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Z. E.; Gale, J. D. A Computational Investigation of the Properties of a Reverse Osmosis Membrane. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20(36), 7788–7799. DOI: 10.1039/c0jm01545h.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghava Rao, J.; Chandrababu, N. K.; Muralidharan, C.; Nair, B. U.; Rao, P. G.; Ramasami, T. Recouping the Wastewater: A Way Forward for Cleaner Leather Processing. J. Clean. Prod. 2003, 11(5), 591–599. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00095-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, M. Global Water Shortage and Potable Water Safety; Today’s Concern and Tomorrow’s Crisis. Environ. Int. 2022, 158, 106936. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, S. B.; Lawrence, J. Overview - Drinking Water Quality and Sustainability. Water Qual. Res. J. Canada. 2003, 38(1), 3–13. DOI: 10.2166/wqrj.2003.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, L.; Yang, H.; Chen, Z.; Qiu, M.; Hu, B.; Wang, X. Chemosphere Bismuth Oxychloride-Based Materials for the Removal of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater. Chemosphere. 2021, 273, 128576. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajith, M. P.; Aswathi, M.; Priyadarshini, E.; Rajamani, P. Bioresource Technology Recent Innovations of Nanotechnology in Water Treatment: A Comprehensive Review. Bioresources Technol. 2021, 342(September), 126000. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, L.; Zhang, K. Nanopore-Based Strategy for Sequential Separation of Heavy-Metal Ions in Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 5884–5891. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, T. A. Environmental Technology & Innovation Protocols for Synthesis of Nanomaterials, Polymers, and Green Materials as Adsorbents for Water Treatment Technologies. Environ. Technol. Innovations. 2021, 24, 101821. DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, T. A.; Mustaqeem, M.; Khaled, M. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management Water Treatment Technologies in Removing Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater: A Review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manage. 2022, 17(December 2021), 100617. DOI: 10.1016/j.enmm.2021.100617.
   Google Scholar
• Ezugbe, E. O.; Rathilal, S. Membrane Technologies in Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Membr. (Basel). 2020, 10, 5. DOI: 10.3390/membranes10050089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gryta, M.; Tomaszewska, M.; Karakulski, K. Wastewater Treatment by Membrane Distillation. Desalination. 2006, 198(1–3), 67–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, W.; Ngo, H. H.; Li, J. A Mini-Review on Membrane Fouling. Bioresources Technol. 2012, 122, 27–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonune, A.; Ghate, R. Developments in Wastewater Treatment Methods. Desalination. 2004, 167(1–3), 55–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Bruggen, B.; Vandecasteele, C.; Van Gestel, T.; Doyen, W.; Leysen, R. A Review of Pressure-Driven Membrane Processes in Wastewater Treatment and Drinking Water Production. Environ. Prog. 2003, 22(1), 46–56. DOI: 10.1002/ep.670220116.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, D.; Ngo, H. H.; Guo, W.; Liu, Y.; Chang, S. W.; Nguyen, D. D.; Nghiem, L. D.; Zhou, J.; Ni, B. Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Antibiotic Wastewater Treatment: Performance and Membrane Fouling Issues. Bioresources Technol. 2018, 267(July), 714–724. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chong, T. H.; Loo, S. L.; Krantz, W. B. Energy-Efficient Reverse Osmosis Desalination Process. J. Memb. Sci. 2015, 473, 177–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, A. W.; Teow, Y. H.; Ang, W. L.; Chung, Y. T.; Oatley-Radcliffe, D. L.; Hilal, N. Nanofiltration Membranes Review: Recent Advances and Future Prospects. Desalination. 2015, 356, 226–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y.; Fu, Q. Algal Fouling of Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Membranes and Control Strategies: A Review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 203(February), 193–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.04.040.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, P. S.; Ismail, A. F. A Review on Inorganic Membranes for Desalination and Wastewater Treatment. Desalination. 2018, 434(July 2017), 60–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.023.
   Google Scholar
• Jamaly, S.; Giwa, A.; Hasan, S. W. Recent Improvements in Oily Wastewater Treatment: Progress, Challenges, and Future Opportunities. J. Environ. Sci. (China). 2015, 37, 15–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanzada, N. K.; Farid, M. U.; Kharraz, J. A.; Choi, J.; Tang, C. Y.; Nghiem, L. D.; Jang, A.; An, A. K. Removal of Organic Micropollutants Using Advanced Membrane-Based Water and Wastewater Treatment: A Review. J. Memb. Sci. 2020, 598(November 2019), 117672. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117672.
   Google Scholar
• Lesjean, B.; Rosenberger, S.; Laabs, C.; Jekel, M.; Gnirss, R.; Amy, G. Correlation Between Membrane Fouling and Soluble/Colloidal Organic Substances in Membrane Bioreactors for Municipal Wastewater Treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51(6–7), 1–8. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, H.; Bowman, C. N.; Davis, R. H. Membrane Fouling Reduction by Backpulsing and Surface Modification. J. Memb. Sci. 2000, 173(2), 191–200. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00360-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, M.; Shon, H. K.; Gray, S. R.; Elimelech, M. Membrane-Based Processes for Wastewater Nutrient Recovery: Technology, Challenges, and Future Direction. Water Res. 2016, 89, 210–221. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. J.; Wu, K. F.; Wang, Z. J.; Zhao, L.; Li, S. S. Fouling and Cleaning of Membrane - a Literature Review. J. Environ. Sci. (China) English Ed. 2000, 12, 241–251.
   Google Scholar
• Bilal, M.; Zhang, Z. Ceramic Membrane Technology for Water and Wastewater Treatment: A Critical Review of Performance, Full-Scale Applications, Membrane Fouling and Prospects. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 418(January), 129481. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129481.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. R.; Lee, Y. J.; Lee, D. J. Membrane Fouling During Water or Wastewater Treatments: Current Research Updated. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2019, 94, 88–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, A.; Tanudjaja, H. J.; Ouda, M.; Hasan, S. W.; Chew, J. W. Membrane Fouling Mitigation Techniques for Oily Wastewater: A Short Review. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 43 (August), 102293. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102293.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C.; Wakeman, R. Membrane Fouling and Alternative Techniques for Its Alleviation. Membr. Technol. 2000, 2000(124), 4–10. DOI: 10.1016/S0958-2118(00)80017-8.
   Google Scholar
• Julian, H.; Nurgirisia, N.; Qiu, G.; Ting, Y. P.; Wenten, I. G. Membrane Distillation for Wastewater Treatment: Current Trends, Challenges and Prospects of Dense Membrane Distillation. J. Water. Process. Eng. 2022, 46(December 2021), 102615. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102615.
   Google Scholar
• Awad, E. S.; Sabirova, T. M.; Tretyakova, N. A.; Alsalhy, Q. F.; Figoli, A.; Salih, I. K. A Mini-Review of Enhancing Ultrafiltration Membranes (Uf) for Wastewater Treatment: Performance and Stability. ChemEngineering. 2021, 5(3), 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering5030034.
   Google Scholar
• Jhaveri, J. H.; Murthy, Z. V. P. A Comprehensive Review on Anti-Fouling Nanocomposite Membranes for Pressure Driven Membrane Separation Processes. Desalination. 2016, 379, 137–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She, Q.; Wang, R.; Fane, A. G.; Tang, C. Y. Membrane Fouling in Osmotically Driven Membrane Processes: A Review. J. Memb. Sci. 2016, 499, 201–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharraz, J. A.; An, A. K. Patterned Superhydrophobic Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) Membranes for Membrane Distillation: Enhanced Flux with Improved Fouling and Wetting Resistance. J. Memb. Sci. 2020, 595(October 2019), 117596. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117596.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyas, A.; Mertens, M.; Oyaert, S.; Vankelecom, I. F. J. Synthesis of Patterned PVDF Ultrafiltration Membranes: Spray-Modified Non-Solvent Induced Phase Separation. J. Memb. Sci. 2020, 612(June), 118383. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118383.
   Google Scholar
• Alshwairekh, A. M.; Alghafis, A. A.; Alwatban, A. M.; Alqsair, U. F.; Oztekin, A. The Effects of Membrane and Channel Corrugations in Forward Osmosis Membrane Modules – Numerical Analyses. Desalination. 2019, 460(March), 41–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Bhoj, Y.; Tharmavaram, M.; Rawtani, D. A Comprehensive Approach to Antifouling Strategies in Desalination, Marine Environment, and Wastewater Treatment. Chem. Phys. Impact. 2021, 2(August 2020), 100008. DOI: 10.1016/j.chphi.2020.100008.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Q.; Ng, T. C. A.; Bao, Y.; Ng, H. Y.; Tan, S. C.; Wang, J. Developing Better Ceramic Membranes for Water and Wastewater Treatment: Where Microstructure Integrates with Chemistry and Functionalities. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 428(March 2021), 130456. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130456.
   Google Scholar
• Gul, A.; Hruza, J.; Yalcinkaya, F. Fouling and Chemical Cleaning of Microfiltration Membranes: A Mini-Review. Polymers (Basel). 2021, 13(6), 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz, O.; Aghajani, M.; Greenberg, A. R.; Ding, Y. Surface-Patterning of Polymeric Membranes: Fabrication and Performance. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2018, 20, 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2018.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutariya, B.; Sargaonkar, A.; Raval, H. Methods of Visualizing Hydrodynamics and Fouling in Membrane Filtration Systems: Recent Trends. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2022, 58(1), 101–130. DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2022.2089585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hube, S.; Eskafi, M.; Hrafnkelsdóttir, K. F.; Bjarnadóttir, B.; Bjarnadóttir, M. Á.; Axelsdóttir, S.; Wu, B. Direct Membrane Filtration for Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 710, 136375. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, H.; Min, X.; Tang, C. J.; Sillanpää, M.; Zhao, F. Recent Advances in Membrane Filtration for Heavy Metal Removal from Wastewater: A Mini Review. J. Water. Process. Eng. 2022, 49(July), 103023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103023.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, K. J.; Bolster, D.; Derlon, N.; Morgenroth, E.; Nerenberg, R. Effect of Fouling Layer Spatial Distribution on Permeate Flux: A Theoretical and Experimental Study. J. Memb. Sci. 2014, 471, 130–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogarathinam, L. T.; Velswamy, K.; Gangasalam, A.; Ismail, A. F.; Goh, P. S.; Narayanan, A.; Abdullah, M. S. Performance Evaluation of Whey Flux in Dead-End and Cross-Flow Modes via Convolutional Neural Networks. J. Environ. Manage. 2022, 301(September 2021), 113872. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113872.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nfor, B. K.; Verhaert, P. D. E. M.; van der Wielen, L. A. M.; Hubbuch, J.; Ottens, M. Rational and Systematic Protein Purification Process Development: The Next Generation. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27(12), 673–679. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keir, G.; Jegatheesan, V. A Review of Computational Fluid Dynamics Applications in Pressure-Driven Membrane Filtration. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 13(2), 183–201. DOI: 10.1007/s11157-013-9327-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi Bazaz, S.; Mashhadian, A.; Ehsani, A.; Saha, S. C.; Krüger, T.; Ebrahimi Warkiani, M. Computational Inertial Microfluidics: A Review. Lab. Chip. 2020, 20(6), 1023–1048. DOI: 10.1039/c9lc01022j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, L. E.; Reding, J. P. Dynamic Simulation Through Analytic Extrapolation. AIAA Pap. 1981, 19(2), 160–166. DOI: 10.2514/3.62227.
   Google Scholar
• Haddadi, B.; Jordan, C.; Miltner, M.; Harasek, M. Membrane Modeling Using CFD: Combined Evaluation of Mass Transfer and Geometrical Influences in 1D and 3D. J. Memb. Sci. 2018, 563(December 2017), 199–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.040.
   Google Scholar
• Logtenberg, S. A.; Nijemeisland, M.; Dixon, A. G. Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer at the Wall-Particle Contact Points in a Fixed-Bed Reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54(13–14), 2433–2439. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00445-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, A.; Mohammadi, T.; Hosseinalipour, S. M.; Allahdini, V. CFD Modeling of Porous Membranes. Desalination. 2008, 222(1–3), 482–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samstag, R. W.; Ducoste, J. J.; Griborio, A.; Nopens, I.; Batstone, D. J.; Wicks, J. D.; Saunders, S.; Wicklein, E. A.; Kenny, G.; Laurent, J. CFD for Wastewater Treatment: An Overview. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 74(3), 549–563. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samstag, R. W.; Ducoste, J. J.; Griborio, A.; Nopens, I.; Batstone, D. J.; Wicks, J. D.; Saunders, S.; Wicklein, E. A.; Kenny, G.; Laurent, J. Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations by Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department University of Alabama in Huntsville Huntsville AL 35899 Sponsored by Office of Naval Research Iowa Institute of Hydrauli. No. 407.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.; Hsu, J. A.; Chang, C. L.; Ho, C. D.; Cheng, T. W. Simulation Study of Transfer Characteristics for Spacer-Filled Membrane Distillation Desalination Modules. Appl. Energy. 2017, 185, 2045–2057. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.; Ying, X. B.; Huang, Y. H.; Chen, Y. Q.; Shen, D. S.; Zhang, X.; Feng, H. J. Numerical Study of Hydrodynamic Characteristics in a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor. Environ. Res. 2021, 194(November 2020), 110614. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110614.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yue, C.; Zhang, Q.; Zhai, Z. Numerical Simulation of the Filtration Process in Fibrous Filters Using CFD-DEM Method. J. Aerosol. Sci. 2016, 101, 174–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T.; Wei, C.; Feng, C.; Zhu, J. A Novel Airlift Reactor Enhanced by Funnel Internals and Hydrodynamics Prediction by the CFD Method. Bioresources Technol. 2012, 104, 600–607. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder, K.; Gelbe, H. Two- and Three-Dimensional CFD-Simulation of Flow-Induced Vibration Excitation in Tube Bundles. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 1999, 38(4–6), 621–629. DOI: 10.1016/S0255-2701(99)00063-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. L.; Krist, S. T.; Anderson, W. K. Navier-Stokes Computations of Vortical Flows Over Low-Aspect-Ratio Wings. Aiaa J. 1990, 28(2), 205–212. DOI: 10.2514/3.10376.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Pannala, S.; Broekhuis, R.; Gautam, P.; Gu, T.; West, D.; Balakotaiah, V. Three-Dimensional CFD Simulation of Pattern Formation in a Shallow Packed-Bed Reactor for Oxidative Coupling of Methane. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 400(June), 125979. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125979.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari, A.; Zamankhan, P.; Mousavi, S. M.; Pietarinen, K. Modeling and CFD Simulation of Flow Behavior and Dispersivity Through Randomly Packed Bed Reactors. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 144(3), 476–482. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.07.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawawi, M. H.; Saleha, A.; Salwa, A.; Hassan, N. H.; Zahari, N. M.; Ramli, M. Z.; Muda, Z. C. A Review: Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 2030. DOI: 10.1063/1.5066893.
   Google Scholar
• Ranganathan, P.; Pandey, A. K.; Sirohi, R.; Tuan Hoang, A.; Kim, S. H. Recent Advances in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Modelling of Photobioreactors: Design and Applications. Bioresources Technol. 2022, 350(January), 126920. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126920.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tafarroj, M. M.; Daneshazarian, R.; Kasaeian, A. CFD Modeling and Predicting the Performance of Direct Absorption of Nanofluids in Trough Collector. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 148(September 2017), 256–269. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.020.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, A. J. C.; Kekre, R.; Butler, J. E. Comparison of the Static and Dynamic Properties of a Semiflexible Polymer Using Lattice Boltzmann and Brownian-Dynamics Simulations. Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2009, 80(3), 1–10. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.036704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmesin, C.; Kremer, K. The Bond Fluctuation Method: A New Effective Algorithm for the Dynamics of Polymers in All Spatial Dimensions. Macromolecules. 1988, 21(9), 2819–2823. DOI: 10.1021/ma00187a030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooneie, A.; Schuschnigg, S.; Holzer, C. A Review of Multiscale Computational Methods in Polymeric Materials. Polymers (Basel). 2017, 9, 1. DOI: 10.3390/polym9010016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermak, D. L.; McCammon, J. A. Brownian Dynamics with Hydrodynamic Interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 69(4), 1352–1360. DOI: 10.1063/1.436761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berti, C.; Furini, S.; Gillespie, D.; Boda, D.; Eisenberg, R. S.; Sangiorgi, E.; Fiegna, C. Three-Dimensional Brownian Dynamics Simulator for the Study of Ion Permeation Through Membrane Pores. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10(8), 2911–2926. DOI: 10.1021/ct4011008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, D. R.; Brady, J. F. Brownian Dynamics Simulation of Hard-Sphere Colloidal Dispersions. J. Rheol. 2000, 44(3), 629–651. DOI: 10.1122/1.551104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H.; Kim, S.; Chang, H. Brownian Dynamic Simulation for the Aggregation of Charged Particles. J. Aerosol. Sci. 2001, 32(11), 1369–1388. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-8502(01)00063-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banchio, A. J.; Brady, J. F. Accelerated Stokesian Dynamics: Brownian Motion Accelerated Stokesian Dynamics: Brownian Motion. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 10323(2003), 10323–10332. DOI: 10.1063/1.1571819.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. S.; Underhill, P. T. Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Polymers and Soft Matter. Handb. Mater. Model, 2005, 2619–2630. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3286-2_140.
   Google Scholar
• Northrup, S. H.; Allison, S. A.; Andrew McCammon, J. Brownian Dynamics Simulation of Diffusion-Influenced Bimolecular Reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 80(4), 1517–1524. DOI: 10.1063/1.446900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, S. Y.; Jeong, J.; Park, J. D.; Ahn, K. H. Interplay Between Particulate Fouling and Its Flow Disturbance: Numerical and Experimental Studies. J. Memb. Sci. 2021, 635(June), 119497. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119497.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, H.; Underhill, P. T. Coarse-Grained Model of Conformation-Dependent Electrophoretic Mobility and Its Influence on DNA Dynamics. Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2015, 92(5), 1–8. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.052301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, H.; Szafran, S. A.; Underhill, P. T. Passive Trapping of Rigid Rods Due to Conformation-Dependent Electrophoretic Mobility. Soft Matter. 2016, 12(12), 3121–3126. DOI: 10.1039/c5sm02816g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchin, P.; Aimar, P.; Sanchez, V. Influence of Surface Interaction on Transfer During Colloid Ultrafiltration. J. Memb. Sci. 1996, 115(1), 49–63. DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00279-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brant, J. A.; Childress, A. E. Membrane-Colloid Interactions: Comparison of Extended DLVO Predictions with AFM Force Measurements. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002, 19(6), 413–427. DOI: 10.1089/109287502320963409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Chen, L. Microfiltration (MF) Membrane Fouling Potential Evaluation of Protein with Different Ion Strengths and Divalent Cations Based on Extended DLVO Theory. Desalination. 2013, 331, 62–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoek, E. M. V.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Elimelech, M. Effect of Membrane Surface Roughness on Colloid-Membrane DLVO Interactions. Langmuir. 2003, 19(11), 4836–4847. DOI: 10.1021/la027083c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Meeren, P.; Saveyn, H.; Bogale Kassa, S.; Doyen, W.; Leysen, R. Colloid-Membrane Interaction Effects on Flux Decline During Cross-Flow Ultrafiltration of Colloidal Silica on Semi-Ceramic Membranes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6(7), 1408–1412. DOI: 10.1039/b315220k.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. C.; Kim, A. S. B. D. Brownian Dynamics, Molecular Dynamics, and Monte Carlo Modeling of Colloidal Systems. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 112(1–3), 159–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2004.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brańka, A. C.; Heyes, D. M. Algorithms for Brownian Dynamics Simulation. Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top. 1998, 58(2), 2611–2615. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.2611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. K.; Won, Y. J.; Yoo, J. H.; Ahn, K. H.; Lee, C. H. Flow Analysis and Fouling on the Patterned Membrane Surface. J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 427, 320–325. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J. H.; Lee, J.; Jung, S. Y.; Choi, D. C.; Won, Y. J.; Ahn, K. H.; Park, P. K.; Lee, C. H. Correlation Between Particle Deposition and the Size Ratio of Particles to Patterns in Nano- and Micro-Patterned Membrane Filtration Systems. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 156, 608–616. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.10.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, S. Y.; Won, Y. J.; Jang, J. H.; Yoo, J. H.; Ahn, K. H.; Lee, C. H. Particle Deposition on the Patterned Membrane Surface: Simulation and Experiments. Desalination. 2015, 370, 17–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, Y. J.; Jung, S. Y.; Jang, J. H.; Lee, J. W.; Chae, H. R.; Choi, D. C.; Hyun Ahn, K.; Lee, C. H.; Park, P. K. Correlation of Membrane Fouling with Topography of Patterned Membranes for Water Treatment. J. Memb. Sci. 2016, 498, 14–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.09.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, S. Y.; Ahn, K. H. Transport and Deposition of Colloidal Particles on a Patterned Membrane Surface: Effect of Cross-Flow Velocity and the Size Ratio of Particle to Surface Pattern. J. Memb. Sci. 2019, 572(November 2018), 309–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.011.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyas, A.; Mertens, M.; Oyaert, S.; Vankelecom, I. F. J. Anti-Fouling Behavior of Micro-Patterned PVDF Membranes Prepared via Spray-Assisted Phase Inversion: Influence of Pattern Shapes and Flow Configuration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 259(September 2020), 118041. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118041.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, W.; Yang, S.; Liu, W.; Wong, P. W.; Wang, R.; Li, X.; Sheng, G.; Lau, W.; An, A. K.; Sun, F. Understanding the Influence of Hydraulic Conditions on Colloidal Fouling Development by Using the Micro-Patterned Nanofiltration Membrane: Experiments and Numerical Simulation. J. Memb. Sci. 2022, 654(November 2021), 120559. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120559.
   Google Scholar
• Mazinani, S.; Al-Shimmery, A.; Chew, Y. M. J.; Mattia, D. 3D Printed Nanofiltration Composite Membranes with Reduced Concentration Polarisation. J. Memb. Sci. 2022, 644(November 2021), 120137. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120137.
   Google Scholar
• Schwinge, J.; Wiley, D. E.; Fletcher, D. F. Simulation of the Flow Around Spacer Filaments Between Channel Walls. 2. Mass-Transfer Enhancement. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41(19), 4879–4888. DOI: 10.1021/ie011015o.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, D. E.; Fletcher, D. F. Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling of Flow and Permeation for Pressure-Driven Membrane Processes. Desalination. 2002, 145(1–3), 183–186. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00406-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani, A.; Kim, S.; Hoek, E. M. V. Pressure Flow, and Concentration Profiles in Open and Spacer-Filled Membrane Channels. J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 277(1–2), 7–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruf, S. H.; Rickman, M.; Wang, L.; Mersch, J., IV; Greenberg, A. R.; Pellegrino, J.; Ding, Y. Influence of Sub-Micron Surface Patterns on the Deposition of Model Proteins During Active Filtration. J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 444, 420–428. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z.; Ilyas, A.; Muylaert, K.; Vankelecom, I. F. J. Optimization of Patterned Polysulfone Membranes for Microalgae Harvesting. Bioresources Technol. 2020, 309(March), 123367. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao, Z.; Liu, B.; Ilyas, A.; Vanierschot, M.; Muylaert, K.; Vankelecom, I. F. J. Harvesting Microalgae Using Vibrating, Negatively Charged, Patterned Polysulfone Membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2021, 618(July 2020), 118617. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118617.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, D. C.; Jung, S. Y.; Won, Y. J.; Jang, J. H.; Lee, J.; Chae, H. R.; Ahn, K. H.; Lee, S.; Park, P. K.; Lee, C. H. Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Modeling of Particle Deposition on the Patterned Isopore Membrane in Crossflow Microfiltration. J. Memb. Sci. 2015, 492, 156–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, W.; Lee, C.; Yoo, C. H.; Shin, M. G.; Lee, G. W.; Kim, T. S.; Jung, H. W.; Lee, J. S.; Lee, J. H. Structural Tailoring of Sharkskin-Mimetic Patterned Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Optimizing Biofouling Resistance. J. Memb. Sci. 2020, 595(October 2019), 117602. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117602.
   Google Scholar
• Malakian, A.; Zhou, Z.; Messick, L.; Spitzer, T. N.; Ladner, D. A.; Husson, S. M. Understanding the Role of Pattern Geometry on Nanofiltration Threshold Flux. Membr. (Basel). 2020, 10(12), 1–12. DOI: 10.3390/membranes10120445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilyas, A.; Yihdego Gebreyohannes, A.; Qian, J.; Reynaerts, D.; Kuhn, S.; Vankelecom, I. F. J. Micro-Patterned Membranes Prepared via Modified Phase Inversion: Effect of Modified Interface on Water Fluxes and Organic Fouling. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2021, 585, 490–504. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z.; Ling, B.; Battiato, I.; Husson, S. M.; Ladner, D. A. Concentration Polarization Over Reverse Osmosis Membranes with Engineered Surface Features. J. Memb. Sci. 2021, 617(December 2019), 118199. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118199.
   Google Scholar
• Lyu, Z.; Ng, T. C. A.; Tran-Duc, T.; Lim, G. J. H.; Gu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, J.; Phan-Thien, N.; Wang, J., et al. 3D-Printed Surface-Patterned Ceramic Membrane with Enhanced Performance in Crossflow Filtration. J. Memb. Sci. 2020, 606(April), 118138.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. J.; Wu, R. M. Simulation of Resistance of Cross-Flow Microfiltration and Force Analysis on Membrane Surface. Desalination. 2008, 233(1–3), 239–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.09.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouwenvelder, J. S.; Picioreanu, C.; Kruithof, J. C.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Biofouling in Spiral Wound Membrane Systems: Three-Dimensional CFD Model Based Evaluation of Experimental Data. J. Memb. Sci. 2010, 346(1), 71–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, D. C.; Jung, S. Y.; Won, Y. J.; Jang, J. H.; Lee, J. W.; Chae, H. R.; Lim, J.; Ahn, K. H.; Lee, S.; Kim, J. H., et al. Effect of Pattern Shape on the Initial Deposition of Particles in the Aqueous Phase on Patterned Membranes During Crossflow Filtration. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2017, 4(2), 66–70. DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.; Lee, G. W.; Choi, W.; Yoo, C. H.; Chun, B.; Lee, J. S.; Lee, J. H.; Jung, H. W. Pattern Flow Dynamics Over Rectangular Sharklet Patterned Membrane Surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 514(December 2019), 145961. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145961.
   Google Scholar
• Unni, H. N.; Yang, C. Brownian Dynamics Simulation and Experimental Study of Colloidal Particle Deposition in a Microchannel Flow. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2005, 291(1), 28–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.04.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. M.; Li, X. Y. Modeling of the Initial Deposition of Individual Particles During the Cross-Flow Membrane Filtration. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014, 440, 91–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.10.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar