Unity Amid Barbed Wire: Asylum Restrictions, European Integration and the Migration Crisis

References

• Armstrong, W. & Anderson, J. 2007 eds, Geopolitics of European Union Enlargement: The Fortress Empire, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. 2011, ‘Temporary Migrants, Partial Citizenship and Hypermigration’ in Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14: 5: 665–693.
   Google Scholar
• Bialasiewicz, L., Dahlman, C.T., Apuzzo, G.M., Ciută, F., Jones, A., Rumford, C., Wodak, R., Anderson, J. & Ingram, A. 2009, ‘Interventions in the New Political Geographies of the European "Neighborhood"’ in Political Geography 28: 2: 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigo, D. 2014, ‘Death in the Mediterranean Sea: The Results of the Three Fields of Action of European Union Border Controls’ in Jansen, Y., Celikates, R. & de Bloois, J. eds, The Irregularization of Migration in Contemporary Europe: Detention, Deportation, Drowning, New York: Rowman & Littlefield International: 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Boccardi, I. 2002, Europe and Refugees: Towards an EU Asylum Policy, New York, NY: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2003, ‘The “External Dimension” of EU Immigration and Asylum Policy’ in International Affairs 79: 3: 619–638.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, B. & Krzyżanowski, M. 2007, ‘Inside/Outside the European Union: Enlargement, Migration Policy and the Search for Europe’s Identity’ in Armstrong, W. & Anderson, J. eds, Geopolitics of European Union Enlargement: The Fortress Empire, New York: Routledge: 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Cassarino, J.P. 2013, ‘The Drive for Securitized Temporariness’ in Triandafyllidou, A. ed., Circular Migration between Europe and Its Neighbourhood: Choice or Necessity?, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, N. 2009, European Readmission Policy: Third Country Interests and Refugee Rights, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, S. 1996, ‘Visa Requirements, Carrier Sanctions, “Safe Third Countries” and “Readmission”: The Development of an Asylum “Buffer Zone” in Europe’ in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21: 1: 76–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousens, E.M. & Cater, C.K. 2001, Toward Peace in Bosnia: Implementing the Dayton Accords, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlman, C.T. 2006, ‘Detour to Europe: Enlargement, Southeast Europe, and the EU’s External Dynamic’ in Eurasian Geography and Economics 47: 6: 683–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlman, C.T. & Ó Tuathail, G. 2005, ‘The Legacy of Ethnic Cleansing: The International Community and the Returns Process in Post-Dayton Bosnia–Herzegovina’ in Political Geography 24: 5: 569–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsche Welle 2016, ‘Poll: Germans increasingly Skeptical Of Refugees, http://www.dw.com/en/poll-germans-increasingly-skeptical-of-refugees/a-18982943, accessed 15 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Donais, T. 2005, The Political Economy of Peacebuilding in Post-Dayton Bosnia, New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2011, The Global Approach to Migration and Mobility, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2016, Communication on Establishing a New Partnership Framework with Third Countries under the European Agenda on Migration, Strasbourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Council 2005, The Hague Programme: 10 Priorities for the Next Five Years, Brussels: European Council.
   Google Scholar
• Fagen, P.W. 2003, ‘Post-Conflict Integration and Reconstruction: Doing It Right Takes a While’ in Steiner, N., Gibney, M. & Loescher, G. eds, Problems of Protection: The UNHCR, Refugees, and Human Rights, New York, NY: Routledge: 197–222.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, J. 1994, ‘Flight from Asylum: Trends toward Temporary Refuge and Local Responses to Forced Migrations’ in Virginia Journal of International Law 35: 1: 13–70.
   Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T. & Richter, S. 2010, ‘‘National Identity Matters: The Limited Impact of EU Political Conditionality in the Western Balkans’ in’ Journal of European Public Policy 17: 2: 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. 2007, ‘The Extraterritorialisation of Asylum and the Advent of Protection Lite’, Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies: http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/84510, accessed 27 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. 2011, ‘Outsourcing Asylum: The Advent of Protection Lite’ in Bialasiewicz, L. ed., Europe in the World, Farnham: Ashgate: 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J. 2006, ‘Return Dynamics in Bosnia and Croatia: A Comparative Analysis’ in International Migration 44: 3: 89–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, J. & Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. 2014, Non-refoulement in a World of Cooperative Deterrence, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan School of Law.
   Google Scholar
• ILO 2013, Youth Employment and Migration Brief, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Joly, D. 1998, ‘Temporary Protection within the Framework of a New European Asylum Regime’ in International Journal of Human Rights 2: 3: 49–76.
   Google Scholar
• Juss, S.S. 2005, ‘‘The Decline and Decay of European Refugee Policy’ in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25: 4: 749–792.
   Google Scholar
• Kacarska, S. 2012, Europeanisation through Mobility: Visa Liberalisation and Citizenship Regimes in the Western Balkans, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh School of Law.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. 1999, New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, I. & Mason, W. 2006, Peace at Any Price: How the World Failed Kosovo, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, R. 2002, ‘Towards a New Map of European Migration’ in International Journal of Population Geography 8: 2: 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kofman, E. 2002, ‘Contemporary European Migrations, Civic Stratification and Citizenship’ in Political Geography 21: 8: 1035–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koser, K. 2001, The Return and Reintegration of Rejected Asylum Seekers and Irregular Migrants: An Analysis of Government Assisted Return Programmes in Selected European Countries, Geneva: International Organization for Migration.
   Google Scholar
• Koser, K. & Black, R. 1999, ‘Limits to Harmonization: The “Temporary Protection” of Refugees in the European Union’ in International Migration 37: 3: 521–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2001, The Europeanisation of refugee Policies: Between Human Rights and Internal Security, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2013, ‘Shifting Up and Out: The Foreign Policy of European Immigration Control’ in Guiraudon, V. & Lahav, G. eds, Immigration Policy in Europe: The Politics of Control, New York, NY: Routledge: 129–150.
   Google Scholar
• McKeever, D., Schultz, J. & Swithern, S. 2005, Foreign Territory: The Internationalisation of EU Asylum Policy, Oxford: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• MHRR 2003, Comparative Indicators on Refugees, Displaced Persons and Returnees, Property Law Implementation and Reconstruction in BiH from 1991 to 30 June 2003, Sarajevo: Ministry for Human Rights and Refugees.
   Google Scholar
• Migration and Home Affairs 2016, New Migration Partnership Framework: Reinforced Cooperation with Third Countries to Better Manage Migration, Strasbourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Muniandy, P. 2015, ‘Informality and the Politics of Temporariness: Ethnic Migrant Economies in Little Bangladesh and Little Burma in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia’ in International Sociology 30: 6: 561–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD 2001, Trends in International Migration 2000, Paris: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Orchard, P. 2014, ‘Reconsidering Safe Areas as a Means to Protect Civilians’ in Asia Pacific Center for the Responsibility to Protect 4: 4: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• OSCE 2014, Reassessing Progress in the Development and Implementation of the Legal and Policy Framework for the Reintegration of Repatriated Persons, Prishtina: Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe Mission in Kosovo.
   Google Scholar
• Rajkumar, D., Berkowitz, L., Vosko, L.F., Preston, V. & Latham, R. 2012, ‘At the Temporary–Permanent Divide: How Canada Produces Temporariness and Makes Citizens through Its Security, Work, and Settlement Policies’ in Citizenship Studies 16: 3–4: 483–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romaní, L.P. 2013, The Repatriation Process in Kosovo: Institutional Organisation, Legal Framework, Lessons Learnt and Remaining Challenges, Prishtina: ECMI Kosovo.
   Google Scholar
• Roxström, E. & Gibney, M. 2003, ‘The Legal and Ethical Obligations of UNHCR: The Case of Temporary Protection in Western Europe’ in Steiner, N., Gibney, M. & Loescher, G. eds, Problems of Protection: The UNHCR, Refugees, and Human Rights, New York, NY: Routledge: 37–60.
   Google Scholar
• Samers, M. 1999, ‘“Globalization”, the Geopolitical Economy of Migration and the “Spatial Vent”’ in Review of International Political Economy 6: 2: 166–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segerblom, E. 2007, ‘Temporary Protected Status: An Immigration Statute that Redefines Traditional Notions of Status and Temporariness’ in Nevada Law Journal 7: 2: 664–684.
   Google Scholar
• Selm, J. van 2000, Kosovo’s Refugees in the European Union, New York: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Selm, J. van 2003, ‘Refugee Protection Policies and Security Issues’ in Newman, E. & Selm, J. van eds, Refugees and Forced Displacement: International Security, Human Vulnerability, and the State, New York, NY: United Nations University Press: 66–92.
   Google Scholar
• Sopf, D. 2001, ‘Temporary Protection in Europe after 1990: The “Right to Remain” of Genuine Convention Refugees’ Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 6: 109–156.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, V. 2009, The Exclusionary Politics of Asylum, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Suhrke, A., Barutciski, M., Sandison, P. & Garlock, R. 2000, The Kosovo Refugee Crisis: An Independent Evaluation of UNHCR’s Emergency Preparedness and Response, Geneva: UNHCR: http://www.alnap.org/resource/2848.aspx, accessed 29 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Toal, G. & Dahlman, C.T. 2011, Bosnia Remade: Ethnic Cleansing and Its Reversal, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trauner, F. & Kruse, I. 2008, ‘EC Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreements: A New Standard EU Foreign Policy Tool?’ in European Journal of Migration and Law 10: 4: 411–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandafyllidou, A. 2013, ‘Circular Migration at the Periphery of Europe: Choice, Opportunity, or Necessity?’ in Triandafyllidou, A. ed., Circular Migration between Europe and Its Neighbourhood, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: 212–236.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP 2003, International Assistance to BiH, 1996–2002. A Tentative Analysis of Who Is Doing What, Where, Sarajevo: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR 1996, Populations of Concern to UNHCR: A Statistical Overview, Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR 2016, ‘UNHCR Statistics: The World in Numbers’ in UNHCR Population Statistics: http://popstats.unhcr.org, accessed 3 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M.A. 2005, Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velluti, S. 2013, Reforming the Common European Asylum System: Legislative Developments and Judicial Activism of the European Courts, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vosko, L.F., Preston-Dunlop, V. & Latham, R. 2014 eds, Liberating Temporariness? Migration, Work, and Citizenship in an Age of Insecurity, Montréal: McGill–Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasem, R. & Ester, K. 2008, Temporary Protected Status: Current Immigration Policy and Issues, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Zielonka, J. 2001, ‘How new Enlarged Borders Will Reshape the European Union’ in Journal of Common Market Studies 39: 3: 507–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar