The Big Deal: Should Libraries Stay or Should Libraries Go?

References

• Kenneth Frazier, “The Librarian's Dilemma: Contemplating the Costs of the ‘Big Deal’,” in D-Lib Magazine, ed. William Y. Arms, vol. 7, no. 3. (Virginia: Corporation for National Research Initiatives (CNRI), 2001). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier.html.
   Google Scholar
• Richard. Poynder, “The Big Deal. (Cover Story),” Information Today 28, no. 8 (2011): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Barbara. Quint, “The End of the ‘Big Deal’ Era,” Information Today 21, no. 1 (2004): 7.
   Google Scholar
• Doris Small. Helfer, “Is the Big Deal Dead? Status of the Crisis in Scholarly Publishing,” Searcher 12, no. 3 (2004): 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew. Albanese, “Four MN Colleges Reject “Big Deal,” Library Journal 129, no. 11 (2004): 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zac. Rolnik, “Big Deal = Good Deal?,” The Serials Librarian 57, no. 3 (2009): 194–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sarah. Glasser, “Judging Big Deals: Challenges, Outcomes, and Advice,” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 25, no. 4 (2013): 263–76.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Reserve History, “The Great Recession, December 2007–June 2009,” Robert Rich, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/great_recession_of_200709 (accessed July 15, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Jim. Millhorn, “Lessons from the Big Deal: The Rise and Fall of Licensed Packages is Not All Bad,” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Summer 2018, no. 90 (2018), http://www.istl.org/18-summer/viewpoints.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jonathan. Nabe, David C. Fowler, “Leaving the “Big Deal” … Five Years Later,” The Serials Librarian 69, no. 1 (2015): 20–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mary Ann. Jones, Derek. Marshall, and Sharon A. Purtee, “Big Deal” Deconstruction,” The Serials Librarian 64, no. 1–4 (2013): 137–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay. Ellis, “Open Access is Going Mainstream. Here’s Why That Could Transform Academic Life,” The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/interactives/Trend19-OpenAccess-Main (accessed July 11, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Holly. Else, “Radical Open-Access Plan Could Spell End to Journal Subscriptions,” Nature 561, no. 7721 (2018): 17. http://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06178-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay. Ellis, “After the Elsevier ‘Tipping Point,' Research Libraries Consider Their Options,” Chronicle of Higher Education 65, (2019): 29.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen. Bosch Henderson, and Kittie. Henderson, “New World, Same Model | Periodicals Price Survey 2017,” Library Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com?detailStory=new-world-same-model-periodicals-price-survey-2017 (accessed July 15, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Phil. Davis, “Libraries Receive Shrinking Share of University Expenditures,” The Scholarly Kitchen 15, (2019). https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/07/22/libraries-receive-shrinking-share/ (accessed July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Rickey D. Best, “Is the “Big Deal” Dead?,” The Serials Librarian 57, no. 4 (2009): 353–63.
   Google Scholar
• Robert E. Wolverton, Jr., and Tim. Bucknall, “Are Consortium “Big Deals” Cost Effective? A Comparison and Analysis of E-Journal Access Mechanisms–Workshop Report,” The Serials Librarian 55, no. 3 (2008): 469–77.
   Google Scholar
• Amy. Carlson, and Barbara M. Pope, “The “Big Deal”: A Survey of How Libraries Are Responding and What the Alternatives Are,” The Serials Librarian 57, no. 4 (2009): 380–98.
   Google Scholar
• Emma. Cryer, and Karen S. Grigg, “Consortia and Journal Package Renewal: Evolving Trends in the ‘Big Package Deal'?,” Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries 8, no. 1 (2011): 22–34.
   Google Scholar
• Colleen. Cleary, “Why the “Big Deal” Continues to Persist,” The Serials Librarian 57, no. 4 (2009): 364–79.
   Google Scholar
• Deborah D. Blecic, Stephen E. Wiberley, Jr., Joan B. Fiscella, Sara. Bahnmaier-Blaszczak, and Rebecca. Lowery, “Deal or No Deal? Evaluating Big Deals and Their Journals,” College & Research Libraries 74, no. 2 (2013): 178–93. 2013):
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonathan. Nabe, and David C. Fowler, “Leaving the “Big Deal”: Consequences and Next Steps,” The Serials Librarian 62, no. 1–4 (2012): 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Angie. Rathmel, Lea. Currie, and Todd. Enoch, “Big Deals’ and Squeaky Wheels: Taking Stock of Your Stats,” The Serials Librarian 68, no. 1–4 (2015): 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Angie Rathmel, in Question about your article, edited by Jeff Coghill (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Trey. Lemley, and Jie. Li, “Big Deal' Journal Subscription Packages: Are They Worth the Cost?,” Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries 12, no. 1 (2015): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen. Bosch, Barbara. Albee, and Sion. Romaine, “Deal or No Deal,” Library Journal 144, no. 3 (2019): 34–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar