Selection of Saccharum spp. × Saccharum spontaneum progeny for sugar and biomass traits

References

• Alexander, A. G. 1985. “The Energy-Cane Alternative (Vol. 8).” AE Fok Kam Biomass 11 (2): 155.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardo, R. 1996. “Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Maize Single-Cross Performance.” Crop Science 36 (1): 50–56. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183x003600010009x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSES. 2001. “The Laboratory Manual for Australian Sugar Mills. Analytical Methods and Tables.” Australia: BSES Limited 2:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, M. K., A. D’Hont, and N. Berding. 2001. “The Sugarcane Genome: A Synthesis of Current Understanding, and Lessons for Breeding and Biotechnology.” Proceedings of the South Africa Sugarcane Technologists’ Association 75:1–5. https://sasta.co.za/congress-proceedings/#4-7-wpfd-2000-2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cursi, D. E., M. C. Cox, C. de Oliveira Anoni, H. P. Hoffmann, R. Gazaffi, and A. A. F. Garcia. 2020. “Comparison of Different Selection Methods in the Seedling Stage of Sugarcane Breeding.” Agronomy Journal 112 (6): 4879–4897. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravois, K. A., and S. B. Milligan. 1992. “Genetic Relationship Between Fiber and Sugarcane Yield Components.” Crop Science 32 (1): 62–67. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183x003200010014x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C. R. 1975. “Best Linear Unbiased Estimation and Prediction Under a Selection Model.” Biometrics Bulletin 31 (2): 423–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529430.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, N. V., A. Furtado, F. C. Botha, B. A. Simmons, and R. J. Henry. 2015. “Potential for Genetic Improvement of Sugarcane as a Source of Biomass for Biofuels.” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 3:182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P., and T. A. McRae. 2001. “Selection of Sugarcane Clones in Small Plots: Effects of Plot Size and Selection Criteria.” Crop Science 41 (2): 315–322. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.412315x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, M. S., J. D. Miller, and P. Y. P. Tai. 1983. “Genetic and Phenotypic Path Analyses and Heritability in Sugarcane 1.” Crop Science 23 (4): 643–647. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183x002300040010x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khumla, N., S. Sakuanrungsirikul, P. Punpee, T. Hamarn, T. Chaisan, L. Soulard, and P. Songsri. 2021. “Sugarcane Breeding, Germplasm Development and Supporting Genetics Research in Thailand.” Sugar Technology 24 (1): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-00996-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbeng, C. A., and M. C. Cox. 2003. “Early Generation Selection of Sugarcane Families and Clones in Australia: A Review.” Journal of the American Society of Sugarcane Technologists 23:20–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kruskal, W. H., and W. A. Wallis. 1952. “Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 47: 583–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, S. B. 1994. “Test Site Allocation within and Among Stages of a Sugarcane Breeding Program.” Crop Science 34 (5): 1184–1190. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183x003400050008x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, S. B., and B. L. Legendre. 1990. “Development of a Practical Method for Sugarcane Cross Appraisal.” Journal of the American Society of Sugarcane Technologists 11:59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, H., R. Boehm, and H. Piepho. 2018. “’Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It’s Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs.” Frontiers in Plant Science 9 (5): 1511. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palachai, C., P. Songsri, and N. Jongrungklang. 2019. “Comparison of Yield Components of Sugarcane Varieties Grown Under Natural Short-And Long-Term Water-Logged Conditions in Thailand.” SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 51:80–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pélabon, C., C. H. Hilde, S. Einum, and M. Gamelon. 2020. “On the Use of the Coefficient of Variation to Quantify and Compare Trait Variation.” Evolution Letters 4 (3): 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontif, M., C. Kimbeng, K. Gravois, Z. Taylor, D. Sexton, B. Blanchard, M. Daigle, et al. 2023. “Registration of ‘L 14‐267’ Sugarcane.” Journal of Plant Registrations 17 (2): 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/plr2.20267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premachandran, M. N., P. T. Prathima, and M. Lekshmi. 2011. “Sugarcane and Polyploidy: A Review.” Journal of Sugarcane Research 1:1–5. https://sugarcane.icar.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/pp12-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Price, S. 1963. “Cytogenetics of Modern Sugar Canes.” Economic Botany 17 (2): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02985359.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, G. K. 1991. “That BLUP Is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects.” Statistical Science 6 (1): 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011926.
   Google Scholar
• Sandhu, S. D., and G. S. Saini. 1997. “Inter-Relationships Among Cane Yield and Commercial Cane Sugar and Their Component Traits in Autumn Plant Crop of Sugarcane.” Euphytica 95: 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002962131707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santchurn, D., K. Ramdoyal, M. G. H. Badaloo, and M. Labuschagne. 2012. “From Sugar Industry to Cane Industry: Investigations on Multivariate Data Analysis Techniques in the Identification of Different High Biomass Sugarcane Varieties.” Euphytica 185 (3): 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0682-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santchurn, D., K. Ramdoyal, M. G. H. Badaloo, and M. T. Labuschagne. 2014. “From Sugar Industry to Cane Industry: Evaluation and Simultaneous Selection of Different Types of High Biomass Canes.” Biomass and Bioenergy 61:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 2003. The SAS System for Windows Version Release 9.1. Cary, North Carolina, USA: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Shanthi, R. M., K. V. Bhagyalakshmi, G. Hemaprabha, S. Alarmelu, and R. Nagarajan. 2008. “Relative Performance of the Sugarcane Families in Early Selection Stages.” Sugar Technology 10 (2): 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-008-0019-8.
   Google Scholar
• Silveira, L. C. I., B. P. Brasileiro, V. Kist, E. Daros, and L. A. Peternelli. 2015. “Genetic Diversity and Coefficient of Kinship Among Potential Genitors for Obtaining Cultivars of Energy Cane.” Revista Ciência Agronômica 46 (2): 358–368. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20150015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songsri, P., J. Nata, N. Bootprom, and N. Jongrungklang. 2020. “Performances of Elite Sugarcane Genotypes for Agro-Physiological Traits in Relation to Yield Potential and Ratooning Ability Under Rain-Fed Conditions.” Journal of Agronomy 19 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2020.1.13.
   Google Scholar
• Srisink, S., W. Suchato, A. Boontham, W. Wandee, S. Poonpan, and W. Yodprang. 2016. Integrated Sugarcane Pest and Disease Management. Suphan Buri Field Crops Research Center. Edition (1). 52. Accessed October 16, 2022. http://www.sugarzone.in.th/cane/suphan_cane/book_cane1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, J. K., M. C. Cox, F. C. Atkin, X. Wei, and D. M. Hogart. 2011. “Family Selection Improves the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Selecting Original Seedlings and Parents.” Sugar Technology 13 (1): 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-011-0073-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tew, T. L., and R. M. Cobill. 2008. “Genetic Improvement of Sugarcane (Saccharum Spp.) As an Energy Crop.” Genetic Improvement of Bioenergy Crops: 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70805-8_9.
   Google Scholar
• Tomczak, M., and E. Tomczak. 2014. “The Need to Report Effect Size Estimates Revisited. An Overview of Some Recommended Measures of Effect Size.” Trends in Sports Sciences 21: 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., P. A. Jackson, X. Lu, Y. Fan, J. W. Foreman, X. Chen, H. Deng, C. Fu, L. Ma, and K. S. Aitken. 2008. “Evaluation of Sugarcane × Saccharum Spontaneum Progeny for Biomass Composition and Yield Components.” Crop Science 48 (3): 951–961. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2016. Data Analysis. Ggplot2. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-319-24277-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. 2004a. “Performance of Varieties N14 and NCo376 in the Southeast Lowveld of Zimbabwe.” Proceedings of the South African Sugarcane Technologists Association 78:153–160.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. 2004b. “Stalk Population Control of Yield, Quality, and Agronomic Traits of Sugarcane Population in Early Selection Stages.” Sugar Cane International 22 (5): 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. 2018. “Simultaneous Selection for Multiple Traits in Sugarcane Breeding Populations Using Logistic Regression Models.” South African Journal of Plant and Soil 35 (3): 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2017.1340983.
   Google Scholar