Intertextualizing interactive texts for critical thinking: A South Korean EFL experience

References

• Alagozlu, N. (2007). Critical thinking and voice in EFL writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9, 118–136.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, L. (1977). Ideology and the state apparatus (Notes toward an investigation). In Lenin and philosophy and other essays. B. Brewster (Trans.) (pp. 127–186). London, UK: New Left Books.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of modernity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 79–95. doi:10.2307/3587975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays. C. Emerson., & M. Holquist (Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. C. Emerson (Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. S. Heath (Trans.). New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1981). Theory of the text. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text (pp. 31–47). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (1993). Symbolic exchange and death. I. Grant (Trans.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. (1993). Introducing applied linguistics. Harlow: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, J., McMahon, C., & Stout, B. (1999). Critical thinking, thoughtful writing: A rhetoric with readings. Boston, MA: Houghton Miffin Co.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasoma, R., & Lee, J. E. (2013). A current approach to EFL writing: identity and learning in the classroom. Studies in English Language and Literature, 39, 189–219. doi:10.21559/aellk
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasoma, R., Pennycook, A., & Thompson, C. (2004). Beyond plagiarism: Transgessive and non-transgressive intertextuality. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education., 3, 171–193. doi:10.1207/s15327701jlie0303_1
   Google Scholar
• Chi, F. (1998). Intertextuality as a constructive reading strategy: Three successful Taiwanese EFL college cases. Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 24, 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Christine, C. P., Varelas, M., Barry, A., & Rife, A. (2002). Dialogic inquiry around information texts: The role of intertextuality in constructing scientific understandings in urban primary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 13, 435–482. doi:10.1016/S0898-5898(03)00004-4
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, B. W. (1998). A case for critical thinking in the English language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 119–123. doi:10.2307/3587906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Saussure, F. (1974). Course in general linguistics. (W. Baskin, Trans.) London, UK: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1995). Faith in fakes. London, UK: Minerva.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2004). Critical thinking and the art of close reading (part IV). Journal of Developmental Education, 28(2), 36–37.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2010). Critical thinking development: A stage theory. Retrieved from www.criticalthinking.org
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, A. (2001). Critical thinking: An introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., & Davis, K. (2013). The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2006). Watching with the Simpsons: Television, parody, and intertextuality. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. L. Jr. (1963). The March on Washington August 28, 1963. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0yP4aLyq1g
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. L. (2005). Intertextuality in western art music. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, T. J. (1992). Screening the text: Intertextuality in the new wave of French cinema. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobel, M. (1999). Everyday literacies: Students, discourse, and social practice. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. T. Jardine., T. Gora., & L. S. Roudiez (Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. (1984). The revolution in poetic language. M. Walker (Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, J. (2013). Displaying critical thinking in EFL academic writing: A discussion of Japanese to english contrastive rhetoric. RELC Journal, 44, 195–208. doi:10.1177/0033688213488386
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. D. (2007). Second Isaiah lands in Washington, DC; Martin Luther King, Jr’s ‘I have a Dream’ as Biblical Narrative and Biblical Hermeneutic. Rhetoric Review, 405–424. doi:10.1080/07350190701577926
   Google Scholar
• Miola, R. S. (2004). Seven types of intertextuality. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, A. L. (1994). Writing between the lines: Race and intertextuality. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Oster, J. (1989). Seeing with different eyes: Another view of literature in the ESL class. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 85–103. doi:10.2307/3587509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi:10.1002/mur.4770140111
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (1990). Critical pedagogy and second language education. System, 18, 303–314. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(90)90003-N
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Native digital immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2002). Teaching critical thinking in English for academic purposes courses in Australia. TESOL Journal, 11(4), 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Walvoord, B. E., & McCarthy, L. P. (1990). Thinking and writing in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, P. (2013). Critical thinking in a university EFL classroom. Asian EFL Journal, 71, 4–30.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, S. (2014). A stylistic analysis on ‘I Have A Dream.’ Journal of Studies in Social Sciences, 9, 123–134.
   Google Scholar