Language policy formation in higher education: discursive tension and legitimacy-seeking deliberation

References

• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Blackledge, A. (2006). The magical frontier between the dominant and the dominated: Sociolinguistics and social justice in a multilingual world. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447140608668536
   Google Scholar
• Camps, D. M. J. (2017). Legitimating Limburgish. The reproduction of heritage. In P. Lane, J. Costa, & H. J. De Korne (Eds.), Standardizing minority languages: Competing ideologies of authority and authenticity in the global periphery (pp. 1–23). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education, 4(34), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(92)90004-G
   Google Scholar
• Gándara, P., & Hopkins, M. (Eds.). (2010). Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregersen, F. (Ed.) (2014). Hvor parallelt? Om paralellspråkighet på Nordens universitet. [How parallel? Parallel language us at Nordic Universities] TemaNord. Vol. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen, E. (1966). Language conflict and language planning: The case of modern Norwegian. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmen, A. (2017). Parallel language strategy. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & S. May (Eds.), Second and foreign language education (pp. 301–311). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, F. M. (2015). Making policy connections across scales using nexus analysis. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning. A practical guide (pp. 217–231). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hultgren, A. K. (2014). Whose parallellingualism? Overt and covert ideologies in Danish university language policies. Multilingua, 1–2(33), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0004
   Google Scholar
• Hultgren, A., Gregersen, F., & Thøgersen, J. (Eds.). (2014). English in Nordic Universities: Ideologies and practices. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy, 14(3), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9333-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-009-9136-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C. (2010). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050902780706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language Policy. Palgrave McMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. C. (2015). Intertextuality and language policy. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning. A practical guide (pp. 166–180). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue, and novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The kristeva reader (pp. 34–61). Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kulturdepartementet (2008). Mål og meining. Ein heilskapleg norsk språkpolitikk. (St.meld. nr. 35 (2007–2008)). White paper, Ministry of Culture. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-35-2007-2008-/id519923/
   Google Scholar
• Kunnskapsdepartementet (2013). Lange linjer – Kunnskap gir muligheter (Meld. St. 18 (2012–2013)). White paper, Ministry of Education and Research. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld-st-18-20122013/id716040/
   Google Scholar
• Källkvist, M., & Hult, F. M. (2016). Discursive mechanisms and human agency in language policy formation: Negotiating bilingualism and parallel language use at a Swedish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.956044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, T., & Lie, H. (2018). Har språkregler, men følger dem ikke. Khrono .https://khrono.no/sprakstrategi-hvl-sprakradet/har-sprakregler-men-folger-dem-ikke/234396
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (1995). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, A. R. (2010). Voices from above – Voices from below. Who is talking and who is listening in Norwegian language politics? Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2010.505070
   Google Scholar
• Miranda, N., Berdugo, M., & Tejada, H. (2016). Conflicting views on language policy and planning at a Colombian university. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(3–4), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1204052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramberg, B. (2016). Shaping language: What deliberative legitimacy requires. Sociolinguistica, 30(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2016-0005
   Google Scholar
• Røyneland, U. (2016). Revision of the Nynorsk standard deliberation decision and legitimisation. Sociolinguistica, 30(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2016-0006
   Google Scholar
• Salö, L. (2016). Languages and linguistic exchanges in Swedish academia. Practices, processes, and globalizing markets (). [Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University]. DiVA portal. http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:907250/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schwach, V., & Elken, M. (2018). Å snakke fag på et språk andre forstår: Norsk fagspråk i høyere utdanning og arbeidsliv. (66) [To speak about academic topics in a language that others understand]. Rapport. Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning, NIFU.
   Google Scholar
• Soler, J., & Vihman, V. A. (2018). Language ideology and language planning in Estonian higher education: Nationalising and globalising discourses. Current Issues in Language Planning, 19(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2017.1281039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thingnes, J. S. (2020a). Å velje minoriserte språk. Språkpolitikk og språkval i akademia. [To choose or not to choose minoritised languages. Language policy and language choices in academia] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo]. DUO Vitenarkiv. http://hdl.handle.net/10852/80634
   Google Scholar
• Thingnes, J. S. (2020b). Å velje eit minorisert språk: Mellom språkpolitiske ideal og språkleg realitet. [To choose a minoritised language: Between language policy ideals and linguistic realities]. Maal og Minne, 112(2 127–168). http://ojs.novus.no/index.php/MOM/article/view/1902
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 789–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606061071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigth, S. (2004). Language policy and planning. From nationalism to globalisation. Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar