568
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Simultaneous multiplicity: new materialist ontologies and the apprehension of language as assemblage and phenomenon

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10-2-87
  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
  • Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2010.0206
  • Barad, K. (2011). Nature’s queer performativity. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(2), 121–158. https://doi.org/10.5250/quiparle.19.2.0121
  • Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
  • Barad, K. (2019). After the end of the world: Entangled nuclear colonialisms, matters of force, and the material force of justice. Theory & Event, 22(3), 524–550.
  • Becker, A. L. (1991). Language and languaging. Language & Communication, 11(1–2), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(91)90013-L
  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
  • Blaser, M. (2009). Political ontology. Cultural Studies, 23(5–6), 873–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380903208023
  • Blaser, M. (2013). Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: Toward a conversation on political ontology. Current Anthropology, 54(5), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1086/672270
  • Blaser, M. (2014). Ontology and indigeneity: On the political ontology of heterogeneous assemblages. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474012462534
  • Braidotti, R. (2006). Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069232
  • Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486
  • Buchanan, I. (2017). Assemblage theory, or, the future of an illusion. Deleuze Studies, 11(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2017.0276
  • Canagarajah, A. S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01207.x
  • Canagarajah, A. S. (2018). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx041
  • Canagarajah, A. S. (2021). Materialising semiotic repertoires: Challenges in the interactional analysis of multilingual communication. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(2), 206–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1877293
  • Chernela, J. (2018). Language in an ontological register: Embodied speech in the northwest Amazon of Colombia and Brazil. Language & Communication, 63, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.02.006
  • Davies, B. (2018). Ethics and the new materialism: A brief genealogy of the ‘post’ philosophies in the social sciences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1234682.
  • de la Cadena, M., & Blaser, M. (Eds.). (2018). A world of many worlds. Duke University Press.
  • DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum.
  • DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. EUP.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1984). Anti-oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Athlone.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Continuum.
  • Demuro, E., & Gurney, L. (2021). Languages/languaging as world-making: The ontological bases of language. Language Sciences, 83, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101307
  • Dépelteau, F. (2018). Relational thinking in sociology: Relevance, concurrence and dissonance. In F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The palgrave handbook of relational sociology (pp. 3–33). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Errington, J. (1999). Ideology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1–2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.115
  • Escobar, A. (2016). Thinking-feeling with the earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the south. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 11(1), 11–32. https://www.doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102e.
  • Faye, J., & Jaksland, R. (2021). Barad, Bohr and quantum mechanics. Synthese, 199(3), 8231–8255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03160-1
  • Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.
  • Flatschart, E. (2017). Feminist standpoints and critical realism: The contested materiality of difference in intersectionality and new materialism. Journal of Critical Realism, 16(3), 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2017.1313650
  • Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2013). The sexuality-assemblage: Desire, affect, anti-humanism. The Sociological Review, 61(4), 769–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12075
  • Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.921458
  • Gamble, C. N., Hanan, J. S., & Nail, T. (2019). What is new materialism? Angelaki, 24(6), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2019.1684704
  • García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Gurney, L., & Demuro, E. (2022). Tracing new ground, from language to languaging, and from languaging to assemblages: Rethinking languaging through the multilingual and ontological turns. International Journal of Multilingualism 19(3) , 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1689982
  • Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). Routledge.
  • Hein, S. F. (2016). The new materialism in qualitative inquiry: How compatible are the philosophies of Barad and Deleuze? Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616634732
  • Heywood, P. (2012). Anthropology and what there is: Reflections on “ontology.” Cambridge Anthropology, 30(1), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2012.300112
  • Heywood, P. (2017). Cambridge encyclopedia of anthropology. Division of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge. http://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/ontological-turn#h2ref-1
  • Holbraad, M. (2009). Ontography and alterity: Defining anthropological truth. Social Analysis, 53(2), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2009.530205
  • Holbraad, M., Pedersen, M. A., & Viveiros de Castro, E. (2014). The politics of ontology. Society for Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions
  • Holbraad, M., & Pedersen, M. A. (2017). The ontological turn. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hollin, G., Forsyth, I., Giraud, E., & Potts, T. (2017). (Dis)entangling Barad: Materialisms and ethics. Social Studies of Science, 47(6), 918–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717728344
  • Kaiser, B. M., & Thiele, K. (2014). Diffraction: Onto-epistemology, quantum physics and the critical humanities. Parallax, 20(3), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927621
  • Kirby, V. (Ed.). (2017). What if culture was really nature all along? Edinburgh University Press.
  • Kohn, E. (2015). Anthropology of ontologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014127
  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. Oxford University Press.
  • Lather, P. (2016). Top ten+ list: (Re)thinking ontology in (post) qualitative research. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616634734
  • Law, J. (2015). What’s wrong with a one-world world? Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 16(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1020066.
  • Leander, K. M., & Ehret, C. (Eds.). (2019). Affect in literacy teaching and learning: Pedagogies, politics and coming to know. Routledge.
  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (2013). Images of thinking in feminist materialisms: Ontological divergences and the production of researcher subjectivities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 706–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788759
  • Lenz Taguchi, H., & Palmer, A. (2013). A more ‘livable’ school? A diffractive analysis of the performative enactments of girls’ ill-/well-being with (in) school environments. Gender and Education, 25(6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.829909
  • Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C. (2012). Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.718490
  • Li, W. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1222–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035
  • Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039
  • MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
  • MacLure, M. (2016). The refrain of the a-grammatical child: Finding another language in/for qualitative research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616639333
  • Marshall, S., & Moore, D. (2018). Plurilingualism amid the panoply of lingualisms: Addressing critiques and misconceptions in education. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2016.1253699
  • Mazzei, L. A. (2014). Beyond an easy sense: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 742–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530257
  • Monforte, J. (2018). What is new in new materialism for a newcomer? Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10(3), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2018.1428678
  • Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and actor‐networks: Rethinking socio‐material power, politics and space. Geography Compass, 9(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12192
  • Murris, K., & Bozalek, V. (2019). Diffraction and response-able reading of texts: The relational ontologies of Barad and Deleuze. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(7), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1609122
  • Nail, T. (2017). What is an assemblage? SubStance, 46(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2017.0001
  • Orman, J. (2012). Not so super: The ontology of ‘supervernaculars.’ Language & Communication, 32(4), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.08.001
  • Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A. (2010). Metrolingualism: Fixity, fluidity and language in flux. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(3), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710903414331
  • Pennycook, A. (2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315810
  • Pennycook, A. (2018). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Routledge.
  • Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2019). Mundane metrolingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1575836
  • Phillips, J. (2006). Agencement/assemblage. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 108–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300219
  • Rekret, P. (2016). A critique of new materialism: Ethics and ontology. Subjectivity, 9(3), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0001-y
  • Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J., & Pratt, S. L. (2020). The new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3–4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419830135
  • Schaffer, J. (2010). Monism: The priority of the whole. The Philosophical Review, 119(1), 31–76. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2009-025
  • Seargeant, P. (2009). Language ideology, language theory, and the regulation of linguistic behaviour. Language Sciences, 31(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.12.002
  • Seargeant, P. (2010). The historical ontology of language. Language Sciences, 32(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2008.11.001
  • Sharma, B. K. (2020). A new materialist perspective to studying L2 instructional interactions in engineering. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1767030
  • Thorpe, H., & Clark, M. (2020). Gut feminism, new materialisms and sportwomen’s embodied health: The case of red-s in endurance athletes. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1631879
  • Toohey, K. (2019). The onto-epistemologies of new materialism: Implications for applied linguistics pedagogies and research. Applied Linguistics, 40(6), 937–956. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy046
  • van der Tuin, I., & Dolphijn, R. (2010). The transversality of new materialism. Women: A Cultural Review, 21(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2010.488377.
  • Warfield, K. (2016). Making the cut: An agential realist examination of selfies and touch. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641706

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.