0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

English academic writing for academic purposes and beyond: the experiences of undergraduate students in Hong Kong

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Altınmakas, D., & Bayyurt, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.006
  • Baron, P., & Corbin, L. (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 759–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.655711
  • Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 5(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.37514/JBW-J.1986.5.1.02
  • Beaufort, A. (2007). College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction. Utah State University Press.
  • Beavis, C., & Green, B. (2012). The 3D model in action: A review. In B. Green & C. Beavis (Eds.), Literacy in 3D: An integrated perspective in theory and practice (pp. 39–60). ACER Press.
  • Berg, E. C., Hult, F. M., & King, K. A. (2001). Shaping the climate for language shift? English in Sweden’s elite domains. World Englishes, 20(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00217
  • Breeze, R. (2012). Rethinking academic writing pedagogy for the European university. Rodopi.
  • Bulfin, S., & McGraw, K. (2015). Digital literacy in theory, policy and practice: Old concerns, new opportinities. In M. Henderson & G. Romeo (Eds.), Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions (pp. 266–281). Cambridge University Press.
  • Canagarajah, S. (2006). The place of world englishes in composition: Pluralization continued. College Composition and Communication, 57(4), 586–619. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc20065061
  • Canagarajah, S. (2018). English as a spatial resource and the claimed competence of Chinese STEM professionals. World Englishes, 37(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12301
  • Casanave, C. P. (2017). Controversies in second language writing: Dilemmas and decisions in research and instruction (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
  • Chan, J. Y. H. (2013). Contextual variation and Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 32(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12004
  • Clark, R., & Ivanič, R. (1997). The politics of writing. Routledge.
  • Corella, M. (2022). “It’s better language”: The social meanings of academic language in an elementary classroom. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 19(2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2021.1935955
  • Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
  • Dafouz, E. (2020). Undergraduate student academic writing in English-medium higher education: Explorations through the ROAD-MAPPING lens. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100888
  • Dezuanni, M. (2018). Minecraft and children’s digital making: Implications for media literacy education. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1472607
  • Education Bureau of Hong Kong. (2013). Survey on opinions of employers on major aspects of performance of first degree graduates in Year 2010 - Executive summary. https://www.cspe.edu.hk/en/Resources-Surveys.html
  • Education Bureau of Hong Kong. (2016). Survey on opinions of employers on major aspects of performance of first degree graduates in Year 2013- Executive summary. https://www.cspe.edu.hk/en/Resources-Surveys.html
  • Education Bureau of Hong Kong. (2019). Survey on opinions of employers on major aspects of performance of first degree graduates in Year 2016 - Executive summary. https://www.cspe.edu.hk/en/Resources-Surveys.html
  • Education Bureau of Hong Kong. (2022). Survey on opinions of employers on major aspects of performance of first degree graduates in Year 2019 (survey report). https://www.cspe.edu.hk/en/Resources-Surveys.html
  • Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2011). Meeting the challenges of English-medium higher education: The first-year experience in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.01.001
  • Green, B. (1988). Subject specific literacy and school learning: A focus on writing. Australian Journal of Education, 32(2), 156–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494418803200203
  • Green, B. (2002). A literacy project of our own? English in Australia, 134, 25–31.
  • Green, B., & Beavis, C. (2013). Literacy education in the age of new media. In K. Hall, T. Cremin, B. Comber, & L. C. Moll (Eds.), International handbook of research on Children’s literacy, learning, and culture (pp. 42–53). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • Hill, C., Khoo, S., & Hsieh, Y.-C. (2020). An investigation into the learning transfer of English for specific academic purposes (ESAP) writing skills of students in Singapore. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 48, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100908
  • Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: Education, knowledge and reputation. Language Teaching, 46(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000036
  • Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  • Ivanič, R., Edwards, R., Barton, D., Martin-Jones, M., Fowler, Z., Hughes, B., Mannion, G., Miller, K., Satchwell, C., & Smith, J. (2009). Improving learning in college: Rethinking literacies across the curriculum. Routledge.
  • Jeon, M. (2016). English language education policy and the native-speaking English Teacher (NET) scheme in Hong Kong. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp. 91–111). Springer.
  • Johnson, R. K. (1994). Language policy and planning in Hong Kong. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 14, 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002889
  • Klemmenčič, M. (2014). What is student agency? An ontological exploration in the context of research on student engagement. In M. Klemmenčič, S. Bergan, R. Primožič, & R. Primozic (Eds.), Student engagement in Europe: Society, higher education and student governance (pp. 11–29). Council of Europe.
  • Kyte, R. (2002). Conversation and authority: A tension in the inheritance of the church-related college. In S. R. Haynes (Ed.), Professing in the postmodern academy (pp. 115–129). Baylor University Press.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2019). On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103(Supplement 2019), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12536
  • Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (Eds.). (2000). Student writing in higher education: New contexts. Open University Press.
  • Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
  • Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. Routledge.
  • Lillis, T., Harrington, K., Lea, M. R., & Mitchell, S. (2015). Introduction. In T. Lillis, K. Harrington, M. R. Lea, & S. Mitchell (Eds.), Working with academic literacies: Case studies towards transformative practice (pp. 3–22). The WAC Clearinghouse & Parlor Press.
  • Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5
  • Majhanovich, S. (2014). Neo-liberalism, globalization, language policy and practice issues in the Asia-Pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(2), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2013.875650
  • Mak, B. C. N. (2019). Teaching hong kong English before teaching academic English: The gateway to effective learning of college writing. Journal of Linguistics and Educational Research, 2(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.30564/jler.v2i1.331
  • Márquez, M. C., & Porras, A. M. (2020). Science communication in multiple languages is critical to its effectiveness. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00031
  • McCambridge, L. (2015). Academic writing in an ELF environment: Standardization, accommodation—or transformation? In T. Lillis, K. Harrington, M. R. Lea, & S. Mitchell (Eds.), Working with academic literacies: Case studies towards transformative practice (pp. 185–193). The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press.
  • McKinley, J. (2015). Critical argument and writer identity: Social constructivism as a theoretical framework for EFL academic writing. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(3), 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2015.1060558
  • Nathan, P. (2021). “We make the invisible visible”: Investigating and evaluating the one-to-one consultation service at a UK higher education institution. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101000
  • Nouwen, H. J. M. (1971). Creative ministry. Doubleday.
  • Pearson, J. (2017). Processfolio: Uniting academic literacies and critical emancipatory action research for practitioner-led inquiry into EAP writing assessment. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2–3), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1279544
  • Pérez-Milans, M. (2016). Bilingual education in Hong Kong. In O. Garcia, S. May, & A. Lin (Eds.), Bilingual and multilingual education (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02324-3_17-1
  • Pu, S., & Xu, H. (2022). Resistance and agency in second language academic discourse socialisation: Undergraduate students’ experiences of an EAP course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 58, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101122
  • Rassool, N. (2013). The political economy of English language and development: English vs. national and local languages in developing countries. In E. J. Erling & P. Seargeant (Eds.), English and development: Policy, pedagogy, and globalization (pp. 45–67). Multilingual Matters.
  • Reid, J.-A. (2013). Rural boys, literacy practice, and the possibilities of difference: Tales out of school. In M. Corbett & B. Green (Eds.), Rethinking rural literacies transnational perspectives (pp. 135–154). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Roose, T. M., & Newell, G. E. (2020). Exploring online discussions through an academic literacies approach. ELT Journal, 74(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa027
  • Scott, F., & Marsh, J. (2018). Digital literacies in early childhood. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.97
  • Smit, U. (2023). English-medium instruction (EMI). ELT Journal, 77(4), 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad018
  • Sugiharto, S. (2023). Untangling the politics of (re) production of nonexistence in academic writing and publishing. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2023.2187393
  • Sung, C. C. M. (2023). Agency and feedback-seeking: Academic English socialization of L2 students in Hong Kong. Language and Education, 37(3), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2085048
  • Tour, E. (2020). Teaching digital literacies in EAL/ESL classrooms: Practical strategies. TESOL Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.458
  • Tsui, A. P., & Ngo, H. (2017). Student’s perceptions of English-medium instruction in a Hong Kong university. Asian Englishes, 1, 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2016.1230484
  • Wong, S. S.-H. (2015). Mobile digital devices and preschooler’s home multiliteracy practices. Language and Literacy, 17(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.20360/G2CP49
  • Yeung, M. (2021). Tertiary students’ choice between native and non-native speaker English teachers and the role of English proficiency in learner preferences: Some evidence from post-colonial Hong Kong. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 18(2), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.30397/TJTESOL.202110_18(2).0003

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.