824
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Using Bayes Factors to Test Hypotheses in Developmental Research

REFERENCES

  • Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407–425. doi:10.1037/a0021524
  • Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Lindenberger, U. (2010). Adult age differences in covariation of motivation and working memory performance: Contrasting between-person and within-person findings. Research in Human Development, 7(1), 61–78. doi:10.1080/15427600903578177
  • Budescu, D. V., Broomell, S., & Por, H.-H. (2009). Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Psychological Science, 20(3), 299–308. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02284.x
  • Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., … Riddell, A. (in press). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/stan-paper-revision-feb2015.pdf
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
  • Etz, A., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2015). J. B. S. Haldane’s contribution to the Bayes factor hypothesis test (arXiv preprint No. 1511.08180). Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.08180
  • Ferguson, C. J., & Heene, M. (2012). A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science’s aversion to the null. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 555–561. doi:10.1177/1745691612459059
  • Gelman, A. (2012). Ethics and statistics: Ethics and the statistical use of prior information. Chance, 25(4), 52–54. doi:10.1080/09332480.2012.752294
  • Gigerenzer, G., Krauss, S., & Vitouch, O. (2004). The null ritual: What you always wanted to know about significance testing but were afraid to ask. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 391–408). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Marewski, J. N. (2015). Surrogate science: The idol of a universal method for scientific inference. Journal of Management, 41(2), 421–440. doi:10.1177/0149206314547522
  • Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2004). Likelihood ratios: A simple and flexible statistic for empirical psychologists. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(5), 791–806. doi:10.3758/BF03196706
  • Grange, J. A., Kowalczyk, A. W., & O’Loughlin, R. (2016). The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2695998). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2695998
  • Hager, W. (2013). The statistical theories of Fisher and of Neyman and Pearson: A methodological perspective. Theory & Psychology, 23(2), 251–270. doi:10.1177/0959354312465483
  • Haller, H., & Krauss, S. (2002). Misinterpretations of significance: A problem students share with their teachers? Methods of Psychological Research Online, 7(1). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a77b/e62627ff35f08469b56d08fc776bad512e94.pdf
  • Hubbard, R., & Bayarri, M. J. (2003). Confusion over measures of evidence (p’s) versus errors (α’s) in classical statistical testing. The American Statistician, 57(3), 171–178. doi:10.1198/0003130031856
  • JASP Team. (2016). JASP (Version 0.8.0.0). Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org
  • Jeffreys, H. (1961). The theory of probability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Jeffreys, H. (1935). Some tests of significance, treated by the theory of probability. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (31, pp. 203–222). Cambridge University Press.
  • Jeffreys, H. (1980). Some general points in probability theory. In H. Jeffreys & A. Zellner (Eds.), Bayesian analysis in econometrics and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Jeffreys (pp. 451–453). New York, NY: North-Holland.
  • Koechlin, E., Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J. (1997). Numerical transformations in five-month-old human infants. Mathematical Cognition, 3(2), 89–104. doi:10.1080/135467997387425
  • Kruschke, J. K. (2011). Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 299–312. doi:10.1177/1745691611406925
  • Kruschke, J. K. (2013). Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 573–603. doi:10.1037/a0029146
  • Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2017). The Bayesian new statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–29. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4
  • Lavine, M., & Schervish, M. J. (1999). Bayes factors: What they are and what they are not. American Statistician, 53(2), 119–122. doi:10.1080/00031305.1999.10474443
  • Liu, C. C., & Aitkin, M. (2008). Bayes factors: Prior sensitivity and model generalizability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52(6), 362–375. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2008.03.002
  • Loehlin, J. C. (2007). The strange case of c2 = 0: What does it imply for views of human development? Research in Human Development, 4(3/4), 151–162. doi:10.1080/15427600701662959
  • Ly, A., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). Harold Jeffreys’s default Bayes factor hypothesis tests: Explanation, extension, and application in psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 19–32. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2015.06.004
  • Mayo, D. G., & Spanos, A. (2011). Error statistics. In P. S. Bandyopadhyay & M. R. Forster (Eds.), Philosophy of statistics (pp. 153–198). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
  • Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2011). Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 16(4), 406–419. doi:10.1037/a0024377
  • Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Jamil, T. (2015). Package ‘BayesFactor’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/
  • Morey, R. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Rouder, J. N. (2016). Calibrated Bayes factors should not be used: A reply to Hoijtink, van Kooten, and Hulsker. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(1), 11–19. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1052710
  • Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 231, 289–337. doi:10.1098/rsta.1933.0009
  • O’Hara, R. B., & Sillanpää, M. J. (2009). A review of Bayesian variable selection methods: What, how and which. Bayesian Analysis, 4(1), 85–117. doi:10.1214/09-BA403
  • Perezgonzalez, J. D. (2016). Commentary: How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01504
  • Peterson, D. (2016). The baby factory: Difficult research objects, disciplinary standards, and the production of statistical significance. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 2, 1–10. doi:10.1177/2378023115625071
  • Plummer, M. (2003). JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (pp). Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/conferences/DSC-2003/Drafts/Plummer.pdf
  • Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
  • Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44(10), 1276–1284. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.10.1276
  • Rouder, J. N. (2016, March 21). Roll your own II: Bayes factors with null intervals [Web log post]. Retrieved, from http://jeffrouder.blogspot.com/2016/03/roll-your-own-ii-bayes-factors-with.html
  • Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2012). Default Bayes factors for model selection in regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(6), 877–903. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.734737
  • Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
  • Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
  • Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2015). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences, 22(2), 322–339. Psychological Methods. doi:10.1037/met0000061
  • Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15(6), 657–680. doi:10.1007/BF01068419
  • Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 309–316. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.309
  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
  • Tromovitch, P. (2015). The lay public’s misinterpretation of the meaning of ‘significant’: A call for simple yet significant changes in scientific reporting. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1). Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/477
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804. doi:10.3758/BF03194105
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., Van Der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. doi:10.1177/1745691612463078
  • Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology an empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 291–298. doi:10.1177/1745691611406923
  • Williams, M. N. (2017, April 10). Separating model from hypothesis in the Bayes factor test [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://thepathologicalscience.blogspot.com/2017/04/separating-model-from-hypothesis-in.html
  • Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358(6389), 749–750. doi:10.1038/358749a0
  • Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., Peeters, M., Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (in press). Where do priors come from? A Bayesian evaluation of a latent growth model with informative priors. Research in Human Development.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.