Investigating Differences Between American and Indian Raters in Assessing TOEFL iBT Speaking Tasks

REFERENCES

• Bansal, R. K. (1976). The intelligibility of Indian English ( Monograph No. 4). Hyderbad, India: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (1995). The effect of rater variables in the development of an occupation-specific language performance test. Language Testing, 12(1), 1–15. doi:10.1177/026553229501200101
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (2000). An investigation of the rating process in the IELTS oral interview. In IELTS research reports (Vol. 3). Retrieved from https://www.ielts.org/pdf/Vol3_Report3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 229–242.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, M. D., Mannell, R. H., & Dunn, P. K. (2011). Does a rater’s familiarity with a candidate’s pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interviews? Language Testing, 28(2), 201–219. doi:10.1177/0265532210393704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalhoub-Deville, M., & Wigglesworth, G. (2005). Rater judgment and English language speaking proficiency. World Englishes, 24(3), 383–391. doi:10.1111/j.0083-2919.2005.00419.x
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. (1999). Standard English: Discordant voices. World Englishes, 18(2), 171–186. doi:10.1111/1467-971X.00132
   Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service. (2007). TOEFL iBT Tips. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/TOEFL_Tips.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fayer, J. M., & Krasinski, E. (1987). Native and nonnative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 37(3), 313–326. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00573.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, H. (2012). The impact of World Englishes on oral proficiency assessment: Rater attitude, rating tendency, and challenges ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83–103. doi:10.1093/applin/23.1.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. B. (1982). The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk, & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. B. (2005). Asian Englishes: Beyond the Canon. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2009). An investigation into native and non-native teachers’ judgments of oral English performance: A mixed methods approach. Language Testing, 26(2), 187–217. doi:10.1177/0265532208101010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C. (2002). The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 173–190. doi:10.2307/3588329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, L. (2011). Interactional competence in a paired speaking test: Features salient to raters. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2), 127–145. doi:10.1080/15434303.2011.565845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, J. (2010). The development of the English language in India. In A. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of World Englishes (pp. 167–180). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, J., & Hoffmann, S. (2006). Describing verb-complementational profiles of new Englishes: A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide A Journal of Varieties of English, 27(2), 147–173. doi:10.1075/eww.27.2
   Google Scholar
• Myford, C. M., & Wolfe, E. W. (2000). Monitoring sources of variability within the test of spoken English assessment system (TOEFL Research Report No. RR-65). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidlhofer, B. (2004). 10. Research Perspectives on Teaching English as a Lingua Franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 209. doi:10.1017/S0267190504000145
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. E., & Bisazza, J. A. (1982). The comprehensibility of three varieties of English for college students in seven countries. Language Learning, 32(2), 259–269. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1982.tb00971.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London, UK: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Winke, P., & Gass, S. (2012). The influence of second language experience and accent familiarity on oral proficiency rating: A qualitative investigation. TESOL Quarterly. doi:10.1002/tesq.73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winke, P., Gass, S., & Myford, C. (2013). Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing, 30(2), 231–252. doi:10.1177/0265532212456968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement: Transactions of the Rasch Measurement SIG, 8, 370.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, X., & Mollaun, P. (2011). Using raters from India to score a large-scale speaking test. Language Learning, 61(4), 1222–1255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Elder, C. (2011). Judgments of oral proficiency by non-native and native English speaking teacher raters: Competing or complementary constructs? Language Testing, 28(1), 31–50. doi:10.1177/0265532209360671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar