Test Preparation Beliefs and Practices in a High-Stakes Context: A Teacher’s Perspective

References

• Abrams, L. S., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers’ opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 18–29. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson, C., & Hamps-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13(3), 280–297. doi:10.1177/026553229601300304
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279. doi:10.1177/026553229601300303
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81–90. doi:10.1177/003172171009200119
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L. (2011). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Comparing primary and secondary teachers in New Zealand. Assessment Matters, 3, 45–70.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Hirschfeld, G. (2007). Students, conceptions of assessment and mathematics achievement: Evidence for the power of self-regulation. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 7, 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., Hui, S. K. F., Yu, W. M., & Kennedy, K. J. (2011). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment in Chinese contexts: A tripartite model of accountability, improvement, and irrelevance. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 307–320. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Michaelides, M. P. (2011). Ecological rationality in teachers’ conceptions of assessment across samples from Cyprus and New Zealand. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 319–337. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0052-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Remesal, A. (2012). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A cross-cultural comparison. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 75–89. doi:10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n1.37286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics–Egypt. (2013). Indicators of income, expenditure, and consumptions. Retrieved from http://capmas.gov.eg/pdf/studies/pdf/enf2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chemers, M. M., Hu, L. T., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Liu, D. (2011). Washback effect of CET-4 and new college English teaching model exploration. Retrieved from http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HLXB201101054.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 3–17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. J., & Curtis, A. (Eds.). (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L. (2003). Teaching for the test: Validity, fairness, and moral action. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(3), 5–11. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00132.x
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L. (2005). Teaching for the test: How and why test preparation is appropriate. In R. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardized testing (pp. 159–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L. (2006). Preparing examinees for test taking: Guidelines for test developers and test users. In S. Downing, & T. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 115–128). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Deville, C., & Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2011). Accountability-assessment under no child left behind: Agenda, practice, and future. Language Testing, 28(3), 307–321. doi:10.1177/0265532211400876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebril, A., & Brown, G. T. L. (2014). The effect of high-stakes examination systems on teacher beliefs: Egyptian teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 21(1), 16–33. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.831030
   Google Scholar
• Gebril, A. & Hozayin, R. (2013). Assessing English in the Middle East and North Africa. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 1–7). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T., Gore, J., & Ladwig, J. (2006). Teachers’ fundamental beliefs, commitment to reform and the quality of pedagogy. Paper prepared for presentation at Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference Adelaide, November 26-30, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hamp-Lyons, L. (1998). Ethical test preparation practice: The case of the TOEFL*. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 329–337. doi:10.2307/3587587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E. (1997). The diploma disease in Egypt: Learning, teaching and the monster of the secondary leaving certificate. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(1), 161–176. doi:10.1080/0969594970040111
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. (1993). Backwash and TOEFL 2000 ( Unpublished manuscript, commissioned by Educational Testing Service (ETS)). University of Reading, Reading, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, D., Merki, K., Oerke, B., & Holmeier, M. (2012). Statewide low-stakes tests and a teaching to the test effect? An analysis of teacher survey data from two German states. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(4), 451–467. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.677803
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G., Jones, B., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbrough, T., & Davis, M. (1999). The impacts of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 199–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, E. R., & Waltman, K. (2008). Test preparation: Examining teacher perceptions and practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 28–45. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00120.x
   Google Scholar
• Legard, R., Keegan, J., & Ward, K. (2003). In-depth Interviews. In J. Lewis, & J. Ritchie (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 138–169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, C. (2007). Dynamic assessment: Assessment for and as teaching? Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(3), 257–278. doi:10.1080/15434300701481127
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., & Ritchie, J. (2003). Generalising from qualitative research. In J. Lewis, & J. Ritchie (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 263–286). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 241–256. doi:10.1177/026553229601300302
   Google Scholar
• Moore, W. P. (1994). Appropriate test preparation: Can we reach a consensus? Educational Assessment, 2(1), 51–68. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea0201_3
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2014). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, A. J., & Smith, M. L. (1994). Measurement-driven reform: Research on policy, practice, pepercussion (Technical Report No. 381). Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, F. L. (2011). Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2001). Teaching to the test? Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remesal, A. (2007). Educational reform and primary and secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment: The Spanish instance, building upon Black and Wiliam (2005). The Curriculum Journal, 18(1), 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (2004). Beliefs, practices, and interactions of teachers in a Japanese high school English department. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 797–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saville, N., & Hawkeye, R. (2004). The IELTS impact study: Investigating washback on teaching materials. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 73–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer und Schülermerkmalen: Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen [Measures of teacher and student characteristics]. Berlin, Geermany: Free University in Berlin and Humboldt University.
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (1999). Language testing: Impact. In B. Spolsky (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of educational linguistics (pp. 711–714). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Sigel, I. E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of beliefs. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Parental belief system: The psychological consequences for children (pp. 345–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B. (1974). The two nations and educational structure 1780–1870. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8–11. doi:10.3102/0013189X020005008
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B., Chun, T., & Barron, S. (2004). The effects of assessment-driven reform on the teaching of writing in Washington State. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 53–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, D. (1997). Impact and washback in language testing. In C. Clapham, & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 7 Language testing and assessment (pp. 291–302). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, D., & Horák, T. (2011). The impact of changes in the TOEFL exam on teaching in a sample of countries in Europe: Phase 3 and 4. TOEFL research report (RR-11-41). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Y. (2004). Methodology in washback studies. In L. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 19–36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, W. (2014). The Intensity and direction of CET washback on Chinese college students’ test-taking strategy use. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6), 1171–1177. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.6.1171-1177
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Q. (2015). Do component weighting and testing method affect time management and approaches to test preparation? A study on the washback mechanism. System, 50, 56–68. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, Y., & Andrews, S. (2014). Washback effects from a high-stakes examination on out-of-class English learning: Insights from possible self theories. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(1), 71–89. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.757546
   Google Scholar