Fluency in Second Language Testing: Insights From Different Disciplines

References

• American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (2013). The ACTFL proficiency guidelines 2012 - Speaking. Retrieved March 28, 2018, from https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/public/ACTFLProficiencyGuidelines2012_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E., Fagnano, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2003). Disfluences signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 25–36. doi:10.1023/A:1021980931292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E., Hudson Kam, C. L., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33(5), 914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. E., Wasow, T., Losongco, A., & Ginstrom, R. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76(1), 28–55. doi:10.1353/lan.2000.0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., & Seyfeddinipur, M. (2010). The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(4), 441–455. doi:10.1080/01690960903047122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, G. W., & Butterworth, B. L. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses and errors in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22(3), 201–211. doi:10.1177/002383097902200301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J., Van Moere, A., & Cheng, J. (2010). Validating automated speaking tests. Language Testing, 27(3), 355–377. doi:10.1177/0265532210364404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenship, K. L., & Holtgraves, T. (2005). The role of different markers of linguistic powerlessness in persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/0261927X04273034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147. doi:10.1177/00238309010440020101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & De Jong, N. H. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30(2), 159–175. doi:10.1177/0265532212455394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, H. R., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & De Jong, N. H. (2014a). Native ‘um’s elicit prediction of low-frequency referents, but non-native ‘um’s do not. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 104–116. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosker, H. R., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & Jong, N. H. (2014b). The perception of fluency in native and nonnative speech. Language Learning, 64(3), 579–614. doi:10.1111/lang.2014.64.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., Kim, M., & Blasingame, M. (2017). Language-independent talker-specificity in first-language and second-language speech production by bilingual talkers: L1 speaking rate predicts L2 speaking rate. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(2), 886–899. doi:10.1121/1.4976044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H., Lickley, R., & McKelvie, D. (1999). Non-linguistic influences on rates of disfluency in spontaneous speech. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 387–390).
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. E., & Schober, M. F. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 274–296. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of another’s knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive state of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(3), 383–398. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broos, W. P., Duyck, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2016). Verbal self-monitoring in the second Language. Language Learning, 66(S2), 132–154. doi:10.1111/lang.12189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 45–62. doi:10.1111/modl.2007.91.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25(4), 535–544. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00046-8
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (2002). Speaking in time. Speech Communication, 36(1), 5–14. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(01)00022-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84(1), 73–111. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Wasow, T. (1998). Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 201–242. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collard, P., Corley, M., MacGregor, L. J., & Donaldson, D. I. (2008). Attention orienting effects of hesitations in speech: Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, M., Macgregor, L. J., & Donaldson, D. I. (2007). It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension. Cognition, 105(3), 658–668. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, M., & Stewart, O. W. (2008). Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech: The meaning of um. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 589–602. doi:10.1111/lnco.2008.2.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(6), 2862–2873. doi:10.1121/1.1471894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, N. H. (2016a). Fluency in second language assessment. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 203–218). Boston/Berlin, Massachusetts/Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, N. H. (2016b). Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency. Iral, 54(2), 113–132. doi:10.1515/iral-2016-9993
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, N. H., Groenhout, R., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 223–243. doi:10.1017/S0142716413000210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, N. H., & Mora, J. (2017). Does having good articulatory skills lead to more fluent speech in first and second languages? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–13. doi:10.1017/S0272263117000389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2013). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(5), 893–916. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385–390. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.2.385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekens, T., Martens, H., Van Nuffelen, G., De Bodt, M., & Verhelst, W. (2014). Speech rate determination by vowel detection on the modulated energy envelope. Paper presented at the Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 2013 Proceedings of the 22nd European (1252–1256).
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 533–557. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–680. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., & Rossi, G. (2015). Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PloS One, 10(9), e0136100. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doehler, S. P., & Berger, E. (2016). L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics. doi:10.1093/applin/amw021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service. 2004. iBT/Next generation TOEFL Test. Speaking rubrics. Retrieved March 28, 2018, from http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/Speaking_Rubrics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, B., Lind, E. A., Johnson, B. C., & O’Barr, W. M. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(3), 266–279. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(78)90015-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina, C., Pochon-Berger, E., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2012). Le développement de la compétence d’interaction: Une étude sur le travail lexical. Revue Tranel, 57, 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On Fluency. In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85–101). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox Tree, J. E. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 709–738. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox Tree, J. E. (2001). Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 29(2), 320–326. doi:10.3758/BF03194926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulcher, G. (1996). Does thick description lead to smart tests? A data-based approach to rating scale construction. Language Testing, 13(2), 208–238. doi:10.1177/026553229601300205
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher, G. (2003). Testing second language speaking. Harlow, North Dakota: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Galaczi, E., & Taylor, L. (this issue). Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaczi, E. D. (2014). Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests? Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553–574. doi:10.1093/applin/amt017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequences. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1–68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginther, A., Dimova, S., & Yang, R. (2010). Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, 27(3), 379–399. doi:10.1177/0265532210364407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Notebaert, L. (2010). Lexical access problems lead to disfluencies in speech. Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 169–177. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. M. (2001). Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hosman, L. (2015). Powerful and powerless speech styles and their relationship to perceived dominance and control. In R. Schulze, & H. Pishwa (Eds.), The exercise of power in communication (pp. 221–232). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hosman, L. A., & Siltanen, S. A. (2011). Hedges, tag questions, message processing, and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(3), 341–349. doi:10.1177/0261927X11407169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. doi:10.1093/applin/amp048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IELTS. (n.d.). IELTS Speaking band descriptors. Retrieved March 28, 2018, from https://www.ielts.org/-/media/pdfs/speaking-band-descriptors.ashx?la=en
   Google Scholar
• Iwashita, N., Brown, A., Mcnamara, T., & O’Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 24–49. doi:10.1093/applin/amm017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, J., & Feldstein, S. (1970). Rhythms of dialogue. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 166–196). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Kahng, J. (2014). Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, 64(4), 809–854. doi:10.1111/lang.2014.64.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566. doi:10.1111/modl.2010.94.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1102_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, C., White, K. S., & Aslin, R. N. (2011). Toddlers use speech disfluencies to predict speakers’ referential intentions. Developmental Science, 14(4), 925–934. doi:10.1111/desc.2011.14.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kormos, J. (1999). Simulating conversations in oral-proficiency assessment: A conversation analysis of role plays and non-scripted interviews in language exams. Language Testing, 16(2), 163–188. doi:10.1177/026553229901600203
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman’s place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–80. doi:10.1017/S0047404500000051
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 3, 387–417. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, P. (2000). The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 25–42). Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41–104. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–37. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, D., Strik, H., & Lim, G. S. (this issue). Speech technologies and the assessment of second language speaking: Approaches, challenges, and opportunities. Language Assessment Quarterly.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, D. R., Oehmen, R., Dunn, J., Hird, K., & Kirsner, K. (2013). Fluency profiling system: An automated system for analyzing the temporal properties of speech. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 191–202. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0222-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maclay, H., & Osgood, C. E. (1959). Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15, 19–44. doi:10.1080/00437956.1959.11659682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. (2010). Spoken fluency revisited. English Profile Journal, 1, 1–15. doi:10.1017/S2041536210000012
   Google Scholar
• Merlo, S., & Mansur, L. L. (2004). Descriptive discourse: Topic familiarity and disfluencies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37(6), 489–503. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(4), 557–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oviatt, S. (1995). Predicting spoken disfluencies during human–Computer interaction. Computer Speech & Language, 9(1), 19–35. doi:10.1006/csla.1995.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson Education Ltd. (2017). PTE Academic score guide. Retrieved March 28, 2018, from https://pearsonpte.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Score-Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen, P. (2017). Temporal fluency and problem-solving in interaction: An exploratory study of fluency resources in L2 dialogue. System, 70, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(02), 169–190. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04000056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Préfontaine, Y. (2013). Perceptions of French fluency in second language speech production. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 69(3), 324–348. doi:10.3138/cmlr.1748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay, R. W. (1968). Speech patterns and personality. Language and Speech, 11(1), 54–63. doi:10.1177/002383096801100108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E. N. (2016). The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 828–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riazantseva, A. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing a study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 497–526. doi:10.1017/S027226310100403X
   Google Scholar
• Riggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14(4), 423–441. doi:10.1080/01638539109544795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, M. J. (2009). Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), 395–412. doi:10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2010). Some Other “Uh(m)”s. Discourse Processes, 47(2), 130–174. doi:10.1080/01638530903223380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
   Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–200. doi:10.1017/S0272263104262027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2007). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing Research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second langauge use, learning, and teaching (pp. 207–226). Brussels, Belgium: University of Brussels Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, V., Siltanen, S. A., & Hosman, L. A. (1998). The effects of powerful and powerless speech styles and speaker expertise on impression formation and attitude change. Communication Research Reports, 15(1), 27–35. doi:10.1080/08824099809362094
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, R. L. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact‐finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11(2), 139–169. doi:10.1111/hcre.1984.11.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, P. (2011). Pausing patterns: Differences between L2 learners and native speakers. ELT Journal, 65(1), 71–79. doi:10.1093/elt/ccq020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Bosch, L., Oostdijk, N., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2004). Durational aspects of turn-taking in spontaneous face-to-face and telephone dialogues. In P. Sojka, I. Kopecek, & K. Pala (Eds.), Text, Speech and Dialogue: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference TSD 2004 (pp. 563–570). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Towell, R. (2002). Relative degrees of fluency: A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40(2), 117–150. doi:10.1515/iral.2002.005
   Google Scholar
• Towell, R., & Dewaele, J. M. (2005). The role of psycholinguistic factors in the development of fluency amongst advanced learners of French. In J. M. Dewaele (Ed.), Focus on French as a Foreign Language (pp. 210–239). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. doi:10.1093/applin/17.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hest, E. (2000). Analyzing self-repair: An alternative way of language assessment. In G. V. Ekbatani & H. D. Pierson (Eds.), Learner-directed assessment in ESL (pp. 75–88). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Wilson, T. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 957–968. doi:10.3758/BF03206432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar