An Innovative Approach to Assessing Depth of Knowledge of Academic Words

References

• Anderson, R. C, & Nagy, W. E. (1991). Word meanings. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 690–724). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F., Kame’enui, E. J., & Ash, G. E. (2003). Research on vocabulary instruction: Voltaire redux. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 752–785). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum & Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Omanson, R. C. (1987). The effects and uses of diverse vocabulary instructional techniques. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147–163). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bolger, D. A., Balass, M., Landen, E., & Perfetti, C. A. (2008). Context variation and definitions in learning the meanings of words: An instance-based learning approach. Discourse Processes, 45, 122–159. doi:10.1080/01638530701792826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, C., Culligan, B., & Phillips, J. (2013). A new general service list. Retrieved from http://www.newgeneralservicelist.org
   Google Scholar
• Chui, A. S. Y. (2006). A study of the English vocabulary knowledge of university students in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 16, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. doi:10.2307/3587951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, S., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. (2010). The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers. Language Learning, 60, 573–605. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00568.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosson, A. C., & Lesaux, N. K. (2013). Pinpointing the challenging aspects of academic language: Does knowledge of connectives play a special role in the reading comprehension of English language learners and English-only students? Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosson, A. C., & McKeown, M. G. (2016). How effectively do middle school learners use roots to infer the meaning of unfamiliar words? Cognition and Instruction, 34, 148–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosson, A. C., McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. B., & Ward, A. (2012, July). Developing an assessment to measure depth of knowledge of academic vocabulary. Interactive paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Studies of Reading, Montreal, Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, P., Lawless, R., Li, C., Sabatini, J. S., Bejar, I. I., & O’Reilly, T. (2014). Creating vocabulary item types that measure students’ depth of semantic knowledge (ETS Research Report no. RR-14-02). doi:10.1002/ets2.12001
   Google Scholar
• DeMaio, T. J., & Rothgeb, J. M. (1996). Cognitive interviewing techniques: In the lab and in the field. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 177–195). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Eddington, C. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2015). How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: The current state of the literature. Psychological Bulletin Review, 22(1), 13–37. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0665-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service. (2011). GRE general test. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
   Google Scholar
• Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis‘. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, G. E. (1991). Factors influencing the reading test performance of Spanish-speaking Hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 371–392. doi:10.2307/747894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2013). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35, 305–327. doi:10.1093/applin/amt015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2010). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 19.0. Armonk, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, R. T., & Garcia, G. E. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), 90–112. doi:10.1598/RRQ.31.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, English proficiency, and late-emerging reading difficulties. Educational Researcher, 39, 484–486. doi:10.3102/0013189X10378400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bice, K., & Perrotti, L. (2015). Bilingualism, mind, and brain. In M. Liberman & B. H. Partee (Eds.), Annual review of linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 377–394). Retrieved from https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124937
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2012). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge in second language reading. Language Learning, 4, 79–103.
   Google Scholar
• Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2007). The development of reading skills in children with English as a second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(2), 105–131. doi:10.1080/10888430709336555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, J. N., & Shore, W. J. (2003). A narwal is an animal: Partial word knowledge biases adults’ decisions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 477–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension for struggling readers: The case of Spanish-speaking language minority learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 701–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., Crosson, A. C., Beck, I. B., & Moore, D. W. (2018). Word knowledge and comprehension effects of an academic vocabulary intervention for middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 572–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., Deane, P. D., Scott, J. A., Krovetz, R., & Lawless, R. R. (2017). Vocabulary assessment to support instruction: Building rich word-learning experiences. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meara, P., & Wolter, B. (2004). V_links: Beyond vocabulary breadth. In D. Albrechtsen, K. Haastrup, & B. Henriksen (Eds.), Angles on the English speaking world (Vol. 4, pp. 85–96). Copenhagen, Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meara, P. (2009). Connected words: Word associations and second language vocabulary acquisition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1978). Semantic relations among words. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 61–118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2016). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. David Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 69–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. E., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment Governing Board. (2008). Reading framework for the 2009 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nunberg, G. (1979). The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy, 3(2), 143–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers. (2016). PAARC assessment. New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2012). Vocabulary assessment. Making do with what we have while we create the tools we need. In J. Baumann & E. Kame’enui (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (2nd ed., pp. 231–255). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 282–296. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.2.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pethö, G. (2001). What is polysemy? – A survey of current research and results. In E. T. Németh & K. Bibok (Eds.), Pragmatics and flexibility of word meaning (pp. 175–224). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Princeton University. 2010. WordNet: A lexical database for English. New Jersey: Princeton. Retrieved from http://wordnet.princeton.edu
   Google Scholar
• Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 282–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning., 52, 513–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, D. D., & Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21(1), 28–52. doi:10.1191/0265532204lt273oa
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2012. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. (1989). Towards a deeper assessment of vocabulary knowledge (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 654 321). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10(3), 355–371.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 41–60). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incidental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48, 281–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (2014). Conceptual review article. Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64, 913–951. doi:10.1111/lang.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 499–520. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82–102. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J., Lubliner, S., & Hiebert, E. H. (2006). Constructs underlying word selection and assessments tasks in the archival research on vocabulary instruction. In C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, B. Maloch, J. Hoffman, & D. Schallert (Eds.), National reading conference yearbook (pp. 264–275). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. A., Flinspach, S. L., Vevea, J. L., & Castaneda, R. (2015). Vocabulary knowledge as a multidimensional concept: A six factor model. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Scientific Study of Reading, Hapuna Beach, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S. G. (2012). Smarter balanced assessment consortium: Comprehensive research agenda. Report Prepared for the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.smarterbalanced.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Comprehensive_Research_Agenda.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Srinvasan, M., & Snedeker, J. (2011). Judging a book by its cover and contents: The representation of polysemous and homophonous meanings in four-year-old children. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 245–272. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72–110. doi:10.3102/00346543056001072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234. doi:10.1017/S0142716401002041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar