Investigating the Benefits of Scaffolding in Assessments of Young English Learners: A Case for Scaffolded Retell Tasks

References

• Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59. doi:10.1177/1362168810383329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Caski (Eds), Proceedings of the second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
   Google Scholar
• Attali, Y. (2011). Immediate feedback and opportunity to revise answers: Application of a graded response IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(6), 472–479. doi:10.1177/0146621610381755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L., Heritage, M., & Butler, F. A. (2014). Developmental considerations and curricular contexts in the assessment of young language learners. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 423–439). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 37, 29–51. doi:10.1007/BF02291411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 23–48). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, S. A. (2014). If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again: Applications of sequential IRT models to cognitive assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 632–644. doi:10.1177/0146621614536464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devolder, A., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 557–573. doi:10.1111/jcal.2012.28.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. (2012). Making text comprehensible for english learners: The siop model, (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act. (2015). Public Law No. 114-354.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at-risk students. School Psychology International, 23, 112–127. doi:10.1177/0143034302023001733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 167–196. doi:10.1017/S0272263116000085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Testing Research, 15(1), 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, B. L. (2012). Technology enabled assessments: An investigation of scoring models for scaffolding tasks ( Unpublished Dissertation). University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). Allocating federal funds for state programs for English language learners. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2000). Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 50–64. doi:10.1177/01466216000241003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of s-x2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289–298. doi:10.1177/0146621603027004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2013). Dynamic assessment in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–8). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0345
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2017). Computerized dynamic assessments for young language learners. In M. K. Wolf & Y. G. Butler (Eds.), English language proficiency assessments for young learners (pp. 214–233). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17, 323–342. doi:10.1177/1362168813482935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, E. M., & Rodgers, A. (2004). The role of scaffolding in teaching. In A. Rodgers & E. M. Rodgers (Eds.), Scaffolding literacy instruction: Strategies for K-4 classrooms (pp. 1–10). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Tutz, G. (1990). Sequential item response models with an ordered response. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 39–55. doi:10.1111/bmsp.1990.43.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159–180. doi:10.1080/13670050608668639
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27–62). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., & Butler, Y. G. (2017). An overview of English language proficiency assessments for young learners. In M. K. Wolf & Y. G. Butler (Eds.), English language proficiency assessments for young learners (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., Guzman-Orth, D., Lopez, A., Castellano, K., Himelfarb, I., & Tsutagawa, F. (2016). Integrating scaffolding strategies into technology-enhanced assessments of English learners: Task types and measurement models. Educational Assessment, 21(3), 157–175. doi:10.1080/10627197.2016.1202107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar