An Equal Challenge? Comparing TOEFL iBT™ Speaking Tasks with Academic Speaking Tasks

References

• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2017, October). Australian senior secondary curriculum: Literacy. Downloaded from the Australian Curriculum website. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/literacy/
   Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., Bennett, S., Hall, M., & Molloy, E. (2016). Support for assessment practice: Developing the assessment design decisions framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(5), 545–556. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benwell, B. (1999). The organisation of knowledge in British university tutorial discourse: Issues, pedagogic discourse strategies and disciplinary identity. Pragmatics, 9(4), 535–565. doi:10.1075/prag.9.4.06ben
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. H. (2002). Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: Shifting dynamics and identities. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 429–453. doi:10.1177/14614456020040040201
   Google Scholar
• Berrill, D. P. (1991). Exploring underlying assumptions: Small group work of university undergraduates. Educational Review, 43(2), 143–157. doi:10.1080/0013191910430204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (2014). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York and Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Conrad, S. M., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M., Clark, V., … Urzua, A. (2004). Representing language use in the university: Analysis of the TOEFL® 2000 spoken and written academic language corpus (TOEFL Monograph No. TOEFL-MS-25). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, K. (2010). Background paper for the AQF Council on generic skills. South Australian Department of Further Education Employment Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.aqf.edu.au/Portals/0/Documents/Generic%20skills%20background%20paper%20FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, L. A., & Swain, M. (2014). Contextualizing performances: Comparing performances during TOEFL iBTTM and real-life academic speaking. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 353–373. doi:10.1080/15434303.2014.947532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Iwashita, N., & McNamara, T. (2005). An examination of rater orientations and test-taker performance on English-for-academic-purposes speaking tasks (TOEFL Monograph No. TOEFL-MS-29). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, F. A., Eignor, D., Jones, S., McNamara, T., & Suomi, B. K. (2000). TOEFL® 2000 speaking framework: A working paper (TOEFL Monograph No. TOEFL-MS-20). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A. (2008). The TOEFL validity argument. In C. A. Chapelle, M. K. Enright, & J. M. Jamieson (Eds.), Building a validity argument for the test of English as a foreign language (pp. 319–352). New York and Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. (2008). Building a validity argument for the test of English as a foreign language. New York and Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, A., Grant, L., Mulcahy-Ernt, P., & Powers, D. (2005). A teacher-verification study of speaking and writing prototype tasks for a New TOEFL. (TOEFL Monograph No. TOEFL-MS-26). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, P. A. (2007). Problematising academic discourse socialisation. In H. Marriott, T. Moore, & R. Spence-Brown (Eds.), Learning discourses and the discourses of learning (pp. 1–18). Melbourne and Sydney: Monash University ePress/Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, P. A. (2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169–192. doi:10.1017/S0267190510000048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischman, S. (2003). Language and medicine. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 470–502). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, K., Elder, C., & Wigglesworth, G. (2012). Investigating the validity of an integrated listening-speaking task: A discourse-based analysis of test takers’ oral performances. Language Testing, 29(3), 345–369. doi:10.1177/0265532211424479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (1989). The structure of a text. In M. A. K. Haliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, context and text (pp. 70–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hativa, N., & Marincovich, M. (1995). Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Heuboeck, A. (2009). Some aspects of coherence, genre and rhetorical structure – And their integration in a generic model of text. University of Reading Language Studies Working Papers, 1, 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, J. M., Eignor, D., Grabe, W., & Kunnan, A. J. (2008). Frameworks for a new TOEFL. In C. A. Chapelle, M. K. Enright, & J. M. Jamieson (Eds.), Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language (pp. 55–96). New York and Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joughin, G. (1998). Dimensions of oral assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 367–378. doi:10.1080/0260293980230404
   Google Scholar
• Joughin, G. (2008). Oral assessment from the learner’s perspective: The experience of oral assessment in post-compulsory education. Saarbrücken. Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2009). Nurturing generic capabilities through a teaching and learning environment which provides practice in their use. Higher Education, 57(1), 37–55. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9131-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M. (2004). The role of peer support in ESL students’ accomplishment of oral academic tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 337–368. doi:10.3138/cmlr.59.3.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G. (2009). Speaking up: Six Korean students’ oral participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars. English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), 142–156. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2009.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Morita, N. (2000). Discourse socialization through oral classroom activities in a TESL graduate classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 279–310. doi:10.2307/3587953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 573–603. doi:10.2307/3588281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morreale, S. P., & Pearson, J. C. (2008). Why communication education is important: The centrality of the discipline in the 21st century. Communication Education, 57(2), 224–240. doi:10.1080/03634520701861713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J., & O’Brien, D. (2005). Selling your design: Oral communication pedagogy in design education. Communication Education, 54(1), 6–19. doi:10.1080/03634520500076885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors’ Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2017, October). Common core state standards: English language arts standards » speaking & listening » grade 11-12. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/SL/11-12/
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B. (2000). Making sense of discourse analysis. Gold Coast, QLD: Gerd Stabler.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, D., Flores, A., & Niklasson, L. (2016). Assessment revisited: A review of research in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 1008–1032. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1055233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M., Leung, S., & Oltman, P. K. (2001). The reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks important for academic success at the undergraduate and graduate levels (TOEFL Monograph No. TOEFL-MS-21). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J., & Lindemann, S. (2002). Teaching the literature review to international graduate students. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 105–120). Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, T., Kazlauskas, A., & Davis, T. (2004). Teaching first year students to communicate their reasoning. In D. Nulty & N. Meyers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Rim Conference on the First Year in Higher Education (pp. 14–16). Brisbane, Qld: Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Zappa-Hollman, S. (2007). Academic presentations across post-secondary contexts: The discourse socialization of non-native English speakers. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 63(4), 455–485. doi:10.3138/cmlr.63.4.455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Živković, S. (2014). The importance of oral presentations for university students. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 468–475.
   Google Scholar