Test Review: Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS)

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 257–279. doi:10.1177/026553229601300303
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2009). The intersection of test impact, validation and educational reform policy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 118–131. doi:10.1017/S0267190509090102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapelle, C. A. (2012). Validity argument for language assessment: The framework is simple … . Language Testing, 29(1), 19–27. doi:10.1177/0265532211417211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service. (2016). The road ahead for state assessments: What the assessment consortia built, why it matters, and emerging options. Princeton, NJ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Fairbairn, S. (2011). Test review: ACCESS for ELLs®. Language Testing, 28(3), 425–431. doi:10.1177/0265532211404195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B. H., & Flores, B. B. (2018). The English language proficiency assessment for the 21st century (ELPA21). Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 433–442. doi:10.1080/15434303.2018.1549241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. (2002). Validating high-stakes testing programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 31–40. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2002.tb00083.x
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). (pp. 13–103). New York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241–256. doi:10.1177/026553229601300302
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 229–258. doi:10.3102/00346543062003229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, P. (2016). Shifting the focus of validity for test use. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 236–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2018). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. (1997). The centrality of test use and consequences for test validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 5–13. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00585.x
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. (2016). Evaluating test validity: Reprise and progress. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 268–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Texas Classroom Teachers Association (TCTA). (2018). USDE approves Texas’s state ESSA plan. Retrieved from https://tcta.org/node/14730-usde_approves_texas_s_state_essa_plan
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2016). TELPAS writing audit report. Grades 2–12. [Research report]. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2017). Title III TELPAS update [PowerPoint presentation]. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2018a). TELPAS manual for raters and test administrators: Grades K-12. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2018b). Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) updates: TETN #598 [PowerPoint presentation]. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2018c). ELPS-TELPAS proficiency level descriptors. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2018d). 2019–2020 English learner reclassification criteria in ESSA state plan, Title III, Part A. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2018e). English learner reclassification criteria 2018–2019. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2018f). 2018–2019 Testing coordinator training. [PowerPoint presentation]. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2019). Chapter 6: Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS). In technical digest 2017–2018. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2019a). Educator guide: Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) and TELPAS English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) alternate. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2019b). Chapter 3: Standard technical processes in Technical digest 2017–2018. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2019c). Student success initiative manual. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2019d). Texas English language proficiency assessment system statewide summary report. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2019e). Enrollment in Texas public schools, 2018–19. (Document No. No. GE19 601 13). Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2019f). TELPAS validity evidence based on the consequences of testing (proficiency-level trends). Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• WIDA Consortium. (2018). WIDA consortium report 2017–2018. Madison, WI: Author. https://wida.wisc.edu/sites/default/files/Website/Memberships/Consortium/Annual-Reports/2018WIDAAnnualReport.pdf
   Google Scholar