The Effect of Additional Time on the Quality of Argumentation in L2 Writing Assessment: A Mixed-methods Study

References

• Bae, J., Bentler, P. M., & Lee, Y. S. (2016). On the role of content in writing assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(4), 302–328. doi:10.1080/15434303.2016.1246552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biola, H. R. (1982). Time limits and topic assignment for essay tests. Research in the Teaching of English, 16(1), 97–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breland, H. M., Bridgeman, B., & Fowles, M. E. (1999). Writing assessment in admission to higher education: Review and framework ( Research Report No. 99-3). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Caudery, T. (1990). The validity of timed essay tests in the assessment of writing skills. ELT Journal, 44(2), 122–131. doi:10.1093/elt/44.2.122
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Strasbourg, France: Author. Retrieved from www.coe.int/lang-cefr
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., Helwig, R., & Tindal, G. (2004). Writing performance assessments: How important is extended time? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 132–142. doi:10.1177/00222194040370020401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crone, C., Wright, D., & Baron, P., (1993). Performance of examinees for whom English is their second language on the spring 1992 SAT II: Writing test ( Unpublished manuscript). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10(1), 5–43. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, A., Kantor, R., & Powers, D. E. (2002). Decision making while rating ESL/EFL writing tasks: A descriptive framework. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 67–96. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service [ETS]. (2019, December 20). TOEFL ITP overall performance descriptors. ETS TOEFL ITP. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/toefl_itp/research/performance-descriptors/
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, S. C. (1992). The effects of time and instruction on writing performance of eighth-grade students in writing assessment situations ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Gamer, M., Lemon, J., & Singh, I. F. P. (2012). irr: Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.84. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irr
   Google Scholar
• Hale, G. (1992). Effects of amount of time allowed on the test of written English (Research Report No. 92-27). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1992.tb01458.x
   Google Scholar
• Hirvela, A. (2017). Argumentation & second language writing: Are we missing the boat? Journal of Second Language Writing, 100(36), 69–74. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Khabbazbashi, N. (2017). Topic and background knowledge effects on performance in speaking assessment. Language Testing, 34(1), 23–48. doi:10.1177/0265532215595666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuder, B., & Harwood, N. (2015). L2 writing in test and non-test situations: Process and product. Journal of Writing Research, 6(3), 233–278. doi:10.17239/jowr-2015.06.03.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoch, U., & Elder, C. (2010). Validity and fairness implications of varying time conditions on a diagnostic test of academic English writing proficiency. System, 38(1), 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, B. (1990). What does time buy? ESL student performance on home versus class compositions. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 140–154). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S., & Stone, C. A. (2006). Performance assessment. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 387–431). Westport, CT: American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, G. S. (2009). Prompt and rater effects in second language writing performance assessment ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students’ writing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(1), 59–92. doi:10.3200/JEXE.76.1.59-92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (1999). How to handle opposing arguments in persuasive messages: A meta-analytic review of the effects of one-sided and two-sided messages. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 22, pp. 209–249). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Polio, C., & Friedman, D. A. (2016). Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, D. E., & Fowles, M. E. (1996). Effects of applying different time limits to a proposed GRE writing test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(4), 433–452. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1996.tb00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444–456. doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. A. (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students’ persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12–23. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2014.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence based approach. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., Oh, S., Wang, Y., & Tsutagawa, F. S. (2018). Young adolescent EFL students’ writing skill development: Insights from assessment data. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 311–329. doi:10.1080/15434303.2018.1531868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009). Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation. Written Communication, 26(2), 183–209. doi:10.1177/0741088309333019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Erlam, R. (2016). The effect of timing on the quantity and quality of test-takers’ writing. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Younkin, W. F. (1986). Speededness as a source of test bias for non-native English speakers on the college level academic skills test. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(11–A), 4072.
   Google Scholar