References
- ACTFL. (n.d.a). Assigning CEFR ratings to ACTFL assessments: https://www.actfl.org/resources/assigning-cefr-ratings-actfl-assessments
- ACTFL. (n.d.b). Alignment of the ACTFL proficiency ratings to the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB). https://languagetesting.com/pub/media/wysiwyg/research/white_papers/Alignment_of_the_ACTFL_Proficiency_Ratings_to_the_CLB_D7.pdf
- Arnott, S., Brogden, L. M., Faez, F., Peguret, M., Piccardo, E., Rehner, K., Taylor, S. K., & Wernicke, M. (2017). The common European Framework of reference for languages (CEFR) in Canada: A research agenda. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 31–54. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/24472/29667
- Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
- Bachman, L. F. (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 2(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0201_1
- Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford University Press.
- Bournot-Trites, M., Barbour, R., Jezak, M., Stewart, G., & Carbonneau, D. B. (2015). Theoretical framework for the Canadian Language Benchmarks/Niveaux de compétence linguistique canadiens. Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. https://www.language.ca/product/pdf-e-003-theoretical-framework-for-the-clb-and-nclc/
- Bournot-Trites, M., Friesen, L., & Ruest, C. (2018). Report on the correspondence of the Canadian Language Benchmarks/Niveaux de compétence linguistique canadiens versus the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks.
- Breton, G., Lepage, S., & North, B. (2008). Cross-language benchmarking seminar to calibrate examples of spoken production in English, French, German, Italian and Spanish with regard to the six levels of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), CIEP, Sèvres 23-25 June 2008. Report. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168045a0cd
- Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5070/L462005216
- Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. (2011). Niveaux de compétence linguistique canadi ens: Français langue seconde pour les adultes. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/ircc/migration/ircc/francais/pdf/pub/competence-linguistique.pdf
- Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. (2012). Canadian Language Benchmarks: English as a second language for adults. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/ircc/migration/ircc/english/pdf/pub/language-benchmarks.pdf
- Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard-setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. Sage.
- Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. https://rm.coe.int/1680459f97
- Council of Europe. (2009). Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR). https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680667a2d
- Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4
- Dicks, J. (2018). Aligning the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB) and the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). A report prepared for the Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks.
- Dorans, N. J. (2004). Equating, concordance, and expectation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28(4), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621604265031
- Eckes, T. (2011). Introduction to many-facet Rasch measurement. Peter Lang.
- Elder, C. (2018). Test review: Certifying French competency: The DELF tout public (B2). Language Testing, 35(4), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218781627
- Faez, F., Majhanovich, S., Taylor, S., Smith, M., & Crowley, K. (2011). The power of ‘can do’ statements: Teachers’ perceptions of CEFR-informed instruction in French as a second language classrooms in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 1–19. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19855
- Figueras, N., North, B., Takala, S., Verhelst, N., & Van Avermaet, P. (2005). Relating examinations to the CCommon European FrameworkEuropean Framework: A manual. Language Testing, 22(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt308oa
- Green, A. (2017). Linking tests of English for academic purposes to the CEFR: The score user’s perspective. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1350685
- Hunter, D., Andrews, A., & Piccardo, E. (2016). Synergies: Language learning, settlement and integration. https://www.dce.ca/en/student-services/resources/Synergies-Project/Synergies—English.pdf
- Hunter, D., Cousineau, D., Collins, G., & Hook, G. (2019). Action-oriented approach: Handbook. Canadian Association of Second Language Teachers. https://www.caslt.org/en/product/aoa-handbook/
- ICTC/CTIC. (Information and Communications Technology Council/Le Conseil des technologies de l’information et des communications) (n.d.). CLB backgrounder. https://www.scribd.com/document/335224581/ICTC-CLB-Backgrounder-FR-pdf.
- Jezak, M. (2017). Language is the key: The Canadian Language Benchmarks model. University of Ottawa Press.
- Jezak, M., & Piccardo, E. (2017). Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB) and Niveaux de compétence linguistique canadiens (NCLC) – Canadian frameworks of reference for languages in the era of glocalization. In M. Jezak (Ed.), Twenty years of the Canadian Language Benchmarks and Niveaux de compétence linguistique canadiens: Policy, research and practice (pp (pp. 7–31). University of Ottawa Press.
- Jones, N. (2002). Relating the ALTE Framework to the Common European Framework of Reference. In J. C. Alderson (Ed.), Case studies in the use of the Common European Framework (pp. 167–183). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168069f403
- Kane, M. T. (2004). Certification testing as an illustration of argument-based validation. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2(3), 135–170. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0203_1
- Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000
- Kenyon, D. (2012). Using Bachman’s assessment use argument as a tool in conceptualizing the issues surrounding linking ACTFL and CEFR. In E. Tschirner (Ed.), Aligning frameworks of reference in language testing: The ACTFL proficiency guidelines and the Common European Framework of Reference (pp. 5–17). Stauffenburg Verlag.
- Knoch, U., & Chapelle, C. A. (2018). Validation of rating processes within an argument-based framework. Language Testing, 35(4), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217710049
- Kristmanson, P., Lafargue, C., & Culligan, K. (2013). Experiences with autonomy: Learner’s voices on language learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(4), 462–486. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1723.462
- Lewis, J. R. (2014). Usability: Lessons learned … and yet to be learned. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(9), 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.930311
- Lim, G. S., Geranpayeh, A., Khalifa, H., & Buckendahl, C. W. (2013). Standard setting to an international reference framework: Implications for theory and practice. International Journal of Testing, 13(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2012.678526
- Linacre, J. M. (2021). A user’s guide to FACETS, Rasch model computer program. https://www.winsteps.com/a/Facets-Manual.pdf
- Matz, D. C., & Hause, E. L. (2008). “Dealing” with the central limit theorem. Teaching of Psychology, 35(3), 198–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/009862830803500308
- Negishi, M., Takada, T., & Tono, Y. (2013). A progress report on the development of the CEFR-J. In E. D. Galaczi & C. J. Weir (Eds.), Exploring language frameworks: Proceedings of the ALTE Krakow Conference, July 2011, Krakow, Poland, (pp. 135–163). Cambridge University Press.
- North, B. (2014a). The CEFR in practice. Cambridge University Press.
- North, B. (2014b). Putting the Common European Framework of Reference to good use. Language Teaching, 47(2), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000206
- North, B., & Hughes, G. (2003). CEF performance samples for relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168045a0c4
- North, B., & Lepage, S. (2005) Seminar to calibrate examples of spoken performances in line with the scales of the CCommon European Framework of Reference for LangReference for Languages, CIEP, Sèvres, 2-4 December 2004, Report. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168045a0cb
- North, B., & Piccardo, E. (2018). Aligning the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB) to the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR): Research report. Ottawa: Centre for Canadan Language Benchmarks. https://www.language.ca/aligning-clb-and-cefr/
- North, B., & Piccardo, E. (2019). Aligning the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB) to the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR): Research report. Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. https://www.language.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Aligning-the-CLB-and-CEFR.pdf
- Papageorgiou, S. (2010). Investigating the decision-making process of standard setting participants. Language Testing, 27(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349472
- Peng, C., Liu, J., & Cai, H. (2021). Aligning China’s Standards of English Language Ability with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00617-2
- Pépin, C. (2008). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment and Canadian Language Benchmarks 2000/Niveaux de compétence linguistique canadiens 2006: An overview of concepts, structures and applications. Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. https://www.language.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/CEFR_CLB_Final_Report.pdf
- Piccardo, E. (2014). From communicative to action-oriented: A research pathway. Government of Ontario/Canadian Heritage. https://transformingfsl.ca/en/components/from-communicative-to-action-oriented-a-research-pathway/
- Piccardo, E., & North, B. (2019). The action-oriented approach: A dynamic vision of language education. Multilingual Matters.
- Piccardo, E., North, B., & Maldina, E. (2019). Promoting innovation and reform in language education through a quality assurance template for CEFR implementation. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, Special Issue 22(1), 103–128. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/25835/1882521827
- Richer, J. -J. (2017). Quand le monde du travail peut venir en renfort de la didactique des langues … , [When the world of work can come to reinforce language pedagogy]. Revue TDFLE 70 : La pensée CECR. [TDFLE Review 70: The CEFR Concept], 1–34. http://revue-tdfle.fr/les-numeros/numero-70/28-quand-le-monde-du-travail-peut-venir-en-renfort-de-la-didactique-des-langues
- Shohamy, E. (1981). Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the oral interview and concurrent validity with cloze procedure. In A. S. Palmer, J. M. Groot, & G. A. Trosper (Eds.), The construct validation of tests of communicative competence (pp. 94–105). TESOL.
- Shohamy, E. (1988). A proposed framework for testing the oral language of second/foreign language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007294
- Swender, E., Tschirner, E., & Bärenfänger, O. (2012). Comparing ACTFL/ILR and CEFR based reading tests. In E. Tschirner (Ed.), Aligning frameworks of reference in language testing: The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines and the Common European Framework of Reference (pp. 123–137). Stauffenburg Verlag.
- Tagliante, C., & Megre, B. (2008). L’impact du CECR sur l’evaluation des competences en FLE (Comptes rendus d’experiences pedagogiques). Revue japonaise de didactique du français, 3(1), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.24495/rjdf.3.1_172
- Taylor, L. (2004). Issues of test comparability. Research Notes, 15, 2–6. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/23131-research-notes-15.pdf
- Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Tschirner, E., Bärenfanger, O., & Wanner, I. (2012). Assessing evidence of validity of assigning CEFR ratings to the ACTFL oral proficiency interview (OPI) and the oral proficiency interview by computer (OPIc). Technical Report US-2012-PUB 1. Universität Leipzig. https://www.languagetesting.com/pub/media/wysiwyg/research/OPIc-CEFR-Study-Final-Report.pdf
- Vandergrift, L. (2006). Proposal for a common framework of reference for languages for Canada.Canadian Heritage/Patrimoine canadien. Series: New Canadian perspectives. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2011/pc-ch/CH4-114-2006-eng.pdf
- van Lier, L. (2007). Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity. Innovation in Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt42.0
- Weir, C. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
- West, R., & Reeves, N. (2003). Pathways to proficiency: The alignment of language proficiency scales for assessing competence in English language. Department for Education and Skills. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/10367/1/Pathways%2520To%2520Proficiency.pdf