Variation of reservoir fluid property during the high pressure air injection process

References

• Adewusi, A. and M. Greaves. 1991. Forward in situ combustion: oil recovery and properties. Fuel 70:503–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J.G. and B.C. Sahuquet. 1972. Chemical aspects of in-situ combustion–Heat of combustion and kinetics. SPE Journal 12:410–22.
   Google Scholar
• Clara, C., M. Durandeau, G. Quenault, and T.-H. Nguyen. 2000. Laboratory studies for light-oil air injection projects: potential application in handil field. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering 3(3):239–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats, K.H. 1980. In-situ combustion model. SPE Journal 20:239–248.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S.C. 2010. A study of oxidation reaction kinetics during an air injection process. Faculty of Engineering, Computer & Mathematical Science, Australia School of Petroleum, The University of Adelaide
   Google Scholar
• Hamedi Shokrlu, Y., Y. Maham, X. Tan, T. Babadagli, and M. Gray. 2012. Enhancement of the efficiency of in situ combustion technique for heavy-oil recovery by application of nickel ions. Fuel 105:397–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, B., Q. Chen, L.M. Castanier, and A.R. Kovscek. 2005. Improved in-situ combustion performance with metallic salt additives. In SPE Western Regional Meeting, Irvine, CA: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, H., C.-D. Yuan, and Y.-C. Zhang. 2012a. Recent progress of high-pressure air injection (HPAI) process in light oil reservoir: laboratory investigation and field application. SPE heavy Oil Conference, Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, H., J.-Z. Zhao, W.-F. Pu, J. Zhao, and X.-Y. Kuang. 2012b. Thermal study on light crude oil for application of high-pressure air injection (HPAI) process by TG/DTG and DTA tests. Energy & Fuels 26(3):1575–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kök, M.V. 2006. Effect of clay on crude oil combustion by thermal analysis techniques. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 84(2):361–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kök, M.V. 2012. Thermal behavior and kinetics of crude oils at low heating rates by differential scanning calorimeter. Fuel Processing Technology 96:123–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kök, M.V. and C. Acar. 2006. Kinetics of crude oil combustion. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 83(2):445–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kök, M.V. and K.G. Gul. 2013a. Combustion characteristics and kinetic analysis of Turkish crude oils and their SARA fractions by DSC. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 114(1):269–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kök, M.V. and K.G. Gul. 2013b. Thermal characteristics and kinetics of crude oils and SARA fractions. Thermochimica Acta 569:66–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kök, M.V. and A.S. Gundogar. 2013. DSC study on combustion and pyrolysis behaviors of Turkish crude oils. Fuel Processing Technology 116:110–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kök, M.V. and A.G. Iscan. 2006. Kinetics of crude oil combustion. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 83(2):445–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kök, M.V., O. Karacan, and R. Pamir. 1998. Kinetic analysis of oxidation behavior of crude oil SARA constituents. Energy & Fuels 12:580–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. and D. Yang. 2011. Modified α function for the Peng−Robinson equation of state to improve the vapor pressure prediction of non-hydrocarbon and hydrocarbon compounds. Energy & Fuels 25(1):215–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., D. Yang, and X. Li. 2013. Determination of three-phase boundaries of solvent(s)–CO2–heavy oil systems under reservoir conditions. Energy & Fuels 27(1):145–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., S. Zheng, and D. Yang. 2011. Enhanced swelling effect and viscosity reduction of solvent(s)-CO2-heavy oil systems. Paper read at Proceedings of the SPE heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
   Google Scholar
• Mahinpey, N., A. Ambalae, and K. Asghari. 2007. In situ combustion in enhanced oil recovery (EOR): a review. Chemical Engineering Communications 194(8):995–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R.G., S.A. Mehta, and M.G. Ursenbach. 2002. A guide to high pressure air injection (HPAI) based oil recovery. SPE/DOE improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Razaghi, S., R. Kharrat, S. Vossoughi, and D. Rashtchian. 2008. Feasibility study of auto ignition in in-situ combustion. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute 51:287–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriuez, E., A. Ordonez, M. Trujillo, and S.A.J.D.M. Belgrave. 2012. A framework for consolidating air injection experimental data. SPE Latin American and Caribean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Mexico City, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Sarma, H. and S. Das. 2009. Air injection potential in kenmore oilfield in Eromanga Basin Australia. A screening study through thermogravimetric and calorimetric analyses. 2009 SPE Middle East Oil &Gas Show and Conference, Bahrain International Exhibition Centre, Kingdom of Bahrain.
   Google Scholar
• Tekac, V., I. Cibulka, and R. Holub. 1984. PVT properties of liquids and liquid mixtures: a review of the experimental methods and the literature data. Fluid Phase Equilibria 19:33–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursenbach, M.G., R.G. Moore, and S.A. Menhta. 2009. Air injection in heavy oil reservoirs-a process whose time has come (again). Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 49:48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youtsos, M.S.K. and E. Mastorakos. 2013. Numerical simulation of thermal and reaction waves for in situ combustion in hydrocarbon reservoirs. Fuel 108:780–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar