Ion-size effect on electrokinetic energy conversion in nanofluidic channels

References

• Bandopanhyay A., and S. Chakraborty. 2011. Steric-effect induced alterations in streaming potential and energy transfer efficiency of non-newtonian fluids in narrow confinements. Langmuir 27:12243–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazant M. Z., M. S. Kilic, B. D. Storey, and A. Ajdari. 2009. Towards an understanding of induces-charge electrokinetics at large applied voltages in concentrated solution. Advanced in Colloid and Interface Science 152:48–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazant M. Z., B. D. Storey, and A. Kornyshev. 2011. Double layer in ionic liquids: overscreening versus crowding. Physical Review Letters 106:046102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikerman J. J. 1942. Structure and capacity of electrical double layer. Philosophical Magazine Series7;33 (220):384 [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14786444208520813].
   Google Scholar
• Bocquet L., and E. Charlaix, Nanofluidics. 2010. from bulk to interfaces. Chemical Society Reviews 39:1037–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borukhov I., and D. Andelman. 1997. Steric effects in electrolytes: a modified Poisson–Boltzmann equation. Physical Review Letters 79:435–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan D. Y. C., and R. G. Horn. 1985. The drainage of thin liquid films between solid surfaces. Journal of Chemical Physics 83:5311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C. C., and R. J. Yang. 2009. A perspective on streaming current in silica nanofluidic channels: Poisson–Boltzmann model versus Poisson–Nernst–Planck model. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 339:517–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C. C., and R. J. Yang. 2009. Electrokinetic energy conversion in micrometer-length nanofluidic channels. Microfluids and Nanofluidics 9:225–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C. C., and R. J. Yang. 2011. Electrokinetic energy conversion efficiency in ion-selective nanopores. Applied Physics Letters 99:083102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C. C., R. J. Yang, M. Wang, J.-J. Miau, and V. Lebiga. 2012. Liquid flow retardation in nanospaces due to electroviscosity: electrical double layer overlap, hydrodynamic slippage, and ambient atmospheric CO2 dissolution. Physics of Fluid 24: 072001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L. J., and L. Jay Guo. 2010. Nanofluidic diodes. Chemical Society Review 39:923–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daiguji H., Y. Oka, and K. Shirono. 2005. Nanofluidic diode and bipolar transistor. Nano Letters 5 (11):2274–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daiguji H. 2010. Ion transport in nanofluidic channels. Chemical Society Review 39:901–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S., and S. Chakraborty. 2011. Steric-effect-induced enhancement of electrical-double-layer overlapping phenomena. Physical Review E 84:012501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frydel D., and Y. Levin. 2012. A close look into the excluded volume effects within a double layer. Journalof Chemical Physics 137(16):164703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garai A., and S. Chakraborty. 2010. Steric effect and slip-modulated energy transfer in narrow fluidic channels with finite aspect ratios. Electrophoresis 31:843–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georges J. M., S. Millot, J. L. Loubet, and A. Tonck. 1993. Drainage of thin liquid films between relatively smooth surfaces. Journal of Chemical Physics 98:7345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie D. 2012. High energy conversion efficiency in nanofluidic channels. Nano Letters 12(3):1410–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberger J., R. Fan, and P. Yang. 2006. Inorganic nanotubes: a novel platform for nanofluidics. Account of Chemical Research 39;239–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatlo M. M., R. R. van, and L. Lue. 2012. The electric double layer at high surface potential: the influence of excess ion polarizability. Europhys Letters 97:28010.
   Google Scholar
• Huang D., C. Sendner, D. Horinek, R. Netz, and L. Bocquet. 2008. Water slippage versus contact angle: aquasi universal relationship. Physical Review Letters 101:226101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter R. J. 2001. Foundations of colloid science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kilic M. S., M. Z. Bazant, and A. Ajdari. 2007. Steric effects in the dynamics of electrolytes at large applied voltages. I. Double-layer charging. Physical Review E 75:021502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilic M. S., M. Z. Bazant, and A. Ajdari. 2007. Steric effects in the dynamics of electrolytes at large applied voltages. II. Modified Poisson–Nernst–Planck equations. Physical Review E 75:021503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S. M., M. A. Burns, and E. F. Hasselbrink. 2006. Electrokinetic protein preconcentration using a simple glass/poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic chip. Analytical Chemistry 78:4779–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong X., J. Jiang, D. Lu, Z. Liu, and J. Wu. 2014. Molecular theory for electrokinetic transport in pH-regulated nanochannel. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 5:3015–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak R., G. Guan, W. K. Peng, and J. Han. 2013. Microscaleelectrodialysis: Concentration profiling and vortex visualization. Desalination 308:138–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X. W., and X. S. Zhang. 2012. Membrane air-conditioning system driven by renewable energy. Energy Conversion and Management 53:189–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X. W., X. S. Zhang, F. Wang, X. Zhao, and Z. Zhang. 2015. Research on ration selection of mixed absorbent solution for membrane air-condition system. Energy Conversion and Management 89:111–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyklema J. 1995. Fundamentals of interface and colloid science. Volume II: Solid–liquid interface. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masliyah J. H., and S. Bhattacharjee. 2006. Electrokinetic and colloid transport phenomena. New Jersey: John Wiley &Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Osterle J. F. 1964. Electrokinetic energy conversion. Journal of Applied Mechanics 31:161–4.
   Google Scholar
• Schoch R. B., and P. Renaud. 2005. Ion transport through nanoslits dominated by the effective surface charge. Applied Physics Letters 86:253111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siria A., P. Poncharal, A. L. Biance, R. Fularand, X. Blase, S. T. Purcall, and L. Bocquet. 2013. Giant osmotic energy conversion measured in a single transmembrane boron nitride nanotube. Nature 494:455–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein D., M. Kruithof, and C. Dekker. 2004. Surface-charge-governed ion transport in nanofluidic channels. Physical Review Letters 93:035901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey B. D., and M. Z. Bazant. 2012. Effects of electrostatic correlations on electrokinetic phenomena. Physical Review E 86:056303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiss F., R. Chouikh, and A. Guizani. 2013. A numerical investigation of the effects of membrane swelling in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Energy Conversion Management 67:318–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y. C., and J. Han. 2008. Pre-binding dynamic range and sensitivity enhancement for immuno-sensors using nanofluidic preconcentrator. Lab Chip 8:392–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xuan X., and D. Li. 2006. Thermodynamic analysis of electrokinetic energy conversion. Journalof Power Sources 156:677–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar