A study on operation problems of hydropower plants integrated with irrigation schemes operated in Turkey

References

• Acreman, M., and M. J. Dunbar. 2004. Defining environmental river flow requirements, a review. Hydrology Earth System Science 8:861–76. doi:10.5194/hess-8-861-2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., S. Müller, and Z. Dobrotková. 2011. Renewable energy markets and prospects by technology. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA)/OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Cap-Net. 2008. Performance and capacity of river basin organizations, cross-case comparation of four RBOs. http://cap-net.org/sites/cap-netorg/files/RBO %20 performance.doc.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., H. Shi, B. Sivakumar, and M. R. Peart. 2016. Population, water, food, energy and dams. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 56:18–28. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DSI (State Hydraulic Works) 2015. Hydroelectric energy generation in Turkey. Accessed May 23, 2015. http://www.DSI.gov.tr/english/service/enerjie.htm.
   Google Scholar
• DSI (State Hydraulic Works). 2015a. Energy production report of state hydraulic works in 2015, 54. Ankara, Turkey: Department of Operation and Maintenance. General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works. Minister of Forest and Water Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• DSİ (State Hydraulic Works) 2016. Southeastern Anatolia Project. General Directorate of State Hydraulics Works. Accessed July 06, 2017. http://www2.dsi.gov.tr/dijital/gap-brosur/files/assets/basichtml/page1.html.
   Google Scholar
• ESHA (European Small Hydropower Association). 2010. Hydropower and environment. Technical and operational procedures to better integrate small hydropower plants in the environment. Brussels, Belgium: APER publisher. www.esha.be.
   Google Scholar
• IHA (International Hydropower Association). 2003. The role of hydropower in sustainable development. International Hydropower Association, IHA. February, London, United Kingdom, White Paper, 1–140.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 2011. Special report renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Working Group III-Mitigation of Climate Change, IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Karki, P. 2008. Briefing: IHA sustainability guidelines and assessment protocol. Engineering Sustainability 161 (1):3–5. doi:10.1680/ensu.2008.161.1.3.
   Google Scholar
• Kaygusuz, K. 2011. Energy services and energy poverty for sustainable rural development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2), 936–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsford, R. T. 2000. Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Australia Ecology 25 (2):109–27. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01036.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koç, C. 2007. Assessing the financial performance of water user associations: A case study at Great Menderes Basin, Turkey. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 21 (2):61–77. doi:10.1007/s10795-006-9015-x.
   Google Scholar
• Koç, C. 2011. Co-operation of irrigation and canal hydropower plants. 2nd Istanbul International Water Forum. May 3–5, Istanbul, Theme 3, Side activity, 5. Session (May 5, 2011) Kağıthane Hall, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Koç, C. 2012. Problems and solutions related to hydroelectric power plants constructed on the Buyuk Menderes and the West Mediterranean Basin. Energy Sources. Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 34 (15):1416–25. doi:10.1080/15567036.2012.674084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koç, C. 2015. A study on the role and importance of irrigation management in integrated river basin management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187:488. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4647-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koç, C. 2017. A study on importance and role of irrigation and hydropower plant operation in integrated river basin management. Computational Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering 6:1–10. doi:10.4236/cweee.2017.61001.
   Google Scholar
• Koç, C., and Y. Bayazıt. 2015. A study on assessment financing of irrigation schemes. Irrigation and Drainage 64 (4):535–45. doi:10.1002/ird.1925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koç, C., Y. Bayazıt, and R. Bakış. 2016. A study on determining the hydropower potential of Çine Dam in Turkey. Computer Water, Energy Environment Engineering 5:79–85. doi:10.4236/cweee.2016.52008.
   Google Scholar
• Koç, C., Y. Bayazıt, and H. Bozkurt. 2014. Entegre Havza Yönetiminde Su Kaynaklarının Uzaktan Algılama Yöntemleriyle Ölçülüp, Değerlendirilebilme Olanakları Üzerine Bir Çalışma. 12. Tekirdağ: Kültürteknik Sempozyumu, Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, (Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı, sayfa 96). Accessed Mayıs 21-23, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Koç, C., K. Özdemir, and A. Fayrap. 2010. A study on the role and the importance of irrigation operation services in integrated river basin management in Büyük Menderes Basin. I. National Irrigation and Agricultural Structures Symposium May 27–29, Symposium Book, 187–200, Kahraman Maraş, Turkey
   Google Scholar
• Larinier, M. 2008. Fish passage experience at small-scale hydro-electric power plants in France. Hydrobiologia 609.1:97–108. doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9398-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larinier, M., F. Travade, and J. P. Porcher. 2002. Fishways: Biological basis, design criteria and monitoring. Bulletin Français De La Peche Et De La Pisciculture 364:208.
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, B., and S. Rundle. 2002. Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environmental Conservation 29:134–53. doi:10.1017/S0376892902000097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, J. L. 2006. In stream flow methodologies: An evolution of the tenant method for higher gradient streams in the national forest system lands in the western U.S. ( M.S. thesis). Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University; 143.
   Google Scholar
• Orth, D. J., and O. E. Maughan. 1981. Evaluation of the Montana method for recommending in stream flows in Oklahoma streams. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 61:62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sekercioglu, C. H., S. Anderson, E. Akcay, R. Bilgin, Ö. E. Can, G. Semiz, Ç. Tavsanoğlu, M. B. Yokes, A. Soyumert, K. İpekdal, İ. K. Sağlam, M. Yücel, and N. Dalfes. 2010. Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis. Biological Conservation 144 (12):2752–69. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHERPA (Small Hydro Energy Efficient Promotion Campaign Action). 2010. Hydropower and environment-technical and operational procedures to better integrate small hydropower plants in the environment. Intelligent energy for Europe and small hydropower energy efficiency campaign action (SHERPA), 23. Italy: APER.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrade, L., A. Texier, L. David, and M. Larinier. 2008. Topologies and measurements of turbulent flow in vertical slot fishways. Hydrobiology 609:177–88. doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9416-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharme, R. E. 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: Emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research Application 19:397–441. doi:10.1002/rra.736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TMMOB (Union of Chamber of Turkish Architects Engineers). 2011. The report on hydropower projects. Accessed November 15, 2011. www.tmmob.org.tr/resimler/ekler/682384b57-999789_ek.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trussart, S., D. Messier, V. Roquet, and S. Aki. 2002. Hydropower projects: A review of most effective mitigation measures. Energy Policy 30:1251–59. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00087-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yüksel, I. 2010. Energy production and sustainable energy policies in Turkey. Renewable Energy 35:1469–76. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2010.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar