Life Cycle Assessments of different electricity production scenarios in France with a variable proportion of nuclear energy

References

• Argyrou, M. C., P. Christodoulides, and S. A. Kalogirou. 2018. Energy storage for electricity generation and related processes: Technologies appraisal and grid scale applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 94 (July):804–21. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.044.
   Google Scholar
• Bamber, N., I. Turner, V. Arulnathan, Y. Li, S. Zargar Ershadi, A. Smart, N. Pelletier, et al. 2020 . Comparing sources and analysis of uncertainty in consequential and attributional life cycle assessment: Review of current practice and recommendations. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 25 (1):168–80. doi:10.1007/s11367-019-01663-1.
   Google Scholar
• BP. BP statistical review of world energy. 2020. [Online]. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/news-and-insights/press-releases/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2020-published.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cassoret, B. 2021. Energy transition, 2nd ed., 162. Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.1201/9781003088486.
   Google Scholar
• Dallinger, D., and M. Wietschel. Grid integration of intermittent renewable energy sources using price-responsive plug-in electric vehicles. Jun. 01, 2012. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 (5). Pergamon:3370–82. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.019.
   Google Scholar
• HAUT CONSEIL POUR LE CLIMAT. 2019. Premier rapport annuel. [Online]. https://www.hautconseilclimat.fr/publications/rapport-2019-english-version/.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, A. S., C. Azzaro-Pantel, and D. Le Boulch. 2016. A typology for world electricity mix: Application for inventories in consequential LCA (CLCA). Sustainable Production and Consumption 8 (September):93–107. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2016.09.002.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S., and B. W. Brook. 2018 . A nuclear- to-gas transition in South Korea: Is it environmentally friendly or economically viable? Energy Policy 112:67–73. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijbregts, M. A. J., Z. J. N. Steinmann, P. M. F. Elshout, G. Stam, F. Verones, M. Vieira, M. Zijp, A. Hollander, R. van Zelm, et al. 2017 . ReCipe2016: A harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 22 (2):138–47. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Energy Agency. 2021. Conditions and Requirements for the Technical Feasibility of a Power System with a High Share of Renewables in France Towards 2050. [Online]. https://www.iea.org/reports/conditions-and-requirements-for-the-technical-feasibility-of-a-power-system-with-a-high-share-of-renewables-in-france-towards-2050.
   Google Scholar
• JRC. 2021. Technical assessment of nuclear energy with respect to the ‘do no significant harm’ criteria of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (‘Taxonomy Regulation’). [Online]. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC125953.
   Google Scholar
• Lassonde, S., O. Boucher, F.-M. Breon, I. Tobin, and R. Vautard. 2016. Spatial optimization of an ideal wind energy system as a response to the intermittency of renewable energies?.
   Google Scholar
• Luna-Nemecio, J., S. Tobón, and L. G. Juárez-Hernández. 2020. Sustainability-Based on socioformation and complex thought or sustainable social development. Resources, Environment and Sustainability 2 (July):100007. doi:10.1016/j.resenv.2020.100007.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, P. D., J. Lindgren, J. Mikkola, and J. Salpakari. 2015. Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 45:785–807. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, C., and M. Jefferson. 2016.Renewable and nuclear electricity: Comparison of environmental impacts. Energy Policy 96:758–69. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Réseau de Transport de l’Electricité. 2017a. Bilan prévisionnel de l’équilibre offre-demande d’électricité en France 2017, chapitre 6, scénario Ampère.
   Google Scholar
• Réseau de Transport de l’Electricité. 2017c“Bilan prévisionnel de l’équilibre offre-demande d’électricité en France 2017, chapitre 8, scénario Volt.
   Google Scholar
• Réseau de Transport de l’Electricité. 2017d. Bilan prévisionnel de l’équilibre offre-demande d’électricité en France 2017, chapitre 9, scénario Watt.
   Google Scholar
• Réseau de Transport de l’Electricité. 2019. Bilan prévisionnel de l’équilibre offre-demande d’électricité en France.
   Google Scholar
• Réseau de Transport de l’Electricité. 2021. Futurs énergétiques 2050.
   Google Scholar
• Réseau de Transport de l’électricité. 2017b. Bilan prévisionnel de l’équilibre offre-demande d’électricité en France 2017, chapitre 7, scénario Hertz.
   Google Scholar
• Salemdeeb, R., R. Saint, W. Clark, M. Lenaghan, K. Pratt, and F. Millar. 2021. A pragmatic and industry-oriented framework for data quality assessment of environmental footprint tools. Resources, Environment and Sustainability 3 (March):100019. doi:10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100019.
   Google Scholar
• Schlömer, S. et al. 2014. III ANNEX Technology-specific Cost and Performance Parameters Editor: Lead Authors: Contributing Authors: To the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer Technology-specific Cost and Performance Parameters Annex III AIII Contents.
   Google Scholar
• Société Française d’Energie Nucléaire (SFEN). 2019. Quand décider d’un renouvellement du parc nucléaire français ?. [Online]. https://www.sfen.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Quand-d%C3%A9cider-d%E2%80%99un-renouvellement-du-parc-nucl%C3%A9aire-fran%C3%A7ais.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Treyer, K., and C. Bauer. 2016.The environmental footprint of UAE׳s electricity sector: Combining life cycle assessment and scenario modeling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 55:1234–47. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.016.
   Google Scholar
• Treyer, K., C. Bauer, and A. Simons. 2014. Human health impacts in the life cycle of future European electricity generation. Energy Policy 74 (S1):S31–S44. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.034.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, O. 2017. Mineral Resources and Energy Future Stakes in Energy Transition. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/C2017-0-00318-X.
   Google Scholar