Coupled trajectory optimization and tuning of tracking controllers for parafoil generator

References

• Aldemir, A., and H. Hapoğlu. 2016. Comparison of PID tuning methods for wireless temperature control. Journal of Polytechnical 19 (191):9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Astrom, K. J., and T. Hagglund. 1995. PID controllers, theory, design and tuning. 2nd ed. USA: Instrument Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Bingul, Z., and O. Karahan. 2018. Comparison of PID and FOPID controllers tuned by PSO and ABC algorithms for unstable and integrating systems with time delay. Optimal Control Applications & Methods 39 (4):1431–50. doi:10.1002/oca.2419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canale, M., L. Fagiano, and M. Milanese. 2007. Power kites for wind energy generation. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 27 (99):25–38. doi:10.1109/MCS.2007.4339282.
   Google Scholar
• Canale, M., L. Fagiano, and M. Milanese. 2008. Kitegen: A revolution in wind energy generation. Energy 34 (3):355–61. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2008.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canale, M., L. Fagiano, and M. Milanese. 2009. High altitude wind energy generation using controlled power kites. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 18 (2):279–93. doi:10.1109/TCST.2009.2017933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Y. C. Fang, N. Sun, and Y. Z. Qian. 2016. Pseudospectral method based on time optimal anti-swing trajectory planning for double pendulum crane systems. Acta Automatica Sinica 42:153–60.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, D. L., and W. Yu. 2017.Path planning of multi-agent system in unknown environment with neural kernel smoothing and reinforcement learning. Neurocomputing 233: 34–42.doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.08.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elnagar, G., M. A. Kazemi, and M. Razzaghi. 1995. The pseudospectral Legendre method for discretizing optimal control problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 40 (10):1793–96. doi:10.1109/9.467672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagiano, L., M. Milanese, and D. Piga. 2010. High-altitude wind power generation. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 25 (1):168–80. doi:10.1109/TEC.2009.2032582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheisarnejad, M., and M. H. Khooban. 2021. An intelligent non-integer PID controller-based deep reinforcement learning: Implementation and experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 68 (4):3609–18. doi:10.1109/TIE.2020.2979561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Q., F. Fahroo, and I. M. Ross. 2008. Spectral algorithm for pseudospectral methods in optimal control. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 31 (3):460–71. doi:10.2514/1.32908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Z. Y., J. G. Guo, X. M. Wang, J. Chang, and H. Huang. 2021. Sliding mode control for systems subjected to unmatched disturbances/unknown control direction and its application. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 31 (4):1303–23. doi:10.1002/rnc.5336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, W. J., Q. Lu, and J. Chang. 2015. A Gauss pseudospectral method for reentry trajectory planning with characteristic trend partitioning. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautics Sinica 36:3338–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and C. Park. 2009. Wind power generation with a parawing on ships, a proposal. Energy 35:336–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kober, J., J. A. Bagnell, and J. Peters. 2013. Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey. The International Journal of Robotics Research 32 (11):1238–74. doi:10.1177/0278364913495721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehna, M., B. Hoppmann, C. Scholz, and R. Heinrich. 2021.A reinforcement learning approach for the continuous electricity market of Germany: Trading from the perspective of a wind park operator. Energy and AI 8: 100139.doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100139
   Google Scholar
• Lillicrap, T. P., J. J. Hunt, A. Pritzel, N. Heess, T. Erez, Y. Tassa, D. Silver, and D. Wierstra. 2015. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. Computer Science 8 (6):A187.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X., J. Liu, Y. Yu, and C. Sun. 2020.Event-triggered reinforcement learning control for the quadrotor UAV with actuator saturation. Neurocomputing 415: 135–45.doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyd, M. L. 1980. Crosswind kite power. Journal of Energy 4 (3):106–11. doi:10.2514/3.48021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdi, E. S., C. Joseph, O. Cathal, and T. Daniel. 2020.Experimental rig investigation of a direct interconnection technique for airborne wind energy systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 123: 106300.doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiti, D., S. Biswas, and A. Konar. 2008. Design of a fractional order PID controller using particle swarm optimization technique. The International Journal, Advanced Manufacturing Technology 58 (5–8):521–31.
   Google Scholar
• Manassakan, S., and V. Peerapon. 2022.Model-based deep reinforcement learning for wind energy bidding. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 136: 107625.doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107625
   Google Scholar
• Miele, E. S., F. Bonacina, and A. Corsini. 2022.Deep anomaly detection in horizontal axis wind turbines using graph convolutional autoencoders for multivariate time series. Energy and AI 8: 100145.doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100145
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., J. Blanche, S. Harper, T. Lim, R. Gupta, O. Zaki, W. Tang, V. Robu, S. Watson, D. Flynn, et al. 2021. A review: Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence and robotics in the offshore wind sector. Energy and AI 8:100146. doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100146.
   Google Scholar
• Mnih, V., K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. K. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, et al. 2015. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature. 518(7540):529–33. doi:10.1038/nature14236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neeraj, V., and D.B. Beena. 2022. Influence of Reynolds number consideration for aerodynamic characteristics of airfoil on the blade design of small horizontal axis wind turbine. International Journal of Green Energy 19 (7):733–46. doi:10.1080/15435075.2021.1960356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omab, C., C. Smb, A. Cz, et al. 2021. Desired tracking of delayed quadrotor UAV under model uncertainty and wind disturbance using adaptive super-twisting terminal sliding mode control. International Student Admissions Test 123:455–471. doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2021.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Qi, W. H., H. P. Ju, G. D. Zong, J. D. Cao, and J. Cheng. 2021. Synchronization for quantized semi-Markov switching neural networks in a finite time. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 32 (3):1264–75. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2984040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, J., Z. Chen, M. Sun, and Q. Sun. 2021. Multi-verse optimizer based PI-type active disturbance rejection generalized predictive control gain tuning for ship motion. Optimal Control Applications and Methods. doi:10.1002/oca.2818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sean, C., F. Gregory, and B. Dominique. 2018. Real-time optimizing control of an experimental crosswind power kite. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 26 (2):507–22. doi:10.1109/TCST.2017.2672404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, D., G. Lever, N. Heess, T. Degris, D. Wierstra and M. Riedmiller. Deterministic policy gradient algorithms. Beijing, China: ACM Press. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. S., and A. G. Barto. 2018. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thresher, R., M. Robinson, and P. Veers. 2007. To capture the wind. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 5 (6):34–46. doi:10.1109/MPE.2007.906304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udo, Z., and B. Philip. 2013. Emergence and economic dimension of airborne wind energy. In Airborne wind Energy, 0125. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, D., X. Dong, J. Shen, and S. C. Hoi. 2020. Reducing estimation bias via triplet-average deep deterministic policy gradient. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 99:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, J. Z., and X. T. Zhuan. Parameter self-optimization and tuning algorithm based on reinforcement learning. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology. doi:10.11992/tis.202012038.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Z. F. Zhang, Q. Y. Yang, D. An, D. Li, and C. Li. 2020.EV charging bidding by multi-DQN reinforcement learning in electricity auction market. Neurocomputing 397: 404–14.doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.08.106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. B., Q. Zong, and H. C. Lu. 2017. Formation trajectory optimization of quadrotor UAV based on HP adaptive pseudospectral method. Science China: Technology Science 3:239–48.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J. 2020. Neural networks-based optimal tracking control for nonzero-sum games of multi-player continuous-time nonlinear systems via reinforcement learning. Neurocomputing 412: 167–76.doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.06.083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. M., Z. Q. Chen, Z. Y. Huang, M. Sun, and Q. Sun. 2020. Active disturbance rejection controller for multi-area interconnected power system based on reinforcement learning. Neurocomputing 425 (5):149–59. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.03.070.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z. C., W. Zhou, and J. Tao. 2021.Deep reinforcement learning framework for resilience enhancement of distribution systems under extreme weather events. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 128: 106676.doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zia, U. R., K. Ammara, A. Samia, S. Ali, N. Hayat, M. Abdullah, and U. B. Saeed. 2021. Wind energy potential and economic assessment of southeast of Pakistan. International Journal of Green Energy 18 (1):1–16. doi:10.1080/15435075.2020.1814298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong, G. D., Y. D. Wang, H. R. Karimi, and K. Shi. 2022.Observer-based adaptive neural tracking control for a class of nonlinear systems with prescribed performance and input dead-zone constraints. Neural Networks 147: 126–35.doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2021.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar