Review of ionomers in catalyst layers of proton exchange membrane (PEM) modules: key parameters, characterization and manipulation methods

References

• Balogun, E. O., N. Hussain, J. Chamier, and P. Barendse. 2019. Performance and durability studies of perfluorosulfonic acid ionomers as binders in PEMFC catalyst layers using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (60):32219–30. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlinger, S. A., B. D. McCloskey, and A. Z. Weber. 2018. Inherent acidity of perfluorosulfonic acid ionomer dispersions and implications for ink aggregation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 122 (31):7790–96. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b06493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, C., H. M. Zhang, S. H. Xiao, Y. Zhang, Z. S. Mai, and X. F. Li. 2011. Grafted porous PTFE/partially fluorinated sulfonated poly(arylene ether ketone) composite membrane for PEMFC applications. Journal of Membrane Science 376 (1–2):170–78. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodt, M., R. Wycisk, N. Dale, and P. Pintauro. 2016. Power output and durability of electrospun fuel cell fiber cathodes with PVDF and Nafion/PVDF binders. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 163 (5):F401–10. doi:10.1149/2.0711605jes.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmo, M., D. L. Fritz, J. Merge, and D. Stolten. 2013. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38 (12):4901–34. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. D., S. Chen, A. Wang, M. Wang, L. Guo, and Z. D. Wei. 2023. Blocking the sulfonate group in Nafion to unlock platinum’s activity in membrane electrode assemblies. Nature Catalysis 6 (5):392–401. doi:10.1038/s41929-023-00949-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. C., L. Guo, L. Pan, T. Q. Yan, Z. X. He, Y. Li, C. X. Shi, Z. F. Huang, X. W. Zhang, and J. J. Zou. 2022. Advances in oxygen evolution electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Advanced Energy Materials 12 (14):2103670. doi:10.1002/aenm.202103670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G. Y., C. Wang, Y. J. Lei, J. B. Zhang, Z. M. Mao, Z. Q. Mao, J. W. Guo, J. Q. Li, and M. G. Ouyang. 2017. Gradient design of Pt/C ratio and Nafion content in cathode catalyst layer of PEMFCs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (50):29960–65. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., C. Zhao, F. M. Sun, J. T. Fan, H. Li, and H. J. Wang. 2020. Research progress of catalyst layer and interlayer interface structures in membrane electrode assembly (MEA) for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system. eTransportation 5:100075. doi:10.1016/j.etran.2020.100075.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., S. H. Shin, D. H. Lee, G. Doo, D. W. Lee, J. Hyun, S. H. Yang, D. M. Yu, J. Y. Lee, and H. T. Kim. 2022. Oligomeric chain extender-derived poly(p-phenylene)-based multi-block polymer membranes for a wide operating current density range in polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis. Journal of Power Sources 526:231146. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coms, F. D., H. Liu, and J. E. Owejan. 2008. Mitigation of perfluorosulfonic acid membrane chemical degradation using cerium and manganese ions. In Proton Exchange membrane fuel cells 8, pts 1 and 2. ECS Transactions 16 (2):1735. doi:10.1149/1.2982015.
   Google Scholar
• Deabate, S., G. Gebel, P. Huguet, A. Morin, and G. Pourcelly. 2012. 3 in situ and operando determination of the water content distribution in proton conducting membranes for fuel cells: A critical review. Energy & Environmental Science 5 (10):8824–47. doi:10.1039/c2ee21834h.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, H., C. Xu, and W. Chen. 2023. Modeling and configuration optimization of the rooftop photovoltaic with electric-hydrogen-thermal hybrid storage system for zero-energy buildings: Consider a cumulative seasonal effect. Building Simulation 16 (10):1799–819. doi:10.1007/s12273-023-1066-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P., A. A. Tal, A. Skallberg, C. Brommesson, Z. J. Hu, R. D. Boyd, W. Olovsson, N. Fairley, I. A. Abrikosov, X. Zhang, et al. 2018. Cerium oxide nanoparticles with antioxidant capabilities and gadolinium integration for MRI contrast enhancement. Scientific Reports 8(1):6999. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25390-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esfahani, R. A. M., H. M. Fruehwald, F. Afsahi, and E. B. Easton. 2018. Enhancing fuel cell catalyst layer stability using a dual-function sulfonated silica-based ionomer. Applied Catalysis B-Environmental 232:314–21. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J. T., M. Chen, Z. L. Zhao, Z. Zhang, S. Y. Ye, S. Y. Xu, H. J. Wang, and H. Li. 2021. Bridging the gap between highly active oxygen reduction reaction catalysts and effective catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature Energy 6 (5):475–86. doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00824-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornaciari, J. C., M. R. Gerhardt, J. Zhou, Y. N. Regmi, N. Danilovic, A. T. Bell, and A. Z. Weber. 2020. The role of water in vapor-fed proton-exchange-membrane electrolysis. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 167 (10):104508. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab9b09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Salaberri, P. A. 2023a. Proton exchange membranes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells: An analysis of perfluorosulfonic acid and aromatic hydrocarbon ionomers. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 38: e00727. doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Salaberri, P. A. 2023b. A numerical assessment of mitigation strategies to reduce locaoxygen and proton transport resistances in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Materia/s 16 (21): 6935. doi:10.3390/ma16216935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Salaberri, P. A., A. Sánchez-Ramos, and P. K. Das. 2022. On the optimal cathode catalyst layer for polymer electrolyte fuel cells: Bimodal pore size distributions with functionalized microstructures. Frontiers in Energy Research 10. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2022.1058913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garsany, Y., R. W. Atkinson, M. B. Sassin, R. M. E. Hjelm, B. D. Gould, and K. E. Swider-Lyons. 2018. Improving PEMFC performance using short-side-chain low-equivalent-weight PFSA ionomer in the cathode catalyst layer. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 165 (5):F381–91. doi:10.1149/2.1361805jes.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawas, R., R. Sun, Y. W. Li, K. C. Neyerlin, Y. A. Elabd, M. Tang, and J. Snyder. 2021. Characterization of a sulfonated Poly(Ionic Liquid) block copolymer as an ionomer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells using rotating disk electrode. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 168 (12):124511. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ac4375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimet, A., L. Chikh, A. Morin, and O. Fichet. 2016a. Effect of a neutral fluorinated network on the properties of a perfluorosulfonic acid ionomer as proton exchange membrane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41 (34):15562–72. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimet, A., L. Chikh, A. Morin, and O. Fichet. 2016b. Strengthening of perfluorosulfonic acid ionomer with sulfonated hydrocarbon polyelectrolyte for application in medium-temperature fuel cell. Journal of Membrane Science 514:358–65. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y. Q., D. Z. Yang, B. Li, D. J. Yang, P. W. Ming, and C. M. Zhang. 2021. Effect of dispersion solvents and ionomers on the rheology of catalyst inks and catalyst layer structure for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13 (23):27119–28. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c07070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, M. A., A. B. Sulong, R. E. Rosli, E. H. Majlan, L. K. Shyuan, M. A. A. Mashud, and Ieee. 2015. Measurement of hydrogen ion conductivity through proton exchange membrane. In 2015 IEEE International Wie Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE). IEEE, 552–55. doi: 10.1109/WIECON-ECE.2015.7443991.
   Google Scholar
• Harada, M., S. Takata, H. Iwase, S. Kajiya, H. Kadoura, and T. Kanaya. 2021. Distinguishing adsorbed and deposited ionomers in the catalyst Layer of polymer electrolyte fuel cells using contrast-variation small-angle neutron scattering. American Chemical Society Omega 6 (23):15257–63. doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c01535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haragirimana, A., N. Li, Z. X. Hu, and S. W. Chen. 2021. A facile, effective thermal crosslinking to balance stability and proton conduction for proton exchange membranes based on blend sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46 (29):15866–77. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, P., Y. T. Mu, J. W. Park, and W. Q. Tao. 2020. Modeling of the effects of cathode catalyst layer design parameters on performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Applied Energy 277:115555. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B. Y., Y. He, K. Huang, Y. Q. Zhu, Y. W. Zhang, and Z. H. Wang. 2019. Effects of Nafion content in membrane electrode assembly on electrochemical Bunsen reaction in high electrolyte acidity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (23):11646–54. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, Y., C. Seol, S. M. Kim, and S. Jang. 2022. Investigation of the correlation effects of catalyst loading and ionomer content in an anode electrode on the performance of polymer electrode membrane water electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47 (42):18229–39. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, K., J. Xuan, Q. Du, Z. M. Bao, B. A. Xie, B. W. Wang, Y. Zhao, L. Fan, H. Wang, Z. Hou, et al. 2021. Designing the next generation of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature 595(7867):361–69. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03482-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Garcia, J. C., J. A. Olmos-Asar, E. A. Franceschini, and M. M. Mariscal. 2021. Effect of Nafion content and hydration level on the electrochemical area of a Pt nanocatalyst in the triple-phase boundary. Physical Chemistry ChemicaL Physics 23 (48):27543–51. doi:10.1039/d1cp03731e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinnouchi, R., K. Kudo, N. Kitano, and Y. Morimoto. 2016. Molecular dynamics simulations on O2 permeation through Nafion Ionomer on platinum surface. Electrochimica Acta 188:767–76. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakinuma, K., M. Kawamoto, K. Tamoto, M. Yamaguchi, S. Honmura, A. Iiyama, and M. Uchida. 2021. Evaluation of ionomer distribution on electrocatalysts for polymer electrolyte fuel cells by use of a low acceleration voltage scanning electron microscope. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 168 (5):054510. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/abfa59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenberg, A., A. Chowdhury, M. F. Fang, A. Z. Weber, Y. Okamoto, A. Kusoglu, and M. A. Modestino. 2020. Highly permeable perfluorinated sulfonic acid lonomers for improved electrochemical devices: Insights into structure-property relationships. Journal of the American Chemical Society 142 (8):3742–52. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b09170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., H. J. Kim, K. Y. Lee, J. H. Jang, S. Y. Lee, E. Cho, I. H. Oh, and T. H. Lim. 2008. Effect of nafion (R) gradient in dual catalyst layer on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33 (11):2783–89. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T. H., J. Y. Yi, C. Y. Jung, E. Jeong, and S. C. Yi. 2017. Solvent effect on the Nafion agglomerate morphology in the catalyst layer of the proton exchange membrane fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (1):478–85. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T. H., J. H. Yoo, T. Maiyalagan, and S. C. Yi. 2019. Influence of the Nafion agglomerate morphology on the water-uptake behavior and fuel cell performance in the proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Applied Surface Science 481:777–84. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klose, C., T. Saatkamp, A. Munchinger, L. Bohn, G. Titvinidze, M. Breitwieser, K. D. Kreuer, and S. Vierrath. 2020. All-hydrocarbon MEA for PEM water electrolysis combining low hydrogen crossover and high efficiency. Advanced Energy Materials 10 (14):1903995. doi:10.1002/aenm.201903995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korte, C., F. Conti, J. Wackerl, P. Dams, A. Majerus, and W. Lehnert. 2015. Uptake of protic electrolytes by polybenzimidazole-type polymers: Absorption isotherms and electrolyte/polymer interactions. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 45 (8):857–71. doi:10.1007/s10800-015-0855-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, N. N., A. Konovalova, D. Aili, Q. Li, H. S. Park, J. H. Jang, H. J. Kim, and D. Henkensmeier. 2019. Thermally crosslinked sulfonated polybenzimidazole membranes and their performance in high temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of Membrane Science 588:117218. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo, K., R. Jinnouchi, and Y. Morimoto. 2016. Humidity and temperature dependences of oxygen transport resistance of nafion thin film on platinum electrode. Electrochimica Acta 209:682–90. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari, S., R. T. White, B. Kumar, and J. M. Spurgeon. 2016. Solar hydrogen production from seawater vapor electrolysis. Energy & Environmental Science 9 (5):1725–33. doi:10.1039/c5ee03568f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurihara, Y., T. Mabuchi, and T. Tokumasu. 2017. Molecular analysis of structural effect of Ionomer on oxygen permeation properties in PEFC. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 164 (6):F628–37. doi:10.1149/2.1301706jes.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurihara, Y., T. Mabuchi, and T. Tokumasu. 2019. Molecular dynamics study of oxygen transport resistance through ionomer thin film on Pt surface. Journal of Power Sources 414:263–71. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusoglu, A., and A. Z. Weber. 2017. New insights into perfluorinated sulfonic-acid lonomers. Chemical Reviews 117 (3):987–1104. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., S. Escribano, F. Micoud, G. Gebel, S. Lyonnard, L. Porcar, N. Martinez, and A. Morin. 2020. In situ measurement of ionomer water content and liquid water saturation in fuel cell catalyst layers by high-resolution small-angle neutron scattering. ACS Applied Energy Materials 3 (9):8393–401. doi:10.1021/acsaem.0c00853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H., H. Kang, S. D. Yim, Y. J. Sohn, and S. G. Lee. 2022. Revelation of transport properties of ultra-thin ionomer films in catalyst layer of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells using molecular dynamics. Applied Surface Science 598:153815. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. J., R. H. Qi, and L. Z. Zhang. 2019. Performance improvement of electrolytic air dehumidification systems with high-water-uptake polymer electrolyte membranes. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 136 (26):47676. doi:10.1002/app.47676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. Y., R. H. Qi, and L. Z. Zhang. 2020. Analysis and optimization of material physical characteristics for electrolytic air dehumidifier with a PEM. Applied Thermal Engineering 169:114929. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.114929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Y. Lu, Z. Cui, and R. Qi. 2023. Coaxial nanofiber IrOx@SbSnOx as an efficient electrocatalyst for proton exchange membrane dehumidifier. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15 (8):10606–20. doi:10.1021/acsami.2c18375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, S. Q., S. Yuan, Y. W. Liang, H. Li, Z. L. Xu, Q. Xu, J. W. Yin, S. Y. Shen, X. H. Yan, and J. B. Zhang. 2023. Engineering the catalyst layers towards enhanced local oxygen transport of low-pt proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Materials, designs, and methods. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 48 (11):4389–417. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G. F., D. L. Yang, and P. Y. A. Chuang. 2018. Defining nafion ionomer roles for enhancing alkaline oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. ACS Catalysis 8 (12):11688–98. doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b02217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. Z., K. Yu, A. Bird, F. Guo, J. Ilavsky, Y. D. Liu, D. A. Cullen, A. Kusoglu, A. Z. Weber, P. J. Ferreira, et al. 2023. Unraveling the core of fuel cell performance: Engineering the ionomer/catalyst interface. Energy & Environmental Science 16(7):2977–90. doi:10.1039/d2ee03553g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Haro, M., L. Guetaz, T. Printemps, A. Morin, S. Escribano, P. H. Jouneau, P. Bayle-Guillemaud, F. Chandezon, and G. Gebel. 2014. Three-dimensional analysis of nafion layers in fuel cell electrodes. Nature Communications 5 (1):5229. doi:10.1038/ncomms6229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyu, X., T. Van Cleve, E. Young, J. L. Li, H. R. Yu, D. A. Cullen, K. C. Neyerlin, and A. Serov. 2023. Design of graded cathode catalyst layers with various ionomers for fuel cell application. Journal of Power Sources 556:232530. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek, A., E. Sadeghi, J. Jankovic, M. Eikerling, and K. Malek. 2020. Aquivion ionomer in mixed alcohol-water solution: Insights from multiscale molecular modeling. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 124 (6):3429–38. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, I., L. G. A. Melo, M. M. West, D. P. Wilkinson, D. Bizzotto, and A. P. Hitchcock. 2020. Imaging reactivity of the Pt-lonomer interface in fuel-cell catalyst layers. ACS Catalysis 10 (15):8285–92. doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c01594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, N., G. Gebel, N. Blanc, N. Boudet, J. S. Micha, S. Lyonnard, and A. Morin. 2019. Heterogeneous nanostructural aging of fuel cell ionomer revealed by Operando SAXS. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2 (5):3071–80. doi:10.1021/acsaem.8b02004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, N., Z. Peng, A. Morin, L. Porcar, G. Gebel, and S. Lyonnard. 2017. Real time monitoring of water distribution in an operando fuel cell during transient states. Journal of Power Sources 365:230–34. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashio, T., A. Ohma, and T. Tokumasu. 2016. Molecular Dynamics Study of Ionomer Adsorption at a carbon surface in catalyst ink. Electrochimica Acta 202:14–23. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modestino, M. A., M. Dumortier, S. M. H. Hashemi, S. Haussener, C. Moser, and D. Psaltis. 2015. Vapor-fed microfluidic hydrogen generator. Lab on A Chip 15 (10):2287–96. doi:10.1039/c5lc00259a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molaeimanesh, G. R., M. A. Bamdezh, and M. Nazemian. 2018. Impact of catalyst layer morphology on the performance of PEM fuel cell cathode via lattice Boltzmann simulation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43 (45):20959–75. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawietz, T., M. Handl, C. Oldani, K. A. Friedrich, and R. Hiesgen. 2016. Quantitative in situ analysis of ionomer structure in fuel cell catalytic layers. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 8 (40):27044–54. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b07188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, A., G. Gebel, L. Porcar, Z. Peng, N. Martinez, A. Guillermo, and S. Lyonnard. 2017. Quantitative multi-scale operando diagnosis of water localization inside a fuel cell. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 164 (2):F9–21. doi:10.1149/2.1401614jes.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu, Y. T., A. Z. Weber, Z. L. Gu, T. Schuler, and W. Q. Tao. 2020. Mesoscopic analyses of the impact of morphology and operating conditions on the transport resistances in a proton-exchange-membrane fuel-cell catalyst layer. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 4 (7):3623–39. doi:10.1039/d0se00560f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normile, S. J., and I. V. Zenyuk. 2019. Imaging ionomer in fuel cell catalyst layers with synchrotron nano transmission x-ray microscopy. Solid State Ionics 335:38–46. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2019.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, Y., A. Ohma, K. Shinohara, and K. Fushinobu. 2013. Influence of equivalent weight of ionomer on local oxygen transport resistance in cathode catalyst layers. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 160 (8):F779–87. doi:10.1149/2.040308jes.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, S., A. Orfanidi, H. Schmies, B. Anke, H. N. Nong, J. Hübner, U. Gernert, M. Gliech, M. Lerch, and P. Strasser. 2020. Ionomer distribution control in porous carbon-supported catalyst layers for high-power and low Pt-loaded proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature materials 19 (1):77–85. doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0487-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. C., K. Kakinuma, H. Uchida, M. Watanabe, and M. Uchida. 2015. Effects of short-side-chain perfluorosulfonic acid ionomers as binders on the performance of low Pt loading fuel cell cathodes. Journal of Power Sources 275:384–91. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. E., J. Kim, J. Han, K. Kim, S. Park, S. Kim, H. S. Park, Y. H. Cho, J. C. Lee, and Y. E. Sung. 2021. High-performance proton-exchange membrane water electrolysis using a sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) membrane and ionomer. Journal of Membrane Science 620:118871. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peron, J., D. Edwards, M. Haldane, X. Y. Luo, Y. M. Zhang, S. Holdcroft, and Z. Q. Shi. 2011. Fuel cell catalyst layers containing short-side-chain perfluorosulfonic acid ionomers. Journal of Power Sources 196 (1):179–81. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poojary, S., M. N. Islam, U. N. Shrivastava, E. P. L. Roberts, and K. Karan. 2020. Transport and Electrochemical Interface Properties of Ionomers in low-pt loading catalyst layers: Effect of ionomer equivalent weight and relative humidity. Molecules 25 (15):3387. doi:10.3390/molecules25153387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu, X. T., Y. T. Duan, J. L. Li, C. Y. Ru, and C. J. Zhao. 2021. Understanding of hydrocarbon ionomers in catalyst layers for enhancing the performance and durability of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 493:229671. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putra, A., H. Iwase, D. Yamaguchi, S. Koizumi, Y. Maekawa, M. Matsubayashi, and T. Hashimoto. 2010. In-situ observation of dynamic water behavior in polymer electrolyte fuel cell by combined method of small-angle neutron scattering and neutron radiography. Journal of Physics Conference Series 247 (1):012044. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/247/1/012044.
   Google Scholar
• Qi, R. H., D. J. Li, H. Y. Li, H. H. Wang, and L. Z. Zhang. 2018. Heat and mass transfer in a polymeric electrolyte membrane-based electrochemical air dehumidification system: Model development and performance analysis. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 126:888–98. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, R. H., D. J. Li, and L. Z. Zhang. 2017. Performance investigation on polymeric electrolyte membrane-based electrochemical air dehumidification system. Applied Energy 208:1174–83. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, D. K., L. F. Peng, X. M. Lai, M. Ni, and W. Lehnert. 2019. Mechanical failure and mitigation strategies for the membrane in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 113:109289. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy, N., S. Kumaraguru, R. Koestner, T. Fuller, W. B. Gu, N. Kariuki, D. Myers, P. J. Dudenas, and A. Kusoglu. 2021. Ionomer side chain length and equivalent weight impact on high Current density transport resistances in PEMFC cathodes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 168 (2):024518. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/abe5eb.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, H., Y. Teng, X. C. Meng, D. H. Fang, H. Huang, J. T. Geng, and Z. G. Shao. 2021. Ionomer network of catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources 506:230186. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reshma, P., and K. Ashwini. 2017. Cerium oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization and study of antimicrobial activity. Journal of Nanomaterials & Molecular Nanotechnology 6 (3). doi: 10.4172/2324-8777.1000219.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfi, A., C. Oldani, L. Merlo, D. Facchi, and R. Ruffo. 2018. New perfluorinated ionomer with improved oxygen permeability for application in cathode polymeric electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources 396:95–101. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvado, M. B., P. Schott, L. Guetaz, M. Gerard, T. David, and Y. Bultel. 2021. Towards the understanding of transport limitations in a proton-exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst layer: Performing agglomerate scale direct numerical simulations on electron-microscopy-based geometries. Journal of Power Sources 482:228893. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ramos, A., J. T. Gostick, and P. A. Garcia-Salaberri. 2021. Modeling the effect of low Pt loading cathode catalyst Layer in polymer electrolyte fuel cells: Part I. Model formulation and validation. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 168 (12):124514. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ac4456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassin, M. B., Y. Garsany, R. W. Atkinson, R. M. E. Hjelm, and K. E. Swider-Lyons. 2019. Understanding the interplay between cathode catalyst layer porosity and thickness on transport limitations en route to high-performance PEMFCs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (31):16944–55. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahgaldi, S., I. Alaefour, J. Zhao, and X. G. Li. 2018. Impact of ionomer in the catalyst layers on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance under different reactant flows and pressures. Fuel 227:35–41. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahgaldi, S., A. Ozden, X. G. Li, and F. Hamdullahpur. 2018. Cathode catalyst layer design with gradients of ionomer distribution for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Conversion and Management 171:1476–86. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, Z. H., R. Wycisk, and P. Pintauro. 2021. Electrospun Composite Proton-Exchange and Anion-Exchange Membranes for Fuel Cells. Energies 14 (20):6709. doi:10.3390/en14206709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibayama, M., T. Matsunaga, T. Kusano, K. Amemiya, N. Kobayashi, and T. Yoshida. 2014. SANS studies on catalyst ink of fuel cell. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 131 (3):39842. doi:10.1002/app.39842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozaki, K., S. Kajiya, S. Yamakawa, N. Hasegawa, T. Suzuki, M. Shibata, and R. Jinnouchi. 2023. Investigation of gas transport resistance in fuel cell catalyst layers via hydrogen limiting current measurements of CO-covered catalyst surfaces. Journal of Power Sources 565:232909. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siracusano, S., V. Baglio, A. Stassi, L. Merlo, E. Moukheiber, and A. S. Arico. 2014. Performance analysis of short-side-chain aquivion (R) perfluorosulfonic acid polymer for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Journal of Membrane Science 466:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siracusano, S., S. Trocino, N. Briguglio, V. Baglio, and A. S. Arico. 2018. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool in polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis. Materials 11 (8):1368. doi:10.3390/ma11081368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siracusano, S., N. Van Dijk, E. Payne-Johnson, V. Baglio, and A. S. Arico. 2015. Nanosized IrOx and IrRuOx electrocatalysts for the O2 evolution reaction in PEM water electrolysers. Applied Catalysis B-Environmental 164:488–95. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleiti, A. K., W. A. Al-Ammari, R. Arshad, and T. El Mekkawy. 2022. Energetic, economic, and environmental analysis of solid oxide fuel cell-based combined cooling, heating, and power system for cancer care hospital. Building Simulation 15 (8):1437–54. doi:10.1007/s12273-021-0865-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soboleva, T., X. Zhao, K. Malek, Z. Xie, T. Navessin, and S. Holdcroft. 2010. On the micro-, meso-, and macroporous structures of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalyst layers. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2 (2):375–84. doi:10.1021/am900600y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurgeon, J. M., and N. S. Lewis. 2011. Proton exchange membrane electrolysis sustained by water vapor. Energy & Environmental Science 4 (8):2993–98. doi:10.1039/c1ee01203g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suermann, M., T. J. Schmidt, and F. N. Buchi. 2015. Investigation of mass transport losses in polymer electrolyte electrolysis cells. ECS Transactions 69 (17):1141–48. doi:10.1149/06917.1141ecst.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., L. Cui, J. Gong, J. Zhang, Y. Xiang, and S. Lu. 2019. Design of a catalytic layer with hierarchical proton transport structure: The role of nafion nanofiber. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 7 (3):2955–63. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, F. M., H. Liu, M. Chen, and H. J. Wang. 2023. Boosting oxygen transport through mitigating the interaction between Pt and ionomer in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources 553:232240. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X. Y., H. M. Yu, X. Q. Gao, and Z. G. Shao. 2021. The threshold method in the analysis of catalyst layer porosity towards oxygen transport resistance in PEMFCs. Catalysis Science & Technology 11 (20):6804–10. doi:10.1039/d1cy00882j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar, K., P. Gazdzicki, and K. A. Friedrich. 2019. Comparative investigation into the performance and durability of long and short side chain ionomers in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 439:227078. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, M. 2016. Development of ion conductive nanofibers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Polymer Journal 48 (1):51–58. doi:10.1038/pj.2015.76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinh, V. D. C., and D. Kim. 2020. Enhancement of oxidative stability of PEM fuel cell by introduction of HO center dot radical scavenger in nafion ionomer. Journal of Membrane Science 613:118517. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cleve, T., S. Khandavalli, A. Chowdhury, S. Medina, S. Pylypenko, M. Wang, K. L. More, N. Kariuki, D. J. Myers, A. Z. Weber, et al. 2019. Dictating Pt-based electrocatalyst performance in polymer electrolyte fuel cells, from formulation to application. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 11(50):46953–64. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b17614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinothkannan, M., B. Son, and S. Shanmugam. 2022. Porous gC(3)N(4)-Gd2Zr2O7 enables the high-temperature operation of nafion membranes in polymer electrolyte fuel cells over 500 hours. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 10 (16):8975–88. doi:10.1039/d2ta00483f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., S. G. Advani, and A. K. Prasad. 2013. Pbi/Nafion/SiO2 hybrid membrane for high-temperature low-humidity fuel cell applications. Electrochimica Acta 105:530–34. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. L., T. Liu, H. Sun, W. He, Y. Z. Fan, and S. X. Wang. 2020. Investigation of dry ionomer volume fraction in cathode catalyst layer under different relative humilities and nonuniform ionomer-gradient distributions for PEM fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta 353:136491. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., S. B. Wang, J. B. Zhang, J. Q. Li, M. G. OuYang, and J. L. Wang. 2015. The key materials and components for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Progress in Chemistry 27 (2–3):310–20. doi:10.7536/PC140827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, Y., D. K. Qiu, P. Y. Yi, L. F. Peng, and X. M. Lai. 2022. Design and optimization of gradient wettability pore structure of adaptive PEM fuel cell cathode catalyst layer. Applied Energy 312:118723. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, C., A. Labouriau, R. Hjelm, B. Orler, C. Johnston, and Y. S. Kim. 2012. Nafion in dilute solvent systems: Dispersion or solution? ACS Macro Letters 1 (12):1403–07. doi:10.1021/mz3005204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, M., S. Kwon, and T. H. Kim. 2015. High performance blend membranes based on sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) and poly(p-benzimidazole) for PEMFC applications. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 29:104–11. doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, S., S. Lee, A. Z. Taning, T. H. Yang, S. H. Park, and S. D. Yim. 2020. Current understanding of catalyst/ionomer interfacial structure and phenomena affecting the oxygen reduction reaction in cathode catalyst layers of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 21:289–96. doi:10.1016/j.coelec.2020.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, A. G., J. F. Liu, G. Y. Wei, D. Liu, and L. Wang. 2022. Bipyridine polybenzimidazole ionomer with optimized electrochemical boundaries enhanced power density of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells by 2.5 times. Journal of Power Sources 545:231925. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., L. G. A. Melo, X. Zhu, M. M. West, V. Berejnov, D. Susac, J. Stumper, and A. P. Hitchcock. 2018. 4D imaging of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalyst layers by soft X-ray spectro-tomography. Journal of Power Sources 381:72–83. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, R., and P. S. Fedkiw. 2012. Analysis of EIS Technique and nafion 117 conductivity as a function of temperature and relative humidity. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 159 (3):B340–46. doi:10.1149/2.104203jes.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakovlev, Y. V., Y. V. Lobko, M. Vorokhta, J. Novakova, M. Mazur, I. Matolinova, and V. Matolin. 2021. Ionomer content effect on charge and gas transport in the cathode catalyst layer of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 490:229531. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, P., J. Huang, J. Li, K. Luo, L. Zhang, Q. Fu, X. Zhu, and Q. Liao. 2023. Insights into the effect of drying temperature on catalyst layer structure and PEM water electrolysis performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 52:170–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., R. Tocchetto, K. Nixon, R. Sun, and Y. A. Elabd. 2022. Dehumidification via polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis with sulfonated pentablock terpolymer. Journal of Membrane Science 658:120709. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, X. H., Z. L. Xu, S. Yuan, A. Han, Y. Shen, X. J. Cheng, Y. W. Liang, S. Y. Shen, and J. B. Zhang. 2022. Structural and transport properties of ultrathin perfluorosulfonic acid ionomer film in proton exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst layer: A review. Journal of Power Sources 536:231523. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarlagadda, V., M. K. Carpenter, T. E. Moylan, R. S. Kukreja, R. Koestner, W. Gu, L. Thompson, and A. Kongkanand. 2018. Boosting fuel cell performance with accessible carbon mesopores. ACS Energy Letters 3 (3):618–21. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshino, S., A. Shinohara, K. Kodama, and Y. Morimoto. 2020. Fabrication of catalyst layer with ionomer nanofiber scaffolding for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 476:228584. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, S., C. F. Zhao, X. Y. Cai, L. An, S. Y. Shen, X. H. Yan, and J. L. Zhang. 2023. Bubble evolution and transport in PEM water electrolysis: Mechanism, impact, and management. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 96:101075. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaton, M., J. Roziere, and D. J. Jones. 2017. Current understanding of chemical degradation mechanisms of perfluorosulfonic acid membranes and their mitigation strategies: A review. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 1 (3):409–38. doi:10.1039/c7se00038c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. Z., H. Y. Li, and R. H. Qi. 2019. Heat and mass transfer in PEM-based electrolytic air dehumidification element with an optimized anode-side electrochemical model. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 135:1152–66. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. M., Q. G. Li, C. Si, Y. J. Zhong, X. D. Wang, L. Jiao, K. Deng, Y. L. Wang, Q. X. Liu, and Y. Z. Xia. 2022. Coupling effects of water content, temperature, oxygen density, and polytetrafluoroethylene loading on oxygen transport through ionomer thin film on platinum surface in catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47 (6):4062–74. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., S. Shironita, and M. Umeda. 2016. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy investigation on the ionomer degradation modeling of the anode using a porous microelectrode. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41 (15):6526–33. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., S. Shahgaldi, I. Alaefour, Q. Xu, and X. G. Li. 2018. Gas permeability of catalyzed electrodes in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Applied Energy 209:203–10. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, N. N., Z. Q. Shi, and F. Girard. 2022. Superior Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) performance using short-side-chain perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) membrane and Ionomer. Materials 15 (1):78. doi:10.3390/ma15010078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, C. F., S. Yuan, X. J. Cheng, L. An, J. Z. Li, S. Y. Shen, J. W. Yin, X. H. Yan, and J. L. Zhang. 2023. Effect of perfluorosulfonic acid ionomer in anode catalyst layer on proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer performance. Journal of Power Sources 580:233413. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Y. Q. Li, X. R. Chen, Z. Yang, S. Yang, Q. Wang, X. Y. Liu, and S. F. Lu. 2022. New insights into degradation of Fe-N-C catalyst layers: Ionomer decomposition. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 10 (38):20323–30. doi:10.1039/d2ta03669j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar