Influence of the Fiber Origin on its Structure and Geometrical Indices

References

• Bahi, A., J. T. Jones, C. M. Carr, R. V. Ulijn, and J. Shao. 2007. Surface characterization of chemically modified wool. Textile Research Journal 77: 937–945. doi:10.1177/0040517507083520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeck, W., P. Mortier, and P. Simoens. 2001. Scanning electron microscopic study of different hair types in various breeds of rabbits. Folia Morphol 60: 33–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, D. J., B. J. Crook, and I. W. Purvis. 2002. Differences in fibre diameter profile characteristics in wool staples from Merino sheep and their relationship with staple strength between years, environments, and bloodlines. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53: 481–491. doi:10.1071/AR00129.
   Google Scholar
• Czaplicki, Z. 1996. A laser-based method for measurement of wool fibre diameter. Fibres & Textile in Eastern Europe 4: 161–162.
   Google Scholar
• Czaplicki, Z. 2012. Properties and structure of polish alpaca wool. Fibres & Textile in Eastern Europe 20: 8–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaplicki, Z., and K. Ruszkowski. 2014. Optimization of scouring alpaca wool by ultrasonic technique. Journal of Natural Fibers 11: 169–183. doi:10.1080/15440478.2013.864577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, C., L. Wang, and X. Wang. 2007. Diameter variations of irregular fibers under different tensions. Fibers and Polymers 8: 642–648. doi:10.1007/BF02876003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, J. L., and W. W. Sumner. 1996. Development of fibre and follicle characteristics related to wool bulk in Perendale sheep over the first year of life. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 56: 314–318.
   Google Scholar
• Goudarzi, G., Z. Sepehrizadeh, M. T. Yazdi, and M. Jamshidiha. 2008. Comparison of surface modification of wool fibres using Pronase, Trypsin, Papain and Pepsin. Fibres & Textile in Eastern Europe 16: 90–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, B. A. 2003. Influence of nutrition, fibre diameter and fibre length on the fibre curvature of cashmere. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43: 1199–1209. doi:10.1071/EA01178.
   Google Scholar
• Kajiura, Y., S.Watanabe, T.Itou, A.Iida, Y. Shinohara, and Y. Amemiya. 2005. Structural analysis of single wool fibre by scanning microbeam SAXS. Journal of Applied Crystallography 38: 420–425. doi:10.1107/S0021889805005157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamel, M. M., F. Abdelghaffar, and M. M. El-Zawahry. 2011. Eco-friendly dyeing of wool with a mixture of natural dyes. Journal of Natural Fibers 8: 289–307. doi:10.1080/15440478.2011.627114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan, C. W., and C. W. M. Yuen. 2009. A comparative study of wool fibre surface modified by physical and chemical methods. Fibers and Polymers 10: 681–686. doi:10.1007/s12221-010-0681-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh, H. J. 1983. A photographic reference system of microstructure of hair of southern African bovids. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 4: 89–132.
   Google Scholar
• Kotlinska, A., and B. Lipp-Simonowicz. 2011. Research on the enzymatic treatment of wool fibres and changes in selected properties of wool. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 19: 88–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, R., and W. A. Meyer. 2010. A note on the specific cuticle structure of wool hairs in otters (Lutrinae). Zoological Science 27: 826–829. doi:10.2108/zsj.27.826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznicka, E., and A. Grondkowska. 2013. The quality of camel wool held in the Tunisian Sahara Desert. Animal Science 52: 91–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, S. A., J. Y. Lee, D. H. Lee, and B. S. Jeon. 2007. Mechanical properties of wool fiber in the stretch breaking process. Fibers and Polymers 8: 130–133. doi:10.1007/BF02908171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., H. Yi, and S. Shang. 2012. Measurement of diameter and scale of cashmere fibers by computer images analysis. Journal of Fiber Bioengineering & Informatics 5: 95–103. doi:10.3993/jfbi.
   Google Scholar
• Lijing, W., L. Xin, and W. Xungai. 2004. Changes in fibre curvature during the processing of wool and alpaca fibres and their blends. TIWC 2004: Proceedings of The Textile Institute 83rd World Conference, May 23–27, Shanghai, China. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, C. J., F. A. Pfeiffer, and N. E. Blakeman. 1991. Medullation in mohair. Small Ruminant Research 5: 357–365. doi:10.1016/0921-4488(91)90073-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matukonis, A., J. Palaima, and A. Vitkauskas. 1989. Material science, 2nd ed., 69. Vilnius, Lithuania: Mokslas.
   Google Scholar
• Montaghi, Z., S. Eskandarnejad, and M. Montazer. 2014. The unfluence of the coarse wool treatment on fibre structure and physico-mechanical parameters. Journal of NaturalFibers 11: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Montes, M., I. Quicano, R. Quispe, E. Quispe, and L. Alfonso. 2008. Quality characteristics of Huacaya alpaca fiber produced in the Peruvian Andean Plateau region of Huancavelica. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 33–38. doi:10.5424/sjar/2008061-5258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, G. R. S. 1996. The coarse fibre component and fibre end diameter characteristics of Australian wool tops. The Journal of The Textile Institute 87: 265–273. doi:10.1080/00405009608659079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, A. D., and S. G. Gherardi. 2002. Comparision of the Sirolan fleecescan and OFDA 2000 for on-farm testing of fibre diameter. Anim. Prod. Aust 24: 173–117.
   Google Scholar
• Qi, K., C. J. Lupton, F. A. Pfeiffer, and D. L. Minikhiem. 1994. Evaluation of the optical fibre diameter analyser (OFDA) for measuring fiber diameter parameters of sheep and goats. Journal of Animal Science 72:1675–1679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafat, S. A., H. Rochambeau, M. Brims, R. G. Thebault, S. Deretz, M. Bonnet, and D. Allain. 2007. Characteristics of Angora rabbit fiber using optical fiber diameter analyzer. Journal of Animal Science 85: 3116–3122. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragaišienė, A., and J. Rusinavičiūtė. 2012. Comperative investigation of mechanical indices of sheep’s wool and dog hair fibre. Fibres & Textile in Eastern Europe 20: 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Shahidi, S., M. Ghoranneviss, B. Moazzenchi, A. Rashidi, and D. Dorranian. 2004. Study of surface modification of wool fabrics using low temperature plasma. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Frontiers of Plasma Physics and Technology, 297–301.
   Google Scholar
• Singha, K., S. Maity, M. Singha, P. Paul, and D. P. Gon. 2012. Effects of fiber diameter distribution of nonwoven fabrics on its properties. International Journal of Textile Science 1: 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• SIROLAN™ LASERSCAN. 1999. A New Technology for a New Millennium. AWTA LTD, September: 1–24
   Google Scholar
• Vineis, C., A. Aluigi, and C. Tonin. 2008. Morphology and thermal behaviour of textile fibres from the hair of domestic and wild goat species.ed.
   Google Scholar
• AUTEX Research Journal 8: 68–71.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, A., and W. Yu. 2011. The effects of wool surface characteristic on fuzzing and pilling of knitted fabrics. Fibers and Polymers 12: 528–533. doi:10.1007/s12221-011-0528-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., T. Mahar, X. Liu, and X. Wang. 2007. Measurement precision and evaluation of the diameter profiles of single wool fibers. Textile Research Journal 77: 981–991. doi:10.1177/0040517507083555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildman,A.B. 1954. The microscopy of animal textile fibres. Leeds, England: Wool Industry Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B., J. Chow, A. G. Abbott, M. S. Ellison, M. S. Kennedy, and D. Dean. 2011. Variation of surface charge along the surface of wool fibers assessed by high-resolution force spectroscopy. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 6: 61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM Designation: D 1294–95a. Standard Test Method for Tensile Strength and Breaking Tenacity of Wool Fiber Bundles 1–in. (25.4–mmm) Gage Length.
   Google Scholar
• International standard ISO 139:2005. Textiles–Standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing.
   Google Scholar
• International standard ISO 17751:2007. Textiles–Quantitative analysis of animal fibres by microscopy–Cashmere, wool, speciallity fibres and their blends.
   Google Scholar
• IWTO Standard Test Method IWTO-12-95. Measurements of the Mean and Distribution of Fibre Diameter using Sirolan-Laserscan Fibre Diameter Analyser.
   Google Scholar