338
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Kenaf (Hibiscus Cannabinus L.) Breeding

, , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all

References

  • Acquaah, G. 2012. Principles of plant genetics and breeding. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Akhtar, M. N., A. Sulong, M. K. F. Radzi, N. F. Ismail, M. R. Raza, N. Muhamad, and M. A. Khan. 2016. Influence of alkaline treatment and fiber loading on the physical and mechanical properties of kenaf/polypropylene composites for variety of applications. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 26 (6):657–64. doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.12.004.
  • Akinrotimi, C. A., and P. I. Okocha. 2018. Evaluations of genetic divergence in Kenaf (Hibiscus Cannabinus L.) genotypes using agro-morphological characteristics. Journal of Plant Sciences and Agricultural Research 2 (2):12.
  • Akpan, G. A. 2000. Cytogenetic characteristics and the breeding system in six Hibiscus species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100 (2):315–18. doi:10.1007/s001220050041.
  • Alexopoulou, E., Y. Papatheohari, M. Christou, and A. Monti. 2013. Origin, description, importance, and cultivation area of kenaf. In Kenaf: A multi-purpose crop for several industrial applications, ed. A. Monti and E. Alexopoulou, 1–15. London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Amaducci, S., M. T. Amaducci, R. Benati, and G. Venturi. 2000. Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops (hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy. Industrial Crops and Products 11 (2–3):179–86. doi:10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00063-1.
  • Arumingtyas, E. L. 2015. Kenaf: Its prospect in Indonesia. Journal of Biological Researches 20 (1):21–26. doi:10.23869/bphjbr.20.2.20154.
  • Ayadi, R., L. Hamrouni, M. Hanana, S. Bouzid, M. Trifi, and M. L. Khouja. 2011. In vitro propagation and regeneration of an industrial plant kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Industrial Crops and Products 33 (2):474–80. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.10.025.
  • Ayadi, R., M. Hanana, R. Mzid, L. Hamrouni, M. L. Khouja, and H. A. Salhi. 2017. Hibiscus cannabinus L.–kenaf: A review paper. Journal of Natural Fibers 14 (4):466–84.
  • Bahtoee, A., K. Zargari, and E. Baniani. 2012. An investigation on fiber production of different kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus l.) genotypes. World Applied Sciences Journal 16 (1):63–66.
  • Baldwin, B. S., J. E. Hollowell, J. W. Mosley, and R. D. Cossar. 2006. Registration of ‘Whitten’kenaf. Crop Science 46 (2):988. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0215.
  • Banerjee, R., G. V. Kumar, and S. P. J. Kumar. 2019. Omics-based approaches in plant biotechnology. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Batayeva, D., B. Labaco, C. Ye, X. Li, B. Usenbekov, A. Rysbekova, G. Dyuskalieva, G. Vergara, R. Reinke, and H. Leung. 2018. Genome-wide association study of seedling stage salinity tolerance in temperate japonica rice germplasm. BMC Genetics 19 (1):2. doi:10.1186/s12863-017-0590-7.
  • Behmaram, R., G. Saleh, M. Foroughi, Z. Noori, P. J. Malar, and J. Harun. 2014. Genetic control of fiber yield and quality in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Iranian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 3 (1):41–31.
  • Bhardwaj, H. L., C. L. Webber III, and G. S. Sakamoto. 2005. Cultivation of kenaf and sunn hemp in the mid-Atlantic United States. Industrial Crops and Products 22 (2):151–55. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.08.002.
  • Borém, A., and R. Fritsche-Neto. 2014. Biotechnology and plant breeding: Applications and approaches for developing improved cultivars. United Kingdom: Elsevier.
  • Bourguignon, M., K. Moore, A. Lenssen, S. Archontoulis, B. Goff, and B. Baldwin. 2016. Kenaf productivity and morphology, when grown in Iowa and in Kentucky. Industrial Crops and Products 94:596–609. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.044.
  • Brown, R. C., and T. R. Brown. 2014. Biorenewable resources: Engineering new products from agriculture. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Chen, A., D. Li, H. Tang, and J. Li. 2009. The breeding of “China hybrid kenaf 316”(H316) with super high yield disease-resistance and wide adaptability. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 31 (3):173–78.
  • Chen, A., D. Li, H. Tang, S. Tan, Y. Gong, Q. Tang, and J. Li. 2008. The breeding of kenaf new variety China kenaf 12. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 30 (1):1–5.
  • Chen, A., D. Li, J. Li, H. Tang, and S. Huang. 2011a. Selection and breeding of “China Kenaf 13”-A new kenaf variety with high yield, disease-resistance and wide adaptability. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 33 (4):172–78.
  • Chen, A., J. Thangui, J. Li, S. Huang, and D. Li. 2016. The breeding of kenaf new variety “China kenaf 16”with high yield, disease resistance and wide adaptability. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 38 (1):1–8,18.
  • Chen, M., C. Wei, J. Qi, X. Chen, J. Su, A. Li, A. Tao, and W. Wu. 2011b. Genetic linkage map construction for kenaf using SRAP, ISSR and RAPD markers. Plant Breeding 130 (6):679–87. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2011.01879.x.
  • Cheng, Y., L. Zhang, J. Qi, and L. Zhang. 2020. Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Hibiscus cannabinus and Comparative Analysis of the Malvaceae Family. Frontiers in Genetics 11:227. doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00227.
  • Cheng, Z. 2001. Kenaf research, products and applications in Japan. Plant Fibers Production 23 (3):16–24.
  • Cheng, Z., B. Lu, K. Sameshima, D. X. Fu, and J. Chen. 2004. Identification and genetic relationships of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) germplasm revealed by AFLP analysis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51 (4):393–401. doi:10.1023/B:GRES.0000023454.96401.1c.
  • Cheng, Z., K. Sameshima, and J. K. Chen. 2002. Genetic variability and relationship of kenaf germplasm based on RAPD analysis. China’s Fiber Crops 24 (1):1–11.
  • Cobb, J. N., G. DeClerck, A. Greenberg, R. Clark, and S. McCouch. 2013. Next-generation phenotyping: Requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126 (4):867–87.
  • Coetzee, R. 2004. Characterization of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) cultivars in South Africa. M.Sc. thesis, University of the Free State.
  • Coetzee, R., L. Herselman, and M. T. Labuschagne. 2009. Genetic diversity analysis of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) using AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers. Plant Genetic Resources 7 (2):122–26. doi:10.1017/S1479262108067889.
  • Contreras, R. N., J. M. Ruter, and W. W. Hanna. 2009. An oryzalin-induced autoallooctoploid of Hibiscus acetosella ‘Panama Red’. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 134 (5):553–59. doi:10.21273/JASHS.134.5.553.
  • Cook, C. G., and A. W. Scott. 1995. Registration of ‘SF459ʹ kenaf. Crop Science 35 (6):1712. doi:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500060041x.
  • Cook, C. G., and A. W. Scott. 2000. Registration of `Gregg’ Kenaf. Crop Science 40 (6):1831.
  • Cook, C. G., J. W. Sij, and A. W. Scott. 2000. Registration of `Dowling’ Kenaf. Crop Science 40 (6):1831.
  • Dempsey, J. M. 1975. Fiber crops. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida.
  • Duarte, M. C., G. L. Esteves, M. L. F. Salatino, K. C. Walsh, and D. A. Baum. 2011. Phylogenetic analyses of Eriotheca and related genera (Bombacoideae, Malvaceae). Systematic Botany 36 (3):690–701. doi:10.1600/036364411X583655.
  • Faiz, A., Z. S. Mohd, and A. Mustapha. 2016. Effect of gamma irradiation on morphological traits in M1 generation of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L) V36 variety. R&D Seminar 2016: Research and Development Seminar 2016, Malaysia.
  • Faruq, G., M. A. Alamgir, M. M. Rahman, M. R. Motior, H. P. Zakaria, B. Marchalina, and N. A. Mohamed. 2013. Morphological charecterization of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) in Malaysian tropical environment using multivariate analysis. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 23 (1):60–67.
  • Feng, Z., Y. Mao, N. Xu, B. Zhang, P. Wei, D. Yang, Z. Wang, Z. Zhang, R. Zheng, and L. Yang. 2014. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (12):4632–37. doi:10.1073/pnas.1400822111.
  • Gan, Y., J. Hong, N. Lin, F. Chen, and M. Li. 2001. The breeding and releasing of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) new variety Ming Hong 31. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 23 (4):1–7.
  • Golam, F., M. A. Alamgir, M. M. Rahman, B. Subha, and M. R. Motior. 2011. Evaluation of genetic variability of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) from different geographic origins using morpho-agronomic traits and multivariate analysis. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5 (13):1882.
  • Gupta, P. K., P. L. Kulwal, and V. Jaiswal. 2019. Association mapping in plants in the post-GWAS genomics era. Advances in Genetics 104:75–154.
  • Hiron, N., N. Alam, F. A. Ahmed, R. Begum, and S. S. Alam. 2006. Differential fluorescent banding and isozyme assay of Hibiscus cannabinus L. and H. sabdariffa L. (Malvaceae). Cytologia 71 (2):175–80. doi:10.1508/cytologia.71.175.
  • Hong, J., R. Zeng, Y. Gan, J. Lu, and F. Chen. 2008. Selection and breeding of new Kenaf variety, Minhong 321. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 23 (3):288–91.
  • Hong, J., R. Zeng, and Y. Li. 2009. Breeding of Kenaf new variety Minhong 964 with high yield and superior quality. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 31 (5):221–26.
  • Hong, J., Y. Gan, F. Chen, and M. Li. 1999. The breeding of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) New Variety Ming Hong 298. China’s Fiber Crops 21 (2):10–14.
  • Huang, J., J. Zhang, W. Li, W. Hu, L. Duan, Y. Feng, F. Qiu, and B. Yue. 2013. Genome‐wide association analysis of ten chilling tolerance indices at the germination and seedling stages in maize. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 55 (8):735–44. doi:10.1111/jipb.12051.
  • Huo, G., D. Li, and A. Chen. 2009. Genetic diversity analysis of 44 shares of Hibiscus cannabinus L. germplasm resources using ISSR molecular marker. Agricultural Science and Technology 10 (3):63–67.
  • Islam, M., and S. S. Alam. 2011. Karyotype characterization with fluorescent banding in one released and two wild germplasms of hibiscus cannabinus L. Cytologia 76 (2):223–27. doi:10.1508/cytologia.76.223.
  • Islam, M. M. 2019. Varietal advances of jute, kenaf and mesta crops in Bangladesh: A review. International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry 4 (1):24–41. doi:10.11648/j.ijbc.20190401.15.
  • Jeong, S. W., S. J. Kwon, J. H. Ryu, J. B. Kim, J. W. Ahn, S. H. Kim, Y. D. Jo, H. Choi, S. B. Im, and S. Y. Kang. 2017. Development of EST-SSR markers through de novo RNA sequencing and application for biomass productivity in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Genes & Genomics 39 (10):1139–56. doi:10.1007/s13258-017-0582-z.
  • Jiang, Y., B. Yang, N. S. Harris, and M. K. Deyholos. 2007. Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots. Journal of Experimental Botany 58 (13):3591–607. doi:10.1093/jxb/erm207.
  • Jiang, Y., and M. K. Deyholos. 2006. Comprehensive transcriptional profiling of NaCl-stressed Arabidopsis roots reveals novel classes of responsive genes. BMC Plant Biology 6 (1):25. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-6-25.
  • Jin, G., F. Fu, D. Tian, M. Wei, X. Pan, and X. Luo. 2007. Report of the breeding of the new middle maturing Kenaf variety” ZH-01”. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 29 (6):317–21.
  • Kang, S. Y., S. J. Kwon, S. W. Jeong, J. B. Kim, S. H. Kim, and J. H. Ryu. 2016. An improved kenaf cultivar’Jangdae’with seed harvesting in Korea. Korean Journal of Breeding Science 48 (3):349–54. doi:10.9787/KJBS.2016.48.3.349.
  • Kashif, M. H., D. Tang, Z. Li, F. Wei, Z. Liang, and P. Chen. 2020. Comparative cytological and gene expression analysis reveals potential metabolic pathways and target genes responsive to salt stress in Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 39:1245–60. doi:10.1007/s00344-019-10062-7.
  • Kawasaki, S., C. Borchert, M. Deyholos, H. Wang, S. Brazille, K. Kawai, D. Galbraith, and H. J. Bohnert. 2001. Gene expression profiles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. The Plant Cell 13 (4):889–905. doi:10.1105/tpc.13.4.889.
  • Khatodia, S., K. Bhatotia, N. Passricha, S. M. P. Khurana, and N. Tuteja. 2016. The CRISPR/Cas genome-editing tool: Application in improvement of crops. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:506. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00506.
  • Khatodia, S., and S. M. Khurana. 2014. Trending: The Cas nuclease mediated genome editing technique. Biotech Today 4 (1):46–49. doi:10.5958/2322-0996.2014.00019.2.
  • Kim, W. J., D. S. Kim, S. H. Kim, J. B. Kim, E. J. Goh, and S. Y. Kang. 2010. Analysis of genetic similarity detected by AFLP and PCoA among genotypes of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 13 (4):243–49. doi:10.1007/s12892-010-0092-x.
  • Kreps, J. A., Y. Wu, H. S. Chang, T. Zhu, X. Wang, and J. F. Harper. 2002. Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiology 130 (4):2129–41. doi:10.1104/pp.008532.
  • Kumar, D. 1999. Possibility of commercial utilization of residual heterosis in Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 59 (2):227–32.
  • Kurobane, I., H. Yamaguchi, C. Sander, and R. A. Nilan. 1979. The effects of gamma irradiation on the production and secretion of enzymes, and on enzyme activities in barley seeds. Environmental and Experimental Botany 19 (2):75–84. doi:10.1016/0098-8472(79)90011-X.
  • Lauriault, L. M., and N. Puppala. 2009. The influence of rainfed and limited irrigation conditions and early vs. late plantings on kenaf as a potential industrial crop in the southern High Plains, USA. Industrial Crops and Products 29 (2–3):549–53. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.10.006.
  • Lee, I. S., C. H. Kang, S. J. Kwon, and Y. E. Na. 2019. Characteristics of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) mutants induced by gamma-ray. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology: B 9:241–50.
  • LeMahieu, P. J., E. S. Oplinger, and D. H. Putnam. 2003. Kenaf. In Alternative field crops manual. University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension; University of Minnesota, Center for Alternative Plant & Animal Products and the Minnesota Extension Service.
  • Li, D., and A. Chen. 2005. The breeding of Kenaf hybrid H305 with super high yield disease-resistance and wide adaptability. Plant Fibers and Products 27 (5):221–26.
  • Li, D., A. Chen, H. Tang, and J. Li. 2009. The breeding of “China hybrid Kenaf 318”(H318) with super high yield, disease-resistance and wide adaptability. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 31 (1):1–7.
  • Li, D., K. Dossa, Y. Zhang, X. Wei, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, A. Liu, R. Zhou, and X. Zhang. 2018. GWAS uncovers differential genetic bases for drought and salt tolerances in sesame at the germination stage. Genes 9 (2):87. doi:10.3390/genes9020087.
  • Li, D., and S. Huang. 2013. The breeding of Kenaf. In Kenaf: A multi-purpose crop for several industrial applications, ed. A. Monti and E. Alexopoulou, 45–58. London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Li, D., S. Tan, A. Chen, Y. Gong, and W. Liu. 2003. The breeding of new Kenaf variety KB11 with high yield disease-resistance and wide adaptability. Plant Fibers and Products 25 (4):3–7.
  • Li, D., S. Tan, Y. Gong, W. Liu, and A. Chen. 2001. The breeding of new Kenaf variety KB2 with high yield disease-resistance and wide adaptability. China’s Fiber Crops 23 (1):1–6.
  • Li, H., D. Li, A. Chen, H. Tang, J. Li, and S. Huang. 2017. RNA-seq for comparative transcript profiling of kenaf under salinity stress. Journal of Plant Research 130 (2):365–72. doi:10.1007/s10265-016-0898-9.
  • Li, H., D. Li, and L. Zhao. 2019. Identification and validation of single-nucleotide polymorphism markers linked to first flower node in kenaf by using combined specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing and bulked segregant analysis. Industrial Crops and Products 128:566–71. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.055.
  • Li, J., S. Huang, H. Tang, A. Chen, H. Li, and D. Li. 2013. Breeding of “China hybrid kenaf 368” with super high yield, disease-resistance and wide adaptability. China’s Fiber Crops 35 (6):277–284,291.
  • Li, Z. S. 1994. Selection on a new variety: Zhehong 832 with higher output of bast and core. China's Fiber Crops 16 (4):5–8, 15.
  • Liao, X., Y. Zhao, P. Chen, B. Zhou, Y. Diao, M. Yu, Z. Huang, and R. Zhou. 2016. A comparative analysis of the atp8 gene between a cytoplasmic male sterile line and its maintainer and further development of a molecular marker specific to male sterile cytoplasm in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 34 (1):29–36. doi:10.1007/s11105-015-0894-6.
  • Liao, X., Y. Zhao, X. Kong, A. Khan, B. Zhou, D. Liu, M. H. Kashif, P. Chen, H. Wang, and R. Zhou. 2018. Complete sequence of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) mitochondrial genome and comparative analysis with the mitochondrial genomes of other plants. Scientific Reports 8 (1):1–13. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30297-w.
  • Lin, L., J. Qi, P. Fang, J. Wu, A. Tao, P. Lin, and J. Xu. 2008a. Breeding of A Kenaf variety Fuhong 9913 with double high-yielding, good quality and high disease resistance. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 30 (2):65–68.
  • Lin, L., J. Qi, P. Fang, J. Wu, P. Lin, and W. Wu. 2004a. Breeding of a new kenaf variety Jinguang 1 with No-thorn. China’s Fiber and Products 26 (4):157–61.
  • Lin, P. 2011. The breeding and cultivation of new kenaf varieties” Fuhonghang952”. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology 23 (6):26–29.
  • Lin, P., J. Qi, L. Lin, J. Wu, A. Tao, and P. Fang. 2008b. Breeding and cultivation technology of Fuhong No. 7, A new variety of Kenaf with super-high quality, high yield and disease resistance. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 30 (5):233–38. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.04.003.
  • Lin, P., L. Lin, J. Wu, N. Lin, J. Cai, and J. Qi. 2004b. Breeding of Fuhong4, a kenaf variety with high yielding and resistance. China’s Fiber and Products 26 (1):1–4.
  • Liu, W., J. S. Yuan, and C. N. Stewart Jr. 2013. Advanced genetic tools for plant biotechnology. Nature Reviews Genetics 14 (11):781–93. doi:10.1038/nrg3583.
  • Liu, Y. 2005. Diallel and stability analysis of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) in South Africa. M.Sc. thesis, University of the Free State.
  • Lusser, M., C. Parisi, D. Plan, and E. Rodriguez-Cerezo. 2012. Deployment of new biotechnologies in plant breeding. Nature Biotechnology 30 (3):231. doi:10.1038/nbt.2142.
  • Meints, P. D., and C. A. Smith. 2003. Kenaf seed storage duration on germination, emergence, and yield. Industrial Crops and Products 17 (1):9–14. doi:10.1016/S0926-6690(02)00052-3.
  • Monti, A., and E. Alexopoulou. 2013. Kenaf: A multi-purpose crop for several industrial applications. London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Mostofa, M. G., L. Rahman, and M. M. Hussain. 2011. Combining ability for yield and yield contributing characters in Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Bangladesh Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics 24 (1):01–06. doi:10.3329/bjpbg.v24i1.16307.
  • Mostofa, M. G., M. R. Islam, A. T. M. M. Alam, S. M. M. Ali, and M. A. F. Mollah. 2002. Genetic variability, heritability, and correlation studies in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences 2:442–424.
  • Muniandi, S. K. M., M. A. Hossain, M. P. Abdullah, and N. A. Ab Shukor. 2018. Gibberellic acid (GA 3) affects growth and development of some selected kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) cultivars. Industrial Crops and Products 118:180–87. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.036.
  • Nishino, T. 2004. Natural fiber sources. In Green composites:Polymer composites and the environment, ed. C. Baillie. New York: CRC Press.
  • Niu, X., J. Xu, T. Chen, A. Tao, and J. Qi. 2016. Proteomic changes in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) leaves under salt stress. Industrial Crops and Products 91:255–63. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.07.034.
  • Noori, Z., G. Saleh, M. Foroughi, R. Behmaram, P. Kashiani, M. Zare, R. A. Halim, R. Alimon, and S. S. Shapor. 2016. Generation mean analysis for forage yield and quality in Kenaf. Iranian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 5 (2):23–31.
  • Odahara, M., Y. Horii, M. Kimura, and K. Numata. 2019. Efficient callus induction and completion of regeneration in kenaf Hibiscus cannabinus. BioRxiv: 546754.
  • Patanè, C., and O. Sortino. 2010. Seed yield in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as affected by sowing time in South Italy. Industrial Crops and Products 32 (3):381–88. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.06.002.
  • Poehlman, J. M., and D. A. Sleper. 1995. Breeding field crops. 4th ed. Ames: Lowa State University Press.
  • Qi, J. 1996. Studies on the breeding of a new kenaf variety Fuhong No. 1 of high yield and disease resistance. Journal of Fujian Agricultural University 25 (3):281–286.
  • Qi, J., H. Huang, P. Lin, L. Lin, J. Wu, W. WU, P. Fang, N. Lin, J. Cai, and S. Chen. 2003a. Selection and breeding of Fuhong 3, a kenaf variety with high yield, resistance and adaptability. China’s Fiber Crops 42 (3):1–7.
  • Qi, J., J. Xu, A. Li, X. Wang, G. Zhang, J. Su, and A. Liu. 2011. Analysis of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship of kenaf germplasm by SRAP. Journal of Natural Fibers 8 (2):99–110. doi:10.1080/15440478.2011.577590.
  • Qi, J., L. Lin, and P. Lin. 2002. Selection and breeding of Fuhong 952, a new kenaf variety. Journal of Fujian Agricultural University 31 (4):433–36.
  • Qi, J., L. Lin, P. Lin, Y. Zhou, P. Fang, J. Cai, N. Lin, and A. Li. 2003b. Selection and breeding of Fuhong 951, a kenaf variety with high yield and quality. Journal of Fujian Agricultural University 32 (1):1–5.
  • Qi, J., and W. Li. 1999. Breeding and popularization of Fuhong No. 2, a new kenaf variety with high yield, stress resistance and wide adaptability. Journal of Fujian Agricultural University 28 (4):385–89.
  • Qi, J., Y. Chen, R. Zhou, L. Lin, K. Liang, J. Wu, and P. Fang. 2005. Genetic effects and heterosis analysis for yield and quality traits in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Zuo Wu Xue Bao 31 (4):469–75.
  • Ryu, J., S. J. Kwon, D. G. Kim, M. K. Lee, J. M. Kim, Y. D. Jo, S. H. Kim, S. W. Jeong, K. Y. Kang, and S. W. Kim. 2017. Morphological characteristics, chemical and genetic diversity of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) genotypes. Journal of Plant Biotechnology 44 (4):416–30. doi:10.5010/JPB.2017.44.4.416.
  • Satya, P., and M. Chakraborti. 2015. Development and utilization of DNA markers for genetic improvement of bast fibre crops. In Aplication of molecular markers in plant genome analysis and breeding, ed. K. Taški-Ajduković, 119–142. Kerala, India: Research Signpost.
  • Satya, P., M. Karan, C. S. Kar, A. K. Mahapatra, and B. S. Mahapatra. 2013. Assessment of molecular diversity and evolutionary relationship of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), roselle (H. sabdariffa L.) and their wild relatives. Plant Systematics and Evolution 299 (3):619–29. doi:10.1007/s00606-012-0748-8.
  • Satya, P., M. Karan, K. Chakraborty, C. Biswas, and P. G. Karmakar. 2014. Comparative analysis of diversification and population structure of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) and roselle (H. sabdariffa L.) using SSR and RGA (resistance gene analogue) markers. Plant Systematics and Evolution 300 (5):1209–18. doi:10.1007/s00606-013-0956-x.
  • Schiml, S., F. Fauser, and H. Puchta. 2014. The CRISPR/C as system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in A rabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. The Plant Journal 80 (6):1139–50. doi:10.1111/tpj.12704.
  • Sehgal, D., R. Singh, and V. R. Rajpal. 2016. Quantitative trait loci mapping in plants: Concepts and approaches. In Molecular breeding for sustainable crop improvement, ed. V. R. Rajpal, S. R. Rao, and S. N. Raina, 31–59. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Shu, Q. Y., B. P. Forster, H. Nakagawa, and H. Nakagawa. 2012. Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. United Kingdom: CABI.
  • Sobha, S., K. Rekha, and T. K. Uthup. 2019. Biotechnological advances in rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) breeding. In Advances in plant breeding strategies: Industrial and food crops, ed. J. M. Al-Khayri, S. M. Jain, and D. V. Johnson, 179–236. Switzerland: Springer.
  • Song, G., M. Jia, K. Chen, X. Kong, B. Khattak, C. Xie, A. Li, and L. Mao. 2016. CRISPR/Cas9: A powerful tool for crop genome editing. The Crop Journal 4 (2):75–82. doi:10.1016/j.cj.2015.12.002.
  • Su, J., A. Chen, and J. Lin. 2004. Genetic diversity, evaluation and utilization of kenaf germplasm in China. Plant Fiber and Products 26 (1):5–9.
  • Sultana, R., A. K. M. L. Quader, M. Haque, S. Mazumder, and S. K. Paul. 2016. In vitro studies on callus induction of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). International Journal of Microbiology and Application 3 (1):1.
  • Sun, H., M. Meng, Z. Yan, Z. Lin, X. Nie, and X. Yang. 2019. Genome-wide association mapping of stress-tolerance traits in cotton. The Crop Journal 7 (1):77–88. doi:10.1016/j.cj.2018.11.002.
  • Swami, A. K., S. I. Alam, N. Sengupta, and R. Sarin. 2011. Differential proteomic analysis of salt stress response in Sorghum bicolor leaves. Environmental and Experimental Botany 71 (2):321–28. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.12.017.
  • Tang, Y., and D. Li. 1993. Studies on multi-generation utilization of high yield combination H116 in Kenaf (Hibiscus Cannabinus L.). Scientia Agricultura Sinica 26 (2):30–38.
  • Tao, A., J. Qi, L. Lin, P. Fang, J. Wu, and P. Lin. 2008. Breeding of Fuhong No. 15, a new Kenaf variety with high yield, disease resistance and strong adaptability. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 30 (4):181–84.
  • Thabet, S. G., Y. S. Moursi, M. A. Karam, A. Graner, and A. M. Alqudah. 2018. Genetic basis of drought tolerance during seed germination in barley. PloS One 13 (11):e0206682. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206682.
  • Varshney, R. K., A. Graner, and M. E. Sorrells. 2005. Genomics-assisted breeding for crop improvement. Trends in Plant Science 10 (12):621–30. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.10.004.
  • Voss-Fels, K. P., A. Stahl, and L. T. Hickey. 2019. Q&A: Modern crop breeding for future food security. BMC Biology 17 (1):18. doi:10.1186/s12915-019-0638-4.
  • Wang, Z., X. Wang, H. Zhang, L. Ma, H. Zhao, C. S. Jones, J. Chen, and G. Liu. 2020. A genome‐wide association study approach to the identification of candidate genes underlying agronomic traits in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 18 (3):611–13. doi:10.1111/pbi.13251.
  • Webber, C. L., III, H. L. Bhardwaj, and V. K. Bledsoe. 2002. Kenaf production: Fiber, feed, and seed. In Trends in new crops and new uses, ed. J. Janick and A. Whipkey, 327–39. Alexandria, VA: ASHS Press.
  • Webber, C. L., III, and V. K. Bledsoe. 2002. Kenaf yield components and plant composition. In Trends in new crops and new uses, ed. J. Janick and A. Whipkey, 348–57. Alexandria, VA: ASHS Press.
  • Wei, F., D. Tang, Z. Li, M. H. Kashif, A. Khan, H. Lu, R. Jia, and P. Chen. 2019. Molecular cloning and subcellular localization of six HDACs and their roles in response to salt and drought stress in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Biological Research 52 (1):20. doi:10.1186/s40659-019-0227-6.
  • Wilson, F. D., T. E. Summers, J. F. Joyner, D. W. Fishler, and C. C. Seale. 1965. Everglades 41ʹand ‘Everglades 71ʹ: two new varieties of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) for the fiber and seed. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Agricultural Experiment Station.
  • Withanage, S. P., M. A. Hossain, H. A. B. Roslan, M. P. Abdullah, S. B. Napis, and N. A. A. Shukor. 2015. Overexpression of Arabidopsis thaliana gibberellic acid 20 oxidase (AtGA20ox) gene enhance the vegetative growth and fiber quality in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) plants. Breeding Science 65 (3):177–91. doi:10.1270/jsbbs.65.177.
  • Wu, J., J. Qi, L. Lin, P. Fang, A. Tao, and P. Lin. 2008. Selection and breeding of Fuhong13, A new Kenaf variety with highyield and multi-resistance. Plant Fiber Sciences in China 30 (1):6–9.
  • Wu, J., J. Qi, L. Lin, P. Lin, S. Zhang, and J. Cai. 2003. Selection and breeding of Fuhong 991, A Kenaf variety with high yield and quality. China’s Fiber and Products 25 (6):261–65.
  • Xie, D., Z. Dai, Z. Yang, Q. Tang, J. Sun, X. Yang, X. Song, Y. Lu, D. Zhao, and L. Zhang. 2018. Genomic variations and association study of agronomic traits in flax. BMC Genomics 19 (1):512. doi:10.1186/s12864-018-4899-z.
  • Xiong, H. P. 2008. Breeding sciences of bast and leaf fiber crops, 319–41. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press.
  • Xu, J., A. Li, X. Wang, J. Qi, L. Zhang, G. Zhang, J. Su, and A. Tao. 2013. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) accessions evaluated by SRAP and ISSR. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 49:94–100. doi:10.1016/j.bse.2013.03.006.
  • Zhang, G., J. Qi, X. Zhang, P. Fnag, J. Su, A. Tao, L. Tao, W. Wu, and A. Liu. 2011. A genetic linkage map of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) based on SRAP, ISSR and RAPD markers. Agricultural Sciences in China 10 (9):1346–53. doi:10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60127-2.
  • Zhang, L., A. Li, X. Wang, J. Xu, G. Zhang, J. Su, J. Qi, and C. Guan. 2013. Genetic diversity of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) evaluated by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR). Biochemical Genetics 51 (9–10):800–10. doi:10.1007/s10528-013-9608-7.
  • Zhang, L., X. Wan, J. Xu, L. Lin, and J. Qi. 2015. De novo assembly of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) transcriptome using Illumina sequencing for gene discovery and marker identification. Molecular Breeding 35 (10):192. doi:10.1007/s11032-015-0388-0.
  • Zhang, L., X. Wan, L. Zhang, Y. Xu, J. Xu, L. Lin, J. Qi, and L. Zhang. 2019. Development of InDel markers for identification of a single mendelian locus controlling leaf shape in Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus). Tropical Plant Biology 12 (2):78–84. doi:10.1007/s12042-019-09219-1.
  • Zhang, L., Y. Xu, X. Zhang, X. Ma, L. Zhang, Z. Liao, Q. Zhang, X. Wan, Y. Cheng, and J. Zhang. 2020. The genome of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) provides insights into bast fibre and leaf shape biogenesis. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18 (8):1796–809.
  • Zhao, Y., P. Chen, X. Liao, B. Zhou, J. Liao, Z. Huang, X. Kong, and R. Zhou. 2013. A comparative study of the atp9 gene between a cytoplasmic male sterile line and its maintainer line and further development of a molecular marker specific for male sterile cytoplasm in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Molecular Breeding 32 (4):969–76. doi:10.1007/s11032-013-9926-9.
  • Zhao, Y., X. Liao, B. Zhou, H. Zhao, Y. Zhou, and R. Zhou. 2016. Mutation in the coding sequence of atp6 are associated with male sterile cytoplasm in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Euphytica 207 (1):169–75. doi:10.1007/s10681-015-1559-0.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.