Economic Impacts of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) Cotton

References

• Abdelraheem, A., N. Adams, and J. Zhang. 2020. Effects of drought on agronomic and fiber quality in an introgressed backcross inbred line population of Upland cotton under field conditions. Field Crops Research 254:107850. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdurakhmonov, I. Y., M. S. Ayubov, K. A. Ubaydullaeva, Z. T. Buriev, S. E. Shermatov, H. S. Ruziboev, R. G. Percy, E. J. Devor, G. C. Sharma, V. R. Sripathi, et al. 2016. RNA interference for functional genomics and improvement of cotton (Gossypium sp.). Frontiers in Plant Science 7:202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdurakhmonov, I. Y., Z. T. Buriev, S. Saha, J. N. Jenkins, A. Abdukarimov, and A. E. Pepper. 2014. Phytochrome RNAi enhances major fibre quality and agronomic traits of the cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. Nature Communications 5 (1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S., X. Wei, Z. Sheng, P. Hu, and S. Tang. 2020. CRISPR/Cas9 for development of disease resistance in plants: Recent progress, limitations and future prospects. Briefings in Functional Genomics 19 (1):26–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbar, W., A. Gowda, J. E. Ahrens, J. W. Stelzer, R. S. Brown, S. L. Bollman, J. T. Greenplate, J. Gore, A. Catchot, G. Lorenz, et al. 2019. First transgenic trait for control of plant bugs and thrips in cotton. Pest Management Science 75 (3):867–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, A., M. Khan, A. Ishaq, A. Hussain, S. U. Rehman, I. A. Khan, and S. F. A. Shah. 2020. Pakistan textiles can bounce back vigorously. International Review of Management and Marketing 10 (2):30–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, S., A. Rana, M. A. Zia, S. U. Khan, A. Iqbal, and G. M. Ali. 2018. Temporal status of Bt gene expression in Pakistani cotton. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 55 (1):7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, K. C., R. G. Luttrell, T. W. Sappington, L. S. Hesler, and S. K. Papiernik. 2018. Frequency and abundance of selected early-season insect pests of cotton. Journal of Integrated Pest Management 9 (1):20–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, S., S. H. Khan, A. Ahmed, and A. M. Dandekar. 2020. The tale of cotton plant: From wild type to domestication, leading to its improvement by genetic transformation. American Journal of Molecular Biology 10 (2):91–127.
   Google Scholar
• Babar, U., M. A. Nawaz, U. Arshad, M. T. Azhar, R. M. Atif, K. S. Golokhvast, A. M. Tsatsakis, C. Sherbakova, G. Chung, and I. A. Rana. 2020. Transgenic crops for the agricultural improvement in Pakistan: A perspective of environmental stresses and the current status of genetically modified crops. GM Crops & Food 11 (1):1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banfalvi, Z., E. Csákvári, V. Villányi, and M. Kondrák. 2020. Generation of transgene-free PDS mutants in potato by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. BMC Biotechnology 20:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros, M. A. L., C. R. C. D. Silva, L. M. D. Lima, F. J. C. Farias, G. A. Ramos, and R. C. D. Santos. 2020. A Review on Evolution of Cotton in Brazil: GM, White, and Colored Cultivars. Journal of Natural Fibers 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, I. S., C. Fuqua, and T. G. Platt. 2018. Ecological and evolutionary dynamics of a model facultative pathogen: Agrobacterium and crown gall disease of plants. Environmental Microbiology 20 (1):16–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basal, H., E. Karademir, H. K. Goren, V. Sezener, M. N. Dogan, I. Gencsoylu, and O. Erdogan. 2019. Cotton Production in Turkey and Europe. In Cotton Production,edited by K. Jabran and B. S. Chauhan, 297–321.  John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Baydar, G., N. Ciliz, and A. Mammadov. 2015. Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 104:213–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard, C. E., A. Boets, R. Mourant, J. Van Rie, and R. J. Akhurst. 2008. Unusually high frequency of genes encoding vegetative insecticidal proteins in an Australian Bacillus thuringiensis collection. Current Microbiology 57 (3):195–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, C. A., W. Chiaravalle, M. Dalla-Rizza, J. R. Farias, M. F. García-Degano, G. Gastaminza, D. Mota-Sanchez, G. Murua, C. Omoto, B. K. Pieralisi, et al. 2016. Current situation of pests targeted by Bt crops in Latin America. Current Opinion in Insect Science 15:131–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortesi, L., and R. Fischer. 2015. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnology Advances 33 (1):41–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes, G., and P. Barfoot. 2018. Farm income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996-2016. GM Crops & Food 9 (2):59–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkitbayeva, S., M. Qaim, and J. Swinnen. 2016. A black (white) hole in the global spread of GM cotton. Trends in Biotechnology 34 (4):260–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabezon, E., J. Ripoll-Rozada, A. Peña, F. De La Cruz, and I. Arechaga. 2015. Towards an integrated model of bacterial conjugation. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 39 (1):81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, R. 2016. Estimating the biotech sector’s contribution to the US economy. Nature Biotechnology 34 (3):247–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, S., M. Jin, C. Wu, P. Chakraborty, and Y. Xiao. 2020. Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein family Vip3A and mode of action against pest Lepidoptera. Pest Management Science 76 (5):1612–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, N., P. Chakraborty, M. Sen, and R. Bandopadhyay. 2020. Choice of explant for plant genetic transformation. In Biolistic DNA Delivery in Plants, edited by S. Rustgi and H. Luo, 107–23. New York, NY: Humana.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., J. Z. Zhao, H. L. Collins, E. D. Earle, J. Cao, and A. M. Shelton. 2008. A critical assessment of the effects of Bt transgenic plants on parasitoids. PLoS One 3 (5):e2284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., J. Huang, and F. Qiao. 2013. Farmers’ knowledge on pest management and pesticide use in Bt cotton production in china. China Economic Review 27:15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., X. Lu, N. Shu, S. Wang, J. Wang, D. Wang, L. Guo, and W. Ye. 2017. Targeted mutagenesis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Scientific Reports 7:44304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J. K., L., . K. Babilonia, T. Wheeler, P. He, and L. Shan. 2019. Return of old foes-recurrence of bacterial blight and Fusarium wilt of cotton. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 50:95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossway, A., J. V. Oakes, J. M. Irvine, B. Ward, V. C. Knauf, and C. K. Shewmaker. 1986. Integration of foreign DNA following microinjection of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. Molecular and General Genetics MGG 202 (2):179–85.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, A. K. F., E. Romanel, T. D. F. Silva, Y. Castilhos, C. G. Schrago, R. Galbieri, J. L. Belot, and M. F. Vaslin. 2015. Complete genome sequences of two new virus isolates associated with cotton blue disease resistance breaking in Brazil. Archives of Virology 160 (5):1371–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danilo, B., L. Perrot, K. Mara, E. Botton, F. Nogué, and M. Mazier. 2019. Efficient and transgene-free gene targeting using Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in tomato. Plant Cell Reports 38 (4):459–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Pena, A., H. Lörz, and J. Schell. 1987. Transgenic rye plants obtained by injecting DNA into young floral tillers. Nature 325 (6101):274–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Europeanseed. 2020. World cotton demand plummets due to COVID-19 pandemic. Published on May 12 2020. Accessed June 5 2020. Available from: https://european-seed.com/2020/05/world-cotton-demand-plummets-due-to-covid-19-pandemic/.
   Google Scholar
• Fedoroff, N. V. 2010. The past, present and future of crop genetic modification. New Biotechnology 27 (5):461–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamanagatti, P. B., and M. T. Dodamani. 2016. Socio-economic conditions of Bt cotton growers across different farm size holders in northern transitional zone of Karnataka. International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics 7 (2):223–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, W., L. Long, X. Tian, F. Xu, J. Liu, P. K. Singh, J. R. Botella, and C. Song. 2017. Genome editing in cotton with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia Ruiz, M. T., A. N. Knapp, and H. Garcia-Ruiz. 2018. Profile of genetically modified plants authorized in Mexico. GM Crops & Food 9 (3):152–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelvin, S. B. 2003. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: The biology behind the “gene-jockeying” tool. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 67 (1):16–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohlke, J., and R. Deeken. 2014. Plant responses to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and crown gall development. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J., S. Arita, C. Emlinger, S. Sydow, and M. A. Marchant. 2019. The 2018-2019 Trade Conflict: A One-Year Assessment and Impacts on US Agricultural Exports. Choices 34 (4):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gunaydin, G. K., A. Yavas, O. Avinc, A. S. Soydan, S. Palamutcu, M. K. Simsek, H. Dundar, M. Demirtas, N. Ozkan, and M. N. Kivilcim. 2019. Organic cotton and cotton fiber production in Turkey, recent developments. In Organic cotton: Textile science and clothing technology, ed. M. Gardetti and S. Muthu, 101–25. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, L., L. Wang, R. Yang, R. Feng, Z. Li, X. Zhou, Z. Dong, G. Ghartey-Kwansah, M. Xu, M. Nishi, et al. 2017. Optimizing conditions for calcium phosphate mediated transient transfection. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 24 (3):622–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurusaravanan, P., S. Vinoth, and N. Jayabalan. 2020. An improved Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.‘KC3ʹ) assisted by microinjection and sonication. Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 56 (1):111–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigler, C. H., B. Singh, D. Zhang, S. Hwang, C. Wu, W. X. Cai, M. Hozain, W. Kang, B. Kiedaisch, R. E. Strauss, et al. 2007. Transgenic cotton over-producing spinach sucrose phosphate synthase showed enhanced leaf sucrose synthesis and improved fiber quality under controlled environmental conditions. Plant Molecular Biology 63 (6):815–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., J. Tan, L. Tu, and X. Zhang. 2014. A peptide hormone gene, Gh PSK promotes fibre elongation and contributes to longer and finer cotton fibre. Plant Biotechnology Journal 12 (7):861–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocaoglu-Ozyigit, A., B. Ucar, V. Altay, and I. I. Ozyigit. 2020. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic analyses of Turkish cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) lines using ISSR markers and chloroplast trnL-F regions. J. Nat. Fibers 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, L. V., I. B. Kresic, J. G. Paz, D. A. Bela, N. E. Tcach, F. M. Lamas, and V. Sofiatti. 2019. Cotton production in Brazil and other South American countries. Cotton Production 13:277–97.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G., Y. Dong, and J. Sun. 1999. Introduction of exogenous DNA into cotton via the pollen-tube pathway with GFP as a reporter. Chinese Science Bulletin 44 (8):698.
   Google Scholar
• Hundleby, P. A., and W. A. Harwood. 2019. Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing. Food and Energy Security 8 (2):e00161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H. H., M. Yu, and E. M. Lai. 2017. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: Biology and applications. The Arabidopsis Book 15:e0186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibrahim, M. A., N. Griko, M. Junker, and L. A. Bulla. 2010. Bacillus thuringiensis: A genomics and proteomics perspective. Bioengineered Bugs 1 (1):31–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ICAC. 2020. International cotton advisory committee Last accessed on June 11, 2020. https://www.icac.org/DataPortal/DataPortal?Units=Production&Year=2019/20%20for.
   Google Scholar
• ISAAA. 2019a. International service for the acquisition of agri-biotech applications. Biotech Cotton Planted in 15 Countries in 2018. Published on Dec 19, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2020.http://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/article/default.asp?ID=17903.
   Google Scholar
• ISAAA. 2019b. International service for the acquisition of agri-biotech applications biotech crop-annual update. Cotton. Published on Oct 30, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2020. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/biotech_crop_annual_update/download/biotech-crop-annual-update-cotton-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ISAAA. 2020. International service for the acquisition of agri-biotech applications. Bt- Cotton Increased Farmers’ Produce by 10-Fold in China. Published on September 23, 2020. Accessed September 21, 2020. http://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/article/default.asp?ID=18344.
   Google Scholar
• James, C. 2010. A global overview of biotech (GM) crops: Adoption, impact and future prospects. GM Crops 1 (1):8–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kado, C. I. 2014. Historical account on gaining insights on the mechanism of crown gall tumorigenesis induced by. Agrobacterium Tumefaciens. Frontiers in Microbiology 5:340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathage, J., and M. Qaim. 2012. Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (29):11652–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, W. A. 2020. The COVID‐19 pandemic and agriculture-short and long run implications for international trade relations. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D’agroeconomie 68 (2):225–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavareddy, G., A. R. V. Kumar, and V. S. Ramu. 2018. Methods of plant transformation-a review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7 (7):2656–68.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., A. Wahid, M. Ahmad, M. T. Tahir, M. Ahmed, S. Ahmad, and M. Hasanuzzaman. 2020. World cotton production and consumption: An overview. In Cotton Production and Uses, ed. S. Ahmad and M. Hasanuzzaman, 1–7. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Khizar, M., J. Shi, S. Saleem, F. Liaquat, M. Ashraf, S. Latif, U. Haroon, S. W. Hassan, S. Ur Rehman, H. J. Chaudhary, et al. 2020. Resistance associated metabolite profiling of Aspergillus leaf spot in cotton through non-targeted metabolomics. PloS One 15 (2):e0228675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouser, S., D. J. Spielman, and M. Qaim. 2019. Transgenic cotton and farmers’ health in Pakistan. PloS One 14 (10):e0222617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranthi, K. R., and G. D. Stone. 2020. Long-term impacts of Bt cotton in India. Nature Plants 6 (3):188–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumria, R., V. G. Sunnichan, D. K. Das, S. K. Gupta, V. S. Reddy, R. K. Bhatnagar, and S. Leelavathi. 2003. High-frequency somatic embryo production and maturation into normal plants in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) through metabolic stress. Plant Cell Reports 21 (7):635–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapegna, P., and T. Perelmuter. 2020. Genetically modified crops and seed/food sovereignty in Argentina: Scales and states in the contemporary food regime. The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (4):700–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. S., K. E. Hammond-Kosack, and K. Kanyuka. 2012. Barley stripe mosaic virus-mediated tools for investigating gene function in cereal plants and their pathogens: Virus-induced gene silencing, host-mediated gene silencing, and virus-mediated overexpression of heterologous protein. Plant Physiology 160 (2):582–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., Y. Yang, W. R. Hu, X. D. Li, J. Q. Cao, and L. Fan. 2015b. Over‐expression of Gh UGP 1 in upland cotton improves fibre quality and reduces fibre sugar content. Plant Breeding 134 (2):197–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F., G. Fan, C. Lu, G. Xiao, C. Zou, R. J. Kohel, Z. Ma, H. Shang, X. Ma, J. Wu, et al. 2015a. Genome sequence of cultivated Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution. Nature Biotechnology 33 (5):524–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., H. Lin, T. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Liu, X. Chen, and X. Hu. 2020a. Impact of climate change on cotton growth and yields in Xinjiang, China. Field Crops Research 247:107590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Y. Cong, Y. Liu, T. Wang, Q. Shuai, N. Chen, G. Junyi, and Y. Li. 2017. Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., E. M. Hallerman, K. Wu, and Y. Peng. 2020b. Insect-Resistant Genetically Engineered Crops in China: Development, Application, and Prospects for Use. Annual Review of Entomology 65:273–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., L. Shi, H. Qian, S. Sun, P. Wu, X. Zhao, B. A. Engel, and Y. Wang. 2020. New problems of food security in Northwest China: A sustainability perspective. Land Degradation & Development 31 (8):975–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Q. Zhang, Q. Zhu, W. Liu, Y. Chen, R. Qiu, B. Wang, Z. Yang, H. Li, Y. Lin, et al. 2015. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Molecular Plant 8 (8):1274–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, S. U., K. Zia, M. Ajmal, R. F. Shoukat, S. Li, M. Saeed, J. Zafar, and R. F. Shoukat. 2018. Comparative efficacy of different insecticides and estimation of yield losses on BT and non-BT cotton for thrips, red cotton bug, and dusky cotton bug. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 6 (6):505–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mandal, A., B. Sarkar, G. Owens, J. K. Thakur, M. C. Manna, N. K. Niazi, J. Somasundaram, and A. K. Patra. 2020. Impact of genetically modified crops on rhizosphere microorganisms and processes: A review focusing on Bt cotton. Applied Soil Ecology 148:103492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayee, C. D., and B. Choudhary. 2013. Adoption and uptake pathways of Bt cotton in India. Indian Society for Cotton Improvement. Available online http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/385842/adoption-and-uptake-pathways-of-bt-cotton-in-india/
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. M., and P. Stevanato. 2020. Application of biotechnology. In Beta maritime, ed. E. Biancardi, L. Panella, and J. McGrath, 237–52. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Milonas, P., C. Gogou, A. Papadopoulou, S. Fountas, V. Liakos, and N. T. Papadopoulos. 2016. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in a Cotton Production Area. Neotropical Entomology 45 (3):240–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, N. M., C. L. Sheppard, and S. E. Sakiyama-Elbert. 2009. Characterization of a multifunctional PEG-based gene delivery system containing nuclear localization signals and endosomal escape peptides. Acta Biomaterialia 5 (3):854–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munir, H., F. Rasul, A. Ahmad, M. Sajid, S. Ayub, M. Arif, P. Iqbal, A. Khan, Z. Fatima, and S. Ahmad. 2020. Diverse uses of cotton: From products to byproducts. In Cotton Production and Uses, ed. S. Ahmad and M. Hasanuzzaman,629–41. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nakashima, K., and K. Yamaguchi‐Shinozaki. 2006. Regulons involved in osmotic stress‐responsive and cold stress‐responsive gene expression in plants. Physiologia Plantarum 126 (1):62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqvi, R. Z., S. S. E. A. Zaidi, M. S. Mukhtar, I. Amin, B. Mishra, S. Strickler, L. A. Mueller, M. Asif, and S. Mansoor. 2019. Transcriptomic analysis of cultivated cotton Gossypium hirsutum provides insights into host responses upon whitefly-mediated transmission of cotton leaf curl disease. PloS One 14 (2):e0210011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noman, A., R. Bashir, M. Aqeel, S. Anwer, W. Iftikhar, M. Zainab, S. Zafar, S. Khan, W. Islam, and M. Adnan. 2016. Success of transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): Fiction or reality? Cogent Food & Agriculture 2 (1):1207844.
   Google Scholar
• Ozyigit, I. I. 2008. Phenolic changes during in vitro organogenesis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) shoot tips. African Journal of Biotechnology 7 (8):1145.
   Google Scholar
• Ozyigit, I. I. 2012. Agrobacterium tumefaciens and its use in plant biotechnology. In Crop production for agricultural improvement, ed. M. Ashraf, M. Öztürk, M. Ahmad, and A. Aksoy, 317–61. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ozyigit, I. I. 2020. Gene transfer to plants by electroporation: Methods and applications. Molecular Biology Reports 47 (4):3195–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozyigit, I. I., M. V. Kahraman, and O. Ercan. 2007. Relation between explant age, total phenols and regeneration response in tissue cultured cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). African Journal of Biotechnology 6 (1):3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ozyigit, I. I., and N. Gozukirmizi. 2008. High efficiency shoot and root formation from cotyledonary nodes of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany 40:1665–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozyigit, I. I., and N. Gozukirmizi. 2009. Efficient shoot and root formation from cotton shoot apices. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 56 (4):527–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palamutcu, S., A. S. Soydan, O. Avinc, G. K. Günaydin, A. Yavas, M. N. Kıvılcım, and M. Demirtaş. 2019. Physical properties of different Turkish organic cotton fiber types depending on the cultivation area. In Organic cotton: Textile science and clothing technology, ed. M. Gardetti and S. Muthu, 25–39. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pasapula, V., G. Shen, S. Kuppu, J. Paez‐Valencia, M. Mendoza, P. Hou, J. Chen, X. Qiu, L. Zhu, X. Zhang, et al. 2011. Expression of an Arabidopsis vacuolar H+‐pyrophosphatase gene (AVP1) in cotton improves drought‐and salt tolerance and increases fibre yield in the field conditions. Plant Biotechnology Journal 9 (1):88–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, H., and R. Heller. 2018. Transfection by electroporation. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology 121 (1):9–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qaim, M., and A. De Janvry. 2003. Genetically modified crops, corporate pricing strategies, and farmers’ adoption: The case of Bt cotton in Argentina. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (4):814–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, F. 2015. Fifteen years of Bt cotton in China: The economic impact and its dynamics. World Development 70:177–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, F., and J. Huang. 2019. Sustainability of the Economic Benefit of Bt Cotton in China: Results from Household Surveys. The Journal of Development Studies 56 (11):2045–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, J. P. A. 2019. Transgenic traits in the cotton crop in Brazil: A review. Colloquium Agrariae 15:115–29.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, B., P. R. Johnston, C. Nielsen-LeRoux, D. Lereclus, and N. Crickmore. 2010. Bacillus thuringiensis: An impotent pathogen? Trends in Microbiology 18 (5):189–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldo, A. R., and M. Ayliffe. 2015. Gene targeting and editing in crop plants: A new era of precision opportunities. Molecular Breeding 35 (1):40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, A., E. Gonçalves, and E. Almeida. 2019. Agricultural technology adoption and land use: Evidence for Brazilian municipalities. Journal of Land Use Science 14 (4–6):320–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha-Munive, M. G., M. Soberón, S. Castañeda, E. Niaves, E. Scheinvar, L. E. Eguiarte, D. Mota-Sanchez, E. Rosales-Robles, U. Nava-Camberos, J. L. Martínez-Carrillo, et al. 2018. Evaluation of the impact of genetically modified cotton after 20 years of cultivation in Mexico. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 6:82–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawan, Z. M. 2018. Climatic variables: Evaporation, sunshine, relative humidity, soil and air temperature and its adverse effects on cotton production. Information Processing in Agriculture 5 (1):134–48.
   Google Scholar
• Shahbaz, U., X. Yu, and M. A. Naeem. 2019. Role of Pakistan Government Institutions in Adoption of Bt cotton and Benefits Associated with Adoption. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology 29 (2):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh, A. A., M. A. Wani, P. Bano, S. Un, T. A. B. Nabi, M. A. Bhat, and M. S. Dar. 2017. An overview on resistance of insect pests against Bt crops. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5:941–48.
   Google Scholar
• Shera, P. S., P. Karmakar, S. Sharma, and K. S. Sangha. 2018. Impact of Bt cotton expressing single (Cry1Ac) and dual toxins (Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab) on the fitness of the predator Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Petersen): Prey-mediated tri-trophic analysis. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 28 (1):98.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, H. A., M. Asif, S. Asad, R. Z. Naqvi, S. Ajaz, N. Umer, N. Anjum, I. Rauf, M. Sarwar, M. G. Arshad, et al. 2019. Development and evaluation of double gene transgenic cotton lines expressing Cry toxins for protection against chewing insect pests. Scientific Reports 9 (1):1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh, S., M. Pathania, G. Grover, and P. Singh. 2019. Genetically modified (GM) cotton: Its past, present and future: A review. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 7 (3):683–91.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, S. J. 2020. The human health benefits from GM crops. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:887–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth, P., A. Maxton, and S. A. Masih. 2019. Bt cotton: A boon against insect resistance. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 8 (2):202–05.
   Google Scholar
• Su, Y., W. Liang, Z. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Zhao, B. Ijaz, and J. Hua. 2017. Overexpression of GhDof1 improved salt and cold tolerance and seed oil content. Gossypium Hirsutum. Journal of Plant Physiology 218:222–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabashnik, B. E., and Y. Carrière. 2017. Surge in insect resistance to transgenic crops and prospects for sustainability. Nature Biotechnology 35 (10):926–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarazi, R., J. L. S. Jimenez, and M. F. Vaslin. 2020. Biotechnological solutions for major cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) pathogens and pests. Biotechnology Research and Innovation19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Tausif, M., A. Jabbar, M. S. Naeem, A. Basit, F. Ahmad, and T. Cassidy. 2018. Cotton in the new millennium: Advances, economics, perceptions and problems. Textile Progress 50 (1):1–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timesca. 2020. The times of central Asia. EU provides 40 million euro as budget support to Uzbekistan agri-food sector. Published on March 12 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. Available from: https://www.timesca.com/index.php/news/22240-eu-provides-40-million-euro-as-budget-support-to-uzbekistan-agri-food-sector
   Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. 2020a. India exports of cotton. 1996-2019 data. Accessed September 20, 2020. https://tradingeconomics.com/india/exports-of-cotton#:~:text=Exports%20of%20Cotton%20in%20India%20averaged%203962.62%20USD%20Million%20from,800.13%20USD%20Million%20in%202020.
   Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. 2020b. Brazil exports of cotton. Accessed September 20, 2020. https://tradingeconomics.com/brazil/exports/cotton#:~:text=Brazil%20exports%20of%20cotton%20was,updated%20on%20September%20of%202020
   Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. 2020c. Pakistan exports of cotton. Accessed September 22, 2020. https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/exports/cotton.
   Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. 2020d. Uzbekistan exports. Accessed June 11, 2020. Available from: https://tradingeconomics.com/uzbekistan/exports
   Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. 2020e. United States exports to Mexico of cotton. Last updated on June 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. Available from: https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/exports/mexico/cotton.
   Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. 2020f. Greece exports of cotton. Updated on June 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://tradingeconomics.com/greece/exports/cotton.
   Google Scholar
• Tzfira, T., and V. Citovsky. 2006. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of plants: Biology and biotechnology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 17 (2):147–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UPK. 2019. Ulusal Pamuk Konseyi, (National Cotton Council). 78th Plenary Meeting of the ICAC, Turkey Country Report. 02-05 December, 2019. Brisbane, Australia. Accessed June 11, 2020. Available from: http://www.upk.org.tr/User_Files/editor/file/Turkey%20Country%20Report-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ur Rahman, M. H., A. Ahmad, X. Wang, A. Wajid, W. Nasim, M. Hussain, B. Ahmad, I. Ahmad, Z. Ali, W. Ishaque, et al. 2018. Multi-model projections of future climate and climate change impacts uncertainty assessment for cotton production in Pakistan. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 253:94–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA. 2019a. United States department of agriculture. Cotton and Products Update June 2019. Published on June 15, 2019. Accessed September 22, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Cotton%20and%20Products%20Update%20June%202019_New%20Delhi_India_6-25-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2019b. United States department of agriculture. China - Peoples Republic of Agricultural Biotechnology Annual Regulatory Process Getting More Unpredictable, Additional Requirements on Trials and Data for Approvals. Published on Feb 22, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Beijing_China%20-%20Peoples%20Republic%20of_2-22-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2019c. United States department of agriculture. Cotton and Products Annual. Published on Dec 12, 2019. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Brasilia_Brazil_10-20-2019.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020a. United States department of agriculture. Agricultural Biotechnology Annual Published on February 04, 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_New%20Delhi_India_10-20-2019
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020b. United States department of agriculture. Cotton and Products Annual. Published on Mar 30, 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Cotton%20and%20Products%20Annual_New%20Delhi_India_04-01-2020.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020c. United States department of agriculture. PSD Reports. Table 04 Cotton Area, Yield and Production. Published on September 11, 2020. Accessed September 22, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/app/index.html#/app/downloads.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020d. United States department of agriculture. Cotton and Products Update. P ublished on August 30, 2020. Accessed September 22, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Cotton%20and%20Products%20Update_Beijing_China%20-%20Peoples%20Republic%20of_08-30-2020.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020e. United States department of agriculture. Cotton & Wool Overview. Last updated on June 25, 2020. Accessed September 22, 2020. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/cotton-wool.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020f. United States department of agriculture. Recent Trends in GE Adoption. Last updated on July 17, 2020. Accessed September 22, 2020. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-us/recent-trends-in-ge-adoption.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020g. United States department of agriculture. Cotton: World Markets and Trade. Published on September 2020. Accessed September 22, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/cotton.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020h. United States department of agriculture. Cotton and Products Annual. Published on April 02, 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Cotton%20and%20Products%20Annual_Islamabad_Pakistan_04-01-2020.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020i. United States department of agriculture. Cotton and Products Annual. Published on Mar 25, 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Cotton%20and%20Products%20Annual_Ankara_Turkey_04-01-2020.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020j. United States department of agriculture. Cotton and Products Annual. Published on April 02, 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Cotton%20and%20Products%20Annual_Tashkent_Uzbekistan%20-%20Republic%20of_04-01-2020.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020k. United States department of agriculture. Agricultural Biotechnology Annual. Published on March 12, 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Mexico%20City_Mexico_10-20-2019.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020l. United States department of agriculture. Cotton and Products Annual. Published on Apr 22, 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Buenos%20Aires_Argentina_10-20-2019.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020m. United States department of agriculture. Cotton and Products Annual. Published on March 31, 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Cotton%20and%20Products%20Annual_Rome_Greece_04-01-2020.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020n. United States department of agriculture. Cotton: World markets and trade. May 2020. Accessed June 11, 2020. https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/kp78gg36g/qv33sh02s/p84197208/cotton.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zwanenberg, P., and V. Arza. 2013. Biotechnology and its configurations: GM cotton production on large and small farms in Argentina. Technology in Society 35 (2):105–17.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, J., G. Vognan, and P. P. Vitale. 2016. The socio-economic impacts of GM cotton in Burkina Faso: Does farm structure affect how benefits are distributed? AgBioForum 19 (2):120–35.
   Google Scholar
• Voloudakis, D., A. Karamanos, G. Economou, J. Kapsomenakis, and C. Zerefos. 2018. A comparative estimate of climate change impacts on cotton and maize in Greece. Journal of Water and Climate Change 9 (4):643–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., R. Sun, B. Zhang, and Q. Wang. 2019. Pollen tube pathway-mediated cotton transformation. In Transgenic cotton: Methods in molecular biology, ed. B. Zhang, 67–73. New York: Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegier, A., V. Alavez, and D. Piñero. 2016. Cotton: Traditional and modern uses. In Ethnobotany of Mexico: Ethnobiology, ed. R. Lira, A. Casas, and J. Blancas, 439–56. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wendel, J. F., and C. E. Grover. 2015. Taxonomy and evolution of the cotton genus. Gossypium. Cotton 57:25–44.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. R., and A. C. Braun. 1942. A cancerous neoplasm of plants. Autonomous bacteria-free crown-gall tissue. Cancer Research 2 (9):597–617.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. J., H. H. Wang, F. F. Li, T. Z. Chen, J. Zhang, Y. J. Jiang, Y. Ding, W. Z. Guo, and T. Z. Zhang. 2008. Enhanced Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic calli of upland cotton via efficient selection and timely subculture of somatic embryos. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 26 (3):174–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, H., and C. M. Rommens. 2007. Transposition-based plant transformation. Plant Physiology 143 (2):570–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., G. Qanmber, Z. Wang, Z. Yang, and F. Li. 2020. Gossypium genomics: Trends, scope, and utilization for cotton improvement. Trends in Plant Science 25 (5):488–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, D., A. Wang, H. Huang, and Y. Chen. 2008. PEG-PBLG nanoparticle-mediated HSV-TK/GCV gene therapy for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Nanomedicine 3 (6):813–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J. Z., and K. A. Gervers. 2019. Genomic analysis of marker-associated fiber development genes in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). Euphytica 215 (4):74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, S. S. E. A., and S. Mansoor. 2017. Viral vectors for plant genome engineering. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B. 2013. Transgenic cotton: From biotransformation methods to agricultural application. In Transgenic cotton: Methods in molecular biology, ed. B. Zhang, 3–16. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., R. Wohlhueter, and H. Zhang. 2016. Genetically modified foods: A critical review of their promise and problems. Food Science and Human Wellness 5 (3):116–23.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. 2015. Transgenic cotton breeding. Cotton 57:229–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, F. L., Y. J. Li, Y. Hu, Y. R. Gao, X. W. Zang, Q. Ding, Y. J. Wang, and Y. Q. Wen. 2016. A highly efficient grapevine mesophyll protoplast system for transient gene expression and the study of disease resistance proteins. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 125 (1):43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, T., L. Wang, S. Li, M. Xu, X. Guan, and B. Zhou. 2017. Characterization of conserved circular RNA in polyploid Gossypium species and their ancestors. FEBS Letters 591 (21):3660–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, M., A. G. Evdokimov, F. Moshiri, C. Lowder, and J. Haas. 2020. Crystal structure of a Vip3B family insecticidal protein reveals a new fold and a unique tetrameric assembly. Protein Science 29 (4):824–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, G. Y., J. Weng, Y. Zeng, J. Huang, S. Qian, and G. Liu. 1983. Introduction of exogenous DNA into cotton embryos. In Methods in enzymology, edited by M. Merkx, Vol. 101, 433–81. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar