Effect of Aperture Size on the Performance of Bamboo Mat Reinforced Soil Bed

References

• Ahirwar, S. K., and J. N. Mandal. 2018. Behaviour of bamboo grid-reinforced soil bed. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1–10. doi:10.1080/19386362.2018.1550909.
   Google Scholar
• Akhil, K. S., N. Sankar, and S. Chandrakaran. 2019. Behaviour of model footing on bamboo mat-reinforced sand beds. Soils and Foundations 59 (5):1324–35. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2019.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhil, K. S., N. Sankar, and S. Chandrakaran. 2020. Use of bamboo mat as a potential soil reinforcement material – An experimental study. Materials Today: Proceedings 31:S336–S339. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.794.
   Google Scholar
• Dewi, R., Y. Hastuti, Y. Sutejo, M. M. Iqbal, and M. Arfan. 2020. Peat soil improvement method using woven bamboo and cerucuk. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology 10 (4):1617–23. doi:10.18517/ijaseit.10.4.4199.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y. L., J. Han, and X. H. Bai. 2011. Numerical analysis of tensile behavior of geogrids with rectangular and triangular apertures. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 29 (2):83–91. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A., A. Ghosh, and A. K. Bera. 2005. Bearing capacity of square footing on pond ash reinforced with jute-geotextile. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 23 (2):144–73. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guido, V. A., D. K. Chang, and M. A. Sweeney. 1986. Comparison of geogrid and geotextile reinforced earth slabs. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 23 (4):435–40. doi:10.1139/t86-073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeri, S. H., R. Noorzad, and A. M. Oskoorouchi. 2000. Effect of geotextile reinforced on the mechanical behavior of sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 18 (6):385–402. doi:10.1016/S0266-1144(00)00005-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegde, A., and T. G. Sitharam. 2015. Use of bamboo in soft-ground engineering and its performance comparison with geosynthetics: Experimental studies. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 27 (9):040142561–9. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IS 1888.1982. Method of load test on soils. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Kolathayar, S., C. A. Aravind, and S. K. Shukla. 2019. Performance assessment of areca leaf grids for soil reinforcement applications. Journal of Natural Fibers. doi:10.1080/15440478.2019.1658253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolathayar, S., C. A. Aravind, and T. G. Sitharam. 2019. Tests and analytical studies on performance of areca leaf cells as cellular confinement in soil. Geomechanics and Geoengineering 1–12. doi:10.1080/17486025.2019.1664774.
   Google Scholar
• Kolathayar, S., S. Narasimhan, R. Kamaludeen, and T. G. Sitharam. 2020. Performance of footing on clay bed reinforced with coir cell networks. International Journal of Geomechanics 20(8):1–8. 04020106. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolathayar, S., S. Sowmya, and E. Priyanka. 2020. Comparative study for performance of soil bed reinforced with jute and sisal geocells as alternatives to HDPE geocells. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 6 (4):53. doi:10.1007/s40891-020-00238-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal, D., N. Sankar, and S. Chandrakaran. 2017. Effect of reinforcement form on the behaviour of coir geotextile reinforced sand beds. Soils and Foundations 57 (2):227–36. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laman, M., and A. Yildiz. 2003. Model studies of ring foundations on geogrid reinforced sand. Geosynthetics International 10 (5):142–52. doi:10.1680/gein.2003.10.5.142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latha, G. M., and A. Somwanshi. 2009. Bearing capacity of square footings on geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27 (4):281–94. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latha, G. M., and V. S. Murthy. 2007. Effects of reinforcement form on the behaviour of geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 25 (1):23–32. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marto, A., and B. A. Othman. 2011. The potential use of bamboo as green material for soft clay reinforcement system. International Conference on Environment Science and Engineering, Singapore, 8:129–33.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Y. 2009. Experimental study on triangular aperture geogrid-reinforced bases over weak subgrade under cyclic loading. MS diss., The University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Ravindran, S., A. Kumar, S. Dutta, M. B. Nadaf, J. N. Mandal, and E. C. Shin. 2019. Unpaved road stabilization using bamboo grid and bitumen coated bamboo cells. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 56 (5):347–51. doi:10.1007/s11204-019-09613-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, D. C., and J. N. Mandal. 2020. Use of polymer/bamboo reinforced rap in base course of flexible pavement construction. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 6 (2):12. doi:10.1007/s40891-020-0195-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasmayaputra, N. A., A. D. Adi, and F. Faris. 2017. Bamboo mat as a temporary reinforced soil retaining wall in a railway bed, International Conference on Technology and Vocational Teachers: 72–77. Indonesia. doi:10.2991/ictvt-17.2017.14.
   Google Scholar
• Sayida, M. K., E. Sheela, V. Akhila, and M. S. Girish. 2020. Durability study of coir geotextile embedded in different types of subgrade soil. Journal of Natural Fibers 1–11. doi:10.1080/15440478.2020.1808146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SijiMol, K., A. D. Suma, and V. B. Sreekumar. 2016. A review of the ecological functions of reed bamboo, genus ochlandra in the western ghats of India: implications for sustainable conservation. Tropical Conservation Science 9 (1):389–407. doi:10.1177/194008291600900121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridhar, R., and M. T. Prathap Kumar. 2017. Experimental investigation of load settlement behavior of coir mat and coir fiber reinforced Sand. Journal of Natural Fibers. doi:10.1080/15440478.2017.1349017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, F., Q. Ma, and W. Xing. 2019. Improvement of clayey soils by combined bamboo strip and flax fiber reinforcement. Advances in Civil Engineering 2019:1–10. 2019. doi:10.1155/2019/7274161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinod, P., and A. B. Bhaskar. 2012. Model studies on woven coir geotextile-reinforced sand bed, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement 165( 1): 53–57. doi:10.1680/grim.9.00030.
   Google Scholar
• Vinod, P., A. B. Bhaskar, and S. Sreehari. 2009. Behaviour of a square model footing on loose sand reinforced with braided coir rope. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27 (6):464–74. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visvanathan, A., S. Velayudhan, and S. Mathew. 2020a. Field evaluation of coir geotextile reinforced subgrade for low volume pavements. Journal of Natural Fibers 1–13. doi:10.1080/15440478.2020.1758279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visvanathan, A., S. Velayudhan, and S. Mathew. 2020b. Evaluation of coir geotextile reinforcement for low-volume roads. Journal of Natural Fibers 1–13. doi:10.1080/15440478.2020.1818346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waruwu, A. 2014. Bamboo reinforcement in shallow foundation on the peat soil. Journal of Civil Engineering Research 4 (3A):96–102.
   Google Scholar
• Waruwu, A., and R. D. Susanti. 2015. Behavior of soil peat with reinforcement of bamboo grid. IOSR Journal of Engineering 5 (11):9–36.
   Google Scholar
• Waruwu, A., R. D. Susanti, and J. A. Putra Buulolo. 2019. Effect of dynamic loads on the compressibility behavior of peat soil reinforced by bamboo grids. Journal of Applied Engineering Science 17 (2):157–62. doi:10.5937/jaes17-16937.
   Google Scholar
• Waruwu, A., . M., and H. Halim. 2017. Settlement estimation of peat reinforced with bamboo grid under embankment. International Review of Civil Engineering 8 (6):299–306. doi:10.15866/irece.v8i6.13130.
   Google Scholar