Composite Filament Made from Post-used Styrofoam and Corn Husk Fiber for Fuse Deposition Modeling

References

• Chun, K. S., S. Husseinsyah, and C. M. Yeng. 2017. Torque rheological properties of polypropylene/cocoa pod husk composites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials 30 (9):1217–27. doi:10.1177/0892705715618743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, K., C. Harmer, B. Isom, and W. F. Shughart. 2018. plastic pollution bans vs recycling solutions. Independent Institute, 1–10. Available from : https://www.independent.org/pdf/briefings/2018_05_14_plastic_pollution.pdf [Accessed 25 June 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Depuydt, D., M. Balthazar, K. Hendrickx, W. Six, E. Ferraris, F. Desplentere, J. Ivens, and A. W. Van Vuure. 2019. Production and characterization of bamboo and flax fiber reinforced polylactic acid filaments for fused deposition modeling (FDM). Polymer Composites 40 (5):1951–63. doi:10.1002/pc.2497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dormer, A., D. P. Finn, P. Ward, and J. Cullen. 2013. Carbon footprint analysis in plastics manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production 51:133–41. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filgueira, D., S. Holmen, J. K. Melbø, D. Moldes, A. T. Echtermeyer, and G. Chinga-Carrasco. 2018. 3D printable filaments made of biobased polyethylene biocomposites. Polymers 10 (3):314. doi:10.3390/polym10030314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, A., Kessler, J., and Thurn, L., 2018. 3D Printing: UnderstandingAdditive manufacturing.Munich:Hasen
   Google Scholar
• Gregor-Svetec, D., M. Leskovšek, U. Vrabič Brodnjak, U. Stankovič Elesini, D. Muck, and R. Urbas. 2020. Characteristics of HDPE/cardboard dust 3D printable composite filaments. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 276 (116379):1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116379.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, G., T. Yang, J. Xu, D. Tao, C. Luo, C. Wang, Q. Dong, and Y. Wang. 2020. Investigation into hydroxypropyl-methylcellulose-reinforced polylactide composites for fused deposition modelling. Industrial Crops and Production 146 (112174):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112174.
   Google Scholar
• Kleer, R., and F. T. Piller. 2019. Local manufacturing and structural shifts in competition: Market dynamics of additive manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics 216:23–34. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koay, S. C., N. M. Y. Fahamy, M. Y. Chan, M. M. Pang, H. L. Choo, and K. Y. Tshai. 2018a. Wood plastic composites made from corn husk fiber and recycled polystyrene foam. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 13 (11):3445–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koay, S. C., V. Subramanian, M. Y. Chan, M. M. Pang, K. Y. Tsai, and K. H. Cheah. 2018b. Preparation and characterization of wood plastic composite made up of durian husk fiber and recycled polystyrene foam. 14th EURECA Conference 2020 International Engineering and Computing Research Conference, 25 November 2020 Selangor. France: EDP Science. MATEC Web of Conference 152: 1–6. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815202019
   Google Scholar
• Kuczko, W., F. Górski, R. Wichniarek, and P. Buń. 2017. Influence of post-processing on accuracy of FDM products. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal 11 (2):172–79. doi:10.12913/22998624/70996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lay, M., N. L. N. Thajudin, Z. A. A. Hamid, A. Rusli, M. K. Abdullah, and R. K. Shuib. 2019. Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of PLA, ABS and nylon 6 fabricated using fused deposition modeling and injection molding. Composite Part B Engineering 176 (107341):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107341.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, S. L., S. C. Koay, M. Y. Chan, K. Y. Tshai, T. R. Chantara, and M. M. Pang. 2020. Wood plastic composites produced from postconsumer recycled polystyrene and coconut shell: Effect of coupling agent and processing aid on tensile, thermal, and morphological properties. Polymer Engineering and Science 60 (1):202–10. doi:10.1002/pen.25273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milosevic, M., D. Stoof, and K. L. Pickering. 2017. Characterizing the mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling natural fiber recycled polypropylene composites. Journal of Composite Science 1 (7):1–14. doi:10.3390/jcs1010007.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, T. Y., S. C. Koay, M. Y. Chan, H. L. Choo, and T. K. Ong. 2020. Preparation and characterization of 3D printer filament from post-used styrofoam. 13th International Engineering Research Conference (13th EURECA 2019), 27 November 2019 Selangor. USA: AIP Publishing. AIP Conference Proceeding 2233: 1–9. doi: 10.1063/5.0001340.
   Google Scholar
• Petchwattana, N., W. Channuan, P. Naknaen, and B. Narupai. 2019. 3D printing filaments prepared from modified poly (lactic acid)/ teak wood flour composites : An investigation on the particle size effects and silane coupling agent compatibilisation. Journal of Physical Science 30 (2):169–88. doi:10.21315/jps2019.30.2.10.
   Google Scholar
• Sari, N. H., I. N. G. Wardana, Y. S. Irawan, and E. Siswanto. 2017. Characterization of the chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of NaOH-treated natural cellulosic fibers from corn husks. Journal of Natural Fibres 15 (4):545–58. doi:10.1080/15440478.2017.1349707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrés, Q., J. K. Melbø, M. Delgado-Aguilar, F. X. Espinach, P. Mutjé, and G. Chinga-Carrasco. 2018. Bio-polyethylene reinforced with thermomechanical pulp fibers: Mechanical and micromechanical characterization and its application in 3D-printing by fused deposition modelling. Composite Part B Engineering 153:70–77. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S., L. Capoen, D. D’hooge, and I. Cardon. 2017. Can the melt flow index be used to predict the success of fused deposition modelling of commercial poly(lactic acid) filaments into 3D printed materials? Plastics, Rubber and Composites 47 (1):9–16. doi:10.1080/14658011.2017.1397308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar