Influence of Water Removal Techniques on the Main Characteristics of Nanofibrillated Cellulose Obtained from Different Lignocellulosic Materials

References

• Agarwal, U. P., A. R. Sally, B. Carlos, S. R. Richard, and P. V. Steve. 2017. Effect of sample moisture content on XRD-estimated cellulose crystallinity index and crystallite size. Cellulose 24 (5):1971–84. doi:10.1007/s10570-017-1259-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, U. P., A. R. Sally, S. R. Richard, and C. Baez. 2018. New cellulose crystallinity estimation method that differentiates between organized and crystalline phases. Carbohydrate Polymers 190:262–70. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, S., J. R. Narayanan, W. Kargupta, V. Haritos, and W. Batchelor. 2020. Cellulose nanofiber diameter distributions from microscopy image analysis: Effect of measurement statistics and operator. Cellulose 27 (8):4189–208. doi:10.1007/s10570-020-03058-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbash, V. A., O. V. Yashchenko, and V. O. Opolsky. 2018. Effect of hydrolysis conditions of organosolv pulp from kenaf fibers on the physicochemical properties of the obtained nanocellulose. Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry 54 (3):193–98. doi:10.1007/s11237-018-9561-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaumont, M., J. König, M. Opietnik, A. Potthast, and T. Rosenau. 2017. Drying of a cellulose ii gel: Effect of physical modification and redispersibility in water. Cellulose 24 (3):1199–209. doi:10.1007/s10570-016-1166-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., J. Bouchard, and R. Berry. 2012. Dispersibility in water of dried nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 13 (5):1486–94. doi:10.1021/bm300191k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaker, A., P. Mutjé, M. R. Vilar, and S. Boufi. 2014. Agriculture crop residues as a source for the production of nanofibrillated cellulose with low energy demand. Cellulose 21 (6):4247–59. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0454-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinga-Carrasco, G. 2011. Cellulose fibres, nanofibrils and microfibrils: The morphological sequence of mfc components from a plant physiology and fibre technology point of view. Celulosa Y Papel 27 (2):12–17. doi:10.1186/1556-276X-6-417.
   Google Scholar
• Corrêa, A. C., K. B. R. Teodoro, J. A. Simão, P. I. C. Claro, E. M. Teixeira, L. H. C. Mattoso, and J. M. Marconcini. 2020. Cellulose nanocrystals from curaua fibers and poly[ethylene-co-(vinyl acetate)] nanocomposites: Effect of drying process of cncs on thermal and mechanical properties. Polymer Composites 1–13. 2018. August. doi:10.1002/pc.25493.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. S., R. J. Moon, S. Ireland, L. Johnston, J. A. Shatkin, K. Nelson, E. J. Foster, 2015. “NIST-TAPPI workshop on measurement needs for cellulose nanomaterial,” no. June: 1–42. doi:10.6028/NIST.SP.1192.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Q., J. Zeng, B. Wang, D. Tang, K. Chen, and W. Gao. 2019. Effect of nanocellulose fiber hornification on water fraction characteristics and hydroxyl accessibility during dehydration. Carbohydrate Polymers 207:44–51. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, E. J., R. J. Moon, U. P. Agarwal, M. J. Bortner, J. Bras, S. Camarero-Espinosa, K. J. Chan, et al. 2018. Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chemical Society Reviews 47 (8):2609–79. doi:10.1039/c6cs00895j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, T. S., D. C. Potulski, L. C. Viana, E. Forville, and A. S. Andrade. 2019. Nanocellulose obtained from residues of peach palm extraction (Bactris gasipaes). Carbohydrate Polymers 218:8–19. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, A. D., and M. S. Cintrón. 2013. Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20 (1):583–88. doi:10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. J., G. S. Oporto, R. Mills, and M. A. S. A. Samir. 2008. Adhesion and surface issues in cellulose and nanocellulose. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 22 (5–6):545–67. doi:10.1163/156856108X295509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümüskaya, E., M. Usta, and H. Kirci. 2003. The effects of various pulping conditions on crystalline structure of cellulose in cotton linters. Polymer Degradation and Stability 81 (3):559–64. doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(03)00157-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanif, Z., H. Jeon, T. H. Tran, J. Jegal, S. A. Park, S. M. Kim, J. Park, S. Y. Hwang, and D. X. Oh. 2018. Butanol-mediated oven-drying of nanocellulose with enhanced dehydration rate and aqueous re-dispersion. Journal of Polymer Research 24:11. doi:10.1007/s10965-017-1343-z.
   Google Scholar
• Hettegger, H., M. Beaumont, A. Potthast, and T. Rosenau. 2016. Aqueous modification of nano-and microfibrillar cellulose with a click synthon. ChemSusChem 9 (1):75–79. doi:10.1002/cssc.201501358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horikawa, Y., M. Shimizu, T. Saito, A. Isogai, T. Imai, and J. Sugiyama. 2018. Influence of drying of chara cellulose on length/length distribution of microfibrils after acid hydrolysis. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 109:569–75. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hribernik, S., K. S. Kleinschek, R. Rihm, J. Ganster, H. P. Fink, and M. S. Smole. 2016. Tuning of cellulose fibres’ structure and surface topography: Influence of swelling and various drying procedures. Carbohydrate Polymers 148:227–35. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., S. Han, and Y. Hsieh. 2013. Controlled defibrillation of rice straw cellulose and self-assembly of cellulose nanofibrils into highly crystalline fibrous materials. RSC Advances 3 (30):12366–75. doi:10.1039/c3ra41646a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., and Y. Hsieh. 2014. Assembling and redispersibility of rice straw nanocellulose: Effect of tert-butanol. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 6 (22):20075–84. doi:10.1021/am505626a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., and Y. L. Hsieh. 2013. Chemically and mechanically isolated nanocellulose and their self-assembled structures. Carbohydrate Polymers 95(1):32–40. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozala, A. F., L. C. Lencastre-Novaes, A. M. Lopes, V. C. Santos-Ebinuma, P. G. Mazzola, A. Pessoa-Jr, D. Grotto, M. Gerenutti, and M. V. Chaud. 2016. Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: A 10-year overview. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 100 (5):2063–72. doi:10.1007/s00253-015-7243-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, X., M. Bowden, E. E. Brown, and X. Zhang. 2015. An improved x-ray diffraction method for cellulose crystallinity measurement. Carbohydrate Polymers 123:476–81. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, K., and M. J. Taherzadeh. 2016. A critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: Composition, imaging, and crystallinity. Bioresource Technology 200:1008–18. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshkava, V., and M. R. Kamal. 2014. Effect of drying conditions on cellulose nanocrystal (cnc) agglomerate porosity and dispersibility in polymer nanocomposites. Powder Technology 261:288–98. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemm, D., E. D. Cranston, D. Fischer, M. Gama, S. A. Kedzior, D. Kralisch, F. Kramer, T. Kondo, T. Lindström, S. Nietzsche, K. Petzold-Welcke, F. Rauchfuß. 2018. Nanocellulose as a natural source for groundbreaking applications in materials science: Today’s state. Materials Today 21 (7):720–48. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemm, D., F. Kramer, S. Moritz, T. Lindström, M. Ankerfors, D. Gray, and A. Dorris. 2011. Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition 50 (24):5438–66. doi:10.1002/anie.201001273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lê, H. Q., K. Dimic-Misic, L. S. Johansson, T. Maloney, and H. Sixta. 2018. Effect of lignin on the morphology and rheological properties of nanofibrillated cellulose produced from γ-valerolactone/water fractionation process. Cellulose 25 (1):179–94. doi:10.1007/s10570-017-1602-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, W., C. Fang, X. Zhou, Q. Yin, S. Pan, R. Yang, D. Liu, and Y. Ouyang. 2018. Cellulose nanocrystals obtained from office waste paper and their potential application in pet packing materials. Carbohydrate Polymers 181:376–85. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., H. Jiang, B. Han, and Y. Zhang. 2019. Drying of cellulose nanocrystal gel beads using supercritical carbon dioxide. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 94 (5):1651–59. doi:10.1002/jctb.5936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström, T. 2017. Aspects on nanofibrillated cellulose (nfc) processing, rheology and nfc-film properties. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 29:68–75. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2017.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., D. Thibodeaux, G. Gamble, P. Bauer, and D. VanDerveer. 2012. Comparative investigation of Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction (XRD) in the determination of cotton fiber crystallinity. Applied Spectroscopy 66 (8):983–86. doi:10.1366/12-06611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupoi, J. S., S. Singh, M. Davis, D. J. Lee, M. Shepherd, B. A. Simmons, and R. J. Henry. 2014. High-throughput prediction of eucalypt lignin syringyl/guaiacyl content using multivariate analysis: A comparison between mid-infrared, near-infrared, and Raman spectroscopies for model development. Biotechnology for Biofuels 7 (1):1–14. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-7-93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martins, D., B. Estevinho, F. Rocha, F. Dourado, and D. Gama. 2020. A dry and fully dispersible bacterial cellulose formulation as a stabilizer for oil-in-water emulsions. Carbohydrate Polymers 230:115657. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattonai, M., D. Pawcenis, S. Del Seppia, J. Łojewska, and E. Ribechini. 2018. Effect of ball-milling on crystallinity index, degree of polymerization and thermal stability of cellulose. Bioresource Technology 270:270–77. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhena, T. C., and M. J. John. 2020. Cellulose nanomaterials: New generation materials for solving global issues. Cellulose 27 (6):1149–1194. doi:10.1007/s10570-019-02889-w
   Google Scholar
• Moon, R. J., A. Martini, J. Nairn, J. Simonsen, and J. Youngblood. 2011. Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chemical Society Reviews 40 (7):3941–94. doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriana, R., F. Vilaplana, and M. Ek. 2016. Cellulose nanocrystals from forest residues as reinforcing agents for composites: A study from macro- to nano-dimensions. Carbohydrate Polymers 139:139–49. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh, D. V., D. P. Thibodeaux, and B. Condon. 2007. X-ray crystallinity of bleached and crosslinked cottons. Textile Research Journal 77 (8):612–16. doi:10.1177/0040517507081982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C., S. Han, H. Namgung, P. Seo, and S. Lee. 2017. Effect of spray-drying condition and surfactant addition on morphological characteristics of spray-dried nanocellulose. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science 33 (1):33–38. doi:10.7747/jfes.2017.33.1.33.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., J. O. Baker, M. E. Himmel, P. A. Parilla, and D. K. Johnson. 2010. Cellulose crystallinity index: Measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnology for Biofuels 3 (1):1–10. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3-10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng, Y., D. J. Gardner, and Y. Han. 2012. Drying cellulose nanofibrils: In search of a suitable method. Cellulose 19 (1):91–102. doi:10.1007/s10570-011-9630-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., D. J. Gardner, Y. Han, A. Kiziltas, Z. Cai, and M. A. Tshabalala. 2013. Influence of drying method on the material properties of nanocellulose i: Thermostability and crystallinity. Cellulose 20 (5):2379–92. doi:10.1007/s10570-013-0019-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., Y. Han, and D. J. Gardner. 2012. Spray-drying cellulose nanofibrils : Effect of drying process parameters on particle morphology. Wood and Fiber Science 44 (4):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkänen, M., H. Kangas, O. Laitinen, A. Sneck, P. Lahtinen, M. S. Peresin, and J. Niinimäki. 2014. Characteristics and safety of nano-sized cellulose fibrils. Cellulose 21 (6):3871–86. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0397-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiévy, N., N. Jacquet, M. Sclavons, C. Deroanne, M. Paquot, and J. Devaux. 2010. Influence of homogenization and drying on the thermal stability of microfibrillated cellulose. Polymer Degradation and Stability 95 (3):306–14. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.11.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacui, I. A., R. C. Nieuwendaal, D. J. Burnett, S. J. Stranick, M. Jorfi, C. Weder, E. J. Foster, R. T. Olsson, and J. W. Gilman. 2014. Comparison of the properties of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils isolated from bacteria, tunicate, and wood processed using acid, enzymatic, mechanical, and oxidative methods. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 6 (9):6127–38. doi:10.1021/am500359f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehaqui, H., N. E. Mushi, S. Morimune, M. Salajkova, T. Nishino, and L. A. Berglund. 2012. Cellulose nanofiber orientation in nanopaper and nanocomposites by cold drawing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 4 (2):1043–49. doi:10.1021/am2016766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solala, I., M. C. Iglesias, and M. S. Peresin. 2020. On the potential of lignin-containing cellulose nanofibrils (lcnfs): A review on properties and applications. Cellulose 27 (4):1853–77. doi:10.1007/s10570-019-02899-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traoré, M., J. Kaal, and A. M. Cortizas. 2016. Application of FTIR spectroscopy to the characterization of archeological wood. Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 153:63–70. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2015.07.108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikman, M., J. Vartiainen, I. Tsitko, and P. Korhonen. 2014. Biodegradability and compostability of nanofibrillar cellulose-based products. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 23 (2):206–15. doi:10.1007/s10924-014-0694-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilarinho, F., A. S. Silva, M. F. Vaz, and J. P. Farinha. 2017. Nanocellulose in green food packaging. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 0:1–12. doi:10.1080/10408398.2016.1270254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, L., D. J. Gardner, and D. W. Bousfield. 2018. Cellulose nanofibril-reinforced polypropylene composites for material extrusion: Rheological properties. Polymer Engineering and Science 58 (5):793–801. doi:10.1002/pen.24615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., X. Wei, J. Li, F. Wang, Q. Wang, J. Chen, and L. Kong. 2015. Study on nanocellulose by high pressure homogenization in homogeneous isolation. Fibers and Polymers 16 (3):572–78. doi:10.1007/s12221-015-0572-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, A., S. Morita, S. Kokot, M. Matsubara, K. Fukai, and Y. Ozaki. 2006. Drying process of microcrystalline cellulose studied by attenuated total reflection IR spectroscopy with two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy and principal component analysis. Journal of Molecular Structure 799 (1–3):102–10. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2006.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, L. E., M. Murphy, and A. A. D’Addieco. 1946. A chlorite holocellulose, its fractionation and bearing on summative wood analysis and studies on the hemicelluloses. Paper Trade Journal 122 (2):35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Žepič, V., E. S. Fabjan, M. Kasunič, R. C. Korošec, A. Hančič, O. Primož, L. S. Perše, and I. Poljanšek. 2014. Morphological, thermal, and structural aspects of dried and redispersed nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC). Holzforschung 68 (6):657–67. doi:10.1515/hf-2013-0132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z., W. Wang, X. Wang, X. Zhao, N. Xia, F. Kong, and S. Wang. 2021. Easy way to prepare dispersible CNC dry powder by precipitation and Conventional Evaporation. Cellulose 28(15):9661–76. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s10570-021-04123-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, M. V. G., C. Borsoi, A. Lavoratti, M. Zanini, A. J. Zattera, and R. M. C. Santana. 2016. Drying techniques applied to cellulose nanofibers. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 35 (8):682–97. doi:10.1177/0731684415626286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar