Cotton Agriculture in Turkey and Worldwide Economic Impacts of Turkish Cotton

References

• Pamuk Yetistiriciligi. 2020. Pamuk Yetiştiriciliği. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://adana.tarimorman.gov.tr/Belgeler/SUBELER/bitkisel_uretim_ve_bitki_sagligi_sube_mudurlugu/endustri_bitkileri_yetistiriciligi_ve_mucadelesi/Pamuk%20Yeti%C5%9Ftiricili%C4%9Fi.doc
   Google Scholar
• Pamuk Raporu. 2020. T.C. Ticaret Bakanlığı Esnaf, Sanatkârlar ve Kooperatifçilik Genel Müdürlüğü, 2019 Yılı Pamuk Raporu, Nisan 2020, 1-40. Accessed February 5, 2021. http://www.upk.org.tr/User_Files/editor/file/2019%20Pamuk%20Raporu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tarim Dunyasi. 2020. Tarım Dünyası Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Platformu. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://www.tarimdunyasi.net/2020/08/18/pamukta-uretim-dustu-ithalat-patladi/
   Google Scholar
• Anadolu Ajansi . 2020. Çukurova çiftçisi alternatif ürünlere yöneldi pamukta ekim alanı daraldı. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/ekonomi/cukurova-ciftcisi-alternatif-urunlere-yoneldi-pamukta-ekim-alani-daraldi/1987309
   Google Scholar
• Istanbul Hazir Giyim. 2020. İstanbul Hazır Giyim ve Konfeksiyon İhracatçıları Birliği. Accessed 5 February 2021. https://www.itkib.org.tr/Home/KbDownload/konfeksiyon-Ihracat-degerlendirme-notu-aralik-2020
   Google Scholar
• Kalkinma Ajansi Raporu. 2020. Pamuk yetiştiriciliği, ekonomik analizi ve pamuğa dayalı sanayi ürünlerinin belirlenmesi. Kars, Turkey: Serhat Kalkinma Ajansi. Accessed 5 February 2021https://www.serka.gov.tr/assets/upload/dosyalar/pamuk-raporu-baski-onayi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Abay, C. F., S. Guler Gumus, and B. Turkekul. 2019. Türkiye’de 2000 yılı sonrası uygulanan tarım politikaları. In Türkiye’de Geçmişten Günümüze Tarım Politikaları ve Ekonomisi, ed. B. Pakdemirli, B. Yucel, and N. Kosum, 21–38. Ankara, Turkey: Akçağ Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Amera, T., R. K. Mensah, and A. Belay. 2017. Integrated pest management in a cotton-growing area in the Southern Rift Valley region of Ethiopia: Development and application of a supplementary food spray product to manage pests and beneficial insects. International Journal of Pest Management 63 (2):185–204. doi:10.1080/09670874.2016.1278084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, S., S. H. Khan, A. Ahmed, and A. M. Dandekar. 2020. The tale of cotton plant: From wild type to domestication, leading to its improvement by genetic transformation. American Journal of Molecular Biology 10 (2):91–127. doi:10.4236/ajmb.2020.102008.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, H., and H. Bayindir. 2008. Pamuk yağı metil esterinin bir dizel motorunun kısmi yüklerinde yanma ve egzoz emisyonlarına etkilerinin araştırılması. Firat Üniversitesi Dogu Arastirmalari Dergisi 6 (3):55.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S., B. A. Nakiyingi, C. Esmen, S. Güneysu, and M. Ejjada. 2020. Environmental impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) from Turkish perceptive. Environment, Development and Sustainability 1–8. doi:10.1007/s10668-020-00933-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytac, S., S. Basbag, F. Arslanoglu, R. Ekinci, and A. K. Ayan. 2020. Lif bitkileri üretiminde mevcut durum ve gelecek. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisligi IX Teknik Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabi 1: 463–92.
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, C. 2020. The Turkish state’s responses to existential COVID-19 crisis. Policy and Society 39 (3):424–41. doi:10.1080/14494035.2020.1783786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkalci, A. C. 2018. Küresel sistemde Türk tekstil sektörünün ürün haritalaması yöntemiyle analizi. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Iktisadi Ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 25 (3):569–85.
   Google Scholar
• Balcik, B. 2019. 2018 Ulusal pamuk konseyi pamuk sektör raporu. 30 Ocak 2019. Accessed February 5, 2021. http://www.upk.org.tr/User_Files/editor/file/pamuksektorraporu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Basal, H. 2017. Türkiye’de pamuk tarımı. Türkiye Tohumcular Birliği Dergisi 21:6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Basal, H., E. Karademir, H. K. Goren, V. Sezener, M. N. Dogan, I. Gencsoylu, and O. Erdogan. 2019. Cotton production in Turkey and Europe. In Cotton Production, ed. K. Jabran, and B. S. Chauhan, 297–321. NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bashimov, G. 2017. Orta Asya ekonomilerinin tekstil ve hazır giyim sektöründeki uluslararası rekabet gücü. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi 5 (2):23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bayram, S., and M. M. Guldur. 2015. Türk hazır giyim sektöründe markalaşma ve Türk hazır giyim markalarının imajı. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2 (5):373–86.
   Google Scholar
• Bostan, S., R. Erdem, Y. E. Ozturk, T. Kilic, and A. Yılmaz. 2020. The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the Turkish society. Electronic Journal of General Medicine 17 (6):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boylan, B. M., J. McBeath, and B. Wang. 2021. US-China relations: nationalism, the trade war, and COVID-19. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 14 23–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, M. R. 2010. Cotton production and processing. In Industrial Applications of Natural Fibres: Structure, Properties and Technical Applications, ed. J. Müssig, 219–36. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Copur, O. 2018. GAP Projesinin Türkiye pamuk üretimine etkisi: son on yıldaki değişimler. Adyütayam 6 (1):11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Cottoninfo. 2020. Soil Health. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://www.cottoninfo.com.au/soil-health
   Google Scholar
• Darekar, A., and A. A. Reddy. 2017. Cotton price forecasting in major producing states. Economic Affairs 62 (3):373–78. doi:10.5958/0976-4666.2017.00047.X.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A., H. Ullah, Z. Ferdous, R. Santiago-Arenas, and A. Attia. 2019. Water management in cotton. In Cotton Production, ed. K. Jabran, and B. S. Chauhan, 47–60. NY, USA: Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Demiryurek K., Aydogan M., and Abaci N. I. 2017. The comparison of pest management information systems and communication networks for organic and conventional hazelnut producers in Samsun Province of Turkey. Organic Agriculture 7(4), 431–440. doi:10.1007/s13165-016-0167-1.
   Google Scholar
• Desore, A., and S. A. Narula. 2018. An overview on corporate response towards sustainability issues in textile industry. Environment, Development and Sustainability 20 (4):1439–59. doi:10.1007/s10668-017-9949-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlet A. 2021. Modern agriculture and challanges. Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies 2 (1): 21–29. doi:10.51753/flsrt.856349.
   Google Scholar
• Egbuta, M. A., S. McIntosh, D. L. Waters, T. Vancov, and L. Liu. 2017. Biological importance of cotton by-products relative to chemical constituents of the cotton plant. Molecules 22 (1):93–117. doi:10.3390/molecules22010093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdem, N. 1996. Pamuk linteri: tanımı, eldesi ve kullanım alanları. Tekstil ve Mühendis 10 (51–52): 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Erdil, M., and A. Erdil. 2017. Assessment of quality requirement and importance for textile industry in Turkey. PressAcademia Procedia 5 (1):58–66. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.572.
   Google Scholar
• Ertugrul, H. M., B. Darici, H. Kiral, and F. Ayhan. 2018. Transmission of world cotton price to domestic cotton price in Turkey. In Politico-Economic Evaluation of Current Issues, eds. S. Koc, A.Orhan, and S.Yilmaz Genc, 165–73. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge International Academics.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, S., and I. De Alencar Naas. 2014. Textile industry can be less pollutant: Introducing naturally colored cotton. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering 2 (2):85–91. doi:10.4995/ijpme.2014.1744.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S. M., and M. N. Parajulee. 2017. Integrated pest management in cotton. In Integrated Pest Management in Tropical Regions, ed. C. Rapisarda and G. E. M. Cocuzza, 134–74. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Gunduz, F. F., O. Akay, S. Gunduz, and C. O. Dolekoglu. 2020. Determination of the factors affecting cotton export of Turkey: A panel gravity model approach. Akademik Hassasiyetler 7 (13):547–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gurel, A., H. Akdemir, S. H. Emiroglu, H. Kadoglu, and H. B. Karadayi. 2000. Pamuk tarımı, teknolojisine genel bakış ve diğer lif bitkileri. TMMOB V TZM Teknik Kongresi 17 (21):525–66. Ankara, Ocak 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hocaoglu-Ozyigit, A., B. Ucar, V. Altay, and I. I. Ozyigit. 2020. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic analyses of Turkish cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) lines using ISSR markers and chloroplast trnL-F regions. Journal of Natural Fibers 1–14. doi:10.1080/15440478.2020.1788493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurriyet. 2019. Pamuktan elde ediliyor, tamamı ihraç ediliyor. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/pamuktan-elde-ediliyor-tamami-ihrac-ediliyor-41380182
   Google Scholar
• ICAC. 2020. International Cotton Advisory Committee. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://www.icac.org/DataPortal/DataPortal?Year=2019/20for
   Google Scholar
• Karsavuran, Y. 2004. Pamuk zararlılarına karşı savaş yöntemlerinin uygulanmasında dikkat edilmesi gereken ana konular. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 41 (1):191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, P., T. Bhagria, N. K. Mutti, A. Rinwa, G. Mahajan, and B. Chauhan. 2019. Cotton production in Turkey and Europe. In Cotton Production, ed. K. Jabran, and B. S. Chauhan, 341–57. NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., A. Wahid, M. Ahmad, M. T. Tahir, M. Ahmed, S. Ahmad, and M. Hasanuzzaman. 2020. World cotton production and consumption: An overview. In Cotton Production and Uses, ed. S. Ahmad and M. Hasanuzzaman, 1–7. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koondhar, M. A., L. Qiu, X. Liu, F. Abbassi, M. A. Koondhar, and H. Ge. 2018. Effects of market price, cultivating area and price regulation on cotton production in China. African Journal of Agricultural Research 13 (16):858–65. doi:10.5897/AJAR2016.11072.
   Google Scholar
• Kucuk, N. 2015. Pamuğun dünyası, küresel aktörler ve politikalar. ASSAM Uluslararasi Hakemli Dergi 2 (4):60–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kucuk, N., and M. H. Aydogdu. 2020. Türkiye’de pamuk üretiminin son dönemlerdeki genel analizi. Euroasia Journal of Mathematics-Engineering Natural & Medical Sciences 8:77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kucuk, U. N., and S. Issi. 2019. Pamuk üretiminin stratejik önemi üzerine genel bir değerlendirme. TURAN: Stratejik Arastirmalar Merkezi 11 (44):391–98.
   Google Scholar
• Li, N., H. Lin, T. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Liu, X. Chen, and X. Hu. 2020. Impact of climate change on cotton growth and yields in Xinjiang, China. Field Crops Research 247:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar, G., S. B. Singh, and S. K. Shukla. 2019. Seed production, harvesting, and ginning of cotton. In Cotton Production, ed. K. Jabran and B. S. Chauhan, 145–74. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mart, C., and A. Uludag. 1998. “Proposed Strategies in integrated pest management in the gap region of Turkey.” Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference 2, Athens, Greece, September 6- 12.
   Google Scholar
• Munir, H., F. Rasul, A. Ahmad, M. Sajid, S. Ayub, M. Arif, P. Iqbal, A. Khan, Z. Fatima, and S. Ahmad. 2020. Diverse uses of cotton: From products to byproducts. In Cotton Production and Uses, ed. S. Ahmad and M. Hasanuzzaman, 629–41. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Organic Cotton Market Report. 2020. Covering production trends and initiative updates from the 2018/19 harvest year. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://textileexchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Textile-Exchange_Organic-Cotton-Market-Report_2020-20200810.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ozkil, M., A. T. Serim, H. Torun, and I. Uremiş. 2019. Determination of weed species, distributions and frequency in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fields of Antalya province. Turkish Journal of Weed Science 2 (22):185–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ozyigit, I. I., I. Dogan, S. Karadeniz, Z. Severoglu, G. Demir, I. E. Yalcin, and C. Yarci. 2021. Mineral nutrient compositions of field-grown weed and maize (Zea mays L.) plants in terms of competition. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 58 (1):115–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamuk Talimati.2017. Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Pamuk Entegre Mücadele Teknik Talimati. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/TAGEM/Belgeler/yayin/Pamuk%20Entegre-29.08.2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rauf, S., M. Shehzad, J. M. Al-Khayri, H. M. Imran, and I. R. Noorka. 2019. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) breeding strategies. In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Industrial and Food Crops, ed. J. M. Al-Khayri, M. Jain, and D. V. Johnson, 29–59. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rojo-Gutiérrez, E., J. J. Buenrostro-Figueroa, L. X. López-Martínez, D. R. Sepúlveda, and R. Baeza-Jiménez. 2020. Biotechnological potential of cottonseed, a by-product of cotton production. In Valorisation of Agro-industrial Residues-Volume II: Non-Biological Approaches. Applied Environmental Science and Engineering for a Sustainable Future, ed. Z. Zakaria, C. Aguilar, R. Kusumaningtyas, and P. Binod, 63–82. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sagir, A., F. Tatli, and B. Gurkan. 1995. “Studies on the diseases of cotton in the Southeast Anatolia Region.” Proc. Plant Protection Problems and Solutions in the GAP Region Symposium, Sanliurfa, April 27-29.
   Google Scholar
• Sasmaz, M. U., and O. Ozel. 2019. Tarım sektörüne sağlanan mali teşviklerin tarım sektörü gelişimi üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Dumlupinar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (61):50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Saygili, E., A. T. Saygili, and S. G. Yargi. 2019. An analysis of the sustainability disclosures of textile and apparel companies in Turkey. Journal of Textile & Apparel/Tekstil Ve Konfeksiyon 29 (3):189–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., P. Kodgire, and S. S. Kachhwaha. 2020. Investigation of ultrasound-assisted KOH and CaO catalyzed transesterification for biodiesel production from waste cotton-seed cooking oil: process optimization and conversion rate evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production 120982. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, J., P. K. Mangat, and R. B. Angeles-Shim. 2018. Natural variation in wild gossypium species as a tool to broaden the genetic base of cultivated cotton. Journal of Plant Science Current Research 2 (5):1–9. doi:10.24966/PSCR-3743/100005.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, W., M. H. Shahrajabian, M. Khoshkharam, H. Shen, and Q. Cheng. 2020. Cultivation of cotton in China and Iran with considering biological activities and its health benefits. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 1 (1):105–20. doi:10.46909/cerce-2020-009.
   Google Scholar
• Tarim Orman. 2019. T. C. Tarım, Orman ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Tescil ve Sertifikasyon Merkez Müdürlüğü, Milli Çeşit Listesi. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Menu/30/Kayit-Listeleri
   Google Scholar
• Tarim Orman. 2020. T.C. Tarım, Orman ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Ürün masalları, Kasım Bülteni, 1-57. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/Belgeler/M%C4%B0LL%C4%B0%20TARIM/%C3%9Cr%C3%BCn%20Masalar%C4%B1%20Kas%C4%B1m%20Ay%C4%B1%20B%C3%BClteni/KASIM%20B%C3%9CLTENLER%C4%B0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ticaret Bakanligi. 2020. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Ticaret Bakanlığı Dış Ticaret İstatistikleri. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://ticaret.gov.tr/istatistikler/dis-ticaret-istatistikleri
   Google Scholar
• Tokel, D. 2021. Dünya pamuk tarımı ve ekonomiye katkısı. Manas Sosyal Arastirmalar Dergisi 10 (2):1022–37. doi:10.33206/mjss.858702.
   Google Scholar
• Tokel, D., and Erkencioglu, B. N. Production and Trade of Oil Crops, and Their Contribution to the World Economy. In Oil Crop Genomics, eds. H. Tombuloglu, T. Unver, G. Tombuloglu, and K. Rehman Hakeem, 415–427. Switzerland: Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70420-9
   Google Scholar
• Tokel, D., B. N. Genc, and I. I. Ozyigit. 2021. Economic impacts of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton. Journal of Natural Fibers 1–18. doi:10.1080/15440478.2020.1870613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turktob. 2021. Türkiye Tohumcular Birliği. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://www.turktob.org.tr/en/pamuk-yetistiriciligi-ve-tarimi/4912
   Google Scholar
• Ugurlu, M. 2020. Pamuk üretiminin ekonomik analizi: Manisa örneği. In Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. Special Issue, 206–217.
   Google Scholar
• Uludag, A., and M. Katkat. 1991. “Weeds in cotton fields and their distributions and densities in Southeast Anatolia.” Proc. 6th Phytopathology Congress of Turkey, Izmir, October 7-11.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020a. United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service, December 2020 Report, Cotton: World Markets and Trade, 1-28. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/kp78gg36g/5m60rj41c/hh63tm60w/cotton__1_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020b. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Biotechnology Annual Published on February 04, 2020. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Cotton%20and%20Products%20Update_Ankara_Turkey_08-30-2020
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020c. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Biotechnology Annual Published on February 04, 2020. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Cotton%20and%20Products%20Annual_Ankara_Turkey_04-01-2020
   Google Scholar
• Wendel, J. F., and C. E. Grover. 2015. Taxonomy and evolution of the cotton genus. Gossypium Cotton 57:25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, L. J., R. K. Mensah, and G. P. Fitt. 2004. Implementing integrated pest management in Australian cotton. In Insect Pest Management, ed. A. R. Horowitz and I. Ishaaya, 97–118. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, T., L. Wang, S. Li, M. Xu, X. Guan, and B. Zhou. 2017. Characterization of conserved circular RNA in polyploid gossypium species and their ancestors. FEBS Letters 591 (21):3660–69. doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar