Determining Geotextile Effects on Bearing Capacity Ratio and Cost of Pavement Layers by Conducting CBR Tests

References

• AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. 1993. Volume 1; American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T 193-13. 2017. Standard method of test for the California bearing ratio
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Farsakh, M., S. Hanandeh, L. Mohammad, and Q. Chen. 2016. Performance of geosynthetic reinforced/stabilized paved roads built over soft soil under cyclic plate loads. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 44 (6):845–53. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I. L., E. Tutumluer, and S. Dessouky. 2006. Construction and instrumentation of Full scale geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement test sections. Airfield and Highway Pavement: Meeting Today’s Challenges with Emerging Technologies, Proceedings of 2006 Airfield and Highway Pavements Specialty Conference. Atlanta, Georgia, April 30 May 3, 2006, pp. 131–42.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D2487-06. 2006. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org
   Google Scholar
• Azar, K., and R. Dabiri. 2015. The effects of geotextile layers on bearing capacity of gravel-silt mixtures. Trakya University Journal of Engineering Sciences 16:61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., S. Hanadeh, M. Abu-Farsakh, and L. Mohammad. 2018. Performance evaluation of full-scale geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavement. Geosynthetics International 25 (1):26–36. doi:10.1680/jgein.17.00031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, B. R. 2014. Cost savings by using geosynthetics in the construction of civil works projects. 10th International Conference on Geosynthetics Berlin (10ICG). 21-25 September, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Cicek, E. 2019. The effects of different types of fibres and geotextiles for pavement design. Road Materials and Pavement Design 20 (4):793–814. doi:10.1080/14680629.2017.1417890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, J. K., A. Bouazza, J. R. Gniel, R. K. Rowe, and H. H. Bui. 2018. Geosynthetic reinforced column supported embankments and the role of ground improvement installation effects. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 55 (6):792–809. doi:10.1139/cgj-2017-0036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeili, M., M. Salajegheh, and S. J. Famenin. 2019. Experimental assessment of geotextile serviceability lifetime as ballasted railway filter focusing on clogging phenomenon. Construction and Building Materials 211:675–87. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galve, J. P., F. Gutierrezi, J. Guerrer, J. Alonso, and I. Diego. 2012. Optimizing the application of geosynthetics to roads in sinkhole-prone areas on the basis of hazard models and cost-benefit analyses. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 34:80–92. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodarzi, S., and H. Shahnazari. 2019. Strength enhancement of geotextile-reinforced carbonate sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 47-2:128–39. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heukelom, W., and AJG. Klomp. 1962. Dynamic Testing as a Means of Controlling Pavements During and After Construction. Proceedings of the Int. Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavement, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, A., A. Adnan, and M. Alam. 2015. Improvement of Granular Subgrade Soil by Using Geotextile and Jute Fiber, International Journal of Science, Technology and Society 3 (5):230–235.
   Google Scholar
• Imjaia, T., K. Pilakoutasb, and M. Guadagnini. 2019. Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced flexible pavements in full-scale field trials. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 47 (2):217–29. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermani, B., M. Xiao, S. M. Stoffels, and T. Qiu. 2018. Reduction of subgrade fines migration into subbase of flexible pavement using geotextile. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 46 (4):377–83. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, J., Z. Tao, J. Qian, and W. Fu. 2018. Investigation the influences of geotextile on reducing the thermal reflective cracking using XFEM. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 19 (5):391–98. doi:10.1080/10298436.2017.1402598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoumi, M. T., A. A. Kordani, and M. Nazirizad. 2017. Experimental study of geotextile effect on improving soil bearing capacity in aggregate surfaced roads. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering 11 (1):43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Naeini, S.A., and M. Mirzakhanlari. 2008. The Effect of Geotextile and Grading on the Bearing Ratio of Granular Soils. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 13: Bundle J, Paper 0891
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, S. W., and M. Q. A. Edens. 2003. A design model for geosynthetic-reinforced pavements. The International Journal of Pavement Engineering 4 (1):37–50. doi:10.1080/1029843031000097562.
   Google Scholar
• Sarma, B., K. Kaushik, R. Bharali, and B. Sharma. 2013. A Study of CBR Properties of Soil Reinforced with Jute Geotextile with Reference to The Road Construction in Assam. Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference December 22-24, Roorkee.
   Google Scholar
• Sayida, M. K., S. Y. Evangeline, and M. S. Girish. 2019. Coir geotextiles for paved roads: A laboratory and field study using non-plastic soil as subgrade. Journal of Natural Fibers 17 (9):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivapriya, S. V., and S. Ganesh-Kumar. 2019. Functional and cost- benefits of geosynthetics as subgrade reinforcement in the design of flexible pavement. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería 28 (51):39–49. doi:10.19053/01211129.v28.n51.2019.9082.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, X., M. Abu-Farsakh, S. Hanandeh, and Q. Chen. 2015. Performance of reinforced and stabilized unpaved test sections built over native soft soil under full-scale moving wheel loads. Transportation Research Record 2511:81–89. doi:10.3141/2511-10.
   Google Scholar
• Tingle, J. S., and S. R. Jersey. 2007. Empirical design methods for geosynthetic-reinforced low-volume roads. Transportation Research Record 2 (1989):91–101. doi:10.3141/1989-52.
   Google Scholar
• Vikram, M. B. 2018. Effect of geotextiles on CBR values. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Development 1-6:118–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., B. Huang, X. Shu, and S. Zhao. 2015. Evaluation of geogrid reinforcement effects on unbound granular pavement base courses using loaded wheel tester. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 43 (5):462–69. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. H., and I. L. Al-Qadi. 2007. Cost-effectiveness of using geotextiles in flexible pavements. Geosynthetics International 14 (1):2–12. doi:10.1680/gein.2007.14.1.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar