A Postmodern Turn for Social Media Research: Theory and Research Directions for Public Relations Scholarship

REFERENCES

• Alonzo, M., & Aiken, M. (2004). Flaming in electronic communication. Decision Support Systems, 36, 205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bortree, D. S., & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups' Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35, 317–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botan, C. H., & Taylor, M. (2004). Public relations: State of the field. Journal of Communication, 54, 645–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briones, R. L., Kuch, B., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2011). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 37, 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. E. (2010). Developing a corporeal cyberfeminism: Beyond cyberutopia. New Media & Society, 12, 929–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn-Calander, R. (2013, November 27). The top 10 corporate social media disasters. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/the-top-10-corporate-social-media-disasters-2013-11
   Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2007). Blogs, online forums, public spaces and the extreme right in North Belgium. In N. Carpentier, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, K. Nordenstreng, M. Hartmann, P. Vihalemm, B. Cammaerts, & H. Nieminen (Eds.), Media technologies and democracy in enlarged Europe: The intellectual word of the 2007 European media and communication doctoral summer pool (pp. 107–119). Tartu, Estonia: Tartu University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2008). Critiques on the participatory potentials of web 2.0. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1, 358–377.
   Google Scholar
• Colby, D. (2001). Conceptualizing the “digital divide”: Closing the “gap” by creating a postmodern network that distributes the productive power of speech. Communication Law & Policy, 6, 123–159.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T. (1998). The Internet as potential equalizer: New leverage for confronting social irresponsibility. Public Relations Review, 24, 289–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K. L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K., & Sweetser, K. D. (2010). Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review, 36, 90–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Merced, M. J. (2013, November 13). After Twitter #fail, JPMorgan calls off Q. and A. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://dealbook.nytimes.com/
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, M., & Pal, M. (2010). Dialog theory in marginalized settings: A subaltern studies approach. Communication Theory, 20, 363–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyrich, N., Padman, M. L., & Sweetser, K. D. (2008). PR practitioners' use of social media tool and communication technology. Public Relations Review, 34, 412–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Fusco, C. (2001). At your service: Latin women in the global information network. In C. Fusco (Ed.), The bodies that were not ours (pp. 187–201). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh, S., & Zoller, H. M. (2012). Dialogue, activism, and democratic social change. Communication Theory, 22, 66–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, M. (2010). On Friday night drinks: Workplace affects in the age of the cubicle. In G. J. Seigworth & M. Gregg (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 250–268). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E. (Ed.). (1992). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (2010). Silly citizenship. Critical Discourse Studies, 7, 233–248.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R. L. (1998). New communication technologies: An issues management point of view. Public Relations Review, 24, 273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R. L., & Palenchar, M. (2009). Strategic issues management: Organizations and public policy challenges (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R. L., Waymer, D., & Palenchar, M. J. (2013). Is the universe of democracy, rhetoric, and public relations whole cloth or three separate galaxies? Public Relations Review, 39, 271–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R. (2000). Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12, 93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R. (2007). Activism. In E. L. Toth (Ed.), The future of excellence in public relations and communication management: Challenges for the next generation (pp. 357–379). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R. (2012). Public relations as activism: Postmodern approaches to theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R., & Voto, F. (2002). Resistance from the margins: The postmodern public relations practitioner as organizational activist. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 57–84.
   Google Scholar
• International Telecommunications Union. (2013). Key ICT indicators for developed and developing countries and the world (totals and penetration rates). Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. A. (1997). Public relations and technology: Practitioner perspectives. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9, 213–236.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher, T. (2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59, 172–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher, T., & Sweetser, K. (2012). Social media adoption among university communicators. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, M. L. (2008). Critical analysis of blogging in public relations. Public Relations Review, 34, 32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, M. L. (2010). Directions in social media for professionals and scholars. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), The Sage handbook of public relations (pp. 643–656). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24, 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lariscy, R. W., Avery, E. J., Sweetser, K. D., & Howes, P. (2009). An examination of the role of online social media in journalists' source mix. Public Relations Review, 35, 314–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization–public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24, 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper, R. V. (1996). Moral objectivity, Jurgen Habermas's discourse ethics, and public relations. Public Relations Review, 22, 133–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch, S., & Neilson, D. (2001). Bringing publics into public relations: New theoretical frameworks for practice. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 127–138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• L'Etang, J., & Pieczka, M. (2006). Public relations: Critical debates and contemporary practices. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38, 313–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunt, P., & Stenner, P. (2005). The Jerry Springer Show as an emotional public sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 27, 59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1993). Libidinal economy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Men, L. R., & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2012). How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: Evidence from China and the United States. Public Relations Review, 38, 723–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, G. (2010). Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs. Critical Discourse Studies, 7, 263–275.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4, 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raupp, J. (2011). Organizational communication in a networked public sphere. Studies in Communication/Media, 1, 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rybalko, S., & Seltzer, T. (2010). Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter. Public Relations Review, 36, 336–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffer, A. J., Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Taylor, M. (2013). The effects of organizational Twitter interactivity on organization–public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39, 213–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, C. (1994). Re-entering cyberspace: Sciences of resistance. Dispositio, 19, 75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. G. (2010). Socially distributing public relations: Twitter, Haiti, and interactivity in social media. Public Relations Review, 36, 329–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. F., & Ferguson, D. (2010). Activism 2.0. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), The Sage handbook of public relations (2nd ed.; pp. 395–407). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerfeldt, E. J. (2013). Online power resource management: Activist resource mobilization, communication strategy, and organizational culture. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25, 347–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetser, K. D. (2010). A losing strategy: The impact of nondisclosure in social media on relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 288–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2010). Anticipatory socialization in the use of social media in public relations: A content analysis of PRSA's Public Relations Tactics. Public Relations Review, 36, 207–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., Kent, M. L., & White, W. J. (2001). How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27, 263–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, E. L. (2002). Postmodernism for modernist public relations: The cash value and application of critical research in public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zoonen, L., Vis, F., & Mihelj, S. (2010). Performing citizenship on YouTube: Activism, satire, and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitma. Critical Discourse Studies, 7, 249–262.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35, 102–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., & Jamal, J. Y. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations' Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37, 321–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xifra, J., & Grau, F. (2010). Nanoblogging PR: The discourse on public relations in Twitter. Public Relations Review, 36, 171–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar