A new culture of advocacy: An exploratory analysis of social activism on the web and social media

References

• ACC Academic Consortium. (2017). ACC leadership symposium. Retrieved from http://acciac.org/student-leadership-conference
   Google Scholar
• Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “Civic engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236–253. doi:10.1177/1541344605276792
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L., & Schneider, C. (2013). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ariel, Y., & Avidar, R. (2015). Information, interactivity, and social media. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23, 19–30. doi:10.1080/15456870.2015.972404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beneito-Montagut, R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the Internet. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 716–735. doi:10.1177/1468794111413368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackbaud Inc. (2014, February). Blackbaud’s charitable giving report: How nonprofit fundraising performed in 2013. Retrieved March 11, 2014, from https://www.blackbaud.com/files/resources/downloads/2014/2013.CharitableGivingReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bobkowski, P., & Smith, J. (2013). Social media divide: Characteristics of emerging adults who do not use social network websites. Media, Culture & Society, 35(6), 771–781. doi:10.1177/0163443713491517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta- analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 13(5), 524–538. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
   Google Scholar
• Boyraz, M., Krishnan, A., & Catona, D. (2015). Who is retweeted in times of political protest? An analysis of characteristics of top tweeters and top retweeted users during the 2011 Egyptian revolution. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(2), 99–119. doi:10.1080/15456870.2015.1013103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 46–65. doi:10.1080/15456870.2015.972282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charity Navigator. (2014). Charity navigator. Retrieved from https://www.charitynavigator.org
   Google Scholar
• CharityWatch. (1995-2014). CharityWatch. Retrieved from https://www.charitywatch.org
   Google Scholar
• The Chronicle of Philanthropy. (2016, May 11). Online giving through network for good exceeds $215 million in the past year. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. Retrieved May 16, 2016, from https://philanthropy.com/interactives/online-giving-dashboard
   Google Scholar
• Ciszek, E. (2014). Cracks in the glass slipper: Does it really “get better” for LGBTQ youth, or is it just another cinderella story? Journal of Communication Inquiry, 38(4), 325–340. doi:10.1177/0196859914551607
   Google Scholar
• Cogburn, D. L., & Espinoza-Vasquez, F. K. (2011). From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 10, 189–213. doi:10.1080/15377857.2011.540224
   Google Scholar
• Corporation for National & Community Service. (2014). Volunteer rates. Corporation for National & Community Service. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from http://www.volunteeringinamerica.gov/rankings.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Cozen, B. (2013). Mobilizing artists: Green patriot posters, visual metaphors, and climate change activism. Environmental Communication, 7(2), 297–314. doi:10.1080/17524032.2013.777353
   Google Scholar
• Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., & Huibers, T. (2011). Social media and political participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems? In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, & H. de Bruijn (Eds.), Electronic participation (pp. 25–35). Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2010). Theoretical foundations of defining the participatory, co-operative, sustainable information society. Information, Communication & Society, 13(1), 23–47. doi:10.1080/13691180902801585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, N., Shifman, L., & Kampf, Z. (2015). “It Gets Better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media & Society, 1–17. doi:10.1177/1461444814568784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauntlet, D. (2011). Making is connecting: The social meaning of creativity, from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79. doi:10.1177/0899764012471585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A., & Del Carmen Caba-Pérez, M. (2016). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook? New Media and Society, 1–21. doi:10.1177/1461444816645652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, T. M., & Barthel, B. (2009). Wielding new media in Web 2.0: Exploring the history of engagement with the collaborative construction of media products. New Media & Society, 11(1&2), 155–178. doi:10.1177/1461444808099580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances. In N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 257–270). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ilavarasan, P. V. (2013). Community work and limited online activism among India youth. The International Communication Gazette, 75(3), 284–299. doi:10.1177/1748048512472945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, J., & Mascaro, C. (2016). Movember: Twitter conversations of a hairy social movement. Social Media+ Society, 2(2), 2056305116637103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelen-Sanchez, A. (2017). Engagement in public relations discipline: Themes, theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches. Public Relations Review, 43(5), 934–944. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2015). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New Media & Society, 1–7. doi:10.1177/1461444815577797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. K., & Sommerfeldt, E. J. (2015). A postmodern turn for social media research: Theory and research directions for public relations scholarship. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23, 31–45. doi:10.1080/15456870.2015.972406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, M. L. (2013). Using social media dialogically: Public relations role in reviving democracy. Public Relations Review, 39, 337–345. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, M. L. (2015). Social media circa 2035: Directions in social media theory. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 1–4. doi:10.1080/15456870.2015.972407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17, 337–353. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüders, M. (2008). Conceptualizing personal media. New Media & Society, 10(5), 683–702. doi:10.1177/1461444808094352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnamara, J. (2010). The 21st century media (R)evolution: Emergent communication practices. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McCorkindale, T., & DiStaso, M. W. (2014). The state of social media research: Where are we now, where we were and what it means for public relations. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations, 1(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, E., & Zingrone, F. (Eds.). (1995). Essential McLuhan. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1964/2001). The medium is the message. In M. G. Durham & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies. (pp. 129–138). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. (Reprinted from Understanding media: The extensions of man, pp. 23-35 & 63-67, 1964, NY: Signet).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., & Bray, C. (2013). Emerging adult usage of social networks as sites of activism: A critical examination of the TOMS and TWLOHA movements. Ohio Communication Journal, 51, 53–77.
   Google Scholar
• Meyrowitz, J. (2001, June). Morphing McLuhan: Medium theory for a new millennium. New york, NY: Keynote address delivered at the Second Annual Convention of the Media Ecology Association, New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Meyrowitz, J. (2008). Power, pleasure, patterns: Intersecting narratives of media influence. Journal of Communication, 58, 641–663. doi:10.1111/jcom.2008.58.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, S., & Kim, Y. (2012). Choosing the right media for mobilization: Issue advocacy groups’ media niches in the competitive media environment. Mass Communication and Society, 15(2), 225–244. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.568316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technolgies for social research. Sociology, 42(5), 837–855. doi:10.1177/0038038508094565
   Google Scholar
• Nah, S., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations. New Media & Society, 15(2), 294–313. doi:10.1177/1461444812452411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, P. B. (1999). Bridging the mass-interpersonal divide: Synthesis scholarship in HCR. Human Communication Research, 25(4), 569–588. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00462.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obar, J. A., Zube, P., & Lampe, C. (2012). Advocacy 2.0: An analysis of how advocacy groups in the United States perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action. Journal of Information Policy, 2, 1–25. doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.2.2012.0001
   Google Scholar
• ÖZdemir, B. P. (2012). Social media as a tool for online advocacy campaigns: Greenpeace Mediterranean’s anti genetically engineered food campaign in Turkey. Global Media Journal – Canadian Edition, 5(2), 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (Ed). (2011). A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013, April). Civic engagement in the digital age. Pew Research Center. Retrieved August 3, 2013, from http://www.pewInternet.org/2013/04/25/civic-engagement-in-the-digital-age
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015, January 9). Social media update. Pew Research Center. Retrieved January 27, 2015, from http://www.pewInternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. M. (2013). Offering hope and making attributions through youtube: An exploratory ethnographic content analysis of the social change-oriented “it gets better project”. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 2(1), 30–65.
   Google Scholar
• Public Interest Registry & Nonprofit Tech for Good. (2016). 2016 Global NPO Online technology report. Retrieved February 2, 2016, from http://www.techreport.ngo
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2000). The extensions of men: The correspondence of Marshall McLuhan and Edward T. Hall. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 117–135. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_06
   Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D., & Wang, L. (2014). The social network effect. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850–868. doi:10.1177/0899764013485159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D., & Waters, R. D. (2014). What do stakeholders like on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community- building messages. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 280–299. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.908721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87–101. doi:10.1177/0267323104040696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolari, C. A. (2012). Media ecology: Exploring the metaphor to expand the theory. Communication Theory, 22, 204–225. doi:10.1111/comt.2012.22.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seelig, M. I. (2016). Communicating the environment beyond photography. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Seelig, M. I. (2018). Social activism: Engaging millennials in social causes. First Monday, 23(2). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/8125/6642
   Google Scholar
• Segerberg, A., & Bennett, W. L. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review, 14, 197–215. doi:10.1080/10714421.2011.597250
   Google Scholar
• Sommerfeldt, E. J., Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2012). Activist practitioner perspectives of website public relations: Why aren’t activist websites fulfilling the dialogic promise? Public Relations Review, 38(2), 303–312. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, L. (2009). Social movement web use in theory and practice: A content analysis of US movement websites. New Media & Society, 11(5), 749–771. doi:10.1177/1461444809105350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, L. (2011). Environmental website production: A structuration approach. Media, Culture & Society, 33(3), 363–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strate, L. (2007). Understanding a man in time: James W. Carey and the media ecology intellectual tradition. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24(2), 177–180. doi:10.1080/07393180701262925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research, techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tatarchevskiy, T. (2011). The ‘popular’ culture of Internet activism. New Media & Society, 13(2), 297–313. doi:10.1177/1461444810372785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2013). ‘”Not this one”: Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 848, 870. doi:10.1177/0002764213479369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2012). Facebook as a tool for producing sociality and connectivity. Television & New Media, 13(2), 160–176. doi:10.1177/1527476411415291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. doi:10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the Internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the Internet sites of the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(1), 59–76. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Weathers, M. R., Sanderson, J., Neal, A., & Gramlich, K. (2016). From silence to#WhyIStayed: Locating our stories and finding our voices. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 17(1), 60–67. doi:10.1080/17459435.2016.1143385
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, E. C. (2014). The personal is political on social media: Online civic expression patterns and pathways among civically engaged youth. International Journal of Communication, 8, 210–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar