Exploring the motivations for live posting during entertainment television viewing

References

• Abbruzzese, J. (2014, February 10). Facebook is watching how you watch TV. Mashable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2014/02/10/facebooks-tv-data
   Google Scholar
• Adashek, A. (2014, June 2). Nielsen reveals the TV season’s top shows on Twitter. Twitter. Retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/2014/nielsen-reveals-the-tv-seasons-top-shows-on-twitter
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C. B., & Rubin, A. M. (1989). Talk radio as interpersonal communication. Journal of Communication, 39(2), 84–94. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barasch, A., & Berger, J. (2014). Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 286–299. doi:10.1037/e512142015-691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartsch, A., & Viehoff, R. (2010). The use of media entertainment and emotional gratification. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2247–2255. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.444
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (Eds.). (1974). The uses of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B. (Eds.). (2009). Media effects: Advances in theory and research. Routledge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). American Time Use Survey-2015 Results. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. L., & Lancaster, A. L. (2014). Individual differences in in-person and social media television coviewing: The role of emotional contagion, need to belong, and coviewing orientation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(8), 512–518. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, A., & Maltby, J. (2008). Impact of the Internet on our lives: Male and female personal perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2005–2013. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley, M. (2015, June 1). The walking dead, empire among the top series on twitter. Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.ew.com/article/2015/06/01/walking-dead-twitter
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhir, P., Torsheim, & Andreassen. (2016). Do age and gender differences exist in selfie-related behaviours? Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 549–555. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty, M., Rowland, D., & Lawson, S. (2012, July). Who is on your sofa? TV audience communities and second screening social networks. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive Television and Video (pp. 79–86). ACM, USA. doi:10.1145/2325616.2325635
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, K. (2016, February 8). For Super Bowl 50, Twitter Inc. (TWTR) touts 4.3 billion views, not tweets shared. International Business Times. Retrieved from http://www.ibtimes.com/super-bowl-50-twitter-inc-twtr-touts-43-billion-views-not-tweets-shared-2299339
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. H. (2017). Second screening politics in the social media sphere: Advancing research on dual screen use in political communication with evidence from 20 countries. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), 193–219. doi:10.1080/08838151.2017.1309420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, M., & Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2015). Predictors of social television viewing: How perceived program, media, and audience characteristics affect social engagement with television programming. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 240–258. doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1029122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, E., & Lee, S. W. (2014). Motivations for the complementary use of text-based media during linear TV viewing: An exploratory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 317–335. doi:10.1080/08838150902908270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., & Lampe, C. (2015). Social media effectiveness for public engagement: example of small nonprofits. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3107–3116). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2702123.2702557
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y., & Lim, J. S. (2015). The impact of engagement motives for social TV on social presence and sports channel commitment. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 755–765. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, Q., & Raney, A. A. (2015). Morally judging entertainment: A case study of live tweeting during downton abbey. Media Psychology, 18, 221–242. doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.956939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, Q., & Zhao, D. (2015). Tweeting live shows: A content analysis of live-tweets from three entertainment programs. In Proceedings of Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Conference on Social Media & Society. Toronto, CA. doi.10.1145/2789187.2789195
   Google Scholar
• Johns, M. D. (2012). Two screen viewing and social relationships. Exploring the invisible backchannel of TV viewing. InProceedings of cultural attitudes towards communication and technology 2012 (pp. 333–343). Perth: Murdoch University.
   Google Scholar
• Joiner, R., Gavin, J., Brosnan, M., Cromby, J., Gregory, H., Guiller, J., … Moon, A. (2012). Gender, internet experience, internet identification, and internet anxiety: A ten-year followup. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(7), 370–372. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. N. (2008, April). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1027–1036). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357213.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbrough, A. M., Guadagno, R. E., Muscanell, N. L., & Dill, J. (2013). Gender differences in mediated communication: Women connect more than do men. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 896–900. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, N. C., Winter, S., Benninghoff, B., & Gallus, C. (2015). How “social” is Social TV? The influence of social motives and expected outcomes on the usage of Social TV applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 255–262. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, N. C, Winter, S, Benninghoff, B, & Gallus, C. (2015). How “Social” Is Social Tv? The Influence Of Social Motives and Expected Outcomes on The Usage Of Social Tv Applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(255–262). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, B. A., & Fink, J. S. (2016). Fantasy sport, FoMO, and traditional fandom: How second-screen use of social media allows fans to accommodate multiple identities. Journal of Sport Management, 30(6), 643–655. doi:10.1123/jsm.2015-0344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E, Lee, J-A, Moon, J. H, & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: motivations for using instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 552-556. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. G. (1986). Generational aspects of television coviewing. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30, 75–85. doi:10.1080/08838158609386609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, K., Huotari, K., Cheng, F., Humphrey, D., Cheshire, C., & Brooks, A. L. (2012, February). Glitter: A mixed-methods study of twitter use during glee broadcasts. In Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) conference on computer supported cooperative work companion (pp. 167–170). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2013, October 7). Nielsen launches Nielsen Twitter TV Ratings. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/press-room/2013/nielsen-launches-nielsen-twitter-tv-ratings.html
   Google Scholar
• Pynta, P., Seixas, S., Nield, G., Hier, J., Millward, & Silberstein, R. (2014). The power of social television: Can social media build viewer engagement? A new approach to brain imaging of viewer immersion. Journal of Advertising Research, 54(1), 71–80. doi:10.2501/jar-54-1-071-080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, A. A., & Ji, Q. (2017). Entertaining each other? Modeling the socially shared television viewing experience. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 424–435. doi:10.1111/hcre.12121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M. (1983). Television uses and gratifications: the interactions of viewing patterns and motivations. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 27(1), 37-51. doi:10.1080/08838158309386471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M. (2009). Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effect. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 165–184). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, E. T. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 3–37. doi:10.4324/9781315679402-4
   Google Scholar
• Schirra, S., Sun, H., & Bentley, F. (2014). Together alone: Motivations for live-tweeting a television series. In Proceedings of the 2014 Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI) (pp. 2441–2450). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557070
   Google Scholar
• Shim, H., Oh, P., Song, H., & Lee, Y. (2015). An exploration of motivations for two screen viewing, social interaction behaviors, and factors that influence viewing intentions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(3), 158–164. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, H., Shin, E., & Lim, S. (2017). What makes us two-screen users? The effects of two-screen viewing motivation and psychological traits on social interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 339–346. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. H. (2013). Defining sociability and social presence in Social TV. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 939–947. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2012, July 17). The rise of the “connected viewer”. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.Reports/2012/Connected-viewers/Findings.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259–288. doi:10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 4th. Hillsdale, NS:Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N. (2016). How co-viewing affects attitudes: The mediating roles of transportation and identification. Media Psychology, 19(3), 381–405. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1082918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohn, D. Y., & Na, E.-K. (2011). Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday, 16. doi:10.5210/fm.v16i3.3368
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H., & Yan, R-N.. (2011). Feeling connected via television viewing: exploring the scale and its correlates. Communication Studies, 62(2), 186–206. doi:10.1080/10510974.2010.550380
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., & Wang, X. (2015). World Cup 2014 in the Twitter World: A big data analysis of sentiments in US sports fans’ tweets. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 392–400. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar