Comparison of the TSI Model 8520 and Grimm Series 1.108 Portable Aerosol Instruments Used to Monitor Particulate Matter in an Iron Foundry

REFERENCES

• Walton , W. H. and Vincent , J. H. 1998 . Aerosol instrumentation in occupational hygiene: An historical perspective . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 28 : 417 – 438 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer , W. G. and Scott , W. D. 1981 . Lung cancer in ferrous foundry workers: A review . Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. , 42 : 329 – 340 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerker , M. 1997 . Light scattering instrumentation for aerosol studies: An historical overview . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 27 : 522 – 540 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhart , J. 2001 . “ Optical direct-reading techniques: Light intensity system ” . In Aerosol Measurement—Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 419 – 454 . New York : Wiley-Interscience .
   Google Scholar
• Chen , B. T. , Tang , J. A. and Yeh , H. C. 1990 . A new technique to calibrate optical particle counters aerodynamically . Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. , 51 : 32 – 35 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görner , P. , Bemer , D. and Fabriès , J. F. 1995 . Photometer measurement of polydisperse aerosols . J. Aerosol Sci. , 26 : 1281 – 1302 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rader , D. J. and O'Hern , T. J. 2001 . “ Optical direct-reading techniques: In situ sensing ” . In Aerosol Measurement—Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 455 – 494 . New York : Wiley-Interscience .
   Google Scholar
• Kuusisto , P. 1983 . Evaluation of the direct reading instruments for the measurement of aerosols . Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. , 44 : 863 – 874 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehocky , A. H. and Williams , P. L. 1996 . Comparison of respirable samplers to direct-reading real-time aerosol monitors for measuring coal dust . Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. , 57 : 1013 – 1018 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai , C. J. , Shih , T. S. and Lin , J. D. 1996 . Laboratory testing of three direct reading dust monitors . Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. , 57 : 557 – 563 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middendorf , P. J. , Lehocky , A. H. and Williams , P. L. 1999 . Evaluation and field calibration of the Miniram PDM-3 aerosol monitor for measuring respirable and total coal dust . Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. , 60 : 502 – 511 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung , A. , Chang , D. P.Y. Kleeman , M. J. 2001 . Comparison of real-time instruments used to monitor airborne particulate matter . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 51 : 109 – 120 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanosky , J. D. , Williams , P. L. and MacIntosh , D. L. 2002 . A comparison of two direct-reading aerosol monitors with the federal reference method for PM2.5 in indoorair . Atmos. Environ. , 36 : 107 – 113 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins , R. A. , Ilgner , R. H. , Tomkins , B. A. and Peters , D. W. 2004 . Development and application of protocols for the determination of response of real−time particle monitors to common indoor aerosols . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 54 : 229 – 241 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran , G. , Adgate , J. L. , Hill , N. , Sexton , K. , Pratt , G. C. and Bock , D. 2000 . Comparison of short−term variations (15−minute averages) inoutdoor and indoor PM2.5 concentrations . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 50 : 1157 – 1166 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang , L. T. , Suh , H. H. Wolfson , J. M. 2001 . Laboratory and field evaluation of measurement methods for one−hour exposures to O3, PM 2.5, and CO . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. , 51 : 1414 – 1422 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan , L. Y. , Lau , W. L. , Lee , S. C. and Chan , C. Y. 2002 . Commuter exposure to particulate matter in public transportation modes in Hong Kong . Atmos. Environ. , 36 : 3363 – 3373 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawska , L. , He , C. , Hitchins , J. , Mengersen , K. and Gilbert , D. 2003 . Characteristics of particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses in Brisbane, Australia . Atmos. Environ. , 37 : 4195 – 4203 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braniš , M. 2006 . The contribution of ambient sources to particulate pollution in spaces and trains of the Prague underground transport system . Atmos. Environ. , 40 : 348 – 356 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingham , S. , Durand , M. , Aberkane , T. , Harrison , J. , Wilson , J. G. and Epton , M. 2006 . Winter comparison of TEOM, MiniVol and DustTrak PM10 monitors in a woodsmoke environment . Atmos. Environ. , 40 : 338 – 347 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teague , S. V. , Veranth , J. M. , Aust , A. E. and Pinkerton , K. E. 2005 . Dust generator for inhalation studies with limited amounts of archived particulate matter . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 39 : 85 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters , T. M. , Heitbrink , W. A. , Evans , D. E. , Slavin , T. J. and Maynard , A. D. 2006 . The mapping of fine and ultrafine particle concentrations in an engine machining and assembly facility . Ann. Occup. Hyg. , 50 : 249 – 257 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters , T. M. , Ott , D. and O'Shaughnessy , P. T. 2006 . Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 portable aerosol spectrometer to the TSI 3321 aerodynamic particle sizer for dry particles . Ann. Occup. Hyg. , 50 : 843 – 850 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran , G. , Adgate , J. L. , Pratt , G. C. and Sexton , K. 2003 . Characterizing indoor and outdoor 15 minute average PM2.5 concentrations in urban neighborhoods . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 37 : 33 – 45 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar