Evaluation of a strapless heart rate monitor during simulated flight tasks

References

• Stanton, N.A., P.M. Salmon, G.H. Walker, C. Baber, and D.P. Jenkins: Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide For Engineering and Design. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M., D. Estève, J.-Y. Fourniols, C. Escriba, and E. Campo: Smart wearable systems: Current status and future challenges. Artif. Intell. Med. 56(3): 137–156 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, J.: Subjective rating scales: science or art? Ergonomics 45(14): 966–987 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation: Airplane Flying Handbook (#FAA-H-8083-3A). Oklahoma City, OK: Federal Aviation Administration—Flight Standards Service, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D.: Human Performance on the Flight Deck. Surrey, U.K.: Ashgate Publishing, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, J.G., and C.D. Wickens: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Billings, C.E., and W.D. Reynard: Human factors in aircraft incidents: results of a 7-year study. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 55(10):960–965 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defence Research and Development Canada: A Review of the Mental Workload Literature, by B. Cain (Report #ADA474193). Toronto, Canada: Defence Research and Development Canada, July 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Borghini, G., L. Astolfi, G. Vecchiato, D. Mattia, and F. Babiloni: Measuring neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 44:58–75 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: Review of Workload Measurement, Analysis and Interpretation Methods, by E. Farmer and A. Brownson (Report #CARE-Integra-TRS-130-02-WP2). Brussels: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation, March 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, G.F., and C.A. Russell: Real-time assessment of mental workload using psychophysiological measures and artificial neural networks. Human Fact. 45(4):635–643 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besson, P., C. Bourdin, L. Bringoux, et al.: Effectiveness of physiological and psychological features to estimate helicopter pilots' workload: A Bayesian network approach. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 14(4):1872–1881 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltman, J.A., and A.W.K. Gaillard: Physiological workload reactions to increasing levels of task difficulty. Ergonomics 41(5):656–669 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright Research and Development Center: Assessment of Crew Workload Measurement Methods, Techniques, and Procedures: Process, Methods and Results, by W.H. Corwin, D. Sandry-Garza, M. H. Biferno, G. Boucek, Jr. (Report #WRDC-TR-89-7006). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Wright Research and Development Center, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• De Rivecourt, M., M.N. Kuperus, W.J. Post, and L.J.M. Mulder: Cardiovascular and eye activity measures as indices for momentary changes in mental effort during simulated flight. Ergonomics 51(9):1295–1319 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., and S. Fu: An Analysis of Pilot's Physiological Reactions in Different Flight Phases. In Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8532, D. Harris (Ed.). Berlin: Springer, 2014. pp. 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• NASA Ames Research Center: NASA-easyJet Collaboration on the Human Factors Monitoring Program (HFMP) Study, Second Interim Report, by A.N. Srivistava, and P. Barton (Report #NASA/TM-2012-216053). Moffett Field, CA, USA: NASA Ames Research Center, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., S.H. Zhu, G.H. Wang, F. Ye, and P.Z. Li: Validity and reliability of multiparameter physiological measurements recorded by the Equivital LifeMonitor during activities of various intensities. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 10(2):78–85 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D.L., J.M. Haller, B.A. Dolezal, C.B. Cooper, and P.C. Fehling: Evaluation of a wearable physiological status monitor during simulated firefighting activities. J. Occup. Environm. Hyg. 11(7):427–433 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terbizan, D.J., B.A. Dolezal, and C. Albano: Validity of seven commercially available heart rate monitors. Measure. Phys. Educat. Exerc. Sci. 6(4):243–247 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Dolezal, B., D. Boland, J. Carney, M. Abrazado, D. Smith, and C. Cooper: Validation of heart rate derived from a physiological status monitor-embedded compression shirt against criterion ECG. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 11(12): 833–839 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehmen, H., M. Haesner, I. Steinke, M. Dorn, M. Gövercin, and E. Steinhagen-Thiessen: Comparison of four different mobile devices for measuring heart rate and ECG with respect to aspects of usability and acceptance by older people. Appl. Ergon. 43(3):582–587 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation: Airplane Simulator Qualification (Advisory Circular #120-40B). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration—Flight Standards Service, July 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., R. Roberge, J. Powell, A. Shafer, and W.W. Jon: Measurement accuracy of heart rate and respiratory rate during graded exercise and sustained exercise in the heat using the Zephyr BioHarness. Int. J. Sports. Med. 34(6):497–501 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, J.A., P.A. Ford, G. Hughes, T. Watson, and A.T. Garrett: BioHarness™ multivariable monitoring device: part. I: validity. J. Sports. Sci. Med. 11(3):400 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti, U.C., S. Schneider, and G.C. Migliaccio: Physiological condition monitoring of construction workers. Automat. Construct. 44:227–233 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierer, D.K., Z. Rosen, L.L. Litman, and K. Fujii: Validation of photoplethysmography as a method to detect heart rate during rest and exercise. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 39(5):264–271 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland, J.M., and D.G. Altman: Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J. Biopharmaceut. Statist. 17(4):571–582 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, J.M., and D.G. Altman: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 47(8): 931–936 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leger, L., and M. Thivierge: Heart rate monitors: validity, stability, and functionality. Phys. Sports Med. 16(5):143–151 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., K. Matsumura, K.-i. Yamakoshi, P. Rolfe, S. Tanaka, and T. Yamakoshi: “Comparison between Red, Green and Blue Light Reflection Photoplethysmography for Heart Rate Monitoring during Motion.” In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2013. pp. 1724–1727.
   Google Scholar
• Valenti, G., and K. Westerterp: “Optical Heart Rate Monitoring Module Validation Study.” In Consumer Electronics (ICCE), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 2013. pp. 195–196.
   Google Scholar
• Parak, J., and I. Korhonen: “Evaluation of Wearable Consumer Heart Rate Monitors based on Photopletysmography.” In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2014. pp. 3670–3673.
   Google Scholar