Evaluation of gowns and coveralls used by medical personnel working with Ebola patients against simulated bodily fluids using an Elbow Lean Test

References

• Bausch, D.G., J.S. Towner, S.F. Dowell, et al.: Assessment of the risk of Ebola virus transmission from bodily fluids and fomites. J. Infect. Dis. 196(Suppl 2):S142–7 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann, H., and T.W. Geisbert: Ebola haemorrhagic fever. Lancet 377:349–862 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, R.A., T. Fletcher, Fischer II, W.A., et al.: Caring for critically ill patients with ebola virus disease: perspectives from West Africa. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 190(7):733–737 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control (CDC): “Guidance on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) To Be Used by Healthcare Workers during Management of Patients with Confirmed Ebola or Persons under Investigation (PUIs) for Ebola who are Clinically Unstable or Have Bleeding, Vomiting, or Diarrhea in U.S. Hospitals, Including Procedures for Donning and Doffing PPE.” Available at http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/ppe/guidance.html (accessed February 10, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Organization (OSHA): “PPE Selection Matrix for Occupational Exposure to Ebola Virus Guidance for common exposure scenarios.” Available at https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3761.pdf (accessed July 23, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI) /Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI): Liquid Barrier Performance and Classification of Protective Apparel and Drapes Intended for Use in Health Care Facilities. (PB70 2012) [Standard] Arlington, VA: ANSI/AAMI, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM): Standard Test Method for Resistance of Materials Used in Protective Clothing to Penetration by Synthetic Blood(ASTM F1670 / F1670M – 08) [Standard] Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM): Standard Test Method for Resistance of Materials Used in Protective Clothing to Penetration by Blood-Borne Pathogens Using Phi-X174 Bacteriophage Penetration as a Test System(ASTM F1671 / F1671 m – 13) [Standard] Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kilinc-Balci, F.S.: A review of isolation gowns in healthcare. J. Eng. Fiber Fabric. 10(3):181–190 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y.H., G.W. Song, H. Zeng, L. Zhang, and J. Li: Characterizing factors affecting the hot liquid penetration performance of fabrics for protective clothing. Textile Res. J. 84:174–86 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standards (ISO): Surgical Drapes, Gowns and Clean Air Suits, used as Medical Devices, for Patients, Clinical Staff and Equipment - Test Method to Determine the Resistance to Wet Bacterial Penetration. (DIN EN ISO 22610, 2006–10) [Standard] Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Olderman, G.M.: Liquid repellency and surgical fabric barrier properties. Eng. Med. 13:35–43 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCullough, E.A., and L.K. Schoenberger: Liquid barrier properties of nine surgical gown fabrics. Int. Nonwovens Dispos. Assoc. J. 3(3):14–20 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Rutala, W.A., and D.J. Weber: A review of single-use and reusable gowns and drapes in health care. Infect. Control Hospital Epidemiol. 22(4):248–257 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC): Water Resistance: Hydrostatic Pressure Test. (AATCC 127–2003) [Technical Manual] Research Triangle Park, NC: AATCC, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM): Standard Test Method for Resistance of Materials Used in Protective Clothing to Penetration by Synthetic Blood Using a Mechanical Pressure Technique. (ASTM F1819 – 07) [Standard] Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A.: Air permeability of nonwoven fabrics, Ms. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, June, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee, D., A. Ray, and V. K. Kothari: Air and water permeability characteristics of nonwoven fabrics. Ind. J. Fibre Textile Res. 29, 2:122–128 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM): Standard Test Method for Air Permeability of Textile Fabrics. (ASTM D737-04) [Standard] Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Midha, V.K., A. Dakuri, and V. Midha: Studies on the properties of nonwoven surgical gowns. J. Industr. Textiles 43:174–190 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Medical Education Division: Units of measurement, body fluids, composition of blood, hematology, somatometric data. In Geigy Scientific Tables, Vol. 1, C. Lentner (ed.). West Caldwell, NJ: The Ciba Pharmaceutical Co., 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Raheel, M. (Ed.): Modern Textile Characterization Methods (Vol. 13). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson Moen & Co. Inc.: Personal communication. Johnson Moen & Co. Inc., Rochester, MN, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, K.W., J.H. McElhaney, J.A. Moylan, and K.T. Fitzpatric: Transmural surgical gown pressure measurements remits in the operating theater. Am. J. Infect. Control. 19(3):147–155 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI): Selection and Use of Protective Apparel and Surgical Drapes in Health Care Facilities. AAMI (TIR11:2005), [Technical Information Report] Arlington, VA: AAMI, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S.S., and M.B. Wilk: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3/4):591–611 (1965).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, M., and A. Pala: Type I error rate and power of three normality tests. Pak. J. Inform. Technol. 2(2):135–139 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Mohd, N.R., and Y.B. Wah: Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. J. Statist. Model. Analyt. 2(1):21–33 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., and S.K. Obendory: Developing protective textile materials as barriers to liquid penetration using melt‐electrospinning. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 102(4):3430–3437 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, B.S.: Friction in Textile Materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008. p. 14.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institute (BSI): Protective Clothing. Electrostatic Properties. Material Performance and Design Requirements. (BS EN 1149-5:2008). [Standard] London, UK: BSI, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D.: Surfactant Science and Technology, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2006. pp. 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kissa, E.: Wetting and Wicking. Textile Res. J. 66(10):660–668 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, E.A.: Methods for determining the barrier efficacy of surgical gowns. Am. J. Infect. Control 21(6):368–374 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granzow, J.W., J.W. Smith, R.L. Nichols, R.S. Waterman, and A.C. Muzik: Evaluation of protective value of hospital gowns against blood strike-through and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus penetration. Am. J. Infect. Control 26(2):85–93 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar